Woman sues 'rapist' for child support
The Lahore High Court (LHC) has directed a trial court to seek evidence from a woman to substantiate her claim that a certain individual is the biological father of her child conceived after her alleged rape.
A single-member bench of the LHC comprising Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad allowed a petition filed by a Muhammad Afzal against the verdict of a trial court.
According to an FIR on March 4, 2020 for offences under section 376, 109 of Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, Maryam Zahid was allegedly raped by Afzal.
As a result of the rape, Maryam conceived and ultimately gave birth to a female child.
Later, a suit was filed on behalf of the child for recovery of maintenance allowance from Afzal. According to the suit, the child being the biological daughter of Afzal was entitled to get an allowance.
Muhammad Afzal contested the suit by filing a written statement, negating the version that he was the biological father of the child.
However, the trial court decreed in the respondent minor's favor. When Afzal failed to pay the interim maintenance allowance, his defense was struck off and the suit was decreed by awarding maintenance allowance to the minor at the rate of Rs3,000 per month.
Muhammad Afzal later challenged the trial court's order in the LHC, which allowed his petition.
In his order, Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad noted that this was not a case of recovery of maintenance allowance simpliciter.
He noted that the contention of Maryam Zahid in the plaint was that as a result of rape she conceived the minor, who being the biological daughter of the present petitioner is entitled to get maintenance allowance.
The verdict said that in case of a legitimate child, the mother institutes a suit under the Family Courts Act, 1964 or approaches the chairman of the concerned union council in the light of Section 9 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, for recovery of maintenance allowance.
The court then fixes an interim maintenance allowance as a temporary arrangement and on failure of the defendant/father to pay interim maintenance the court strikes off his defence and decrees the suit straightaway under Section 17-A of the Family Courts Act, 1964.
"But in the case where a woman claims maintenance for her child against the biological father, who denies the version, the woman would first need to establish, through trustworthy evidence, that the defendant is indeed the biological father of the child.
"The burden of proving that the defendant [Afzal] is the biological father of the child lies on the woman who claims the maintenance," it said.
The LHC said the trial court erred in law by granting maintenance for the child without first ensuring, through the proper process of evidence, that the child is indeed the biological offspring of the petitioner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
LHC grills PFA over 14-year delay in enforcing law
The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday expressed serious concern over the Punjab Food Authority's (PFA) failure to implement a key provision of its own governing law — the Punjab Food Authority Act 2011 — even 14 years after its enactment. During a hearing on a bail petition in a food-related FIR, Justice Ali Zia Bajwa questioned why the PFA had not constituted the mandatory investigation teams composed of food safety officers, as required under the law. "It has been 14 years since this law was enacted, and yet it has not been implemented. That is astonishing," remarked Justice Bajwa. He directly asked the Director General of the PFA why the provision had never been operationalized. The DG PFA failed to offer a satisfactory explanation, telling the court that although the law was drafted in accordance with European standards, it could not be implemented due to practical limitations. The department's law officer added that a shortage of food safety officers had prevented the formation of investigation teams. "If we constitute these teams, it would affect other critical operations of the department," he argued. Unimpressed with the justification, Justice Bajwa observed, "You are practically lifting your hands in helplessness. You admit you lack the capacity to implement the very law you are bound to enforce." Justice Bajwa further questioned the rationale behind passing such a law if its implementation was never feasible. "We will seek a response from the Chief Minister Punjab regarding this situation. Why was this act enacted if it could not be enforced in over a decade?" The court adjourned proceedings while seeking a comprehensive explanation from the provincial government.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Cameras catch jail brutality
A video footage and a video statement by a prisoner have surfaced, allegedly showing severe mistreatment of inmates inside Attock District Jail, reportedly under the supervision of jail officers. Inspector General (IG) Prisons Punjab, Mian Farooq Nazir, has taken notice of the situation and raised key questions: Why were the inmates tortured, how did a camera make its way inside the jail despite tight security, and how were these videos recorded? He appoints Deputy Inspector General (DIG) Prisons Rawalpindi Region, Rana Abdul Rauf, as an inquiry officer, and sought a detailed report. In the footage that has emerged, a uniformed officer can be seen sitting on a chair while having a massage done by an inmate. Other clips show designated prisoners with their hands tied behind their backs being beaten by fellow inmates. In one instance, a prisoner is seen lifting another onto his arms while a third lashes him with a leather strap. This scene is repeated with other prisoners, and one prisoner is even seen being slapped and punched in front of a senior officer. In another separate clip, likely recorded during winter, a senior officer is seen sitting on a chair with others standing around him. A man can be seen beating a prisoner in the lineup from behind. Despite the severity of the situation, neither the administration nor the surrounding officers appeared to intervene. In response to the abuse, inmates went on a hunger strike. A prisoner named Shahab issued a video statement, appealing to higher authorities to take action. Shahab, who had previously raised serious allegations of misconduct, corruption, and abuse in Adiala Jail, is now imprisoned in Attock Jail. In his new statement, he claimed that ever since he filed a writ petition in the High Court two and a half years ago, resulting in an official inquiry, jail staff have harbored deep resentment against him. "We are tortured and humiliated. I have been on a hunger strike for the past four days. Every ward and cell is run like a contractor system. Money is taken from us, and other inmates are made to do labour in our place." He added, "I am not against the jail department or any government institution, but there are a few black sheep involved. We want justice against them." Shahab also alleged that despite extreme heat, trees inside the jail were cut down and used as firewood, depriving prisoners of shade. He further claimed that he had to pay Rs1,000 to each officer just to bring in a book. "I'm passionate about studying," he said, "but we're blocked at every step." He stated that the jail authorities even prevent inmates from appearing in exams unless they file a writ in the High Court. "I can prove every single allegation I've made in front of any impartial officer. If I'm proven wrong, I'll accept any punishment. But what we're enduring now is unbearable. We're being forced into hunger strikes, and we have the videos to back our claims." Following the IG's notice, DIG Rana Abdul Rauf has begun an official inquiry. IG Prisons Punjab Mian Farooq Nazir remarked, "Jail authorities have the legal right to transfer prisoners to different facilities as per the jail manual but no one has the right to physically abuse them. Such behaviour is intolerable." He further noted, "The entry of a camera into the jail despite security is a serious breach. That, too, will be thoroughly investigated. Anyone found responsible will face strict departmental action."
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan govt unveils revised tax fraud punishment procedure
ISLAMABAD: Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, Wednesday, presented revised procedure for penalty, arrest and imprisonment to the persons committing tax fraud with new safeguards for the business community to avoid misuse of powers by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, under the chairmanship of Senator Saleem Mandviwalla, held its fifth consecutive session to deliberate on the Finance Bill 2025 and the Annual Budget Statement laid before Parliament. Aurangzeb informed that on special directive of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, four safeguards have been placed to ensure that powers to arrest must not be misused by the tax officials of the FBR. Arrest for tax fraud: Senate panel for defining a threshold Aurangzeb stated that the government would incorporate four major safeguards for allowing arrests on tax frauds in order to avoid misuse of powers. In the first pre-requisite, the minister said that the accused of tax fraud would be arrested where there was a fear of his escape, but it would be done with the approval of three members of the Board, in grade 21, notified by the FBR. The tampering of proof could be the second reason, and the third reason could be tax fraud amounting to Rs50 million. The fourth condition of the arrest, he said, would only be possible if someone received three notices but not bothered to respond. The Senate Standing Committee on Finance has unanimously recommended for approval and collection of GST from erstwhile FATA/PATA areas and refrained from backing out at the time of approval of the budget from the Parliament. Chairman of the Finance Committee objected that the FBR cannot give sales tax exemption to only PIA. This is a discriminatory exemption and would be challenged in courts once become law. The proposal should cover all leased aircrafts and not be limited to one airline. The committee discussed a range of critical recommendations and policy matters: The committee strongly recommended withdrawing the proposed 18 per cent GST on solar panels. Members observed that ahead of the budget, certain stakeholders had imported and dumped solar equipment in anticipation of the tax hike. The chairman emphasized the discriminatory nature of the move, saying, 'The committee rejects the sudden imposition of GST on solar imports and urges immediate withdrawal.' A seven per cent pension increase for retired government employees was proposed. Proposals were put forward to extend the duration of family pensions. The Higher Education Commission (HEC) was recommended for additional funding allocations. The committee expressed serious concern over the increase in GST from 12 per cent to 18 per cent on small vehicles, including 850cc cars. Chairman Mandviwalla called the 18 per cent sales tax on a Rs3 million vehicle 'unfair,' a sentiment echoed by several senators. Proposals were discussed to moderate the tax to 14 per cent or 15 per cent instead. Senator Shibli Faraz criticised the inequity, noting that while tax relief is being extended to certain regions, small car owners continue to face high taxation. FBR Chairman Rashid Mehmood Langrial said the IMF placed a principle that wherever the reduced GST rate was five percent, it would go up to 10 percent, and any rate of over five percent would go to the standard rate of 18 percent. From the next fiscal year, iron scrap importers will be obligated to sell only to registered manufacturers. Officials said this measure aims to eliminate the misuse of 'flying invoices' and commercial manipulation in scrap trade. The committee also held into consideration the recommendations put forward by Senator Farooq Hamid Naek related to tax fraud and its offences and punishments. Senator Mandviwalla praised the overall conduct and participation of members in the budget discussions, highlighting that the nature of engagement this year signifies a transparent and participatory process reflective of public will. The committee witnessed enthusiastic participation from members of the Senate. Senators Shibli Faraz, Anusha Rahman Ahmad Khan, Faisal Vawda, Muhammad Abdul Qadir, Mohsin Aziz, Kamran Murtaza, Manzoor Ahmad, Agha Shahzaib Durrani, Ahmed Khan, Zarqa Suharwardy Taimur, Waqar Mehdi, Jam Saifullah Khan, Irfan ul Haq Siddique, Khalida Ateeb and other members attended the meeting. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
