Iranians say daily life filled with fear and distrust
CNN staff
A man checks the site at the damaged Tehran building of radio and television broadcaster, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), on 19 June.
Photo:
AFP
After days of tit-for-tat strikes between Israel and Iran, for the civilians caught up in Israel's bombing campaign, life is filled with uncertainty.
"This is war," one 58-year-old father of two in the capital, Tehran, told CNN, adding, "no one really understands what that means."
A week into the conflict, Iranians' contact with the outside world is difficult, hampered by sporadic internet and phone coverage. Some - typically wealthy activists - have access to Starlink terminals providing independent internet access.
Speaking through voice recordings, messages and occasional calls, all the people interviewed asked CNN not to reveal their full names for fear of retribution from Iran's authorities.
Life has found a new wartime rhythm, they said, with local shops still open but some accepting payment on credit, the father of two told CNN. Unable to withdraw money from Iran's Sepah Bank, this credit has become a lifeline.
"We have electricity but gasoline is useless to us because we have nowhere to go outside Tehran," he said, after long lines of traffic departing the capital were seen in recent days.
A photo provided by the Iranian Red Crescent on 19 June, shows the funeral procession of two Iranian Red Crescent members who were killed during an Israeli strike in Tehran.
Photo:
AFP / HO / Iranian Red Crescent
Glued to the TV watching an outlawed Iranian broadcaster based in London, he said his family hadn't left their house in recent days.
"Daily life is filled with constant fear and distrust," he said.
From Shiraz in southern Iran, a 55-year-old English teacher described a "huge group of people waiting" to withdraw cash at a bank branch in the city centre.
"The workers were completely overwhelmed and said they just cannot process all these requests for cash. I wouldn't say it was chaotic, but I do feel there is an underlying feeling of panic," he said.
"It feels like a missile is following me. I go to Karaj and they bomb there. I come to Tehran and they bomb here," a 27-year-old conscript soldier told CNN.
Posted in Tehran, he was able to visit family in Karaj at the weekend, but in the capital is prohibited by military rules from using his phone or other devices. "We can't even check the news."
Smoke rises after an explosion occurred in downtown Tehran, on Sunday 15 June.
Photo:
KHOSHIRAN
A hairdresser from Shiraz lamented the destruction being inflicted: "I don't even know what to say. You watch the videos, the photos. People are being killed, our country is being looted, falling apart like this.
"Israel and the US don't care about the Iranian people," she said. "You want to hit the real target, but it's surrounded by ordinary people. They're destroying the country."
"Rebuilding all this may take decades, if not longer, and in the end it's we the people who will have to bear the cost," a 22-year-old janitor of an apartment building in Tehran told CNN.
More than 200 people have been killed in Iran, according to Tehran, with Israel's strikes taking out much of the key leadership in the country's military and nuclear programme. But Iran has accused Israel of also targeting its energy and digital infrastructure.
"We are paying the price for a dictatorship and its arrogance," shared a nurse from Mashad, northeast Iran, whose father was a decorated war veteran. "But now that all its forces (in the region) have been destroyed, it seems that its own turn has come," she added.
Watching the attacks on a deeply unpopular regime, some Iranians confessed to welcoming the strikes, even as civilians were caught up in the bombings.
"I want to say what I truly feel," a student from Shiraz told CNN, "I don't know what I'll be judged for, what I'll be accused of.
"Still, I'll say it, I'm genuinely happy. Really, deeply happy!" she added. "I believe it's worth it, for the sake of future generations."
But a week into the fighting, even as diplomatic channels for peace start to coalesce, there's still no sign of an end to the bombings. Uncertainty has only been fuelled by US President Donald Trump teasing the possibility of US aircraft joining the bombing campaign.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has slammed Trump's call for surrender, warning that America's involvement in Israel's military campaign would "100% be at their loss."
Other Iranians share his defiance.
"The mood in Iran is starting to morph into an environment of nationalism," according to a 69-year-old Iranian-American woman visiting Tehran. "I saw a lot of cars waving the Islamic Republic flag from their windows as we drove out of town."
The heavily damaged building of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) state controlled media corporation in Tehran, on 19 June, after it was hit a few days earlier in an Israeli strike.
Photo:
AFP
"I lost a son during the Iran-Iraq War and will be happy to fight America and the Zionists again," a 78-year-old mosque caretaker from Isfahan told CNN, "Those who love martyrdom cannot be defeated."
The prospects of peace look slim, one engineering student from Mashad told CNN.
"Now that Trump has come this far, he will see it through to the end. They don't let a wounded bear go free," she said.
-
CNN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Donald Trump says his Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin has a chance of failure
By Brad Ryanrad Ryan and Elias Clure, ABC US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin meet on Friday to discuss the war between Russia and Ukraine. Photo: Brendan SMIALOWSKI and Maxim Shemetov / AFP Donald Trump says his meeting with Vladimir Putin has a "25 per cent chance" of failing, as locals in Alaska hold days of peace prayers in the lead-up to the highly anticipated talks. Friday's meeting at a military base in Anchorage has been on the minds of many in Alaska's biggest city, but particularly inside the Russian Orthodox churches that remain influential in the former Russian territory. "I hate the war," churchgoer Ronalda Angasan told the ABC at one of the peace-prayer events. But like many here, Ms Angasan - who has both Russian and Indigenous Aleut heritage - is reluctant to ascribe blame. "I just see it as they've all done bad, and they all have good people that live in the countries themselves, but the politicians themselves have all done bad," she said. The church has a controversial place in the conflict. Its leadership in Moscow has been vocally supportive of Mr Putin's invasion, which it characterises as a "holy war". MPs in Kyiv later voted to ban organisations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church, including the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and some now believe followers in Ukraine are being unfairly persecuted. But at Anchorage's St Innocent, where three evenings of peace prayers are being held before the Trump-Putin talks, churchgoers say they want to stay out of the politics and focus on peace. "Everyone's a little bit heated politically, whether the war should happen or not, whose side you're on," church dean Father Thomas Rivas said. "We might be one of the only churches that has a contingency of very pro-Putin people also very pro-Zelensky people, and so as a priest you walk the line, not as a compromise but you try and listen to all children." Alaska - which the US bought from Russia in 1867 - is seen as slightly more neutral ground for the talks than the lower 48 states. Trump now says he'd like a second round of talks to take place there too, and said it was possible Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders could be present at that time. "Tomorrow, all I want to do is set the table for the next meeting, which should happen shortly," he said on the eve of the talks. "I'd like to see it happen very quickly, very shortly after this meeting. I'd like to see it actually happen maybe in Alaska... because it's so much easier." Earlier, he told Fox News Radio : "This meeting sets up like a chess game. This [first] meeting sets up a second meeting, but there is a 25 per cent chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting." Trump has repeatedly suggested "land swaps" are on the cards, even after Zelensky ruled out conceding territory. "The worst case [scenario] would clearly be Trump makes a lot of concessions to Putin," said Professor Robert Orttung, a professor of international affairs and long-time scholar of Russian politics at George Washington University. "Then you would see a break in the West. And the Europeans, to the extent they can, ramping up their capabilities." It would be better to see the leaders fail to make a deal, he said. "I think the best-case scenario would be a big nothing, which is what it looks like [will happen]," Professor Orttung said. Trump told Fox News Radio that a final agreement would be up to Putin and Zelensky, who is not invited to the Friday talks. "I'm not going to negotiate their deal. I'm going to let them negotiate their deal," he said. In Ukraine, Friday's meeting has been met with a mixed response, particularly because Zelensky has not been invited. The war has raged for more than three years, since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. While many people want it to end, what terms are agreed to remains a sticking point. Lviv, a city in western Ukraine, is a long way from the front lines, but it hasn't been spared from the conflict. Aerial attacks remain common and many people from the region have joined the fight. Arrto was born in Lviv and his family has lived in the area for generations. He said he wanted an immediate ceasefire. "A lot of my friends died in the war," Arrto said. Arrto's vision for the future of Ukraine is vastly different to Putin's. He wants to see the country join the European Union. He also doesn't want to give up territory to Russia. "Every month I go to a funeral," he said, adding that he'd visited war graves in the area this week. "My two cousins died in the war." Opinion polling has consistently shown the idea of "land swaps" between Kyiv and the Kremlin to be deeply unpopular among Ukrainians. "I think we have to make a big decision of Ukrainian people what we want," Maria, a hospitality worker in Lviv, told the ABC . "We have to make collective decisions. It's not about the president's will or the parliament's will. This is about the whole of Ukraine. The people should decide what to do. "We've put a lot of efforts for defending this territory. So we do not want to give any of it up." In Anchorage, at the St Innocent Russian Orthodox Cathedral, Brad Angasan told the ABC : "My family have really suffered with the war over in Ukraine, watching our church divide the way that it has amongst the Ukrainians and the Russians". "It's been very difficult to watch. We are very hopeful that this [upcoming Trump-Putin meeting] may lead to peace. "If there's one thing we can offer, it's our prayers for peace and an end of suffering." - ABC
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Diplomacy or defiance: Iran's rulers face existential choice after US-Israeli strikes
By Parisa Hafezi , Reuters Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Photo: AFP / HO / Analysis : Weakened by war and diplomatic deadlock, Iran's clerical elite stands at a crossroads: defy pressure to halt its nuclear activity and risk further Israeli and US attack, or concede and risk a leadership fracture. For now, the Islamic Republic establishment is focusing on immediate survival over longer-term political strategy. A fragile ceasefire ended a 12-day war in June that began with Israeli air strikes, followed by US strikes on three Iranian nuclear installations. Both sides declared victory but the war exposed the military vulnerabilities and punctured the image of deterrence maintained by a major Middle East power and Israel's arch regional foe. Three Iranian insiders told Reuters the political establishment now views negotiations with the US - aimed at resolving a decades-long dispute over its nuclear ambitions - as the only way to avoid further escalation and existential peril. The strikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets, which included killings of top Revolutionary Guard commanders and nuclear scientists, shocked Tehran, kicking off just a day before a planned sixth round of talks with Washington. While Tehran accused Washington of "betraying diplomacy", some hardline lawmakers and military commanders blamed officials who advocated diplomacy with Washington, arguing the dialogue proved a "strategic trap" that distracted the armed forces. However, one political insider, who like others requested anonymity given the sensitivity of the matter, said the leadership now leaned towards talks as "they've seen the cost of military confrontation". President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday that resuming talks with the United States "does not mean we intend to surrender", addressing hardliners opposing further nuclear diplomacy after the war. He added: "You don't want to talk? What do you want to do? ... Do you want to go (back) to war?" His remarks were criticised by hardliners including Revolutionary Guards commander Aziz Ghazanfari, who warned that foreign policy demands discretion and that careless statements could have serious consequences. Ultimately, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds the final say. Insiders said he and the clerical power structure had reached a consensus to resume nuclear negotiations, viewing them as vital to the Islamic Republic's survival. Iran's Foreign Ministry said no decision has been made on the resumption of nuclear talks. US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have warned they will not hesitate to hit Iran again if it resumes enrichment of uranium, a possible pathway to developing nuclear weapons. Last week, Trump warned that if Iran restarted enrichment despite the June strikes on its key production plants, "we'll be back". Tehran responded with a vow of forceful retaliation. Still, Tehran fears future strikes could cripple political and military coordination, and so has formed a defence council to ensure command continuity even if the 86-year-old Khamenei must relocate to a remote hideaway to avoid assassination. Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute in Washington DC, said that if Iran seeks to rapidly rebuild its nuclear capacity without securing diplomatic or security guarantees, "a US-Israeli strike won't just be possible - it will be all but inevitable". "Re-entering talks could buy Tehran valuable breathing room and economic relief, but without swift US reciprocity it risks a hardline backlash, deepening elite divisions, and fresh accusations of surrender," Vatanka said. Tehran insists on its right to uranium enrichment as part of what it maintains is a peaceful nuclear energy programme, while the Trump administration demands a total halt - a core sticking point in the diplomatic standoff. Renewed United Nations sanctions under the so-called "snapback" mechanism, pushed by three European powers, loom as a further threat if Tehran refuses to return to negotiations or if no verifiable deal to curb its nuclear activity results. Tehran has threatened to quit the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. But insiders say this is a pressure tactic, not a realistic plan - as exiting the NPT would telegraph an Iranian race for nuclear bombs and invite US and Israeli intervention. A senior Western diplomat said Iran's rulers were vulnerable as never before, and any defiance was a gamble liable to backfire at a time of rising domestic unrest, impaired deterrence power and Israel's disabling of Iran's militia proxies in wars around the Middle East since 2023. Among ordinary Iranians, weariness over war and international isolation runs deep, compounded by a growing sense of failed governance. The oil-based economy, already hobbled by sanctions and state mismanagement, is under worsening strain. Daily blackouts afflict cities around the country of 87 million people, forcing many businesses to cut back. Reservoirs have receded to record lows, prompting warnings from the government of a looming "national water emergency." Many Iranians - even those opposed to the Shi'ite theocracy - rallied behind the country during the June war, but now face lost incomes and intensified repression. Alireza, 43, a furniture merchant in Tehran, said he is considering downsizing his business and relocating his family outside the capital amid fears of further air attack. "This is the result of 40 years of failed policies," he said, alluding to Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution that toppled the Western-backed monarchy. "We are a resource-rich country and yet people don't have water and electricity. My customers have no money. My business is collapsing." At least 20 people across Iran interviewed by phone echoed Alireza's sentiment - that while most Iranians do not want another war, they are also losing faith in the establishment's capacity to govern wisely. Despite broad discontent, large-scale protests have not broken out. Instead, authorities have tightened security, ramped up pressure on pro-democracy activists, accelerated executions and cracked down on alleged Israeli-linked spy networks - fuelling fears of widening surveillance and repression. However, sidelined moderates have resurfaced in state media after years of exclusion. Some analysts see this as a move to ally public anxiety and signal the possibility of reform from within - without "regime change" that would shift core policies. -Reuters
RNZ News
20 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine
By Dmitry Antonov, Tom Balmforth and Olena Harmash , Reuters Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. Photo: Brendan SMIALOWSKI and Maxim Shemetov / AFP United States President Donald Trump said he thought Vladimir Putin was ready to make a deal on ending the war in Ukraine after the Russian president floated the prospect of a nuclear arms agreement on the eve of their summit in Alaska. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's (local time) summit that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. "I think he's going to make a deal," Trump said in a Fox News radio interview, adding that if the meeting went well he would call Zelensky and European leaders afterwards and that if it went badly he would not. The aim of Friday's talks with Putin is to set up a second meeting including Ukraine, Trump said, adding: "I don't know that we're going to get an immediate ceasefire." Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for the meeting with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War Two. In televised comments, Putin said that the US was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict". This was happening, Putin said, "in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole - if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons." His comments signalled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Trump would also discuss the "huge untapped potential" for Russia-US economic ties. A senior eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. "We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians, he understands all (these) dangerous things," the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said that there would be a give and take on boundaries and lands. Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine and Zelensky and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be "scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe but that was yesterday". Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelensky on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Zelensky said the security guarantees had been discussed in "considerable detail" in comments after a meeting in London on Thursday with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer . Friday's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump insisted that the transatlantic NATO alliance should not be part of security guarantees that would be designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. Macron said, however, that Trump had also said the United States and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. It "felt like a big step forward", said the official, who did not want to be named. It was not immediately clear what such guarantees could mean in practice. On Wednesday, Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands and has previously said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024. - Reuters Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
