Israeli credit rating unlikely to get upgrade during Gaza war, S&P official says
JERUSALEM: Israel's credit rating is unlikely to be upgraded until the war in Gaza ends, since the conflict weighs on the Israeli economy and its fiscal position, S&P Global Ratings Director Maxim Rybnikov said on Tuesday.
Any widening of the conflict to Iran would prompt a ratings downgrade, but that is not S&P's baseline scenario, Rybnikov said.
S&P earlier this month affirmed Israel's long- and short-term foreign and local currency sovereign credit ratings at "A/A-1" and maintained a "negative" outlook.
"For the outlook side, it's all about security risks and how this is going to unfold," Rybnikov told the Israel Democracy Institute's annual economic conference.
"The key downside triggers are, first of all, military conflicts hampering some of Israel's characteristics, such as economic growth, fiscal position and balance of payments more than we currently anticipate."
Even in the medium term, higher defence spending is expected to put pressure on Israel's fiscal position, with projections of a budget deficit of 5% in 2027 and 4.2% in 2028, Rybnikov said.
He said the war that began in October 2023 had already lasted longer than initially anticipated.
"We don't know ... the way forward and how the war is going to end, and for us, it certainly presents risks, especially in a scenario where there's a more significant escalation," he said.
Yet, Israel's outlook could move back to "stable" in the event of a reduced likelihood of military escalation and an easing in broader security risks.
"We still expect some stabilisation to happen over the medium term. What forms and how quickly it will take is still uncertain," Rybnikov said.
Globally, he said there has been a "seismic shift" in U.S. trade policies and S&P assumes 25% tariffs on items such as water, steel, semiconductors and aluminum in addition to a 10% across the board tariff. But he does not expect a U.S. recession from a slowdown in growth in the U.S. and China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
26 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Carbon footprint from Israel's war on Gaza exceeds 100 countries
The carbon footprint from Israel's war on Gaza will exceed the emissions of around 100 countries, according to new research. A study published by the Social Science Research Network, first reported by The Guardian on Friday, found that the climate cost of Israel's destruction of the Palestinian enclave, clearing debris and rebuilding the territory could exceed 31m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. That is more than the annual 2023 emissions of many countries, including Costa Rica, Afghanistan and Zimbabwe. The study found that Hamas' rockets and bunker fuel made up for 0.2 percent of those emissions, while the supply and use of weapons, tanks and other ordnance by Israel made up 50 percent. It found that the overall impact of Israel's wars on Gaza and Lebanon, as well as its recent military confrontations with Yemen and Iran, was equivalent to running 84 gas power plants for a year. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It is the third such study looking into the climate cost of Israel's bombardment of Gaza. 'This report is a staggering and sobering reminder of the ecological and environmental cost of Israel's genocidal campaign on the planet and its besieged people,' Zena Agha, policy analyst for Palestinian policy network Al-Shabaka, told The Guardian. 'But this is also the US, UK and EU's war, all of which have provided seemingly limitless military resources to enable Israel to devastate the most densely populated place on the planet.' The research found that 30 percent of greenhouse gas emissions since the war began came from the US sending 50,000 tonnes of weapons and supplies to Israel. A further 20 percent was attributed to Israeli aircraft reconnaissance and bombing campaigns, as well as fuel from tanks and other military vehicles. Around 7 percent of emissions from the conflict were from diesel-guzzling generators in Gaza, which Palestinians rely on due to Israel's blockade and the destruction of solar panels and the enclave's only power plant. Before the war, solar energy made up a quarter of Gaza's electricity - one of the highest densities of rooftop solar panels in the world. Israeli forces have destroyed large swathes of that solar infrastructure. The most significant cost to the climate will come from the reconstruction of Gaza, the study finds. Rebuilding 436,000 apartments, along with hundreds of schools, mosques, clinics and other buildings - in addition to 5km of roads - will produce 29.4m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Underestimate The research used open-source data, media reports, and data from aid groups and UN agencies. The actual climate cost of Israel's war is likely to be much higher than the estimates, due to Israel's media blockade masking the full extent of environmental damage to the enclave. 'This conflict in Gaza shows that the numbers are substantial, greater than the entire greenhouse gas emissions of many entire countries, and must be included for accurate climate change and mitigation targets,' said Frederick Otu-Larbi, co-author of the report and lecturer at the University of Energy and Natural Resources in Ghana. Israel's war on Gaza caused major environmental damage, UN says Read More » Currently, there is no obligation for states to report military emissions to the UN's climate body. The UN last year said that Israel's war had created a devastating environmental crisis in Gaza, destroying sanitation systems, leaving tonnes of debris from explosive devices and causing major pollution. It found that water, sanitation and hygiene systems in Gaza were almost entirely defunct, with the strip's five wastewater treatment plants shut down. Israel's war is exacerbating an already deteriorating environment in Gaza, where over 92 percent of the water was deemed unfit for human consumption in 2020. Climate change and Israel's attacks on environmental infrastructure have long plagued Gaza and other parts of occupied Palestine. After the Nakba - the ethnic cleansing and destruction of Palestinian communities in 1948 by Zionist forces - the Jewish National Fund (JNF) planted monoculture forests of pine trees, often on the ruins of Palestinian villages. The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel revealed in 2013 that the JNF's projects had a devastating impact on local biodiversity. In 2021, Fadel al-Jadba, director of the horticulture department at the Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture, told Middle East Eye that there had been a noticeable decline in agricultural production over the past decade.
The National
37 minutes ago
- The National
Israel escalates deadly attacks on Gaza after 'accepting' US ceasefire proposal
The Israeli military has intensified its bombardment of the Gaza Strip, killing more than 70 people since Thursday morning as it targets residential neighbourhoods, civilian gatherings and critical infrastructure. Dozens more Palestinians have been injured and entire apartment blocks have been levelled by the continuing air strikes in what civilians are calling a campaign of total destruction. The intensification comes after the US on Thursday said Israel had accepted a ceasefire proposal, which includes a 60-day truce, that is being studied by Hamas. Aid distribution by the US-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) also began this week, with crowds of starving and desperate Palestinians gathering to receive parcels of food after almost three months of Israel's total blockade. According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, the death toll has reached 54,249, with 123,492 injured since the war started on October 7, 2023. Israel issued more eviction orders to the three main hospitals in Gaza's north - Al Awdah, the Indonesian hospital and Kamal Adwan - as well as in the areas of Al Atatara, Jabalia Al Balad, Al Shujaiya, Al Daraj and Al Zaytoun, claiming they were "dangerous combat zones". It demanded that thousands of people move westward immediately. But for many in the north, such as Mahmoud Dmida, moving is simply not an option. 'The shelling is relentless. People want to flee, but they can't move, the area is under constant fire,' he told The National. 'Everyone is in danger.' Desperate for peace As Gazans wait for Hamas 's response to the ceasefire proposal, the overwhelming wish on the ground is for the war to end, regardless of the cost, even though the terms of the deal reportedly fall short of the group's core demands. Survival is what matters. 'We want Hamas to accept the deal," said Montaser Hassouna, who is displaced with his family and is sheltering in Al Yarmouk playground. "This madness needs to stop. I know it's a bad deal, Israel just wants its hostages back and offers nothing in return, but we are exhausted. We need a break. Our children are starving. We just want to survive." Similarly, Alaa Mokhtar in Gaza City said he realises that the intensified Israeli bombardment is a tactic aimed at forcing Hamas to accept the proposal, but civilians continue to pay the price. "The deal doesn't guarantee anything will improve, but Hamas should take the 60-day window and use it to clean Gaza of corruption and chaos,' he said. 'We are not only dying from Israeli bombs, we're starving because of lawlessness and theft.'
Arabian Business
an hour ago
- Arabian Business
air conditioning services
District cooling giant says will use the funds to expand capacity and district cooling infrastructure in Dubai projects
