President Trump calls for Barack Obama to be arrested for allegedly trying to subvert his 2016 election win
Gabbard, the Director Of National Intelligence, declassified hundreds of documents on Friday related to the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.
She claimed the emails reveal a conspiracy by Obama to try and subvert Trump's win by using 'manufactured and politicized intelligence' to make it seem like bad actors may have influenced the result.
Gabbard said: 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.'
Her claims were reiterated by Trump who republished her interviews with Fox and several others about the issue on Truth Social.
And on Sunday, he escalated things further by reposting an AI-generated TikTok video titled: 'No one is above the law.'
The clip featured a series of Democrats, including Obama, former president Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, repeating the phrase 'no one is above the law'.
It then transitions to a digitally-altered video of Trump and Obama sitting together in the Oval Office.
To the tune of YMCA by Village People, Obama is swept up by FBI agents, cuffed and led away. The clip ends with Obama wearing an orange jumpsuit behind bars.
Gabbard released a 114-page document which she has claimed shows the Obama administration was aware that there was no threat of Russia 'directly' manipulating the vote in 2016.
She called for an investigatio n and potential criminal prosecution for anyone who took part, which may include Obama and James Comey, the former FBI director.
The documents revealed insider discussions among top Obama officials about Russia's much-debated role in the 2016 U.S. elections.
Although many of the documents are highly redacted or completely blacked out, they show conversations among favorite Trump targets, including former intel chief James Clapper, as officials debated how to describe Russian election activity.
The documents found that there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means'.
But Gabbard says the documents show that Democrats chose to ignore that - or even promote the opposite narrative - to try and take down Trump.
'Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic,' Gabbard in a blistering statement accompanying the document release.
'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.'
Several of the documents put out by the Office of the Director Of National Intelligence (ODNI) show officials found that Russia either wouldn't try or wouldn't be able to shift the outcome of a US vote.
'Russia probably is not trying to going to be able to? [influence] the election by using cyber means to manipulate computer-enabled election infrastructure,' reads one draft line by the then-deputy director of ODNI.
By December 9, following Trump's win over Democrat Hillary Clinton, a document to top intelligence officials tasked them with creating an assessment 'per the President's request' about 'tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election'.
'We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election,' according to a January 2017 report titled 'Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections.'
The report then mentioned Russian cyber operations against both political parties.
Revealing: The administration unsealed the documents amid the fury over the Jeffrey Epstein files
Of the material Gabbard released, one new August 31, 2016 document by an official with their name blacked out states that the 'thrust of the analysis is that there is no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means'.
Democrats have responded by claiming that Gabbard's declassification is designed to deflect from the Department Of Justice's decision to close its investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case.
In response, Trump has instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to disclose grand jury testimony files, pending court approval.
It comes as Trump's efforts to cut ties with Elon Musk and SpaceX hit a road block when a formal review laid out just how crucial his contracts are to America's dominance in space.
Trump had suggested at the height of his feud with the world's richest man that the administration could save millions of dollars by 'terminating' government contracts with Musk's companies, which would force him to 'head back home to South Africa'.
The relationship combusted over Musk's criticism of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and personal attacks about the President's former relationship with Epstein.
Days later, a senior official at the General Services Administration ordered the Defense Department to fill out a form detailing every current SpaceX contract and transaction agreement, The Wall Street Journal revealed.
The official said the data they collated would be shared with the White House to await further instruction.
He also made similar requests to the National Aeronautics And Space Administration (NASA) in an effort to establish whether a competitor could run the same contracts more effectively.
But the Defense Department's review instead established that most of the deals with SpaceX were vital to the missions of the department and NASA, insiders claimed.
It also further highlighted how the government relies on Musk's companies to remain leaders in space exploration, and how little competition there is in the market.
Musk has somewhat of a monopoly on rocket launches and low Earth orbit satellite services, as competitors like Boeing face setbacks in their race to catch up with SpaceX technology.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump tariffs: India has 20 days to avoid 50% levies - what are its options?
India has unexpectedly become a key target in Washington's latest push to pressure Russia over the Ukraine Wednesday, Donald Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50%, up from 25%, penalising Delhi for purchasing Russian oil - a move India called "unfair" and "unjustified". The tariffs aim to cut Russia's oil revenues and force Putin into a ceasefire. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 makes India the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia and places it alongside Brazil, another nation facing steep US tariffs amid tense insists its imports are driven by market factors and vital to its energy security, but the tariffs threaten to hit Indian exports and growth all of India's $86.5bn [£64.7bn] in annual goods exports to the US stand to become commercially unviable if these rates sustain. Most Indian exporters have said they can barely absorb a 10-15% rise, so a combined 50% tariff is far beyond their effective, the tariff would be similar to "a trade embargo, and will lead to a sudden stop in affected export products," Japanese brokerage firm Nomura said in a note. The US is India's top export market, making up 18% of exports and 2.2% of GDP. A 25% tariff could cut GDP by 0.2–0.4%, risking growth slipping below 6% this year. India's electronics and pharma exports remain exempt from additional tariffs for now, but the impact would be felt in India domestically "with labour-intensive exports like textiles and gems and jewelry taking the fall", Priyanka Kishore of Asia Decoded, a Singapore-based consultancy told the BBC. Rakesh Mehra of Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (Citi) called the tariffs a "huge setback" for India's textile exporters, saying they will sharply weaken competitiveness in the US tensions now escalating, experts have called Trump's decision a high-stakes gamble. India is not the only buyer of Russian oil - there are China and Turkey as well - yet Washington has chosen to target a country widely regarded as a key what changed and what could be the fallout? India's former central bank governor Urjit Patel said that India's "worst fears" have materialised with the recent announcement. "One hopes that this is short term, and that talks around a trade deal slated to make progress this month will go ahead. Otherwise, a needless trade war, whose contours are difficult to gauge at this early juncture, will likely ensue," Mr Patel wrote in a LinkedIn post. The damaging impact of the tariffs is why few expect them to last. With new rates starting 27 August, the next 20 days are critical - India's moves in this bargaining window will be closely watched by anxious key question is whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government will quietly abandon trading ties with Russia to avoid the "Russia penalty" or stand firm against the US."India's efforts to reduce its dependence on Russian military hardware and diversify its oil imports predate pressure from the Trump administration, so Delhi may be able to offer some conciliatory gestures in line with its existing foreign policy behaviour," according to Dr Chietigj Bajpaee of Chatham House. He says the relationship is in a "managed decline", losing Cold War-era strategic importance, but Russia will remain a key partner for India for the foreseeable some experts believe Trump's recent actions give India an opportunity to rethink its strategic ties. If anything the US's actions could "push India to reconsider its strategic alignment, deepening ties with Russia, China, and many other countries", says Ajay Srivastava of the the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think will visit China for the regional Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit - his first since the deadly 2020 Galwan border clashes. Some suggest a revival of India-Russia-China trilateral talks may be on the immediate focus is on August trade talks, as a US team visits India. Negotiations stalled earlier over agriculture and dairy - sectors where the US demands greater access, but India holds there be concessions in areas like dairy and farming that India has been staunchly protecting or could the political cost be too high?The other big question: What's next for India's rising appeal as a China-plus-one destination for nations and firms looking to diversify their supply chains and investments?Trump's tariffs risk slowing momentum as countries like Vietnam offer lower tariffs. Experts say the impact on investor sentiment may be limited. India is still courting firms like Apple, which makes a big chunk of its phones locally, and has been largely shielded since semiconductors aren't taxed under the new tariffs. Experts will also be watching what India does to support its exporters."India's government so far has not favoured direct subsidies to exporters, but its current proposed programmes of favourable trade financing and export promotion may not be enough to tackle the impact of such a wide tariff differential," according to stakes high, trade experts say only top-level diplomacy can revive a trade deal that seemed within reach just weeks now the Indian government has put up a strong front, saying it will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests". The opposition has upped the ante with senior Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi calling Trump's 50% tariffs "economic blackmail" and "an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal".Is Modi's touted "mega partnership" with the US now his biggest foreign policy test? And will India hit back?Retaliation by India is unlikely but not impossible, says Barclays Research, because there is precedent."In 2019, India announced tariffs on 28 US products, including US apples and almonds, in response to the US tariffs on steel and aluminium. Some of these tariffs were eventually reversed in 2023, following the resolution of WTO disputes," Barclays Research said in a note. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chris Cuomo trolled for falling for AOC deepfake video about Sydney Sweeney
NewsNation host Chris Cuomo is being trolled on social media after falling for a deepfake video purporting to show New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez discussing the Sydney Sweeney jeans furore on the House floor. Cuomo posted an Instagram video on his X account on Wednesday – believing it to be real, having apparently not noticed its watermark admitting that the clip was 'parody 100% made with AI ' – that showed 'AOC' arguing that Sweeney's new American Eagle commercial, in which she declares that she has 'great jeans', a pun on 'genes,' is racist. Accompanying the post, the anchor wrote in a fever of righteous indignation: 'Nothing about hamas or people burning jews cars. But sweeney jeans ad? Deserved time on floor of congress? What happd to this party? Fight for small business …not for small culture wars.' In addition to the watermark and the fact that Congress is not in session, Cuomo was also not skeptical of the language used by 'AOC' in the video. 'Sydney Sweeney looks like an Aryan goddess, and the American Eagle jeans campaign is blatant Nazi propaganda,' the AI Ocasio-Cortez tells Congress. 'I mean, f***. Watching that sultry little temptress squeeze into a Canadian tuxedo three sizes too small with her bouncy little funbags on the screen staring at you, piercing through the core of your soul with those ocean-blue eyes that could resurrect the Fuhrer from his grave in Argentina, is something that should alarm every American citizen because in America, beauty is not defined by whiteness. 'Oh no, it is defined by the number of victim groups of which you are a member, skinny, attractive, blonde-haired, blue-eyed cisgender women descended from the slave daddy oppressors of this nation. And any man who [masturbates] while thinking about a woman like this probably hates Black people, probably hates gay people, and they certainly hate the diversity of our great nation.' The fake representative concludes her rousing address by declaring: 'So I say, instead of simping for the Sidneys, we should be celebrating the Shaniquas. Instead of worshipping the hot, straight blonde, what about the obese alpha? People with blue hair. They need love too. And to all the haters who say companies that go woke go broke, I'd rather be poor than a f*****g Nazi.' One of the first to call out the credulous Cuomo over the blunder was the real Ocasio-Cortez, who told him: 'This is a deepfake dude. Please use your critical thinking skills. At this point, you're just reposting Facebook memes and calling it journalism.' The journalist took down the post in question and responded: 'You are correct… that was a deepfake (but it really does sound like you). Thank you for correcting. But now to the central claim: show me you calling on hamas to surrender or addressing the bombing of a car in st louis belonging to the idf american soldier?…dude?' Ocasio-Cortez replied in withering style: 'You seem to struggle with knowing how to write an apology. Do you need help? Maybe you should call someone.' The anchor later addressed the controversy on his show, admitting his mistake while also doubling down on his attack on the congresswoman for supposedly ignoring issues in the Middle East and underachieving as a legislator. The attempted pivot did not shield him from further criticism, with Piers Morgan posting: 'Oh dear Chris Cuomo – perhaps spend less time bitching about me and more time trying to spot obvious fakes.' Tim Miller of The Bulwark commented: 'It doesn't augur well for our societal AI future if a professional news anchor gets tricked by a video that has a '100% parody' watermark.' Mike Isaacs, tech reporter for The New York Times, said the incident provided an ample demonstration of why he is 'increasingly convinced we need to administer the equivalent of drivers license tests for access to the internet every five years, forever.' Cuomo was not the only person taken in by the deepfake. Some commentators responding to the original video likewise assumed it was real and accused Ocasio-Cortez of being 'jealous' of Sweeney's beauty.
Economist
29 minutes ago
- Economist
Duty regime: America's consumers will foot the tariff bill
As yet another tranche of Donald Trump's tariffs takes effect, we look at why the duties might outlast him—and how American consumers will ultimately shoulder the trade war's costs. Our correspondent visits US Space Command, which is preparing for a new age of combat in the heavens. And Gen Z's obsession with big, personalised water bottles.
