What NATO patrols are watching in the Baltic Sea after undersea cables were severed
The tanker, which left a Russian port bound for Egypt, is considered by maritime experts to be a member of Moscow's shadow fleet — often old tankers with opaque ownership that try to work around international sanctions.
At a time when the eight NATO nations bordering the Baltic Sea are on high alert after a string of undersea power and internet cables were suspiciously severed, Russia's shadow fleet is getting extra attention.
"We are here to guard our waters," said Lt. Cmdr. Meelis Kants in an interview with CBC News on Wednesday.
"If ships are really doing something suspicious, we will stop them."
Lt. Cmdr. Meelis Kants of the Estonian minehunter Sakala says they are photographing vessels navigating the Gulf of Finland. About 500-600 ships move through that area every week. (Briar Stewart/CBC)
More patrols
The Sakala, which is a minehunter, is one of three Estonian ships that have been sent to patrol a stretch of the Baltic Sea near the mouth of the Gulf of Finland and near the site of two underwater power cables that connect Estonia to Finland.
One was severed on Dec. 25 of last year, along with four internet cables.
At the time, it was the third incident in five weeks where undersea cables were damaged — and suspicion centred around ships connected to Russia.
Since then, Estonia and Finland have boosted their patrols, along with NATO, which has sent frigates, aircraft and naval drones to the area as part of the operation Baltic Sentry.
While investigations into the damaged cables are still ongoing, and there appears to be divided opinion on whether the incidents were accidental or sabotage, NATO countries are concerned enough that they have stepped up monitoring in order to protect the critical infrastructure.
In Estonia's case, the navy is patrolling by looking out for suspicious activity, such as anomalies with anchors and where they are supposed to be positioned. Other red flags include if a ship quickly changes speed or is ignoring radio communication.
The Kira K, an oil tanker flagged to Panama, is shown on a screen inside the Sakala. The ship left Russia and is bound for Egypt. (Briar Stewart/CBC)
No issues since patrols began
Over the past two months, the crew on the Sakala said they looked into 50 potentially suspicious activities. But upon closer inspection, there have been no issues.
The day before the crew took media including CBC News on patrol, they said they had started watching a vessel after they noticed something wrapped around its anchor. It turned out to be a hose.
The Sakala communicated with the ship and shadowed it until the hose was removed.
There wasn't an issue in that case, nor have they encountered any threatening actions over the past two months.
"We don't see anything suspicious happening, so that's already good," Kants said.
"But if we weren't here, I don't know what would happen."
The Baltic Sea stretches from St. Petersburg, Russia, to Denmark, and is one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.
Every week, 500-600 ships transit the Gulf of Finland. Their positions are tracked, but it's what is happening below the surface that is murkier, and why NATO countries are trying to deter any threats against the subsea cables on the bottom of the sea floor.
A crew member of the Sakala looks out from the bridge of the warship. (Briar Stewart/CBC)
Crucial cables
The cables span the world's oceans and seas, together stretching 1.5 million kilometres around the globe.
The fibre optic communication cables are referred to as the backbone of the internet, carrying 95 per cent of the world's data.
While between 150-200 cables are damaged every year by anchors, commercial fishing and even environmental factors like submarine landslides, the fact that there were three incidents in the same area over a relatively short time period has raised suspicions.
"Is it intentional or is it an accident? It's difficult to answer," said Capt. Johan-Elias Seljamaa, deputy commander of Estonia's navy.
"But the fact is that prior to those [recent incidents], there was no damage in such magnitude and in those areas."
Before the cables were severed on Dec. 25, there were two separate incidents just over a month earlier.
A 218-kilometre internet cable between Lithuania and Sweden's Gotland island was damaged on Nov. 17. The following day, a 1,200-kilometre cable connecting the Finnish capital of Helsinki to the German port of Rostock was severed.
At the time, suspicion centred around a Chinese bulk carrier, the Yi Peng 3, which was carrying Russian fertilizer.
While China initially allowed investigators from Germany, Sweden, Finland and Denmark to board the ship, Swedish officials later said China didn't heed the government's request for a prosecutor to be able to conduct a preliminary investigation on board.
The ship eventually departed for Egypt.
Finnish Border Guard's undated handout picture of the presumed anchor of the Eagle S tanker on the seabed. The anchor was recovered from the Gulf of Finland in connection with the criminal investigation related to cables being damaged on Dec. 25, 2024. (Finnish Border Guard/Reuters)
Anchor dragged for 100 km
After the next series of cables were severed on Dec. 25, Finnish investigators seized the Eagle S, an oil tanker suspected of being part of Russia's shadow fleet.
Finnish police said that an anchor, which was later recovered, was suspected of being dragged around 100 kilometres along the seabed.
Seljamaa says since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the ensuing sanctions, the ship traffic they are seeing in the Gulf of Finland has changed.
He says there are now older vessels with more inexperienced crews, but even with that, he says he doesn't know how an anchor could be accidentally dragged for 100 kilometres.
"I don't believe that you couldn't feel it or detect it," he said.
Russia has denied sabotaging the cables, calling it "ridiculous" against the backdrop of the Nord Stream explosions in 2022, which damaged the gas pipelines that ran between Russia and Germany under the Baltic Sea.
While an official investigation into the Nord Stream blast has never been released publicly, several media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, have reported that a group of Ukrainian nationals were behind the explosion.
In the wake of that incident, Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, warned "the complicity of Western countries" meant Russia had "no constraints" and could destroy the west's undersea communication cables.
Estonian warships escort media while taking part in a patrol along the stretch of the Gulf of Finland in the Baltic Sea on Thursday. (Briar Stewart/CBC)
Doubts about the damage being deliberate
After the cables were damaged late last year, the European Union said it was the latest in a series of attacks on critical infrastructure.
But two media reports have recently raised doubts that the acts were deliberate.
WATCH | This Estonian warship is patrolling the Baltic Sea:
Reports by the Washington Post and The Associated Press both cited unnamed officials who said the evidence pointed to an accident and not sabotage.
At the end of January, a cable between Latvia and Sweden was damaged and a Bulgarian vessel was under investigation, but Swedish officials determined it was not sabotage.
Last week. Russia said that it discovered one of its cables in the Baltic Sea had been damaged by what officials called an "external impact."
On board Estonia's Sakala, those in charge are careful with their words. They don't directly accuse Russia of sabotaging the cables, but they make it clear that they view the country as a threat.
They say if a ship is behaving suspiciously and won't respond to radio calls, then Seljamaa says they will respond, including by force.
But Michael Plunkett, a U.K.-based senior naval analyst for Janes, an open-source global intelligence company, says recognizing suspicious activity may be one thing, but responding to a ship in international waters is another.
"Are they able to stop it? Are they able to board it? If it's in international waters, then they are on some fairly shaky legal ground," said Plunkett in an interview with CBC News by Zoom.
But he says the enhanced patrols alone will likely have an impact.
"It sends the message that NATO is aware of the potential threat and it is going to try to deter the more brazen attempts at sabotage."
Officials with Estonia's navy say there hasn't been any suspicious activity since the patrols have been stepped up, but vow that if there is a critical threat, they could respond with force. (Briar Stewart/CBC)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
13 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Column: U.S. Intelligence investigations no longer top secret
Once upon a time, successful intelligence agents were neither seen nor heard, at least in the media. The point of the game was to keep operations secret, at the time and after the conclusion. Times have changed. Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, now the director of National Intelligence, is aggressively and publicly accusing the administration of former President Barack Obama of a criminal conspiracy, with President Donald Trump cheering her on. In November of 1959, President Dwight Eisenhower spoke at the cornerstone ceremony of the new CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. He emphasized that in this field, 'Success cannot be advertised; failure cannot be explained. In the work of intelligence, heroes are undecorated and unsung, often even among their own fraternity.' Director Gabbard charges that after the 2016 election, Obama officials, including the president, conspired to undermine newly elected President Trump by spreading falsehoods about Russian interference in the campaign, especially that the Republican candidate and campaign had colluded with the Russian government. She is trumpeting the charges in the media, and even quotes herself on her agency's website. She is also hardly unique today in discussing intel matters publicly. Soon after the 2016 election, the heads of the CIA, FBI, NSA (National Security Agency) and the director of National Intelligence launched a public relations offensive highlighting how Russia, including President Vladimir Putin, meddled in the race for president, including hacking into the emails of the Hillary Clinton campaign. With great fanfare, they met with President-elect Trump to present evidence behind those conclusions. With equal hype, top officials testified before the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee. There is no denying that Russian hackers meddled in the 2016 election. But, serious analysts doubt this had any serious impact. The fact of that interference is also not news. President Obama publicly revealed these developments in October 2016, just before voting took place. After the election, he ordered a review and analysis of the interference. There is no evidence that Obama directed or tried to influence the conclusions of this review. Why did the intelligence officials go public with lights, cameras and melodrama after the 2016 election? They could have briefed Trump in private, which would have been standard intelligence practice. But, they wanted to protect themselves in the contemporary political warfare of Washington. This was an effort to create a shield from political retribution, and that worked to a degree. Nonetheless, Trump's efforts to promote hostile conspiracies began and continue. During Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress seized on the topic of alleged Russian collusion to launch a massive two-year investigation. Millions of dollars were spent on a demonstrably biased effort that nonetheless concluded there was no persuasive evidence of Republican campaign collaboration with Moscow. The Mueller investigation, along with a separate investigation by Special Counsel John Durham, drew attention to a controversial 'dossier' prepared for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. Both efforts underscore the partisanship then going on. President Eisenhower's statement about the distinctive and very thankless nature of intelligence work reflected direct, disciplined, continuous engagement with security matters at the very top, over many years. Eisenhower was in the White House during the height of the Cold War with the Soviet Union and that nation's numerous allies. Earlier, he led the largest, most challenging military alliance in history against Nazi Germany. Failure would have been catastrophic. Officials then regularly replied 'no comment' when asked about particularly sensitive matters. Today's pervasive partisanship and nonstop media reflect our security and self-indulgence. We may yet pay dearly.


Atlantic
43 minutes ago
- Atlantic
What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?
Trump's use of pardons may have induced some of his confederates—including Stone and Manafort—to not cooperate with prosecutors, or to only partly cooperate, thus depriving the public of a chance at receiving a full accounting. This was a kind of legalized obstruction of justice. Plenty of authorities have pointed out that Trump's claim of a hoax is nonsense. In 2017, PolitiFact named that its lie of the year. In 2018, The Washington Post reported: 'Trump's Russia 'Hoax' Turns Out to Be Real.' In 2019, a report by the Justice Department's inspector general concluded that, as my colleague Adam Serwer put it, 'the 'Russia hoax' defense is itself a hoax, and a highly successful one, aimed at reassuring Trump supporters who might otherwise be troubled by the president's behavior.' Still, the idea that the whole thing was a chimera has taken hold even within some precincts of the mainstream press, where the whole thing is treated as a weird passing obsession. The journalist Ben Smith, who made the decision to publish the Steele dossier, now contends, vaguely and in passive voice, that ' Trump was in retrospect treated unfairly.' Meanwhile, Trump world continues to cook up new iterations of the hoax claim. The most recent ones are driven by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who has a history of weaponizing intelligence, to use a term he's a fan of, and Gabbard, who has for years repeated Kremlin talking points. Last month, Ratcliffe alleged that in 2016, three of the nation's top intelligence officials 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals—all to get Trump,' but as my colleague Shane Harris reported, he didn't have evidence to back that up. Gabbard has released a dribble of documents intended to bolster it, but still nothing that matches the claims. In recent days, MAGA allies have pushed a new and shocking allegation: that emails show Clinton actually approved a plan to smear Trump by claiming he was colluding with Russia. The problem is that, once again, investigations have debunked it. A special counsel appointed by Barr during Trump's first term, with the goal of ferreting out political skulduggery in the Russia investigation, found that messages about Clinton being treated as a smoking gun were, in fact, likely concocted by the Russians. As The New York Times reported, 'The special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.' Durham's finding of a Russian forgery is ironic: Someone has finally turned up a real Russia hoax. Rather than working to fight it, however, Trump's aides are once more colluding with Russia to mislead the American people and further Trump's political fortunes.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ukrainian raid behind enemy lines kills 330 Russian troops
Ukrainian special forces on Tuesday claimed to have killed more than 330 Russian troops in a dawn raid behind enemy lines. Kyiv's defence intelligence (HUR) said a Russian advance in Sumy was 'stopped cold' when troops from its elite Timur unit infiltrated enemy positions and eliminated scores of Vladimir Putin's soldiers in close-quarter fighting and with co-ordinated drone and artillery strikes. HUR did not specify the exact date or location of the battle, but Russia's push into the region has stalled in recent weeks because of Ukraine's strong resistance. A video released by HUR showed Ukrainian fighters approaching the target in a low-flying helicopter before engaging the enemy in a wooded area with assault rifles, machine guns and grenade launchers. Explosions and screams were heard as Ukrainian artillery pounded enemy positions, and dead bodies lay on the ground. Outside the trees, Timur troops could be seen speeding in open-top trucks down unmetaled roads and hand-launching drones in fields. Overwhelmed Russian soldiers were heard over intercepted radio transmissions refusing to attack Ukrainian positions, HUR wrote. '[They were] justifying themselves with far-fetched reasons,' it added. At least 334 Russian troops were killed and over 550 wounded, HUR said. It signed off the video with: 'The armed struggle continues! Glory to Ukraine!' HUR said the operation disrupted Russian supplies of food and ammunition. The action was carried out by the forces of the Chymera, Yunger, Stugna, Siberian Battalion, Aratta, 1514, Paragon, Art Division, First Line, Raven Group, and 6th Special Operations Unit, which are part of the overall Timur Special Unit. Russian forces entered the Sumy Oblast earlier this year after recapturing most of the neighbouring Kursk Oblast in Russia. They aimed to carve out a 'buffer zone' along Ukraine's northeastern border. Ukraine claimed to have halted the Russian advance and even to have recaptured some villages. Severnnyi, a Russian military blogger, wrote on Monday that Moscow's forces had been surrounded in the Oleksiivka area of the region. He said: 'They have us trapped. Water on three sides, and Ukrainians on the fourth.' The elite Timur unit is an umbrella command within HUR that coordinates a number of specialised forces. The group takes its name from its leader, Lieutenant-Colonel Timur, who planted a Ukrainian flag in Crimea for the first time in 10 years in a special operation in August 2024. In March 2024, The Wall Street Journal reported that HUR operators from the Timur unit were actively fighting Russian-aligned forces in Sudan. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.