CVS and Express Scripts sued to block a new law restricting drug middlemen
PBMs, also known as drug middlemen, are third-party administrators of prescription drug plans for health insurers. They negotiate with pharmaceutical companies over how much a health plan will pay for a drug and set the out-of-pocket costs for patients.
Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a law last month that banned PBMs from owning and operating pharmacies in the state, saying at the time that they 'have taken advantage of lax regulations to abuse customers.'
The legislation came following two reports from the Federal Trade Commission and the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability last year that accused PBMs of reaping massive profits by pushing patients to pay for more expensive drugs, including life-saving cancer medicine.
Supporters of the Arkansas law, which goes into effect in January, claimed it would also greatly help independent pharmacies, which can't compete with PBM-owned chains like CVS.
In its lawsuit Thursday, CVS said the legislation will force it to close 23 pharmacies in the state, eliminating hundreds of jobs, and claimed the ban would 'drive-up costs for Arkansans.'
CVS, which declined to further comment, said in their press release that the law violates the Dormant Commerce Clause, a part of the Constitution that restricts states from discriminating against or unfairly burdening out-of-state businesses. It also said the law violates the company's Equal Protection rights.
Susan Peppers, vice president of pharmacy practice for Evernorth Health Services, which runs Express Scripts and is owned by Cigna, said in a press release that 'if this law takes effect in January, hundreds of thousands of Arkansans will be left scrambling to navigate the forced closure of pharmacies and finding new ways to get their medicines and critical clinical support.'
While advocates say the law will help rural Arkansans whose local pharmacies can't stay afloat, Express Scripts is claiming the opposite. The law 'could be especially challenging for the more than 40% of Arkansans that live in a rural area and may not have easy access to a retail pharmacy,' it said.
In a statement to Quartz, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin defended the legislation. 'Pharmacy benefit managers wield outsized power to reap massive profits at the expense of consumers,' he said. 'Through Act 624, Arkansas is standing up to PBMs on behalf of consumers, and I will vigorously defend our law.'
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
CVS vs. UNH: Which Healthcare Stock is a Better Buy After Q2 Earnings?
CVS Health (CVS) and UnitedHealth Group (UNH), two of the largest players in the healthcare sector, recently reported their Q2 earnings, showing contrasting performances. While CVS delivered strong revenue growth and raised its full-year guidance, UnitedHealth faced challenges with declining earnings and released a cautious outlook. This article compares the two stocks to help investors decide which healthcare giant offers a better buying opportunity after the latest results. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Is CVS a Good Stock to Buy Now? CVS has shown steady performance compared to its competitors and made a strong recovery in 2025 after several challenging years. So far this year, its stock has climbed more than 45%. For Q2, the company posted results that exceeded expectations. Notably, the Health Care Benefits segment, which includes Aetna, achieved a 39% increase in adjusted operating income. In response to these positive results, CVS raised its full-year adjusted EPS guidance to a range of $6.30 to $6.40, up from the previous $6.00 to $6.20. The company is also rolling out a $2 billion, multi-year cost-saving plan, with expected 2025 savings set to fully cover rising variable costs. These strategic initiatives and financial metrics underscore CVS Health's strong position in the healthcare sector, making it an attractive option for investors seeking stability and growth. Is UNH a Good Buy Right Now? On the other hand, UnitedHealth has faced several difficulties recently. In April, it reported higher-than-expected medical costs in its Medicare division. In May, the company pulled its full-year financial forecast, and CEO Andrew Witty resigned unexpectedly for personal reasons. Earlier this month, UnitedHealth's stock hit a new 52-week low, falling 51% over the past six months. Interestingly, UnitedHealth's Q2 results added to its challenges. The company missed earnings expectations, reporting $4.08 per share compared to the $4.45 forecast. Additionally, the company issued a weaker profit guidance for the full year. This new outlook factors in the company's performance in the first half of 2025 and expected increases in medical costs for the rest of the year. Despite the challenges, UnitedHealth's steady revenue base, ongoing investments, and expectations for earnings growth in 2026 make it an attractive option for investors willing to look past short-term setbacks. However, cautious investors should monitor how the company manages cost pressures and carries out its plans going forward. Which Healthcare Stock Is a Strong Buy, According to Analysts? Using the TipRanks Stock Comparison tool, we compared these healthcare stocks. Among these companies, CVS stock has earned a Strong Buy rating from analysts, while UNH stock carries a Moderate Buy. In terms of share price appreciation, CVS's average stock price target of $81.75 offers an upside potential of 19% from current levels. In contrast, UNH's stock price forecast of $312.65 suggests a growth rate of just 1%. Conclusion Among the stocks, CVS currently stands out as the better investment option, according to analysts. It holds a stronger analyst rating, a higher projected upside, and has demonstrated solid recent performance with raised earnings guidance. While UNH remains a strong player with long-term potential, CVS's current momentum and outlook may offer a more appealing option for investors.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
CVS, Target, Walmart: Which sell Plan B and/or the abortion pill?
Costco Wholesale has decided to not sell the abortion pill mifepristone across all its U.S. pharmacy stores, citing low demand. This isn't a change in policy or Costco (COST) dropping the medicine. It has never sold mifepristone in its warehouse clubs or through its pharmacies. "Our position at this time not to sell mifepristone, which has not changed, is based on the lack of demand from our members and other patients, who we understand generally have the drug dispensed by their medical providers," Costco said. The decision comes amid campaigns against the pill by religious activist groups, including Inspire Investing and Alliance Defending Freedom. Plan B (Levonorgestrel) Purpose: Emergency contraception to prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex or contraceptive failure (e.g., condom break). When used:Before a pregnancy starts, within 72 hours (best within 24 hours) after sex. How it works: Delays or prevents ovulation (egg release). May also prevent fertilization of the egg. Does not terminate an existing pregnancy. If the fertilized egg is already implanted, Plan B has no effect. Type: High-dose progestin (hormone), similar to birth control pill hormones, just in a single larger dose. Availability: Over-the-counter, no prescription, no age limit in the U.S. The Abortion Pill (Mifepristone + Misoprostol) Purpose: To end an existing pregnancy (up to about 10–11 weeks gestation in the U.S.). When used:After pregnancy has been confirmed (positive test or clinical confirmation). How it works:Mifepristone blocks progesterone, a hormone needed to maintain pregnancy. Misoprostol causes the uterus to contract and expel the pregnancy tissue. Type: Two different medications taken in sequence - not the same as hormonal birth control. Availability: Requires a prescription in the U.S. and is regulated under the FDA's Mifepristone REMS Program (dispensed at certified pharmacies, clinics, or by mail in states where legal). CVS: Stocked in most locations, typically in the family planning aisle; billing through insurance is possible, or pay out-of-pocket and claim later. You can also order online for Commonly available either on shelves or behind the counter; curbside and drive-thru pick-up may be offered Target: Carries Plan B both in-store and online, with options for delivery or same-day in-store Available in the family planning or sexual wellness section; online ordering with pickup or delivery options is also grocery and drugstore chains: Many large grocery store pharmacies (Kroger, Albertsons) and drugstore chains carry Plan B over-the-counter near other reproductive health retail pharmacies CVS and Walgreens: These two major chains have obtained FDA certification (through the Mifepristone REMS program) to dispense mifepristone in select locations, specifically in states where such dispensing is legally permitted. The list includes over 20 states such as California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and others. However, availability varies by location and state-level restrictions Costco has said its decision on the abortion pill is a business one based on demand. The company generally stays out of politics. It has a very clear policy on its website: Costco Wholesale has a long-standing policy against making contributions to any political party or candidate, federal, state or local, in all countries in which we do business. This prohibition covers not only direct contributions, but also support through organizations created under section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, buying tickets to political fundraising events, or furnishing goods, services, or equipment for political fundraising Company also prohibits contributions for "independent expenditures": communications that expressly advocate the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate that are not made in cooperation, consultation, or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate, candidate's authorized committee, or a political party. Related: Costco to keep abortion pill off shelves amid conservative outcry The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Where D.C. crime is bad, residents question Trump's motives
'If Trump is genuinely concerned about safety of D.C. residents, I would see National Guard in my neighborhood,' said Karen Lake, 62, a lawyer who has lived in Congress Heights since 2017, in the far eastern corner of the diamond-shaped district. 'I'm not seeing it, and I don't expect to see it. I don't think Trump is bringing in the National Guard to protect Black babies in Southeast.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump might have found a more sympathetic audience in the distant southeastern quadrant of the city, far away from the National Mall, the White House, or the restaurants and clubs of 16th Street and 14th Street, where a young employee of the Department of Government Efficiency recently was beaten in an assault that raised the city's criminal profile to presidential level. Advertisement In neighborhoods such as Congress Heights and Washington Highlands, where the District of Columbia abuts Prince Georges County, Maryland, the city's Black working class struggles with the twin challenges that have diminished the ranks of what was once, when Washington still had a majority-Black population, affectionately called Chocolate City. There's crime, for sure, but also gentrification driving Black residents into suburban Maryland and Virginia. Advertisement In Ward 8, where Congress Heights is found, there have been 38 homicides this year, according to data from the District of Columbia government. That's almost 10 times as many as Ward 2, where the National Mall is located. But when Trump on Monday described the district as 'dirty' and 'disgusting,' menaced by 'roving mobs of wild youth,' he offended some who otherwise might have been more receptive to his 'law-and-order' pitch. 'I know that we're not those things,' said Le'Greg Harrison, who lives in Congress Heights and said he is supportive of more law enforcement, so long as Black residents aren't the target. 'I know we have a beautiful city.' Trump did not mention Congress Heights by name, but residents say they are well aware of the community's crime statistics and the challenges their neighborhood faces. Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said that federal law enforcement agents had increased their presence in all of the city's neighborhoods, including those in Ward 8. In parts of the ward, she said, arrests have been made in connection with illegal guns and drugs, as well as murder, cruelty to the elderly and other offenses. 'President Trump is committed to making D.C. safe again for all residents,' she said in a written statement. On a humid, overcast afternoon in Washington this week, hungry patrons, mostly Black, pulled up to the retail space known as Sycamore & Oak, which Harrison helped bring to Congress Heights. They grabbed a bite from Black-owned restaurants and discussed what they called Trump's takeover of their city. Advertisement Among the residents of Congress Heights and other neighborhoods of Southeast Washington, the apparent new order has been met with a sense of both incredulity and inevitability. Despite the area's challenges, residents say they take pride in their neighborhood and their city and feel disrespected by the president's portrayal. They feel unseen and misunderstood, their challenges reduced to crime statistics, their children cast as threats, and their culture caricatured. They don't reject safety measures outright. Gerald Walker, a 38-year-old Congress Heights resident, said federal intervention was 'definitely needed.' The National Guard, the FBI, a federalized District of Columbia police force -- 'the more the better.' But many said they were by no means seeking out additional federal involvement in their neighborhoods. And some said they resented being treated as political piñatas in a larger national narrative. It has 'nothing to do with crime in D.C.,' said Ronnie McLeod, 68, a retired bus driver and lifelong Washingtonian who lives in Congress Heights. 'Crime is already down!' 'It's got something to do with something else,' he said. Most of all, many Congress Heights residents say they do not trust Trump's motives. 'He's very out of touch with D.C. people in general,' said Michelle Lee, 42, who lives in Southeast Washington. He may know the political culture of the city, may even have a passing understanding of the ritzier parts of town, she said. Lee, seeming to address the president personally, added, 'You have no idea what an actual resident of D.C. does, goes through.' Advertisement It's not the first time a violent crime against a young, white political staffer has prompted outrage from the federal government. In 1992, an aide to Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama was murdered on Capitol Hill. In the aftermath, Shelby forced a referendum to restore the death penalty in Washington; the initiative was overwhelmingly rejected by voters. Some residents of Southeast described the president's decision to declare a crime emergency and federalize the Metropolitan Police Department for a 30-day period as a power grab or a way to appease affluent white Washingtonians who are anxious about crime. (Any extension would have to be granted by Congress.) Some residents saw the move as a sly way to further gentrify what is left of affordable Washington, by striking fear in residents of low-income neighborhoods that federalized police officers will harass them, or worse. The city has already showed more interest in developing luxury condominiums than in building community recreation centers for children, said Jimmie Jenkins, 35, who grew up in Congress Heights. Many Black residents are not benefiting from the city's growth, he said, and if conditions don't change, Black people will no longer be a significant part of the city's future. Now Trump is pushing aside the city's Black leadership and bringing in federal troops. 'They're definitely aiming to push more Black people out,' said Tyree Jones, 30, who works in Congress Heights. Salim Adofo, a member of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission that represents parts of Congress Heights, was not surprised that residents were drawing connections among crime, federalized law enforcement and gentrification. 'It's becoming harder to live in this specific community as it continues to get developed,' he said. 'It's all wrapped up in together. You really can't separate any of these things.' Advertisement Like opponents of Trump on national cable talk shows and social media, residents of Southeast Washington said the president's message of 'law and order' was undermined when he pardoned even the most violent assailants who attacked police officers during the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. They also brought up his own criminality and raised the possibility that he was deploying forces in Washington to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. But the residents of Southeast Washington have taken the president's moves personally. Trump, they said, is using them. Older residents remember a time when crime was much worse. 'I grew up in the town in the '90s, when we were, quote unquote, the murder capital for almost 10 years,' said Harrison, 40. 'I wouldn't call what we have a state of emergency,' he said. Still, any deployment of extra enforcement must be done with sensitivity for Black citizens, he added. Many Black communities have said for years that they want to be protected from crime, but they don't want to be aggressively targeted for simply being Black. The president's orders have only underscored those positions. 'My father was murdered in my home when I was 15 years old,' said Erica Champion, 28, who was born and raised in Southeast Washington. 'I watched him die.' Champion said she believed the federal government should step in to prevent violent crime, but she is concerned about abuse of power from law enforcement officers and the White House. 'I just don't want him to use it as a means to make it a dictatorship,' she said. Advertisement Local residents said a more comprehensive strategy to combat crime in the city would involve bigger investments in recreation centers, arts and youth job programs. But that will be difficult after Republicans in Congress forced a $1 billion hole in the district's budget. Trump's federal government layoffs already have Washington officials slashing revenue projections. This article originally appeared in
