You can amend the regulations anytime as minister, Dr Wee tells Armizan
PETALING JAYA: Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali can exercise his ministerial powers according to his discretion to amend the Control of Supplies (Amendment) regulations 2021, says MCA President Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong.
This was because under the Control of Supplies Act 1961, Armizan has the prerogative as minister to amend the Control of Supplies (Amendment) regulations 2021.
'As the Minister for nearly two years, why didn't you speak out from the beginning regarding this regulation?
'The regulation can be amended at any time by you. Instead, you chose to enforce Ops Gasak strictly, which created anger among hawkers and concerns among small-time traders and the public.
'And when the pressure came in from all sides, you took a u-turn, apparently the Cabinet agreed to give a few exemptions that will be announced later,' said Dr Wee in a video posted on Facebook on June 10 (Tuesday).
Dr Wee also said the Control of Supplies (Amendment) regulations 2021 clearly stated that all shops must use commercial LPG gas cylinders beginning 2021, and traders were concerned whether or not they are allowed to use subsidised gas cylinders that cost much less.
'You can amend this regulation now, sign it and send it to the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) for the federal gazettal process,' he said.
The war of words over subsidised liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) between Dr Wee and Armizan erupted recently when the latter accused the former of being involved in approving the controversial Control of Supplies (Amendment) regulations 2021 when he was the then transport minister in 2021.
On June 8, Dr Wee had said that although he served as a Cabinet Minister in 2021, he had never been involved in approving such regulations.
In response, Armizan said Dr Wee was referring to a different law, and in his press conference on June 5, he clearly stated that his ministry was enforcing Ops Gasak under the Control of Supplies (Amendment) regulations 2021 to combat the smuggling of subsidised LPG cylinders, among others.
In refuting Armizan's accusations, Dr Wee said the Control of Supplies (Amendment) regulations 2021 had nothing to do with him, as it does not fall under the purview of the Transport Ministry.
'What has the Transport Ministry got to do with this? Unless you assume that all ministers should read and approve federal gazettes together.
'Then all the ministers should be blamed at that time,' said Dr Wee.
Dr Wee said that Armizan had accused him of referring to the wrong law, although he quoted 2021 parliamentary Hansards, which showed that during debates on the Control of Supplies (Amendment) Act 2021, there was no mention about regulating subsidised LPG cylinders
'I have shown proof and now, the Minister should also show evidence through the Control of Supplies (Amendment) Regulations 2021, which clearly states that all restaurants must use commercial LPG and not subsidised LPG beginning 2021,' said Dr Wee.
Dr Wee also said he was disappointed that Armizan did not reply to a May 31 text message from him enquiring about the issue.
The Control of Supplies (Amendment) Regulations 2021, which came into force on Oct 15, 2021, limit the use of subsidised LPG to a maximum of 42kg at any one time for commercial purposes.
Any shop exceeding this limit must obtain a permit and switch to non-subsidised LPG.
On Thursday (June 5), Armizan said small and micro-scale F&B operators would be exempted from enforcement under the ongoing Ops Gasak
Armizan stated that the Cabinet had agreed to review the regulations concerning the use of subsidised LPG cylinders by these traders, following recommendations submitted by the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry.
Ops Gasak, which began on May 1 and ended on Oct 31, was aimed at curbing illegal activities such as decanting (transferring gas from subsidised LPG cylinders to non-subsidised ones), smuggling, and the misuse of subsidised LPG by medium and large-scale industrial sectors.
Dr Wee had said that the Ops Gasak should have focused on large-scale operations and at the borders, rather than on petty traders and hawkers.
The crux of the issue, said Dr Wee, was the smuggling activities at the borders and abuse of targeted subsidies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
MBAM urges govt to reconsider move to impose revised SST on construction services
PETALING JAYA: The Master Builders Association Malaysia (MBAM) expressed deep concern regarding the government's recent announcement to impose the revised Sales and Service Tax (SST) on construction services effective July 1. MBAM president Oliver HC Wee said the construction industry is already subject to multiple layers of taxation across various aspects of project execution – including building materials, labour and equipment. Furthermore, most construction contracts are awarded on a fixed-price and fixed-duration basis. 'Introducing a new tax, especially with the potential for retrospective application, would seriously disrupt existing contractual obligations, budgets and project timelines. This creates an undue burden on both contractors and clients and could lead to delays and cost overruns,' Wee said in a statement. MBAM, he said, is appealing for such tax to apply only to those contracts executed after Jan 1, 2026. 'Contractors have no way to absorb such extra costs. Such application of additional tax would delay our transformation plan involving ESG and digitalisation. If the implementation of the 6% SST is inevitable, we strongly urge that the rate to be reduced from 6% to 4% as the contract value for each contract can be very huge. It should also not be applied retrospectively,' said Wee. He remarked that though the law provides an exemption for 12 months from July 1, it will only be applicable to non-reviewable contracts. 'We would like the government to consider relaxing the exemption rules such that it will be applicable to all contracts and also extend the exemption period to 24 months. The timeline of July 1, 2025 provides insufficient lead time for the industry to respond. A reasonable grace period must be granted to allow all stakeholders to make necessary adjustments and financial preparations,' said Wee. He added that service tax should only be levied on the service portion of the contract value while the non service portion of the contract value including building material and other hardware should not be levied with service tax. The SST, he said, will significantly strain cash flows within the construction sector. He added that contractors already face substantial financial pressures, including retention sums, high upfront capital requirements and corporate tax obligations. Requiring the SST to be paid before monthly progress claims are certified and disbursed aggravates the issue, he said. 'We are aware that, as a general rule, even though the service providers have not collected the service tax levied after 12 months from the date of invoice, the said service tax has to be paid to the government,' Wee said, adding that they hope the government can consider taking the date where the progress claims are approved by the customers in determining when service tax has to be remitted to the government. He emphasised that most contractors are not in a financial position to absorb or pre-finance such tax costs on behalf of clients. 'This situation could lead to broader challenges, affecting the timely execution and delivery of critical infrastructure, property developments, and national construction projects.' In addition to SST, Wee said, the industry is already contributing through a wide array of charges and levies, including foreign worker Employees Provident Fund contributions, Construction Industry Development Board levies, stamp duties on contracts, and HRD Corp levies. 'We are deeply concerned about the cumulative financial impact and urge the government to avoid introducing further inflationary costs in the future. Given the critical role the construction industry plays in national development and economic stability, MBAM respectfully appeals to the government to reconsider the imposition of SST on construction services. It is essential to maintain a stable, predictable and sustainable operating environment for the industry to continue supporting Malaysia's growth and development,' he said.
Malaysiakini
15 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Just reinstate 'efficient, fair' GST, MCA veep tells govt amid SST expansion
MCA has urged the government to reintroduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST) instead of expanding the current Sales and Services Tax (SST) to cover more products and services. 'The government's approach of continuously widening the SST tax net, without addressing underlying issues, will increase the burden on businesses and consumers, without solving the core problem of a weak national tax base. 'Rather than continually introducing new or 'refined' taxes, it would be more sensible to...
The Star
16 hours ago
- The Star
Fair and inclusive policies key to effective poverty alleviation
AS Malaysians grapple with rising living costs and growing financial uncertainty, it is both right and necessary for the government to introduce poverty alleviation measures. However, no policy should seek to help one group at the expense of another. A truly effective anti-poverty strategy must be fair, balanced, and sustainable. Let's be clear: helping the poor must not mean punishing others. If a policy intended to "care for some" ends up "hurting many more," it deserves urgent review. MyKasih and Jualan Rahmah: Noble intentions, flawed implementation While MyKasih and Jualan Rahmah were launched with good intentions to support low-income households, their execution has created selective benefits and structural imbalances. This is especially harmful to small and medium-sized retailers, particularly in non-urban areas. 1. MyKasih – Targeted aid, but at what cost? MyKasih restricts recipients to spending their aid only at designated chain supermarkets. This excludes countless small, family-run shops in kampungs and towns that have faithfully served their communities for years. This raises serious concerns: Who is supporting the small traders who form the backbone of local economies? Why must one group's relief come at another's downfall? Even more troubling, many beneficiaries live in rural areas and must travel far to access approved outlets. This contradicts the principle of accessible, local aid. Meanwhile, excluded grocers lose customers with no way to appeal or participate. 2. Jualan Rahmah – Low prices with hidden costs Jualan Rahmah may appear to offer consumer relief, but in truth, it's government-funded price suppression for certain products, in certain places, at certain times. It benefits only a narrow group, while placing immense pressure on the wider retail sector. When these sales happen repeatedly in the same locations, nearby shops and markets face crushing, unfair competition. It's like saving one patient by evicting others from the ward—what seems compassionate causes broader harm. Our government must not act as both referee and player. Using taxpayers' money to distort the market ultimately hurts the very small businesses that also pay taxes and employ Malaysians. A call for fair, inclusive policy Real poverty alleviation must not create new winners and losers. It must support inclusive growth and protect everyone striving to make a living. If MyKasih continues to exclude local traders, and Jualan Rahmah stays concentrated in select areas, the imbalance will only deepen. The government's role is to set fair, sustainable rules—not run supermarkets. Let us not fight poverty by dividing the rakyat. We must aim for policies that lift everyone, not just a few. DATUK DR MAH HANG SOON MCA Deputy President
