logo
Trump calls 'obliteration' an accurate description of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities

Trump calls 'obliteration' an accurate description of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities

CNBC4 hours ago

U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday disputed Iranian attempts to downplay the strikes on its nuclear facilities, stressing that "obliteration" was an accurate description, even though the full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear capabilities was not immediately clear.
"Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" Trump wrote on Truth Social.
The U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday that there was "severe damage and destruction" to the facilities at Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, but did not go so far as to say that Iran's nuclear capacities had been "obliterated."
"Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Sunday that while the damage assessment is ongoing, "all of our precision munitions struck where we wanted them to strike and had the desired effect."
When asked if Iran still retains any nuclear capability, Caine said that "BDA is still pending, and it would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there."
Battle Damage Assessment, or BDA, is a military term that refers to the process of evaluating the effects of military operations on a target.
It usually involves a physical or functional check on the extent of damage, beyond visual signs, and whether the target remains operable
These assessments are usually conducted by intelligence analysts and reconnaissance teams, using data from drones, satellites, radar, or ground reports. It helps commanders decide if the mission achieved its objectives and if follow-up strikes are needed.
The UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi also struck a cautious tone, saying that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done at the Fordo nuclear facility.
Adding to the uncertainty, Reuters reported, citing a senior Iranian source, that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordo had been moved to an undisclosed location ahead of the U.S. strikes on the enrichment site.
The strikes began early on Saturday, when six U.S. Air Force B-2 stealth bombers dropped six GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) - a 30,000-pound bomb known as the "bunker buster," - on Iran's Fordo nuclear facility, which is built into the side of a mountain.
A seventh U.S. B‑2 bomber released two GBU‑57 bombs on the Natanz Nuclear Facility, while a U.S. Navy submarine also launched a volley of 30 Tomahawk missiles, targeting Natanz and a third site, Isfahan.
The mission, code named Operation Midnight Hammer, involved more than 125 aircraft in total.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan Condemns US Strikes in Iran While Embracing Trump
Pakistan Condemns US Strikes in Iran While Embracing Trump

Bloomberg

time9 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Pakistan Condemns US Strikes in Iran While Embracing Trump

Pakistan condemned the US's bombing of nuclear sites in Iran while at the same time taking steps to build stronger ties with President Donald Trump, suggesting limits to how far Islamabad will go in supporting Tehran in the crisis. Pakistan's Shehbaz Sharif spoke with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday, criticizing the US's action and offering solidarity with the Islamic Republic. While noting Iran's right to self-defense, the prime minister called for dialog as the 'only viable path forward,' according to a statement from his office.

'Pandora's Box': Russia Issues New Warning to Trump Over Iran
'Pandora's Box': Russia Issues New Warning to Trump Over Iran

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

'Pandora's Box': Russia Issues New Warning to Trump Over Iran

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia accused the U.S. of having "opened a Pandora's box" with its strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. President Donald Trump gave the go-ahead on Saturday, June 21, for the U.S. to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites, including the Fordow uranium enrichment plant buried deep in a mountain. The strikes involved the U.S. directly in Israel's ongoing war against Iran. Israel and the U.S. acted to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran said it does not seek to build a nuclear bomb and that its facilities are for nuclear energy. At a United Nations Security Council meeting on Sunday, June 22, Russia's UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said that Washington "yet again demonstrated its complete contempt for the position of the international community." "Washington reasserted that, to further the interests of its Israeli ally, it's prepared not only to turn a blind eye to the killings of tens of thousands of Palestinian women, children, and older persons but also to gamble with the safety and well-being of humanity as a whole," Nebenzia said, referring to the war in Gaza. "Through their actions, the US has opened a Pandora's box. No one knows what new catastrophes and suffering it will bring." Iran has vowed to respond forcefully and said U.S. targets in the region are now legitimate as a consequence of the strikes. It also warned of a regional war. This is a developing article. Updates to follow.

Oil's Spike Unwinds as Traders Await Iran Response to US Attack
Oil's Spike Unwinds as Traders Await Iran Response to US Attack

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil's Spike Unwinds as Traders Await Iran Response to US Attack

(Bloomberg) -- Oil jumped after US strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites in a significant escalation, but later pared gains as fears of an immediate disruption to supplies from the Middle East began to fade. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Global benchmark Brent initially surged as much as 5.7% to $81.40 a barrel in heavy trading, before changing hands near $78. US President Donald Trump said that weekend air attacks had 'obliterated' a trio of targets, and threatened more military action if Iran didn't make peace. In reply, Tehran warned that the strikes would trigger 'everlasting consequences.' The oil market has been gripped by the crisis since Israel attacked Iran more than a week ago, with futures pushing higher, options volumes spiking, and the futures curve shifting to reflect tensions about tighter near-term supplies. While the Middle East accounts for about a third of global crude production, there haven't yet been any signs of actual disruption to physical oil flows, including for cargoes going through the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint. 'Traders are starting to think there is nothing here: we are up $10 a barrel since the war started, now a little more, and so I think there is an appropriate amount of risk in the market,' said Bob McNally, founder of Rapidan Energy Advisers LLC and a former White House energy official. 'Traders are holding their breath, waiting to see if Israel or Iran expand this conflict beyond military and political targets into traded energy,' he told Bloomberg Television. 'So far, no one has pulled that trigger — and if they don't, I can see the price reversing.' The unprecedented US strikes were meant to hobble Iran's nuclear program, and targeted sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. At the United Nations on Sunday, Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani said the 'timing, nature and scale' of Tehran's response 'will be decided by its armed forces.' There are multiple, overlapping risks for crude flows. The biggest centers on the Strait of Hormuz, should Tehran seek to retaliate by attempting to close the narrow conduit. About a fifth of the world's crude output passes through the waterway at the entrance to the Persian Gulf. Iran's parliament has called for the closure of the strait, according to state-run TV. Such a move, however, could not proceed without the approval of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Authorities may yet restrict flows in other ways. 'The market will closely watch Iran's response,' said Muyu Xu, a senior crude analyst at Kpler Ltd. 'If Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz, even for one day, oil can temporarily hit $120 or even $150.' Rival Suppliers In addition, Tehran could opt to target crude infrastructure in rival suppliers in the Middle East, such as fellow OPEC+ producers Saudi Arabia, Iraq or the United Arab Emirates. Both Riyadh and Baghdad expressed concern following the US attack. Elsewhere, Iran could orchestrate attacks on ships on the other side of the Arabian peninsula in the Red Sea, encouraging Yemen-based Houthi rebels to harass vessels. After the US attacks, the group threatened retaliation. If the hostilities escalate, Tehran's own oil-producing capabilities could be targeted, including the key export hub at Kharg Island. Such a move, however, could send crude prices soaring, an outcome that Washington might want to avoid. So far, Kharg Island has been spared, with satellite imagery pointing to a drive by Iran to expedite its exports of oil. The crisis will also throw a spotlight onto the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, and its allies including Russia. In recent months, OPEC+ eased supply curbs at a rapid clip to regain market share, and yet members still have substantial idled capacity that could be reactivated. Brent's prompt spread — the difference between its two nearest contracts, and a closely followed metric — first widened to as much as $1.99 a barrel in backwardation, from $1.53 on Friday. It then retraced almost all of that move. 'It may take a few days or even weeks to discern the Iranian response to this unprecedented attack,' RBC Capital Markets LLC analysts including Helima Croft said in a note. 'Above all, we would caution against the knee jerk 'the worst is behind us' hot take at this stage.' --With assistance from Stephen Stapczynski and Yongchang Chin. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store