logo
Meet NYC's worst ‘pro-defendant' judge who frees violent perps, allegedly berates sex-crime victims and prosecutors

Meet NYC's worst ‘pro-defendant' judge who frees violent perps, allegedly berates sex-crime victims and prosecutors

Yahoo22-03-2025

New York City's worst judge — who lets violent perps walk free a stunning 85% of the time — was once so 'condescending' to a sex-crime victim, the woman refused to testify in her courtroom, sources told The Post.
Queens Criminal Court Judge Wanda 'Wendy' Licitra is 'the bane of our existence,' a Queens District Attorney insider said. 'She has no concern whatsoever for victims of crimes.'
Out of 43 violent felony cases overseen by Licitra between January and June 2024, she set bail only five times and held no suspects in pretrial detention — an 85% release rate, according to a Post review of the latest available Office of Court Administration data.
That was the highest rate of all city judges with at least 25 felony criminal cases, The Post found.
Licitra's alleged affinity for criminals was on display in a 2024 sex-crime case, two sources said.
Licitra, 65, 'declared a mistrial during summations on the case because she didn't think the [prosecuting] attorney was doing a good job,' one source said, noting the judge spoke down to the victim during the proceedings.
'When the case came up for retrial, the woman who testified before her refused to testify again,' the source explained.
The Democrat jurist's treatment of the victim was a serious problem, a second source added. 'The victim was not happy with the way the judge had spoken to her.'
The case was ultimately dismissed.
'This awful thing happens … and because of the way they're treated within the system that's supposed to be protecting them, she was not willing to testify again,' the insider said. 'It's really sad.'
Licitra, a former Legal Aid defense attorney who now earns upwards of $196,200 as a judge, has no love for assistant district attorneys either, critics said.
'She's disrespectful to prosecutors. She loves defense attorneys, but when prosecutors open up their mouths, she's condescending and she's nasty,' one of the sources said.
The second insider recalled how in a different case, a prosecutor went to court to ask to speak to Licitra and waited two hours, only to have the judge, who was appointed to the bench by then-Mayor de Blasio in 2020, refuse.
'It seemed like it was very intentional,' the source said.
Court records show the judge refused to look at 'crystal clear' video in a 2024 assault case against a repeat criminal who at that point had wracked up 26 prior arrests.
Hulking, 6-foot-1 suspect Courtney Jacobs was caught on camera randomly 'choking and beating' a LaGuardia Airport pilot, who was in full uniform on a city bus on his way to work, an ADA told Licitra, according to a transcript.
The prosecutor, who had sought one year behind bars for Jacobs, pleaded with the judge to consider the 'overwhelming' evidence — including photos of the pilot's injuries, and potential testimony from the victim — before offering the suspect any deal.
'This is what members of our community – victims on buses and subway platforms – are truly terrorized by, stranger attacks unprovoked for no reason by someone bigger and stronger,' the prosecutor said.
The prosecutor noted she'd worked extensively with the defense to see if Jacobs had a mental illness or could get treatment — but found he was simply 'a sociopath.'
Jacobs 'understands what he is doing is wrong. He just chooses to do it and it is problematic,' the prosecutor told the judge.
Licitra was unmoved. 'I'm a big girl. I'm perfectly able [to make] my own assessment and determination,' Licitra added, ultimately begrudgingly agreeing to review the tapes.
Jacobs could have been given a two-year sentence, but instead was behind bars for just over three months before being released on Nov. 29 due to time served, according to city records.
On Feb. 5 he was arrested again and accused of randomly socking another unsuspecting victim in the face, this time inside a light rail station at JFK Airport.
A different Queens judge set Jacobs' bail at $10,000 cash or $50,000 bond in that case, which is pending.
Even among defense attorneys, Licitra has gained notoriety for springing violent accused criminals.
'She's letting them all out,' one longtime defense lawyer previously told The Post.
Last year, Licitra cut loose at least two perps charged with first-degree assault with a weapon and second-degree robbery resulting in physical injury, respectively, without bail – only for the pair to be rearrested for violent felonies, according to OCA's pretrial data.
In February of 2022, she released 37-year-old Frank Abrokwa, who was accused of assaulting a woman on the subway by shoving poop in her face – even after Abrokwa snarled at Licitra, 'F–k you, bitch' in her courtroom.
The State University of New York at New Paltz graduate received her law degree from Hofstra University School of Law.
She has two homes — an apartment in Forest Hills, Queens, just a few minutes from the courthouse, and a sprawling 7,500-square-foot home on Long Island worth more than $600,000, where The Post spotted her getting into a white Nissan Rogue in the driveway last week.
Licitra and the Office of Court Administration did not respond to inquiries.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction
Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's long-shot effort to fight hush money conviction

Five months after President Donald Trump was sentenced without penalty in the New York hush money case, his attorneys will square off again with prosecutors Wednesday in one of the first major tests of the Supreme Court's landmark presidential immunity decision. Trump is relying heavily on the high court's divisive 6-3 immunity ruling from July in a long-shot bid to get his conviction reviewed – and ultimately overturned – by federal courts. After being convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, Trump in January became the first felon to ascend to the presidency in US history. Even after Trump was reelected and federal courts became flooded with litigation tied to his second term, the appeals in the hush money case have chugged forward in multiple courts. A three-judge panel of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals – all named to the bench by Democratic presidents – will hear arguments Wednesday in one of those cases. Trump will be represented on Wednesday by Jeffrey Wall, a private lawyer and Supreme Court litigator who served as acting solicitor general during Trump's first administration. Many of the lawyers who served on Trump's defense team in the hush money case have since taken top jobs within the Justice Department. The case stems from the 2023 indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, who accused Trump of falsely categorizing payments he said were made to quash unflattering stories during the 2016 election. Trump was accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.) Trump was ultimately convicted last year and was sentenced without penalty in January, days before he took office. The president is now attempting to move that case to federal court, where he is betting he'll have an easier shot at arguing that the Supreme Court's immunity decision in July will help him overturn the conviction. Trump's earlier attempts to move the case to federal court have been unsuccessful. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated by President Bill Clinton, denied the request in September – keeping Trump's case in New York courts instead. The 2nd Circuit will now hear arguments on Trump's appeal of that decision on Wednesday. 'He's lost already several times in the state courts,' said David Shapiro, a former prosecutor and now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. And Trump's long-running battle with New York Judge Juan Merchan, Shapiro said, has 'just simmered up through the system' in New York courts in a way that may have convinced Trump that federal courts will be more receptive. Trump, who frequently complained about Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.' Trump's argument hangs largely on a technical but hotly debated section of the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year. Broadly, that decision granted former presidents 'at least presumptive' immunity for official acts and 'absolute immunity' when presidents were exercising their constitutional powers. State prosecutors say the hush money payments were a private matter – not official acts of the president – and so they are not covered by immunity. But the Supreme Court's decision also barred prosecutors from attempting to show a jury evidence concerning a president's official acts, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct. Without that prohibition, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts. Trump is arguing that is exactly what Bragg did when he called White House officials such as former communications director Hope Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout to testify at his trial. Hicks had testified that Trump felt it would 'have been bad to have that story come out before the election,' which prosecutors later described as the 'nail' in the coffin of the president's defense. Trump's attorneys are also pointing to social media posts the president sent in 2018 denying the Daniels hush money scheme as official statements that should not have been used in the trial. State prosecutors 'introduced into evidence and asked the jury to scrutinize President Trump's official presidential acts,' Trump's attorneys told the appeals court in a filing last month. 'One month after trial, the Supreme Court unequivocally recognized an immunity prohibiting the use of such acts as evidence at any trial of a former president.' A White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. If Trump's case is ultimately reviewed by federal courts, that would not change his state law conviction into a federal conviction. Trump would not be able to pardon himself just because a federal court reviews the case. Bragg's office countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job. But in this case, Bragg's office argued, Trump has already been convicted and sentenced. That means, prosecutors said, there's really nothing left for federal courts to do. 'Because final judgment has been entered and the state criminal action has concluded, there is nothing to remove to federal district court,' prosecutors told the 2nd Circuit in January. Even if that's not true, they said, seeking testimony from a White House adviser about purely private acts doesn't conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in last year's immunity case. Bragg's office has pointed to a Supreme Court ruling as well: the 5-4 decision in January that allowed Trump to be sentenced in the hush money case. The president raised many of the same concerns about evidence when he attempted to halt that sentencing before the inauguration. A majority of the Supreme Court balked at that argument in a single sentence that, effectively, said Trump could raise those concerns when he appeals his conviction. That appeal remains pending in state court. 'The alleged evidentiary violations at President-elect Trump's state-court trial,' the Supreme Court wrote, 'can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal.'

Austria falls silent for a minute as questions remain about the motive for a deadly school shooting
Austria falls silent for a minute as questions remain about the motive for a deadly school shooting

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Austria falls silent for a minute as questions remain about the motive for a deadly school shooting

GRAZ, Austria (AP) — Austria fell silent for a minute on Wednesday in memory of the 10 people killed in a school shooting in Graz, which ended with the gunman taking his own life. The man's motive remained unclear. Austria has declared three days of national mourning following what appears to be the deadliest attack in its post-World War II history. At 10 a.m. on Wednesday, marking the moment a day earlier when police were alerted to shots at the school, the country stopped for a minute of silence. Hundreds of people lined the central square in Graz, Austria's second-biggest city. Some laid more candles and flowers in front of the city hall, adding to a growing memorial to the victims. The first candles were laid on Tuesday evening as a crowd gathered on the square, some people hugging each other as they tried to come to terms with the tragedy. In the capital, Vienna, the local transport authority had trams, subway trains and buses stop for a minute. Police said they found a farewell letter and a non-functional pipe bomb when they searched the home of the assailant. The 21-year-old Austrian man lived near Graz and was a former student at the BORG Dreierschützengasse high school who hadn't completed his studies. Police have said that he used two weapons, a shotgun and a handgun, which he appeared to have owned legally. Police didn't elaborate on investigators' findings in a brief post on social network X. But a senior official who acknowledged that the letter had been found on Tuesday night said it hadn't allowed them to draw conclusions. 'A farewell letter in analog and digital form was found,' Franz Ruf, the public security director at Austria's Interior Ministry, told ORF public television. 'He says goodbye to his parents. But no motive can be inferred from the farewell letter, and that is a matter for further investigations.' Asked whether the assailant had attacked victims randomly or targeted them specifically, Ruf said that is also under investigation and he didn't want to speculate. He said that wounded people were found on various levels of the school and, in one case, in front of the building. By Wednesday morning, the authority that runs hospitals in Graz said that all patients were in stable condition. Nine were still in intensive care units, with one needing a further operation on a facial wound and a second on a knee injury, while another two had been moved to regular wards. Hundreds of people joined Austrian officials at a service Tuesday evening in the Graz cathedral. 'For me this is important because I'm a teacher myself,' said Stephanie Klamminger-Brünner, 45. 'It shocks me a lot that a school in my hometown is affected by such a terrible event. I'm here out of solidarity with the teachers and students.' ___ Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

US cities brace for more protests as parts of Los Angeles placed under curfew
US cities brace for more protests as parts of Los Angeles placed under curfew

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US cities brace for more protests as parts of Los Angeles placed under curfew

By Brad Brooks, Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali and Dietrich Knauth LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Several U.S. cities braced for protests on Wednesday against President Donald Trump's sweeping immigration raids, as parts of the country's second largest city Los Angeles spent the night under curfew in an effort to quell five days of unrest. The Governor of Texas, Republican Greg Abbott, said he will deploy the National Guard this week, ahead of planned protests. Protesters and police in Austin clashed on Monday. Trump's extraordinary measures of sending National Guard and Marines to quell protests in Los Angeles has sparked a national debate on the use of military on U.S. soil and pitted the Republican president against California's Democrat governor. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers and even our National Guard at risk. That's when the downward spiral began," California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a video address on Tuesday. "He again chose escalation. He chose more force. He chose theatrics over public safety. ... Democracy is under assault." Newsom, widely seen as preparing for a presidential run in 2028, and the state of California sued Trump and the Defense Department on Monday, seeking to block the deployment of federal troops. Trump in turn has suggested Newsom should be arrested. Hundreds of U.S. Marines arrived in the Los Angeles area on Tuesday under orders from Trump, after he also ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard to the city. Marines and National Guard are to be used in the protection of government personnel and buildings and not in police action. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the deployments were not necessary as police could manage the protest, the majority of which have been peaceful, and limited to about five streets. However, due to looting and violence at night she imposed a curfew over one square mile of the city's downtown, starting Tuesday night. The curfew will last several days. Police said multiple groups stayed on the streets in some areas despite the curfew and "mass arrests" were initiated. Police earlier said that 197 people had already been arrested on Tuesday - more than double the total number of arrests to date. Democratic leaders have raised concerns over a national crisis in what has become the most intense flashpoint yet in the Trump administration's efforts to deport migrants living in the country illegally, and then crack down on opponents who take to the streets in protest. Trump, voted back into office last year largely for his promise to deport undocumented immigrants, used a speech honoring soldiers on Tuesday to defend his decision. He told troops at the army base in Fort Bragg, North Carolina: "Generations of army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion and third-world lawlessness." 'FULL-BLOWN ASSAULT' "What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and on national sovereignty, carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags," Trump said, adding his administration would "liberate Los Angeles." Demonstrators have waved the flags of Mexico and other countries in solidarity for the migrants rounded up in a series of intensifying raids. Homeland Security said on Monday its Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division had arrested 2,000 immigration offenders per day recently, far above the 311 daily average in fiscal year 2024 under former President Joe Biden. Protests have also taken place in other cities including New York, Atlanta and Chicago, where demonstrators shouted at and scuffled with officers. Some protesters climbed onto the Picasso sculpture in Daley Plaza, while others chanted that ICE should be abolished. Texas Governor Abbott said late on Tuesday that he will deploy the National Guard, which "will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order." "Texas National Guard will be deployed to locations across the state to ensure peace & order. Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest," Abbott posted on X. South Texas organizations are expected to hold anti-ICE rallies on Wednesday and Saturday, CNN reported local media as saying. About 700 Marines were in a staging area in the Seal Beach area about 30 miles (50 km) south of Los Angeles on Tuesday, awaiting deployment to specific locations, a U.S. official said. California Attorney General Rob Bonta told Reuters the state was concerned about allowing federal troops to protect personnel, saying there was a risk that could violate an 1878 law that generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. "Protecting personnel likely means accompanying ICE agents into communities and neighborhoods, and protecting functions could mean protecting the ICE function of enforcing the immigration law," Bonta said. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Tuesday posted photos on X of National Guard troops accompanying ICE officers on an immigration raid. Trump administration officials have vowed to redouble the immigration raids in response to the street protests. The last time the military was used for direct police action under the Insurrection Act was in 1992, when the California governor at the time asked President George H.W. Bush to help respond to Los Angeles riots over the acquittal of police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store