
Michael Higgins: Woke B.C. law society hostile to verifiable reality
At the beating heart of every woke institution lies an ideology so powerful and sacred that everything, including truth, must be subservient to it.
Article content
Whatever the ideology, it is usually cloaked in virtuous sentiment and undisputed righteousness so that it appears less a belief and more an incontrovertible truth.
Article content
Article content
What began for British Columbia lawyer Jim Heller as a straightforward battle to get his law society to admit what he believes is a simple truth about the Kamloops residential school graves has now morphed into questions over ideology.
Article content
Article content
Is the Law Society of British Columbia (LSBC) ideologically captured by the Indian residential school narrative? And if so, is the LSBC unable to distinguish what is true?
Article content
Article content
These questions arise from new legal documents in Heller's libel suit against the LSBC. He accuses the law society of defaming him for questioning the narrative that 215 'bodies' were found in unmarked graves at the site of the Kamloops Indian Residential School in May 2021.
Article content
Heller wanted the law society to insert the word 'potential' before 'unmarked graves' in its educational material for lawyers to highlight that no bodies have, to date, been discovered, or unearthed, at the site.
Article content
He contends that for this 'crime' he has been accused of being a racist and a denialist, hence the lawsuit.
Article content
In its defence, the LSBC has filed a Response to Civil Claim (RCC) in which it denies libelling Heller, accuses him of holding 'misinformed and misguided views' and says its course material is accurate.
Article content
Article content
Heller has now filed an application to strike the RCC, claiming it is 'convoluted and incomprehensible' and is mainly the view of various academics opining about the Indian residential school system.
Article content
Article content
But his application also accuses the LSBC of being ideologically driven.
Article content
'The LSBC is significantly involved in promoting various ideological perspectives,' says the application. 'Its defamation of Heller and its conduct in this litigation reflects an emotionally charged ideological culture in which objective fact-finding and ethical standards have become secondary to the objective of protecting certain narratives.'
Article content
It adds, 'The tone and content of the RCC and rejection of a quick and inexpensive settlement reflects the use of this litigation to promote ideological perspectives and to double down in its attacks of Heller intended to deter potential debate on certain subjects.'
Article content
In his affidavit to the court, which the National Post has seen, Heller says, 'I have observed a cultural change at the LSBC over the last few years and believe ideological perspectives have compromised objectivity and ethical decision-making on certain subjects. Such perspectives include, for example, belief about the legal system's complicity in the genocide of Indigenous people and the need to 'decolonize' institutions, policies, procedures and practices.' Heller cites the LSBC's 2023 report of the Indigenous Engagement in Regulatory Matters Task Force in which the law society 'acknowledges that it has contributed to the perpetuation of colonialism' and that 'violation of Indigenous rights have been authorized by colonial law and normalized within colonial society.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
20 minutes ago
- CBC
Court battles continue over Sask. Instagram account that made anonymous sexual violence allegations in 2020
Social Sharing In 2020, someone started posting on an anonymous Instagram account alleging sexual assault, harassment and abuse by men in Regina. While it was operational, the victimsvoicesregina account named several high-profile people, including a Regina city councillor, a musician and leaders in the non-profit community. The page was shuttered after legal threats from men who alleged some of the posts were defamatory. Five years later, a series of related lawsuits are continuing to make their way through the Saskatchewan court system. A May 8 decision from Saskatchewan's Court of Appeal ordering SaskTel to hand over identifying documents shows that at least one of those lawsuits may be close to identifying the two women that operated victimsvoicesregina. Mandi Gray is an assistant professor at Trent University who has studied structural violence in Canada's legal system. She said her research indicates defamation suits are increasingly being used as a tool to silence alleged victims of sexual abuse who have come forward to speak out. That has only increased since the MeToo movement in 2020, which sought to hold people accountable for sexual violence, Gray said. "There were consequences for many people who were accused of sexual violence and, as a result of the reputational harm that they're alleging, they have taken action," Gray said. "It is a lot of men with access to resources and power, like celebrities and politicians, but we're also seeing it among regular people, as well, as a tactic to silence and punish people for speaking about what had happened to them." WATCH | Lawsuits used to silence victims, says researcher: Lawsuits used to silence victims, says researcher 3 days ago Duration 2:30 Legal battles continue over an Instagram account that shared anonymous stories of sexual violence and harassment in Regina. A researcher says defamation lawsuits are increasingly being used as a tool to silence those who speak out about their experiences. MeToo movement in Regina CBC has been able to confirm that at least three lawsuits have been filed against the operators of the victimsvoicesregina account. The plaintiffs include a Regina teacher, a man named Ryan Boldt, and someone identified only as A.H., whose lawsuit was referenced in the Court of Appeal decision. CBC has previously spoken with one of the two women who operated the victimsvoicesregina account. CBC agreed not to name the woman, who is a survivor of sexual assault. She launched the Instagram page, also known as Survivor's Stories Regina, in July 2020 in response to a CBC News investigation that uncovered numerous allegations of verbal sexual harassment and inappropriate behaviour against mental health advocate and former Earls manager Jim Demeray, who said the allegations against him were "baseless and untrue." It was one of multiple similar accounts that emerged across Canada during the MeToo movement, which sought accountability for sexual violence perpetrated by the rich and powerful. The account was quickly shut down under threats of lawsuits against the operators. Gray said that demonstrates how defamation lawsuits are a powerful tool. "Even just the mere threat of a defamation lawsuit can often be enough to shut people down from coming forward and reporting, but also just talking about sexual violence more generally," she said. WATCH | Stories on social media are a sexual harassment wake-up call in Regina: Stories on social media are a sexual harassment wake-up call in Regina 5 years ago Duration 1:57 A flood of sexual harassment stories on social media, which also prompted the Street Culture Project to investigate several complaints, is serving as a wake-up call for Regina businesses. It all comes in the wake of a CBC news investigation into a well known mental health advocate who is accused of sexual harassment during his time in the restaurant industry. $1M defamation lawsuit The decision from the Court of Appeal is tied to a June 2021 civil lawsuit by Boldt, represented by Madlin Lucyk of Nychuk & Company, a Regina-based legal firm. Lucyk declined to comment for this story. Boldt filed the lawsuit against three women — referred to in the suit as Jane Doe, Betty Doe and Sally Doe — and Meta Platforms, the company that operates Facebook and Instagram. Boldt alleges that Betty created a false and defamatory story about Boldt sexually harassing her. He alleges that Betty Doe brought the story to Jane Doe and Sally Doe, who administered the victimsvoicesregina account. On July 25, 2020, the account published the story without "taking any steps to verify" the accuracy of the story or the comments made on the post, the lawsuit says. Boldt claims he suffered $1,000,000 in damages as a result of the the defamatory post. He is also seeking punitive and aggravated damages. Since Boldt does not know the identities of Betty Doe or the administrators of the account, and requires that information to properly file his lawsuit, Boldt's legal team filed an application with Telus, Access and SaskTel. The application directed each telecommunication company to produce documents tied to activity from certain internet protocol (IP) addresses at specific dates and times, including account holder name, account holder addresses, account holder billing information, account holder email addresses, physical addresses related to IP addresses and any other identifying information. Although Telus and Access took no position on the application, SaskTel opposed the motion. The Crown Corporation argued that the documents were subject to solicitor-client privilege as they were in the possession of the organization's legal department and that Boldt had not established that they were relevant to his claim. In April 2024, a Court of King's Bench judge ruled against Boldt, finding that the legal confidentiality trumped Boldt's interests. Boldt's appeal of that ruling was heard by a panel of judges including Justice Georgina Jackson, Justice Keith Kilback and Justice Meghan McCreary. The panel found that because the Court of King's Bench judge failed to perform an analysis, and instead simply accepted SaskTel's assertions, the judge made a legal error. The court found that since SaskTel admits it possesses or controls at least some of the identifying documents and they are relevant to the identity of at least one of Jane Doe, Betty Doe or Sally Doe, they should be produced as part of the lawsuit. It also ruled that the information should be held by Boldt and his legal team "in the strictest confidence" and should only be used in this specific litigation.


CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
Ex-boyfriend speaks out amid lotto ticket quarrel
Winnipeg Watch A former couple's quarrel over a winning lottery ticket returned to a Winnipeg court. CTV's Daniel Halmarson has more.

25 minutes ago
Carney meets one-on-one with Trump before G7 meeting officially kicks off
Headlines Latest News Podcasts (new window) Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump have a one-on-one meeting before the official start of the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta. Carney pushing to make progress on Canada-U.S. trade deal ahead of global summit in Alberta. The leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Japan are joining Prime Minister Mark Carney in Kananaskis, Alta., for a meeting of the Group of Seven nations. The summit takes place over the next two days, with discussions focused largely on economic and security priorities. Before the summit officially begins, Carney has a tête-à-tête with U.S. President Donald Trump. The high-stakes bilateral meeting comes as Trump continues to impose punishing tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum and the auto sector. The summit is also expected to draw protests, primarily in Calgary and nearby Banff, where organizers have established designated demonstration zones. Ashley Burke (new window) Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? I'm Ashley Burke, a senior reporter with the parliamentary bureau, in Kananaskis today at the G7 summit site. Prime Minister Mark Carney is attempting to Trump-proof the G7. He's not even going to try to get leaders to sign a joint communiqué, typically issued at the end of these summits. Instead, a senior Canadian official says they're opting for short, action-oriented statements. The move is an attempt to prevent a disaster like the last time Canada hosted in 2018. That G7 in Charlevoix, Que. — when Justin Trudeau was prime minister and U.S. President Donald Trump was in his first term — ended in disarray. Trump rescinded his support of the communiqué and lashed out at Trudeau, who, in a post-summit news conference, vowed to retaliate against U.S. tariffs at the time. (The outburst caught Canadian officials off-guard, as the prime minister had made similar remarks before.) Former Trudeau adviser Jason Easton worked on the U.S.-Canada file in later years. He said history has shown when Trump is at a G7, it's hard to reach a consensus on a statement. We've seen how that can disrupt the G7, particularly at the end, Easton said. What Prime Minister Carney is doing, what he's done from the start of his administration, is focus on actions, focus on deliverables. And I think he's taking a very businesslike approach to finding those areas where G7 leaders can agree we are going to jointly pursue action. PM looking to secure a trade deal to see the U.S. tariffs lifted. Elizabeth Yao was told the school was considering 'further disciplinary action'. Kumar, 22, went missing on May 16. His family in India say they have 'no clear answers' about his death. 2 hours ago Courts and Crime Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear and military structure Friday. 'It's a big hoopla, for sure,' says bus driver contracted to drive law enforcement outside zone.