logo
Iran launches missile attacks on US base in Qatar

Iran launches missile attacks on US base in Qatar

Yahoo4 hours ago

Iran has launched missile attacks on a US military base in Qatar, retaliating for the American bombing of its nuclear sites and escalating tensions in the volatile region.
After the attack, the Gulf nation of Bahrain – which is home to the US 5th Fleet headquarters – temporarily suspended flights in its air space, which is similar to what Qatar did shortly before it was hit.
Qatar condemned the attack on Al Udeid Air Base, but said it intercepted the missiles and no casualties were reported. It said its air space is now safe.
The US confirmed the air base was targeted by a missile attack from Iran but added that casualties were reported.
Tehran said the attack in Qatar matched the number of bombs dropped by the US on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend, signalling its likely desire to de-escalate.
Iran also said it targeted the base because it was outside populated areas.
Tehran announced the attack on state television as martial music played. A caption on screen called it 'a mighty and successful response' to 'America's aggression'.
The Ain al-Assad base housing US troops in western Iraq was also targeted, an Iraqi security source said, but Iran did not claim that attack, which could have been carried out by militias.
Qatar's Foreign Ministry said the attack by Iran's Revolutionary Guards was 'a flagrant violation of Qatar's sovereignty, its air space and international law'.
Al Udeid is also home to the Combined Air Operations Centre, which provides command and control of air power across the region as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, the largest such unit in the world.
The retaliation came a day after the US launched a surprise attack on three of Iran's nuclear sites.
Just before the explosions, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: 'We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer.'
Earlier in the day, Israel expanded its war against Iran to include targets associated with the country's struggling theocracy, striking the gate of a Tehran prison notorious for holding political activists and hitting the headquarters of the military force that suppressed recent protests.
As plumes of thick smoke rose over Tehran, Israel was attacked with another barrage of Iranian missiles and drones. The persistent fire has become a reality for civilians in both countries since Israel started the war to target Tehran's nuclear programme.
On the 11th day of the conflict, Israel said it attacked 'regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran', but Israeli officials insisted they did not seek the overthrow of Iran's government, their arch enemy since the country's 1979 Islamic Revolution.
The Israeli military warned Iranians that it would continue to attack military sites around Tehran over 'the coming days' as its focus shifts to symbolic targets as well. The military issued the warning on the social platform X, though Iranians are struggling to access the outside world as an internet shutdown has crippled the country.
The latest strikes unfolded hours after Donald Trump wrote on social media: 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said the US president was 'simply raising a question'. However, suggestions of overthrowing the Iranian government drew new anger from Tehran, which insists it will not negotiate at this time and is threatening to retaliate directly against American troops or interests in a Middle East already inflamed by the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip.
In the Tehran strikes, Israel blew open a gate at Evin prison. Iranian state television shared surveillance footage of the strike at the facility known for holding dual nationals and westerners often used by Iran as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West.
Evin also has specialised units for political prisoners run by the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which answers only to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The facility is the target of US and EU sanctions.
Iranian state television aired footage it described as being shot inside Evin, with prisoners under control inside the facility. However, the Washington-based Abdorrahman Boroumand Centre for Human Rights in Iran expressed worry about the condition of prisoners there.
'Many families of current detainees have expressed deep concern about the safety and condition of their loved ones held inside the prison,' it said.
Earlier on Monday, Iranian General Abdolrahim Mousavi warned Washington that its strikes had given Iranian forces a 'free hand ' to 'act against US interests and its army'.
Tens of thousands of US troops are based in the Middle East, many in locations within range of short-range Iranian missiles.
The Israeli military also confirmed it had struck roads around Iran's Fordo enrichment facility to obstruct access to the site. The underground site was one of those hit in Sunday's attack by the US on three nuclear facilities.
'The Iranian dictator will be punished with full force for attacking the Israeli home front,' Israel's Defence Ministry said.
According to an Israeli source, Israel is targeting these sites to put pressure on the Iranian administration but is not actively seeking to topple it.
In Vienna, the head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog said he expected heavy damage at the Fordo facility after Sunday's US air strike.
Iran said the US had crossed 'a very big red line' by striking the three sites with missiles and 30,000lb bunker-buster bombs.
Several Iranian officials, including Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi, said Tehran removed nuclear material from targeted sites ahead of time.
Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the agency's board of governors on Monday that Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told him on June 13 that Iran would 'adopt special measures to protect nuclear equipment and materials'.
'I indicated that any transfer of nuclear material from a safeguarded facility to another location in Iran must be declared,' Mr Grossi said, without saying whether Iran had responded.
Iran described its Monday attack on Israel as a new wave of its Operation True Promise 3, saying it was targeting the cities of Haifa and Tel Aviv, according to Iranian state television.
Explosions were also heard in Jerusalem, possibly from air defence systems, and Israel's Magen David Adom emergency rescue service said there had been no reports of injuries.
In Israel, at least 24 people have been killed and more than 1,000 wounded in the war. Israeli strikes on Iran have killed at least 950 people and wounded 3,450 others, according to the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Wants to ‘Make Iran Great Again'
Trump Wants to ‘Make Iran Great Again'

Atlantic

time10 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Trump Wants to ‘Make Iran Great Again'

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. When Donald Trump raised the idea of toppling Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei yesterday, it wasn't just the idea that was surprising. It was the particular phrase he used to describe it. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' he posted yesterday on Truth Social. The phrase became toxic for a reason. Two years ago, an essay in the Claremont Review of Books noted that regime change entered the popular lexicon in 'the early days of the 9/11 wars, when the Bush (43) Administration argued that the security of America and of the entire world depended not merely on defeating hostile countries militarily but on changing their governments into ones more inherently peaceable and favorable to our interests.' Of course, regimes change all the time, but regime change came to mean 'external, forcible transformation from 'authoritarianism' or 'dictatorship.'' This sounds very much like what Trump is discussing. Having switched from discouraging Israeli military strikes against Iran to joining them, he appears to now be toying with broader ambitions. (Trump offers few endorsements stronger than calling something 'politically incorrect.') But the writer of the Claremont Review essay, a prominent right-wing intellectual, warned about such projects. 'We know how that worked out. Regimes were changed all right, but not into democracies,' he wrote. 'And some of them—e.g., the one in Afghanistan—20 years later changed back to the same regime American firepower had overthrown in 2001.' That writer was Michael Anton. Today he is the director of the policy-planning staff at the State Department (a bit of an oxymoron in this administration), and in April, the White House named him to lead the U.S. delegation at technical talks with Iran on a nuclear deal—negotiations that are presumably irrelevant for the time being. Trump's abrupt shift has thrown the MAGA right into acrimony. In truth, the president has never been a pacificist, as I wrote last week. During the 2016 GOP primary, Trump cannily grasped public anger at the Iraq War and turned it against his rivals. Thinkers such as Anton and politicians such as Vice President J. D. Vance then tried to retrofit a more complete ideology of retrenchment and restraint onto it, but Trump is an improviser, not an ideologue. No one should have been too surprised by the president's order to bomb. Still, his rhetorical embrace of regime change was stunning even to those who never bought into his identity as a dove, and certainly to some of his aides. Perhaps Anton was not surprised to see his view so cavalierly discarded; after all, he once likened backing Trump to playing Russian roulette. But Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were unprepared for the change in rhetoric. Rubio solemnly told Fox Business that the U.S. is not at war with the country it just dropped hundreds of thousands of pounds of ordnance on. Vance, on Meet the Press, insisted, 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change. We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out.' A few hours later, Trump contradicted him directly, in what would have been embarrassing for someone still capable of the emotion. Vance's views on foreign policy are deeply shaped by the Iraq War, in which he served. Now his boss is at risk of speedwalking that conflict one country to the east. The Iraq War was the product of months of preparation by the George W. Bush administration: military mobilization, avid though unsuccessful attempts to rally international support, an extended period of manufacturing consensus in Congress and in the American public. Yet despite that work, and as even proponents of regime change in Iran acknowledge, the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq War was a disaster, perhaps the worst American foreign-policy blunder in history. The U.S. government had good war plans for getting rid of Saddam Hussein's regime but had not effectively thought through what would happen after that. Trump has done even less of that thinking, and leads a nation far more politically divided and warier of foreign intervention. Americans have long viewed Iran negatively: A Fox News poll before this weekend's airstrikes found that roughly three-quarters of them view Iran as a 'real security threat.' Still, another poll earlier this month found that most don't want the U.S. to get involved in armed conflict there. A Pew Research Center poll in May even found that slightly more Americans think that the United States is its own 'greatest threat' than that Iran is. Trump's flippant transformation of 'Make America great again' into 'Make Iran great again' exemplifies the hubris of the Iraq War project that he had promised to leave behind. Just as U.S. officials claimed that Iraq could be easily and quickly converted into an American-style democracy, Trump wants to export his catchphrase to Iran, where the implementation would be even hazier than it is here. Iran is a country of some 90 million people, not a dollhouse to be rearranged. Can regime change work? The answer depends on how success is defined. In 1973, for example, the U.S. backed a coup in Chile, toppling the leftist leader Salvador Allende. It worked: Allende was killed and replaced by Augusto Pinochet, who created a stable, market-based, U.S.-friendly Chilean government. But doing that involved horrifying repression and the killing and disappearances of thousands of critics, leaving a black mark on the U.S. record. In another case of regime change, the U.S. government helped topple Iranian leader Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953. This, too, was an immediate success. Mossadegh was removed, and the Washington-friendly Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was restored to power. But the legacy of the moment stretched on much longer. The shah was also brutally repressive, and Iranians remembered the 1953 coup bitterly. In 1979, a revolution swept Iran, deposing Pahlavi and installing a virulently anti-American government. That regime still rules in Tehran—for now, at least. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Iran launched strikes on a U.S. base in Qatar, which were intercepted by Qatar's air-defense system, according to the Qatari government. The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to countries other than their own without giving them the chance to contest their removals. President Donald Trump called on 'everyone' to ' keep oil prices down ' after America's recent attack on Iranian nuclear sites sparked fear of higher oil prices. Dispatches Explore all of our newsletters here. Evening Read Extreme Violence Without Genocide By Graeme Wood Signs of violent criminality are ubiquitous in South Africa. Electric fences and guard dogs protect homes containing something worth stealing. Reported rapes, carjackings, and armed robberies all occur far more frequently than in the United States. In Bloemfontein, one of the safer cities, I asked a hotel clerk for directions to a coffee shop, and she said it was 'just across the road,' not more than 500 feet away. When I headed out on foot, she stopped me and said that for my safety, 'I would prefer that you drive.' More From The Atlantic Culture Break Play. In Death Stranding 2, people play as an unlikely hero: a courier who trips over rocks and experiences sunburn. It's the Amazonification of everything, now as a video game, Simon Parkin writes. Disconnect. Franklin Schneider has never owned a smartphone. And, based on the amount of social and libidinal energy that phones seem to have sucked from the world, he's not sure he ever wants to.

What the Iran conflict means for gas prices
What the Iran conflict means for gas prices

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

What the Iran conflict means for gas prices

The Big Story Americans could see modest increases in the prices they pay at the pump in the wake of increasing conflict with Iran, analysts say. © iStock Andrew Lipow, president of consulting firm Lipow Oil Associates, told The Hill on Monday that any additional increases in gasoline prices will likely be just a few cents. 'I expect that gasoline prices are going to drift up about three to five cents a gallon over the next couple of weeks,' Lipow said. He added that after an initial 5 percent jump in the price of crude oil, 'the market has sold off since then and now has turned negative.' Oil prices fell Monday, and U.S. benchmark WTI crude was down to about $69 per barrel Monday afternoon — after jumping as high as $75 per barrel late last week in anticipation of U.S. strikes on Iran. The U.S. hit Iranian nuclear facilities Saturday night, bringing the country directly into Iran's conflict with Israel. Gasoline prices were higher Monday, averaging $3.22 per gallon, up from $3.14 a week ago. Austin Lin, principal analyst for refining and oil products at Wood Mackenzie, told The Hill he believed that fuel prices were higher than they would otherwise be as a result of the conflict, but that he did not believe they would rise much further. 'There's a good argument that says Q3 versus everyone's expectations from a month ago is going to see higher pricing,' Lin said. 'I would temper that and say, I don't think there's probably a lot of uplift from where we currently are.' Read more on the subject at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: New York planning first large US nuclear plant in years: Hochul New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) ordered the state's public power utility this week to start working on a zero-emissions advanced nuclear energy site that would be the nation's first major nuclear plant project in nearly two decades. Trump in wake of Iran attack: 'Everyone, keep oil prices down' In the wake of the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, President Trump on Monday urged 'everyone' to keep oil prices down. Parliamentarian rules against Senate effort to force Postal Service to sell off EVs The Senate parliamentarian says Republicans cannot include a measure that would force the sale of electric vehicles (EVs) used by the U.S. Postal Service in their 'big, beautiful bill.' Green energy credits phaseout divides Senate Republicans How to phase out Biden-era green energy tax credits is emerging as a key flashpoint among Senate Republicans as they seek to advance their version of the 'big, beautiful bill.' What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: There Might Not Be a Map for That: Budget Cuts Threaten Geological Surveys (The New York Times) A potent heat dome is building over the US, sending temperatures into the triple digits (CNN) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Supreme Court lifts third country deportation limits; liberals pen scathing dissent The Supreme Court on Monday lifted judge-imposed limits on the Trump administration's deportations to countries where migrants have no ties over a scathing dissent from the court's liberal justices. Read more Former ambassador to Russia: Putin, Xi will celebrate Trump's 'preemptive war' in Iran Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul offered warnings on Saturday of how U.S. strikes on Iran could influence U.S. adversaries around the world. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

Trump's courageous Iran strike: Letters to the Editor — June 24, 2025
Trump's courageous Iran strike: Letters to the Editor — June 24, 2025

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's courageous Iran strike: Letters to the Editor — June 24, 2025

The Issue: The US military bombing three Iranian nuclear sites to destroy Tehran's weapons program. President Trump made the right call to deploy American forces to strike nuclear sites in Iran, and he should be commended for his decisive leadership (' 'Bunker busters' hit 3 nuke sites,' June 22). Iran should never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. Thanks to the resolve of our commander in chief and the courage of our armed forces, America, Israel and the free world are safer. Advertisement Iran should now stand down and abandon any thought of retaliation against Americans or be prepared to face the consequences. Trump has proven again that the United States is the leader of the free world and that America stands with Israel. God bless our troops. Paul Bacon Advertisement Hallandale Beach, Fla. Our president had the courage to do what was absolutely necessary, but let's not allow ourselves to rejoice in victory just yet. As with every other military operation — especially in the Middle East — the long game awaits us. Iran will surely try to save face, and it's just a question of how far it will go. Many options are on the table, but we know for certain that we have a president who will protect us at any cost, and that's very reassuring as we go through our daily lives. Rob Feuerstein Advertisement Staten Island Thank you, Trump, for your decisive leadership in obliterating the cataclysmic threat posed by the world's leading sponsor of terror: The Iranian regime. Iran aspires not for the well-being of its own people but for death to America and Israel. All of us who truly seek and celebrate peace join in praising and thanking Trump for his historic efforts to achieve it. Brian Goldenfeld Advertisement Thousand Oaks, Calif. President Trump acted decisively, and with overwhelming strength, to destroy Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb. For over four decades, Iran's calls for 'Death to the Great Satan' were met with little response from the United States — until Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb became imminent and its threats approached reality. Undoubtedly, there will be second guessing by Democrats — and some rogue Republicans — regarding the legality of Trump's military action, but one fact is undeniably true: Trump gave Iran every opportunity to avoid our intervention. By refusing, Iran brought this action upon itself. The only consequence of Trump's action is that America, and the world, became much safer than 24 hours earlier. Jack Kaufman Naples, Fla. Finally: A president who says what he means and means what he says and has courage and faith in the greatest military in history to carry out their mission. God bless our country, our president and our military. Advertisement R.A. Lessin Staten Island After decades of exporting terrorism and lying about its ambitions, Iran has received Trump's message that it can't have nuclear weapons. The president also made it clear that negotiations with us could result in a reset in relations that would lead to a new era of cooperation between Washington and Teheran. Advertisement With no air-defense systems left and his country being pummeled by the Israeli Air Force, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would be smart to take Trump up on his offer. Mel Young Lawrence Iran has proven to be a malignant state that seeks the elimination of Israel and America, its perceived Great and Little Satans. Advertisement Iran and its proxies are moving in close steps toward Nazi Germany's intended goal of exterminating the Jewish people and recreating the world in its own image. During the Holocaust, the world remained silent; thankfully, in our time, Trump refused to do so. Our president stands firm and is committed to Israel's survival and America's leadership. There are few options available when dealing with the cancer known as Iran: Either you terminate it, or it terminates you. The world closed its eyes during the Holocaust, but Trump is keeping our eyes wide open. S.P. Hersh Advertisement Lawrence Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store