Foreign Affairs Committee calls on Israel to allow Palestinian human rights defender travel to Dublin
The Committee has written to the Israeli government asking it to lift a de facto travel ban on Omar Barghouti, co-founder of the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement, so he can address the Robert Tressell Festival in Dublin on Saturday, May 24th.
Advertisement
The festival, named after the Irish author of The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists, is also due to hear from US senator Bernie Sanders, Sinn Féin President Mary Lou McDonald, and British trade unionist Mick Lynch.
Labour foreign affairs spokesperson, Duncan Smith TD, said that the letter has cross party support and was delivered to the Israeli Population and Immigration Authority.
"The plight of Omar Barghouti, who, although a permanent legal resident of Israel, accused of no crime, is being prevented from leaving that country raises very serious concerns," Mr Smith said.
'Mr Barghouti is renowned internationally as a leading human rights defender in Palestinian civil society. His treatment is an indication of the apartheid system Israel operates, which entraps and denies rights to Palestinians as it commits a genocide in Gaza and kills thousands in the West Bank.
Advertisement
'Such a systemic denial of rights also raises serious concerns for the future safety of Palestinians within Israel," he added.
Robert Tressell organising committee chairman, Seamus McDonagh, said that Barghouti has been invited to participate in the festival as a representative of the Palestinian people.
"That Israel refuses to adhere to international law, even to its own law, and allow Omar to travel is of no surprise, but is yet another example of its actions as a rogue state," he said.
Those taking part in the day of debates and discussions In Liberty Hall also include ICTU General Secretary Owen Reidy, journalist Patrick Cockburn, INMO General Secretary, Phil Ní Sheaghdha, Labour MP Mary Kelly Foy, TDs Marie Sherlock, Sinead Gibney and Ruth Coppinger, historians Brian Hanley and Liz Gillis and housing activists Aisling Hedderman and Lucky Khambule.
Musical acts include Faró, Leen and Niamh Parsons.
The theme of this year's event is Facing Down the Carnival of Reaction.
The Art of Solidarity, an exhibition of historic trade union banners and other cultural items, will be on display for the duration of the festival.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Palestinians fear razing of villages in West Bank, as settlers circle their homes
Ali Awad is tired. The 27-year-old resident of Tuba, one of the dozen or so villages that make up Masafer Yatta in the arid south Hebron hills of the occupied West Bank, had been up all night watching as a masked Israeli settler on horseback circled his family home. 'When we saw the masked settler, we knew he wanted violence,' said Awad, his eyes bloodshot. They were lucky this time: the settler disappeared into the darkness before police could show up. The men in Masafer Yatta rarely sleep these days. They take turns standing watch at night, fearful that nearby Israeli settlers will attack under the cover of darkness. Daylight brings little respite. Residents work with an ear pricked up for the sound of approaching vehicles, scanning the horizon for Israeli bulldozers which could signal their homes are next to be demolished. Israel designated Masafer Yatta a military training zone – named firing zone 918, where no civilians can live – in 1981. It has been working since to push out the roughly 1,200 residents who remain. These residents have been fighting in Israeli courts for more than two decades to stop their expulsion, a battle which has slowed, but not stopped, the demolition of Palestinian homes there. Recently, an Israeli administrative body issued a decision which legal experts and activists have said could remove the last remaining legal barriers for the demolition of homes in Masafer Yatta. The decision could lead to the forcible transfer of 1,200 people, something the UN warned could be a war crime. 'This would amount to forcible transfer, which is a war crime. It could also amount to a crime against humanity if committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack,' the UN human rights office said on 26 June. On 18 June, the civil administration's central planning bureau, the Israeli military agency that issues construction permits in occupied Palestinian territories, issued a directive that all pending building requests in Masafer Yatta be rejected. Previously, residents could file building planning requests and, while they were being examined, their structures could not legally be demolished. By cancelling all pending requests, the new directive dismisses all previously submitted cases without examining their particularities and gives demolitions the green light. The decision was made at the same time as Israeli authorities are pursuing sharply increased numbers of demolitions across the West Bank and East Jerusalem, destroying 933 structures since the beginning of the year, a record-breaking pace, according to UN data. As structures are demolished, more Palestinians are killed in the West Bank, with at least 950 killed and 9,000 injured by Israeli forces and settlers since the start of the war in Gaza on 7 October 2023, according to Palestinian health authorities. The new directive cites a military planning document issued a day earlier, which said that firing zone 918 was necessary for combat preparedness and that the presence of civilian structures prevented training exercises. The document says: 'The practical condition for such [military training] access is the removal of the unauthorised constructions, thus enabling the IDF to conduct its training … No construction in the firing zone can be permitted.' It adds that for live-fire exercises to be conducted, the area needs to be 'sterile'. According to a lawyer representing residents of Masafer Yatta, Netta Amar-Shiff, the new directive bypasses a previous legal ruling and abrogates local laws, and could rapidly expedite the destruction of villages. 'If this directive is activated, it means planning institutions can dismiss building requests under military auspices, so no civilian construction and development can be approved. It's easier for them to eliminate entire villages,' Amar-Shiff said. Humanitarian organisations have long accused Israel of establishing firing zones as an excuse to push Palestinians off their land and expand settlement construction. About 18% of Area C, the parts of the West Bank under full Israeli control, has been designated as firing zones. According to government meeting minutes in 1981, the then agriculture minister and future PM, Ariel Sharon, proposed the creation of firing zone 918 with the purpose of forcing Palestinians out of the area. In the meeting, Sharon told the IDF he wanted to expand shooting zones 'in order to keep these areas … in our hands', pointing to 'the expansion of the Arab villagers' in the area. In a comment, the Israeli military said the civil administration was 'holding ongoing discussions regarding villages built within the boundaries of firing zone 918' and that the military had a 'vital need for the area'. 'As a general rule, no approval will be granted for construction within the firing zone, which is designated as a closed military area,' the Israeli military said in a statement to the Guardian, adding that building permit requests were subject to approval by military command. To Awad, last week's decision is the latest attempt in a long line of court decisions and policies by the Israeli government to expel the residents of Masafer Yatta from their homes. In May 2022, Israel's high court ruled that the residents could be expelled and the land repurposed for military use, as it said villagers were not permanent residents of the area before the firing zone was declared. Residents and lawyers, relying on expert testimony and literature, said they had inhabited the area for decades. 'This decision was a clear way of cutting the last nerve of life that these people had,' said Awad, calling it part of a larger policy of 'ethnic cleansing of Palestinians'. Awad and the other residents of Masafer Yatta have spent more than two decades filing petitions, appeals, proposing master plans and submitting documents to try to fight the destruction of their community. 'We tried for many years to supply different documents and proofs and plans to the courts. But, after years of this, a commander in the army says no and that's enough,' said Nidal Younis, head of the Masafer Yatta council, in a press briefing late last month. As the residents navigate Israel's labyrinthine bureaucracy to stave off demolition orders, settlers have acted as the extrajudicial vanguard of displacement, making daily life nearly intolerable for Palestinians. Almost every single resident has a story about being harassed or attacked by nearby settlers, whose presence has been slowly growing, with new outposts popping up on the area's hilltops. In the early hours of 25 June, settlers set fire to Nasser Shreiteh's home in the town of Susiya, burning his kitchen and a bedroom almost entirely, running off as he tried to extinguish the fire. 'They want to evict everyone, they want everyone to disappear. But I am here, if they burn my house down, I will stay here, I have no other place to go,' said Shreiteh, a 50-year-old with seven children, as he overlooked the charred remains of his kitchen. As he spoke, an Israeli military patrol passed and behind it roared a beaten-up sedan driven by settlers, swerving in circles as the car's trunk swung open. They pulled up to Shreiteh's driveway and made an obscene hand gesture before driving off. Incidents of settler violence in the area have sharply increased since the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 and the subsequent war in Gaza. The rise of the far-right, extremist ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir has provided political cover, allowing settlers to act with virtual impunity. Many settlers have been called to military reserves, where they serve around their settlements. Residents of Masafer Yatta said settlers would often walk around in military dress, such as combat trousers, which made it impossible to tell whether they were dealing with settlers or soldiers. Settler violence has escalated the tighter residents have clung to their land. In late January, settlers torched Awad's car, which he had used to transport children to school and residents to legal hearings. Souad al-Mukhamari, a 61-year-old resident of Sfai, another village in Masafer Yatta, complained that one of her granddaughters, a child, had been beaten and pepper-sprayed by a settler a month earlier. Her own home overlooked the debris of a school that was demolished in 2022. Palestinians can do little to protect themselves from settler violence, and are severely punished if they attempt to do so. They complain that Israeli authorities fail to protect them and do not follow up on their complaints. Legal advocates have said they expect little protection from Israel's legal system, but instead are looking to the international community to increase pressure on Israel to halt settlement construction and protect the rights of Palestinians. 'We don't see any possibility of internal change within Israel to protect these communities,' said Sarit Michaeli, an international advocacy officer at the Israeli human rights group B'tselem. 'The only way to stop this is whether there is clear international action to clarify to Israeli policymakers that actions have consequences,' she added. The Trump administration has expressed little interest in addressing illegal settlement construction and violence, lifting Biden-era sanctions on settlers. Instead, Michaeli said the EU could play a role in pressuring Israeli officials, especially as it announced at the end of May that it is reviewing its association agreement with Israel over human rights compliance concerns. As residents of Masafer Yatta wait for international action, they live under the constant threat of displacement and settler violence, their means of resistance all stripped away one at a time. Still, they are determined to stay. 'Just mentally we are preparing for more demolitions. There's nothing more on the ground we can do, besides putting our words in the media so they can reach farther than we can scream,' Awad said.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Miner Ferrexpo sees iron ore output plummet after Ukraine suspends VAT refunds
Ferrexpo has reported a massive slump in iron ore production following the Ukrainian Government's decision to suspend tax refunds for the firm. The mining company delivered 1.3 million tonnes of iron ore during the quarter ending March, compared to 2.1 million in the previous quarter, which was the highest amount since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Meanwhile, the Swiss-headquartered group's pellet output plunged by 39 per cent from more than 1.3 million tonnes to 821,882 tonnes. Ferrexpo has been forced to downsize its operations to one pelletising line and to reduce the production of high-grade concentrate due to the halting of VAT refunds and their negative impact on liquidity levels. The suspension follows sanctions imposed by President Volodomyr Zelensky on the oligarch Kostiantyn Zhevago, who controls a 49.5 per cent stake in Ferrexpo and was once dubbed 'Europe's youngest self-made billionaire'. Zhevago has been accused of embezzling funds from Finance & Credit Bank, which collapsed in 2015. He has denied all allegations. Ukraine's government attempted, but failed, to seize his stake in Ferrexpo's Poltava mine through the courts in 2023. In March, the Daily Mail reported that Ferrexpo would initiate international arbitration proceedings if Ukraine part-nationalised the site, which is Ferrexpo's largest iron ore mine. 'All efforts and representations are underway with the respective authorities and government bodies in Ukraine and internationally to try to resolve the VAT refund suspension,' said Lucio Genovese, interim executive chair of Ferrexpo. Ferrexpo noted on Monday that demand for its high-grade low-alumina concentrate from customers in China continued to be strong. The group's annual production volumes remain far below pre-2022 volumes due to the conflict in Ukraine disrupting export operations and many employees serving in the country's armed forces. Mark Crouch, market analyst for eToro, said: 'Ferrexpo has long been navigating treacherous terrain, but the war in Ukraine has brought unprecedented disruption.' However, he added: 'It's worth remembering that Ferrexpo has weathered severe downturns before. 'The company's shares have traded at significantly lower levels during prior crises, such as the 2008 financial meltdown and the 2015 commodities rout. 'For long-term investors with a high-risk appetite, this may be seen not as a crisis, but as yet another turbulent chapter in Ferrexpo's volatile history.' Ferrexpo shares were 0.7 per cent higher at 49.1p on late Monday afternoon, taking their losses to around 55 per cent since the year began.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
France and UK expected to announce joint plan on small boat crossings
Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron are expected to announce plans for French police to do more to block small boats crossing the Channel at a summit in London this week, but a wider deal on returning asylum seekers is still up in the air. While details remain limited, with French officials still believed to be finalising what action the country can take with boats that are already in shallow waters, an announcement on new plans is expected on Wednesday. It is also still possible that Starmer and the visiting French president could set out plans for a 'one in, one out' returns scheme for asylum seekers who make it to Britain, although UK officials say this is less likely. This latter scheme would allow for the return of small boat arrivals in exchange for the UK accepting another asylum seeker from France who is seen as having a clearer right to claim asylum in Britain, such as through family ties. Macron arrives on Tuesday for a state visit, which will involve events with royals and other pageantry, but is also scheduled to include an Anglo-French summit, and other meetings with Starmer. France is expected to announce that it will allow police to intervene in shallow waters up to 300 metres from shore in order to stop small boats leaving. This will need changes to existing protocol that do not contravene the UN convention on the law of the sea, which bars any intervention at sea that is not an actual rescue. It is understood that a French review of such tactics has been completed, with French and British officials continuing talks about what more could be done. On Friday, French police used knives to puncture a boat in shallow seas near Boulogne, in northern France, although it is not known if this was a sign of new protocols or a one-off. Downing Street declined to comment on possible announcements before the visit, although Starmer's deputy spokesperson indicated that there was likely to be concrete progress on small boat crossings. He told reporters: 'We expect to make progress on a wide range of issues and joint priorities, and that includes migration. I'm not going to get ahead of the summit this week, but there are a range of maritime tactics that we have been discussing and have secured agreement with the French over. 'It is operationally and legally complicated, but we expect these tactics to be operationalised soon. 'It's for French authorities to make operational decisions for themselves, but as I say, it's a complex area, but we are working extremely closely with the French. Our relationship with them is better than it has been for a long time.' The hope of the 'one in, one out plan', in combination of a greater likelihood of boats being stopped in the water, is that this could dissuade people from paying people-smugglers to try to get them across the Channel. It is still not known if that plan will be ready to be announced in time for Macron's visit, with UK officials saying there were still 'lots of moving parts'. One UK government source said: 'We want to get it right. Signing it during the visit would be ideal, but it would be even more ideal to make sure it works properly.' Starmer and Yvette Cooper are facing sustained political pressure to reduce the number of people arriving across the Channel. Despite a government promise to 'smash the gangs' organising crossings, more than 20,000 people have crossed to the UK in the first six months of this year, up 48% on the equivalent period in 2024.
