BarkBox CEO Apologizes for 'Disrespectful' Message About Pride Merchandise
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The CEO of BarkBox apologized after a "disrespectful" internal message about the company's LGBTQ+ Pride Month campaign surfaced online.
Why It Matters
Companies like BarkBox, a monthly subscription service that provides dog products and services to pet owners, have for years voiced support for the LGBTQ+ community and featured products celebrating Pride Month in June. However, some have argued that businesses should stay neutral on issues like LGBTQ+ rights to avoid alienating more conservative consumers.
There have been large protests against companies that have participated in Pride Month celebrations in recent years, including Bud Light and Target.
The LGBTQ+ community and its allies view Pride Month as a critical celebration of the community's progress in securing victories, such as same-sex marriage and other legal protections. But it's also a call to action to continue advancing rights and tolerance, particularly amid recent spikes in anti-LGBTQ+ legislation and hate crimes.
GLAAD, a LGBTQ+ media advocacy group, reported there were 2.5 anti-LGBTQ+ incidents each day in 2024.
What to Know
BarkBox CEO Matt Meeker responded to the backlash the company faced over the internal message in a statement posted to X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday morning.
The internal message, which was posted to Reddit earlier this week, stated that the company planned to pause paid ads for the Pride products and that the "current climate makes this promotion feel more like a political statement than a universally joyful moment for all dog people."
"I apologize. A few days ago, an internal message from a BARK team member was released on social media. The message was disrespectful and hurtful to the LGBTQIA+ community, and as the CEO of BARK, I'm responsible for that," Meeker wrote. "I do not agree with the content of the message. It wasn't good, it doesn't reflect our values, and I'm deeply sorry that it happened."
He said that the Pride collection is still available online and will be "placed prominently" on the homepage.
Newsweek reached out to BarkBox for further comment via email.
A maltipoo puppy wears rainbow sunglasses during Washington, D.C.'s Pride Walk and Rally on July 12, 2021.
A maltipoo puppy wears rainbow sunglasses during Washington, D.C.'s Pride Walk and Rally on July 12, 2021.The company faced backlash from some conservatives, such as Jenna Ellis, a former attorney for President Donald Trump. She posted on X last week that she decided to pause her BarkBox subscription, citing religious objections to the Pride-themed products.
Ellis told Newsweek on Wednesday that in response to the statement, she planned to cancel her subscription and that the company should not "double down on political virtue signaling" to regain trust.
BarkBox said its 2025 Pride merchandise, including products such as "Slay the Dragon Queen" and "Pride March of the Penguins," would be available only through optional add-ons, not as part of standard subscription boxes.
The situation has sparked backlash from both conservatives, who want companies to stay neutral, and LGBTQ+ advocates, who view the company's stance as a retreat on its support for the community, as many companies appear to reduce their Pride campaigns this year.
What People Are Saying
Alexis Nikole Nelson, a forager, cook and social media influencer, on X: "My former employer paused all marketing on Pride toys and cancelled donating the proceeds to a great org because... *checks notes* ... a single bigot doesn't understand how BarkBox works? You literally have to CHOOSE and PAY MORE for the Pride toys. Happy Pride, gang."
Jenna Ellis told Newsweek: "The CEO's apology is disappointing. Rather than listening to reasonable concerns from his own leadership about neutrality and broad customer respect, he seems more concerned with appeasing backlash from a small woke segment. If BarkBox truly valued inclusion, they should stay neutral and respect all customers—not just those aligned with the CEO's apparent politics."
GLAAD President & CEO Sarah Kate Ellis, in a statement in May: "Support for LGBTQ people and employees remains a business imperative that bonds companies to consumers and unites our country. Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion and growth over rank politics. With LGBTQ, Black, and Hispanic consumers growing exponentially, companies that bow to opponents of inclusion will miss out on key growth segments."
What Happens Next
BarkBox's CEO said the company will continue to highlight the products on their website and increase donations to an organization supporting the LGBTQ+ community.
The debate over LGBTQ+ Pride Month will likely continue over the coming weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Beware: The Human Rights Campaign is just a scam to push lefty issues
Why does Uber make videos where people say, 'I'm non-binary or genderqueer'? And why does Lockheed Martin fund floats at Pride parades? Because companies want to raise their score on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index. Equality is a good thing. I support human rights. But the Human Rights Campaign? That's something else. 'They have nothing to do with actual human rights,' says Robby Starbuck. 'They're an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization that pushes topics about transgenderism into the workplace.' Starbuck uses his social-media following to criticize the many companies that partner with the Human Rights Campaign. The campaign 'does great harm,' he says, because companies that want a high score must do things like pay for trans employees' gender reassignment surgery and fund puberty blockers for employees' kids. I push back, 'I know people who've had the surgery, and they seem happier!' 'If you're an adult and you make a set of decisions I disagree with, that's your prerogative,' replies Starbuck. 'I don't want to give my money to a company that's going to use it to fund any sex changes of any child.' People can debate the age when you're considered competent to medically change your gender. What surprises me is how many companies suck up to the Human Rights Campaign by paying for it. Google even brags about providing a 'trans liaison' to help people transition. Even some of your Amtrak tax subsidy goes to pay for this stuff. Amtrak's 'Lead Environmental Specialist' touts 'education on personal pronouns.' To raise their Corporate Equality Index scores, companies are encouraged to donate to LGBTQ+ groups — like the Human Rights Campaign! That helps the campaign collect millions in tax-free money. The more I looked at the organization, the less it seems to be about human rights, and the more it seems to be about left-wing advocacy. Its homepage features protesters holding signs saying, 'I will aid and abet abortion.' When I point that out to Starbuck, he says, 'Yeah, which humans? Which rights? Apparently, if you're a small enough human, you don't have rights.' The campaign's president says its Corporate Equality Index is 'about partnership with businesses to make workplaces as inclusive as possible for LGBTQ+ people.' But today, most businesses are inclusive, and in America, LGBT people are more accepted than ever. Twenty years ago, 37% of Americans supported gay marriage; 45% said gay relationships are moral. Today, support for gay marriage is at 69% and 64% consider gay relationships moral. Yet, as life gets better for LGBT people, the Human Rights Campaign declared a 'national state of emergency for LGBTQ+ Americans!' 'This is a crisis right now!' said HRC president Kelley Robinson. I think I know why she said that. If activists acknowledge that Americans have come to accept LGBT people, the campaign might go out of business. One HRC executive says, 'We are never going to reach a destination.' Of course not. There's money to be made and leftist propaganda that needs spreading. Starbuck, by pointing out what the HRC really does, has persuaded some companies to stop sucking up. Ford, Harley-Davidson, Lowe's, Molson Coors, Toyota, Tractor Supply, Walmart and others announced that they will no longer participate in the Index. 'We came along and told people the story and they backtracking began,' says Starbuck. The campaign's president says, 'What we're seeing from these companies is short-sighted.' Maybe. Businesses can join whatever lists they want, but they ought to do what's good for their business. That means listening to customers, not progressive activists. 'At the end of the day,' says Starbuck, 'that's all people want, is for businesses to do their business. Not to virtue signal . . . or to perpetuate a political ideology.' John Stossel is the author of 'Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media.'
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Most Republicans Enrolled in Medicaid 'Worried' About Funding Cuts—Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While Republicans in Congress have been pushing for major Medicaid cuts in the new budget, many Medicaid enrollees are worried about what this means for their health coverage — including those who identify as Republican. A new poll from KFF revealed that 76 percent of Republicans enrolled in Medicaid are worried about potential funding cuts. The survey also shows that 17 percent of Republicans identify as Medicaid enrollees. This didn't come as a surprise to experts who spoke with Newsweek. "Many of the heavily Republican-controlled states are often the highest per capita recipients of government assistance," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. Why It Matters Republican lawmakers have advanced sweeping changes to Medicaid as part of their budget reconciliation package, known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." The bill, which passed the House in late May 2025, proposes to cut over $700 billion in federal Medicaid spending, threatening coverage for millions of Americans. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that more than 10 million people could lose Medicaid coverage if the proposal becomes law. Beds and medical equipment are seen inside the US Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort while docked at the Port of Miami, Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida on June 3, 2025. Beds and medical equipment are seen inside the US Navy hospital ship USNS Comfort while docked at the Port of Miami, Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida on June 3, 2025. CHANDAN KHANNA/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Potential Medicaid reductions under the new legislation target several key areas, including the federal match for Medicaid expansion, spending caps, new work requirements, and more frequent eligibility checks. While the GOP viewpoint has historically been pro-Medicaid reductions, cuts at this level could significantly impact the nearly 80 million Americans who rely on the program for health insurance, including a significant number of Republicans. In the new KFF report, 76 percent of Republicans enrolled in Medicaid said they were worried about potential funding cuts. Additionally, more than a quarter of Medicaid enrollees are Republican, including one in five who identify with MAGA. "As a government program, Medicaid provides benefits to millions of Americans in 'red' and 'blue' states," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "As such, it should come as no surprise a sizable number of Republicans either receive benefits from the program or know someone who does." The federal government currently pays 90 percent of Medicaid expansion costs, but proposed reductions would lower this rate, threatening financial stability for states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Changes could also introduce per-capita caps or block grants, limit the use of provider taxes to finance Medicaid, and roll back simplified enrollment rules implemented under President Biden. Together, these measures could force states to limit enrollment, reduce benefits, or impose new costs on enrollees. Republican leaders have tied these reductions to broader budget goals, including $4.5 trillion in tax cuts championed by former President Donald Trump. "Many of the heavily Republican-controlled states are often the highest per capita recipients of government assistance," Thompson told Newsweek. "That's not meant to be disingenuous—it simply shows where the power lies: with the wealthy who control the districts and seats in those regions. The truth is, people often vote for their party and don't believe these policies will ever impact them personally—until they do." House Republicans identified more than $880 billion in savings from Medicaid, with much of the debate focused on whether Medicaid should continue to support able-bodied adults without dependents, or remain narrowly focused on children, seniors, and people with disabilities. The bill would also restrict Medicaid funding for certain health care providers, such as Planned Parenthood, and prohibit federal matching funds for gender-affirming care for minors. Nationally, 54 percent of U.S. adults are worried that reductions in federal Medicaid spending would negatively impact their own or their family's ability to get and pay for health care, the KFF report found. "It's a wake-up call for anyone who thinks Medicaid is just a Democratic issue," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek. "Medicaid isn't red or blue. It's the safety net stretched under millions of American families, including a significant slice of the GOP base." What People Are Saying Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "Over the last three election cycles, the Republican base has expanded far past the days of simply promoting tax cuts and has a large number of supporters who rely on programs like Medicaid for essential services. And while cuts to the program could occur, we've already seen blowback to any proposed reductions. That's more than likely because some Republican members of Congress know cuts could dramatically affect their reelection chances." Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "There's a real disconnect between the political talking points and reality. Many Republican voters may not realize just how much their communities (especially rural ones) depend on Medicaid to keep hospitals open and doctors in town. The myth that Medicaid is for 'someone else' is crumbling fast." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "There will be a significant number of people kicked off the Medicaid program—either because they didn't submit their work requirements on time, were removed due to the rollback of Medicaid expansion, or simply no longer qualify." What Happens Next Ryan said if the cuts are enacted, rural hospitals will close, and working-class families will lose their health coverage. "The fallout will land squarely in the heart of Republican country," Ryan said. "You can't gut the safety net and expect your own voters to walk away unscathed." "Medicaid cuts are political dynamite. History shows voters punish politicians who take away health coverage. Just ask Missouri and Tennessee. If Republicans push too hard, they risk alienating their own base."
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Don't say you weren't warned what Trump was going to do
In my Independence Day column last year, I predicted this if Donald Trump got back in the White House: 'Prosecutions will warp into persecutions. Political foes, real and imagined, in the press and online and in the politicians' suites, will be subjected to Trump's whims and power. Pardons and clemency will rain down like manna on Jan. 6, 2021, insurrectionists. Russian President Vladimir Putin will once again have a friend in the White House and an ally against NATO and the West. Immigrants and people from Muslim-majority countries will face an aggressively hostile federal government. Civil rights and LGBTQ+ progress will grind to a halt. The economy will function on behalf of the haves, to the detriment of the have-nots and the left-out.'
