Chalmers hits China-linked companies with landmark lawsuit over crucial military minerals
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched an unprecedented lawsuit against China-linked interests to force them to sell their stake in an Australian rare earths miner, whose products are crucial to warplanes, missiles and submarines.
The lawsuit, filed in the Federal Court on Thursday against foreign investors in Northern Minerals, is also seeking financial penalties for allegedly refusing to obey Chalmers' direction to sell out of the company last year.
The Australian-listed company is developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in remote northern Western Australia, which could be one of the first non-Chinese sources of the minerals used in military guidance systems, wind turbines and electric vehicles.
Chalmers' court action against an entity called Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd and a former associate follows his order last year for five Chinese-linked groups to sell their shares in Northern Minerals to unconnected buyers by September.
'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law,' Chalmers said in a statement. 'We are doing what is necessary to protect the national interest and the integrity of our foreign investment framework.'
China's control of rare earths and critical products is an escalating cause of concern to the United States and countries like Australia, after Donald Trump's trade war prompted Beijing to restrict shipments of the materials. It has made similar moves before, including against Japan in 2010 during a territorial dispute.
China controls nearly all of the world's heavy rare earth production and Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior fellow Ian Satchwell said the global superpower's interests were seeking to exert influence over Northern Minerals.
'Australia, with like-minded partner nations, is seeking to build alternative supply chains for rare earths and other critical minerals, and the Northern Minerals shenanigans are a very obvious example of China-linked bad faith investing to allegedly seek to disrupt those efforts,' Satchwell said.
'In Australia's case those rare earths are used for things such as F35 fighters, missiles attached to them and in the future, nuclear-powered submarines.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
36 minutes ago
- Perth Now
US trade deals may be wrapped up by September: Bessent
Trade deals between US President Donald Trump's administration and other countries could be done by the September 1 Labor Day holiday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says. Bessent on Friday cited talks with 18 main United States trading partners and new revisions to a deal with China aimed at expediting rare earths shipments. The United States sent a new proposal to the European Union on Thursday and India sent a delegation to Washington DC for more talks. "So we have countries approaching us with very good deals," Bessent said on Fox Business Network. "We have 18 important trading partners. ... If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18, there are another important 20 relationships, then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day," Bessent said. He did not mention any changes to a July 9 deadline for countries to reach deals with the United States or have tariffs spike higher, but has previously said that countries negotiating in good faith could get deals. Trump told reporters at the White House on Friday that he could extend the tariff deadline or "make it shorter," adding that within the next week and a half, he would notify countries of their tariff rates. "I'd like to just send letters out to everybody: Congratulations. You're paying 25 per cent" tariffs, Trump said in an apparent joke. Bessent said the United States and China had resolved issues surrounding shipments of Chinese rare earth minerals and magnets to the US, further modifying a deal reached in May in Geneva. As part of its retaliation against new US tariffs, China suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets, upending supply chains central to car makers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. During US-China talks in May in Geneva, China committed to removing the measures imposed since April 2 but those critical materials were not moving as fast as agreed, Bessent said, so the US put countermeasures in place. "I am confident now that we - as agreed, the magnets will flow," Bessent said, adding that these materials would go to US firms that had received them previously on a regular basis. He did not disclose details of the latest agreement, which Trump administration officials said was reached earlier this week. Efforts to resolve the dispute included a phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping which led to teams from both sides meeting again in London, as negotiators try to end a trade war between the world's biggest economies. China's commerce ministry said on Friday the two countries have confirmed details on the framework of implementing the Geneva trade talks consensus. It said China will approve export applications of controlled items in accordance with the law. It did not mention rare earths. China has dual-use restrictions in place on rare earths which it takes "very seriously" and has been vetting buyers to ensure that materials are not diverted for US military uses, according to an industry source. This has slowed down the licensing process. Indian government sources told Reuters that a trade delegation from New Delhi was back in Washington DC on Friday aiming to sew up a limited US trade deal ahead of the July 9 deadline. Trump administration officials frequently count India among countries with which trade talks are at an advanced stage, along with Japan. But early optimism about a simple deal to reduce India's high tariffs has hit roadblocks over disagreements on US import duties for car parts, steel and farm goods, Indian officials with direct knowledge said. Trump said that his administration was looking to get a "full trade barrier dropping" deal with India. "I'm not sure that that's going to happen but as of this moment, we've agreed to that - go into India and trade," Trump said.
West Australian
38 minutes ago
- West Australian
Michelle Grattan: Bold reform a taxing journey
Next week will be the 40th anniversary of the Hawke government's tax summit. Dominated by then treasurer Paul Keating's unsuccessful bid to win support for a consumption tax, it was the public centrepiece of an extraordinary political and policy story. That story was about the possibilities for, but constraints on, bold reform; how a determined treasurer can muster a formidable department to push for change, and the way the ambitions of a minister can clash with the pragmatism of a prime minister. Ken Henry, later secretary of the treasury, was then part of what they dubbed the 'treasury tax reform bunker'. He kept a timesheet, averaging 100 hours work a week for a three-month period. Officials brought sleeping bags and their small children (Henry's were aged three and five) into the office. Before the summit, the government produced a comprehensive draft white paper. Keating battled to keep the conflicting interests 'in the cart' for his blueprint. But the four-day summit, attended by business, unions, premiers and community groups, was inevitably divided by stakeholders' self-interests. In particular, the unions couldn't wear Keating's consumption tax, and Bob Hawke kyboshed it unceremoniously. Keating, who had to settle for a more limited but still very significant set of reforms, was furious with Hawke, and it left a fracture in their relationship. Jim Chalmers was aged seven in 1985. But he's a student of Keating (he did his PhD on his prime ministership) and you can be sure he's boned up on what went right and wrong in that tax reform exercise. Now he is preparing for the Government's August 19-21 'roundtable' and his own bid at major tax reform. The roundtable, as first announced, focused on 'productivity', and that will be central. After all, a fit-for-purpose tax system is one key to improving productivity. The roundtable (for which invitations to business and the union movement are now going out, with more to follow) is nothing like on the scale, in size (the summit had about 160 attendees, the roundtable will have about 25) or preparation, of the elaborate 1985 conference. And crucially, while that summit was the culmination of a process, Chalmers is using the roundtable to kick off a process. Chalmers is lowering expectations in regard to specific outcomes on tax from the roundtable. While those might be obtainable on some productivity issues, on tax he is likely to look for broad support for a direction of reform. For instance, is there a general appetite for reshaping the tax system towards lower personal and company tax, offset by higher taxes on certain investments and savings? ` Most tax experts argue Australia's system is too skewed towards taxing income rather than spending. This leads to calls to increase or broaden the GST, financing cuts to personal income tax. Chalmers has been a long-term opponent of changing the GST, but he says he is not ruling the GST out for discussion at the roundtable. (That's a contrast to when prime minister Kevin Rudd, commissioning Henry to lead a major tax review, excluded the GST from its terms of reference.) Almost certainly, however, it would not be possible to get 'consensus' from business and unions for GST changes. Not least of the constraints is that compensating the losers in such a change is very expensive and there is not the money to do so these days. That immediately limits the extent of reform. Henry tells The Conversation's podcast that if he were designing a tax reform package 'I'd be looking at opportunities to broaden the GST and maybe to increase the rate as well'. But 'I do think it is possible to achieve major tax reform … without necessarily increasing the (GST) rate or extending the base'. Henry's (non-GST) wish list includes getting rid of the remaining State transaction taxes, such as stamp duty on property conveyancing. Notably, he argues for extracting more revenue from taxing natural resources and land, and also from taxing pollution from various sources. 'We're going to need to tax those things more heavily if we're going to relieve the tax burden on young workers through lower personal income tax and introducing tax indexation.' Henry is particularly focused on the unfair burden at present put on these younger taxpayers. He has come around to the idea of income tax indexation as one means of assisting them. A system more geared to younger workers raises immediate questions about the present generous treatment of superannuants. Chalmers is already caught in that hornets' nest with his proposed changes for those with balances more than $3 million. To what extent will the roundtable tax debate revive the issues of negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount? The Government hosed down before the election the prospect of any changes to negative gearing this term. Chalmers, however, had work done on this last term and he would likely favour reining it in. But would this be a bridge too far for the Prime Minister? Indeed, where will Anthony Albanese's limits be when it comes to reform? Would he only support changes that had strong consensus? And how far would he feel constrained in going beyond what he considers he has a mandate for? If Chalmers stays serious about the tax push, it is going to take many months of intense work. It can't be rushed, but nor can it be delayed. If it ran for much over a year it would likely find the Government's political capital had been eroded. The size of its capital store can appear deceptive because so much of it is thanks to Peter Dutton and Donald Trump. In 2022, the Liberals boycotted Labor's jobs and skills summit (although Nationals leader David Littleproud attended). This time, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien has accepted Chalmers' invitation and will participate in the roundtable. It will be a tricky gig for O'Brien, new to this shadow portfolio. He has to avoid being too negative, but nor can he endorse things the Opposition might later reject. The Coalition will not have a tax policy against which to judge what's said. The occasion will be a chance for O'Brien to make contacts and get more insight into stakeholders' views on the key economic debates, much wider than just tax. Importantly, however, O'Brien will need to remember judgments will be being made about him by other participants in the room. Business in particular will be seeking to get a fix on whether Opposition Leader Sussan Ley's declarations about wanting to be constructive where possible are fair dinkum. Michelle Grattan is a professorial fellow at the University of Canberra.
Herald Sun
43 minutes ago
- Herald Sun
Can lithium demand cause Wildcat bounce?
'Garimpeiro' columnist Barry FitzGerald has covered the resources industry for 35 years. Now he's sharing the benefits of his experience with Stockhead readers. Will battery energy storage systems bring forward the day when the lithium market flips from over to undersupply, putting a rocket under lithium prices and ASX lithium stocks in the process? It could well be the case, with the previously under-appreciated demand growth from BESS known to be a key reason behind Rio Tinto's (ASX:RIO) dive in to the lithium space, as the renewable energy sector gets both bigger and smarter. Its $10bn acquisition of Arcadium was classic straw hats in winter stuff by Rio, given the beaten-up lithium prices at the time, which are still to find a bottom. But if it's right about BESS, Rio's move into lithium may well prove to have been sweetly timed. BESS is the new high growth driver for lithium battery demand. It wasn't that long ago that a new solar or wind farm would be built without battery storage. Now utility-scale systems sit alongside renewable energy sources to improve efficiency, providing grid stability benefits as well. BESS demand is not as big as the electric vehicle sector, but its growth rate in 2024 was a phenomenal 51%. Demand growth from the EV sector was a none too shabby 26% off a higher base. High demand growth rates from EVs and BESS have continued in 2025. Combine the two and the question of when lithium demand again outstrips supply comes into sharp focus. Some forecasters suggest a supply deficit could emerge by the end of next year. It was a supply deficit that drove lithium prices to a crazy $US80,000/t ($US6,000/t for concentrates of the intermediate raw material spodumene) in late 2022. Prices are now back at $US8400/t and $US620/t respectively. Struggle town It is struggle town for all but the (very) low cost producers and means that the incentive to bring on new mines and expand existing operations to meet the growth in demand has been extinguished for the time being. That too feeds into the suggestion that the supply deficit and happier days of higher prices could be closer than equity markets think. No one is forecasting a return of prices to the boom time conditions of 2022. But there doesn't need to be for ASX-listed lithium stocks to get off the floor. That comes through in a lithium sector update (June 20) by Argonaut's Hayden Bairstow. His price targets for lithium producers and developers he follows are all well above prevailng market prices even though the price targets have been cut due to lower spodumene prices. 'We believe a (spodumene) price recovery is likely to be rapid once the market swings to a modest deficit, but the cycle is likely to be shorter given the volume of brownfield capacity that can be brought online, largely in Australia,'' Bairstow said. He now expect spot spodumene prices to peak at $US1500/t in late 2026, which is likely to trigger a re-start of existing capacity. A return to a balanced market is then forecast for 2027 before the widening deficit pushes prices higher in the long-term ($US1600/t). Wildcat pick Of the stocks mentioned by Bairstow it was Wildcat Resources (ASX:WC8) that caught Garimpeiro's eye. It was trading mid-week at 14c for a market cap of $187 million. Bairstow has it as a ''spec buy'' and has set a 40c price target. Wildcat is advancing its Tabba Tabba project in the Pilbara towards production. A pre-feasibility study is due for completion in the coming quarter. It's a world-class hard rock discovery weighing in at 74.1Mt grading 1% lithia with exploration upside. Garimpeiro mentioned Wildcat back in December when it was a 20c stock on the basis that projects like Tabba Tabba will be needed to meet the wave of demand coming for lithium from EVs and BESS. His timing for an acknowledgement from the share market that stocks like Wildcat had been oversold was obviously a bit off. But here we are with the lithium demand scenario now being juiced up by BESS. The company itself sees value in its stock as it has just announced a $5 million on-market share buyback. It is an unusual thing for a developer to do, but in Wildcat's case having $60 million in the till makes it a no-brainer given the current share price level. There is also a takeover overlay to the stock. Mineral Resources (ASX:MIN) has an 18% stake which it acquired in November 2023 for 85c a share. MinRes is a 50% partner in the big Wodgina lithium mine about 87km by road from Tabba Tabba. MinRes is busy sorting out its balance sheet and would likely entertain a bid for its stake at prices much higher than the current market price. But it could also decide, like Rio, that lithium represents a high growth opportunity and that Tabba Tabba needs to be part of its lithium story given its proximity to Wodgina. Originally published as Barry FitzGerald: Why Wildcat may the BESS buy as lithium demand goes through the roof
