Truce hopes spark rebound
ORLANDO, Florida, June 16 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
Investor sentiment and risk appetite rebounded sharply on Monday as fears around the Israel-Iran conflict subsided, shifting the spotlight away from geopolitical risk and back towards this week's raft of central bank policy meetings.
In my column today I look at why the dollar's status as a safe-haven asset in times of heightened geopolitical uncertainty may be fading in a world of 'de-dollarization'. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
1. Iranian state broadcaster hit as Iran urges Trump to make Israel halt war
2. Seeking unity, G7 meets amid escalating Ukraine, Middle East conflicts
3. Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for U.S. importers
4. Investors shun long-term U.S. bonds as hopes for aggressive Fed rate cuts fade
5. Reuters interview with ECB Vice President de Guindos
* Oil slides as much as 4% at one stage on Monday but Brent futures settle only 1.35% lower at $73.23/bbl, suggesting a chunky risk premium remains in the price. Oil spiked 7% on Friday.
* Wall Street rebounds strongly, with the S&P 500 back above 6000 points and the Nasdaq gaining 1.4%.
* Nvidia shares rise 2% to the highest since January 24, within sight of the record peak of $153.13 from earlier that month. Shares are up almost 70% from the post-'Liberation Day' low.
* U.S. Treasury yields rise and the curve bear steepens despite a pretty solid 20-year bond auction. Longer-dated yields up 5 bps.
* Gold gives back Friday's gains, sliding more than 1% to $3,386/oz. The dollar rises 0.5% against the yen ahead of the Bank of Japan's rate decision on Tuesday.
Truce hopes spark rebound
Signs of de-escalation between Israel and Iran - or at least hopes of de-escalation - ensured markets started this week much more positively than they finished last week. Whether that optimism is justified remains to be seen but the rebound was pretty strong, taking Wall Street and world stocks back to within sight of their recent highs.
It's a very fluid situation, so investors' relief may be short-lived. Iran has called for U.S. President Donald Trump to get Israel to halt its attacks, but both countries continue to fire missiles at each other. Meanwhile, a U.S. official said Trump will not sign a draft G7 leaders' statement calling for de-escalation of the conflict.
Optimism that a truce will be reached appears to be stronger in equity markets than elsewhere. Gold gave back Friday's gains but not before hitting $3,451 an ounce, a level last reached when it clocked a record high on April 17, and in volatile trade oil settled 1.7% lower, having surged more than 7% on Friday.
Perhaps equity investors have it right. The oil price has less of a bearing on global growth or asset prices than it used to, and markets have been pretty resilient to Middle East conflicts in recent years, with selloffs proving to be shallow and short-lived.
Unless there is a real adverse oil price shock, it will probably be a similar story this time around, although spiking inflation would be problematic for central banks.
Economists at Oxford Economics sketch out an extreme scenario where the closure of the Strait of Hormuz pushes oil up to $130 a barrel, which could lift U.S. CPI inflation to almost 6%. Oil is nowhere near that yet though.
As Deutsche Bank's Henry Allen notes, perhaps the story of the year is how resilient stock markets have been in the face of myriad large shocks - DeepSeek's emergence casting doubt over U.S. tech valuations; Europe's fiscal regime shift triggering the biggest daily jump in German yields since 1990; the U.S. losing its triple-A credit rating; Trump's tariffs and the S&P 500's fifth-biggest two-day fall since World War Two.
And yet here we are, with world stocks at all-time highs.
Aside from geopolitics, the focus for investors this week will mostly revolve around central banks. The Bank of Japan will deliver its policy decision on Tuesday, and economists expect it to hold off from raising rates again due to the uncertainty around U.S. tariffs.
Later this week we have decisions from Indonesia, Brazil, Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, Britain and the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Israel-Iran conflict highlights dollar's tarnished safe-haven appeal
A dramatic spike in the potential for all-out war between Israel and Iran would typically be expected to spark an immediate and strong rally in the U.S. dollar, with investors seeking the safety and liquidity of the world's reserve currency.
That didn't happen on Friday.
The dollar's response to Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and military commanders, followed by Tehran's initial threats and retaliation, was pretty feeble. The dollar index, a measure of the currency's value against a basket of major peers, ended the day up only around 0.25%.
To be sure, the dollar fared better than U.S. stocks or Treasuries, which both fell sharply on Friday. But with oil surging over 7% and gold up a solid 1.5%, a strong 'flight to quality' flow would have lifted the dollar more than a quarter of one percent.
The U.S. currency's move was particularly weak given the dollar's starting point on Friday. It was at a three-and-a-half year low, having depreciated 10% year to date, with sentiment and positioning heavily bearish. Yet a significant geopolitical shock generated barely a knee-jerk bounce.
For comparison, the dollar rose more than 2% in both the first week of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War and in the week following Israel's invasion of Southern Lebanon last year.
The dollar's weak response to this latest Middle East conflict supports the narrative that investors are now reassessing their high exposure to dollars, in light of some of the unorthodox policies put forward by U.S. President Donald Trump in recent months.
The dollar was down slightly early on Monday, and gold and oil were giving back some of Friday's gains too, as markets regained a foothold at the start of a busy week packed with key central bank meetings.
The dollar has historically been one of the best hedges against short-term volatility sparked by geopolitical risk, behind gold and on a par with oil, according to research published last year by Joe Seydl, senior markets economist at JP Morgan Private Bank.
Indeed, a Journal of Monetary Economics paper from last year stated plainly, "The dollar is a safe-haven currency and appreciates when global risk goes up," a trend resulting from the "fundamental asymmetry in a global financial system centered around the dollar" built up over the course of several decades.
That latter part of that argument hasn't changed.
The dollar accounts for almost 60% of the world's $12 trillion FX reserves, with its nearest rival, the euro, accounting for around 20%. Almost two-thirds of global debt is denominated in dollars, and nearly 90% of all FX transactions around the world have the greenback on one side of the trade.
That means traders, financial institutions, businesses, consumers and governments still need to be more exposed to dollars than any other currency, even if they question the direction of current U.S. policy.
However, the dollar's downside 'structural' risks are growing, analysts at Westpac noted on Sunday, as concern over Washington's fiscal health and policy uncertainty erode the dollar's 'safe-haven identity'. Investors are now looking to hedge their large dollar exposure more than ever.
If this dampens their instinctive demand for dollars in periods of sudden geopolitical tension, uncertainty and volatility, then the so-called 'dollar smile' theory could be challenged.
This 'smile' is the idea that the dollar appreciates in periods of financial market stress as well as in 'risk on' periods of strong global growth and investor optimism, but sags in between. This idea was first outlined over 20 years ago by then currency analyst and now hedge fund manager Stephen Jen.
If the Israel-Iran conflict continues to escalate, that dollar smile could get rather lopsided.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* Bank of Japan decision and guidance
* South Korea trade (May)
* Germany ZEW investor sentiment survey (June)
* U.S. retail sales (May)
* U.S. import prices (May)
* U.S. industrial production (May)
* U.S. 5-year TIPS note auction
* Headlines from G7 summit in Canada
Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
(By Jamie McGeever; Editing by Nia Williams)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
India Consulting World Oil Map for Alternative Sources
Indian refiners are considering West African nations and other alternative energy sources to secure additional fuel supplies, should Iran attempt to block the Strait of Hormuz — a critical choke point for global oil and gas transit —as its conflict with Israel intensifies, said oil industry executives. Since the outbreak of the Iran-Israel hostilities on Friday, top oil ministry officials and industry executives are analysing various scenarios and evaluating all possible responses to potential supply disruptions and price spikes. About 40% of India's total crude imports, and 54% of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies, would be at risk if the conflict leads to a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow sea passage between Iran and Oman that carries nearly 30% of global oil trade and 20% of LNG shipments. Executives at Indian refiners and gas companies, however, believe Iran won't enforce a blockade, citing history. A potential closure would likely send prices soaring, drawing the US into a direct confrontation with Iran, while alienating Gulf nations and other oil import-dependent countries, executives said. Blocking the strait would not only disrupt Gulf oil and gas exports, including Iran itself, but also hinder imports of essential items. This, an executive said, would serve as a strong deterrent to Tehran. Indian refiners are not resorting to 'panic buying' for now, a second executive said. However, the are prepared for any eventuality, the executive said, adding that 'closure of the strait would shrink the global pool of available oil and gas. No matter how carefully you prepare, every economy would feel the impact of a supply crunch and price spike.' 'If India turns to West Africa for additional supplies, other importers are likely to follow,' another executive said, underscoring the complexity of the situation. India imports about 90% of its crude oil needs, with local refiners relying on the Gulf for a major portion of their supplies. Of India's total crude imports, around 35% comes from Russia, a little over 40% from the Gulf, and the rest from Africa, the US and other sources. Africa's share of imports dropped to 5% in May from 12% in April. In 2024, India sourced 54% of its LNG requirements from the Gulf, with Qatar supplying 80% and UAE the remainder. Qatar, among the world's top three LNG exporters, plays a key role in global gas supply, and any disruption to its exports could send spot LNG prices soaring. Even long-term LNG prices could rise, as 60% of India's long-term contracts are linked to crude rates. The global LNG market is not as evolved as the oil market, with very limited sources of alternative supplies. During the 2022 global energy crisis, a former Gazprom unit reneged on its LNG supply contract with India's GAIL, forcing the latter to cut supplies to domestic users. India does not have strategic gas storage, though it does maintain strategic crude reserves. However, New Delhi does not disclose data on national oil and gas inventories. According to the oil ministry, India has total crude and petroleum product storage 'capacity' equivalent to 74 days of national consumption. This includes strategic reserves that can cover 9.5 days of demand. Total capacity includes inventory at refineries, pipelines, ships enroute, product depots, and empty tanks that can hold crude or refined products, executives said.
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
India Wants US' Word: No More Tariff Post-BTA
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in Epaper Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India wants an assurance from the US that no additional tariffs will be imposed by the Donald Trump administration once the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) is finalised, said people familiar with the matter. The deal is in the final stages of negotiation and both sides are hopeful of reaching accord quickly. India has sought concessions for labour-intensive sectors such as leather and textiles. 'We have put everything on the table,' said one of the persons, adding that India wants stability in tariffs once a deal is rolled agreements typically include renegotiation clauses, or compensation from the partner effecting a tariff increase. India would like the pact to provide for such a mechanism. 'This would ensure the agreement is ringfenced from prospective changes,' said another US President on April 2 announced a reciprocal tariff of 26% on goods imports from India as part of its trade levies all over the world. These tariffs were paused for 90 days until July 9. However, the baseline tariff of 10% remains in force. India and the US are looking to finalise the BTA ahead of the assurance from Washington is required to ensure tariffs negotiated within the framework of the trade deal remain ringfenced from any changes effected later by the US, said a third official detailing India's is also Trump's mercurial experts are agreed on the need for such a clause. 'The BTA should be timebound and not in perpetuity,' said an expert on trade issues. 'India must insist on a clawback provision — that it will withdraw benefits if the US raises tariffs or goes back on any of its commitments.'Officials said Washington has to find a way to reduce tariffs as New Delhi has sought concessions for sectors such as textiles and leather, as mentioned Trump administration currently requires approval from the US Congress to lower levy below most favoured nation (MFN) rates, but it does have the authority to scrap reciprocal tariffs.'We want preferential and sustained trade advantages and have left it to the US to decide the route it takes to reduce its tariff barriers—whether through the Trade Promotion Authority or by seeking Congressional approval,' said one of the officials cited government is also monitoring the impact of the 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium and the 25% tariffs on auto. While the auto components sector doesn't expect a big dent for now, there may be an impact if the tariffs to the official quoted, India will pursue a concession, if others get sides have had several rounds of discussions on the proposed trade deal and are hopeful of concluding at least an early harvest deal. 'We are working on the early tranche, and there is a date (July 9), before which we would like to conclude this. The progress is good,' commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal said on Monday.A US trade team is in India last week to firm up the has made it clear that any meaningful expansion in bilateral trade will require a significant reduction in US tariffs. Both sides aim to more than double such trade to $500 billion by a Delhi-based trade expert cautioned, 'India should rethink its proposed BTA with the US. The US has a history of incomplete trade deals, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. It has retracted its WTO commitments also. Moreover, the future of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity hangs in the balance with the US-China trade deal.'
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India's Andaman Region: A Hidden Treasure of Oil Reserves?
Union Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Puri said India holds the potential of 'several Guyanas' in the Andaman region and outlined several measures taken by the government for exploration and production. The minister said that the country has 3.5 million square kilometers of sedimentary basin, but it never explored beyond eight per cent area, keeping a large expanse of sea beds unexplored. The minister's statement comes as India is putting in efforts to ramp up its own traditional fossil-based energy production. Also Read: Donald Trump is leaving G7 summit a day early: Here's why "There were parts of the sedimentary basin which were no-go areas. So one of the decisions which we took was that 1 million square kilometers of that sedimentary basin, which was no-go area, has suddenly been made available for E&P," Puri told ANI on Monday. The petroleum minister said that the government has decided to explore a large part of the basin. He said that India imported 80 per cent of oil and 50 per cent of natural gas, adding that even a 5-billion-barrel discovery would be a game-changer. In the nine rounds of open acreage licensing policy, 38 per cent of the bids have come, covering 1 million square kilometers, the minister said, adding that the next round will attract more than 75 per cent of the bids. "We've also issued some of the largest bids on offer anywhere -- something like 2.5 lakh square kilometers of area has been offered out on bidding," the minister said. Also Read: Did double engine failure cause the Air India plane crash? PIB fact-checks He further said that India has the potential of around 42 billion tonnes of oil and gas in its sedimentary basins. He, however, added that exploring offshore reserves are capital extensive, which is why it took so much time for the country to tap into the untapped potential under the seas. "An onshore well costs something like USD 4 million on an average. I'm talking about global rates and dollar rates being held at a particular constant. And an offshore well costs about USD 100 million," he added. Hardeep Puri also made a reference to Guyana, which recently discovered massive oil reserves, saying India has the potential for 'several Guyanas' in the Andaman region. "They (Guyana) dug 46 wells and they didn't find any oil. It's when they dug the 47th one, they found oil. And then it became the largest find," he said. "We have the potential of several Guyanas in the Andaman," he added. Highlighting some of the recent oil discoveries, the minister said that Suryamani has a potential of 4 million metric tons worth of oil, while it is 1.2 million metric tons in Neelmani. In another well, at a depth of 2,865 metres, both oil and gas reserves were found, the minister said, stressing that this is an "underestimation."
