logo
Heartwarming: well-to-do Aucklanders finally get a political win

Heartwarming: well-to-do Aucklanders finally get a political win

The Spinoff3 days ago
Balmoral residents insisted they were from Epsom, not grotty Mt Albert, and they spammed the Representation Commission with complaints until it agreed.
For many huge nerds politically attuned patriots, the Representation Commission's final adjustments to the electorate boundaries for next year's general election dropped with the clanging thud of failure. Following the announcement of the proposed changes in March, 717 objections and counter-objections were submitted by concerned members of the public. Ryan Maguire had attempted to redraw the country's entire political map, writing detailed critiques on almost every proposed boundary change. He would find out his feat was, for the most part, an unsuccessful effort to push a democratic rock up a bureaucratic hill. Mark Croucher would not be placed in the Whangārei electorate, despite, as per his submission, living 15 minutes from Whangārei. Neither would the Labour Party succeed in changing the Northcote electorate's name to Kaipātiki, in line with feedback it had received.
But at least one plucky group of upstarts could claim a win from the commission's announcement. Residents of a well-to-do corner of what some cartographers might controversially claim is Balmoral got the news they wanted, finding out they will remain in the plush Act electorate of Epsom and not the grotty, Labour-infested nearby outpost of Mt Albert.
Finally, you might say, a win for wealthy Aucklanders. But it didn't come without a lot of hard graft. Of the 636 objections submitted to the Representation Commission on its proposed nationwide adjustments, 178 came from a small group of streets between St Lukes and the Mt Eden shops.
Despite Google Maps' defamatory insistence they're from Balmoral, the residents of Balmoral Rd and its surrounds told the commission they identify as being from Mt Eden, and in an electoral sense, Epsom. Whole families wrote identically worded submissions on their total alienation from Mt Albert. 'People in this area look to Mt Eden, not Mt Albert, for their day to day life, eg shopping, amentities [sic], community activities,' wrote Mrs Tracy Peirce. 'People in this area look to Mt Eden, not Mt Albert, for their day to day life, eg shopping, amentities, community activities,' wrote Mr Craig Peirce. 'People in this area look to Mt Eden, not Mt Albert, for their day to day life, eg shopping, amentities, community activities,' wrote Luke and Isaac Peirce.
A host of Mt Albert businesses and places were caught in the crossfire. 'We probably shop at the Dominion Rd Woolworths, walk up Mt Eden on a Saturday (not Mt Albert), go to Mt Eden De Post for a drink (not Albert's Post),' wrote Kevin Adair.
The Albert's Post pub might wonder why it's catching strays, but it has nothing on Mt Albert Grammar. Dozens of submissions echoed a leaflet dropped around alleged Balmoral that claimed the changes would 'split the Epsom Girls Grammar zone'. They raised fears about being forced out of zone for Auckland and Epsom Girls Grammars and toward a less-heralded grammar or even non-grammar school. Those claims were untrue in a literal sense. Electorate boundaries have no impact on school zones. But spiritually and metaphysically, they were persuasive. If the Representation Commission could make the residents of Herbert, Croydon and Fairview Rds vote in the fetid booths of Mt Albert, what was to stop it shuttling their children to, ungrgh, Marist College?
Nothing, was the answer. Some submitters eschewed talk of amenities or school zones and went straight for the jugular, stating they had no truck with the yucky and perhaps even poor people of the neighbouring shire. 'Mt Albert is quite some distance away from us and we have not made the sacrifices to get into the area with its excellent school zones to have it changed to our detriment both practically and financially,' said Shane Farley. 'I voted for David Seymour consistently and find it unpalatable that this right should be taken from me,' said Robyn Cochrane. 'I align my values with Mt Eden area residents, not Mt Albert,' said Mark Tomkins.
Some might see this as a repeat of 2014, when snobbery and 'misinformation about school zones' got the blame for 700 people objecting to being moved out of Epsom and into the Mt Roskill electorate. Indeed, one submitter, Peter Thompson, pointed out that many of the people opposing the proposed adjustment relied on disinformation put out by someone he thought had a 'vested interest in retaining the current boundary settings'. 'Suggested solution,' his submission to the commission read. 'Investigate and expose those responsible for trying to rort the democratic process. Disregard submissions premised on misleading information.'
'Shut the fuck up, Peter,' came the reply, in the form of Friday's decision affirming the Mt Eden-identifying residents of Balmoral. The complainers won. They'll get to stay in the Epsom electorate, along with those with whom their values align. To make up for it, Arch Hill, a suburb separated from Mt Albert by an eight-lane motorway and at least 10 minutes' driving even in good conditions, will be shunted into the electorate currently held by Labour's Helen White. Its residents may be confused by the news, seeing as they're closer to the city centre than the inner west. But there are no grammar schools in Arch Hill. Their objections are unlikely to get much cut-through.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'They are ashamed': Former Labour ministers slammed for refusing to appear at Covid hearing
'They are ashamed': Former Labour ministers slammed for refusing to appear at Covid hearing

Otago Daily Times

time5 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

'They are ashamed': Former Labour ministers slammed for refusing to appear at Covid hearing

By Russell Palmer of RNZ All three coalition parties are criticising Labour's former ministers for refusing to appear at a public Covid-19 hearing, saying they're trying to avoid scrutiny. The second phase of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 pandemic was secured in coalition agreements between all three governing parties. The chair, Grant Illingworth KC, yesterday confirmed that a week-long public hearing with decision-makers would not go ahead because former ministers had refused to participate. They include former prime minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, current Labour leader Chris Hipkins, who was at times the health and Covid-19 response minister, former finance minister Grant Robertson and former health minister and current MP Ayesha Verrall, Those former ministers argue they have provided ample evidence privately to the commission, which - despite having the power to - declined to summons them, saying on balance it was "undesirable given that the former ministers continue to co-operate with the evidence-gathering of the inquiry". "We are confident that the former ministers declining to attend the hearing does not hamper us in our ability to obtain the information we need to be able to properly complete our task. Public hearings are only one mechanism of obtaining evidence, and their use is restricted under our terms of reference," Illingworth said. The reasoning the ministers gave to the inquiry - according to a document the inquiry released - included that former ministers were conventionally interviewed privately for Royal Commissions of Inquiry, that they had cooperated so far and repeating the evidence publicly would be "performative rather than informative", and it risked the recordings being "tampered with, manipulated or otherwise misused". The document noted other witnesses and their families had faced abuse after appearing in public hearings, including in the Royal Commission held in July. Hipkins told RNZ's Morning Report programme today he has been interviewed in private, answered every question fully and even given the commission more information than what he had originally been asked. He accused those involved with the Royal Commission of not knowing what they wanted because they had said public hearings wouldn't be held for five reasons, including avoiding participants being subject to abuse. "They indicated at the end of that interview [his private appearance] ... that they didn't have any further questions and any public hearing would simply be a repeat of any questions they'd already asked me." Hipkins acknowledged that the pandemic was "a really difficult time", however, he said he answered questions from media and the public on a daily basis. Asked what he had to lose by fronting up, Hipkins responded that all the former ministers had followed the same protocol for the Covid commission as had occurred in the past, citing the examples of former Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee at the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission of inquiry and other ministers involved in the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Christchurch mosque attacks. Ardern stood by her decision not to participate, with a spokesperson saying she had recently provided a three-hour interview and remained available to answer any further questions the commission had. Hipkins earlier spoke to reporters at Parliament to defend his decision, and Dr Verrall provided a written statement. Robertson, who is now vice chancellor at the University of Otago, did not respond to RNZ's requests for comment. At Parliament, senior National MP Chris Bishop used the general debate yesterday to call attention to their refusal, saying it was "perhaps unsurprising". "They are ashamed of their record, and they know that held up to the light the decisions they made in 2020 and 2021 and 2022 have led us into the problems we are enduring today. "It was really clear from the second half of 2020 and into 2021 that further stimulus of the New Zealand economy was not only not required, it was counterproductive." He said Treasury pointed to 36% of spending for the Covid response happening after June 2021. "At that point, GDP had already returned to its pre-pandemic levels and inflation was already outside the band and approaching 7.3 percent ... from financial year 2015 to 2019, core Crown debt was actually flat - it actually went down a bit. But from 2019 to 2023, net core Crown debt increased by 169 percent to $155 billion. "That is the debt disaster this government inherited. That is the inflation disaster this government inherited. That is the cause of the recession this government inherited." ACT leader David Seymour mimed running away from reporters before saying "kidding - that's the other guys". He said a lot of people would see the former ministers refusing to appear publicly as "running from accountability, and that's what erodes that trust". "I would have thought if you cared about this country and responding to its next pandemic, which will happen, then you'd want to front up and tell your story," he said. "It's good that they've co-operated in privacy, we're told, but I think the New Zealand people deserve them to show up ... I think there was an opportunity here to come and explain their perspective. Maybe we have it wrong, but they're not doing it." Seymour particularly focused on Hipkins. "The contrast between his behaviour during the pandemic - when they do anything to get in front of the cameras, when we had to endure a 20 minute lecture before they gave us the daily numbers - compared with this behaviour we've learned about today, I think that contrast speaks for itself." Asked about concerns of abuse, Seymour said the former ministers had a public duty to front up. "Are we going to let a small group of anti-social people stop our great nation from having a democratic discourse? I think the simple facts are we don't decide that 'because there's a few crazies out there we're no longer going to have a Parliament'." — Winston Peters (@winstonpeters) August 13, 2025 NZ First leader Winston Peters shared his views on X, saying the former ministers "colluded and decided to decline to give evidence". "The 'Podium of Truth' has become the 'Podium of Evasion'. These former ministers do not want to sit in a public hearing and answer the hard questions that every New Zealander deserves to know. If ever there was a definition for "a different kind of 'abuse of' power" this is it." He said they were undermining the second inquiry to avoid public scrutiny. "Those former Labour Ministers have shown they care nothing about public confidence, and worse, are treating the entire public with distain (sic) and contempt ... and had a disastrous effect on the economy and future of our country - yet they refuse to be held to account."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store