Al Jazeera journalist killed in targeted strike was 'loved by everyone,' says colleague
In a targeted strike on Sunday, Israeli forces killed five Al Jazeera journalists who had been operating out of a tent in front of the beleaguered hospital.
Israel says the strike successfully targeted Hamas militants, but press freedom advocates say it was meant to silence journalists on the front lines of the bloody conflict in Gaza.
Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif, 28, was killed alongside correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa. Mohammad Al-Khaldi, a local freelance reporter, was also killed in the airstrike, medics at Al Shifa Hospital said.
Israel accused al-Sharif of heading up a Hamas cell that was "responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians," citing intelligence and documents found in Gaza as evidence.
Al Jazeera, the Committee to Protect Journalists and United Nations Special Rapporteur Irene Khan have all said Israel's allegations about al-Sharif are unsubstantiated.
Mahmoud says Israel has been amping up its rhetoric against Al Jazeera in recent months, painting the Qatar-based media outlet's Palestinian journalists as terrorists, with a particular focus on al-Sharif.
Mahmoud visited al-Sharif and his other colleagues in the tent a few hours before they were killed. Here is part of his conversation with As It Happens guest host Aarti Pole.
What did you see and hear of this strike that killed your colleagues?
I was actually a block away from the bomb site, where the tent is located.
As you know, many of us are working from the street. We set up these makeshift tents because all the buildings that we've once occupied and had our offices [in] have been destroyed.
So our colleagues from Al Jazeera Arabic had their tents right in front of the main gate of Al Shifa Hospital, the road leading to the emergency department. That's why they had always the opportunity to capture all these images coming from Al Shifa hospital of scores of injuries being transferred to the hospital.
Just a couple hours before it happened, I was just right at that place. I finished up a report on health facilities and the dire situations inside these health facilities, and I stopped by the tent.
We chatted. We giggled a bit. We even talked about when all of this is going to end, we should take a long break. And we insisted on long, because it's been 22 months of relentless coverage, and both Anas and Mohammed, the two correspondents from Al Jazeera Arabic, agreed that, yes, there needs to be a break after all of this.
I left the tent [and] went back to our vehicle on a good note that, God's willing, it will end soon. Hopefully, we will hear a resumption of ceasefire talks rather than the ongoing concerning news of reoccupying the whole Gaza Strip. We wished each other the best of luck and to be safe and protected. But luck was not on their side this time.
So then how did you hear news that there had been this airstrike and that your friend had been killed?
The attack was very massive. I could see it lighting up the sky above Al Shifa, and I [had] seen the smoke and I knew it's got to be the only place that the Israeli military marked as a target, particularly … after a week intensifying the smear campaign, the incitement campaign against Al Jazeera, against the crew members on the ground, the correspondence, the work that we are doing.
They all joined together in a very sinister smear campaign and inciting campaign calling him names, calling him a terrorist or calling him as an affiliate of Hamas and its military wing, but without offering any substantial evidence whatsoever.
For every journalist that was killed, the Israeli military put the same exact statement that they are Hamas members, but failed to provide any concrete evidence whatsoever.
I'm hoping that you might also be able to describe for our listeners what Anas was like when the cameras were off. I know he had a wife and he leaves behind two young children, too.
He had family to take care of, a family that [has] been on constant movement, being displaced more than one time from one place to another. When he was off camera, pretty much he did the same exact thing that we did — searching for food, searching for water, making sure the shelter is safe for his wife, for his mother, for his two little ones.
He was also very, very loved by everyone because he talked about people. He reported about their stories. He reported about their suffering and the challenges that they faced every day of their life for the past 22 months.
It was not a surprise to see a large crowd turning up for his funeral at the Shifa hospital. It filled up the yard of the hospital and mostly from people who knew him, people who supported them, and assisted them throughout this hardship.
We know that Anas was one of a few journalists who were killed in this particular strike. How do you carry on knowing that risk is so near?
I've always been saying that we are steps away from death, and it feels more imminent right now because this is a systematic campaign of getting rid of all the voices that amplify the voices of Palestinians and that it's suppressing the voices of the criticism, the voices that report on the unfolding horror of this genocide.
What we report on is only the tip of the iceberg of what we see and document every single day. There are scenes that we cannot get on the screen because they are so graphic. So it's only five to 10 per cent of what we experience on a daily basis that gets on the screen of Al Jazeera. Not everything, because it would be outrageous to show some of the graphic scenes and footage that we shoot on a daily basis or the reports that we are doing.
I don't feel safe. And the same thing applies to the two million Palestinians across the Gaza Strip. Because Gaza is unprotected ... under the grind of this brutal war machine.
There is no guarantee that this interview is going to finish and nothing is going to happen to me. There's no guarantee that in the middle of this interview something isn't going to happen.
We just live minute-by-minute now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Citywide pro-Palestinian rallies planned Tuesday at major intersections along Bloor, Danforth to demand arms embargo
City-wide pro-Palestinian rallies are planned at major intersections along Bloor Street and Danforth Avenue on Tuesday, when participants are expected to demand an arms embargo as the Israel-Gaza war intensifies. The rallies will take place on major intersections along Bloor and Danforth from Main Street in the east to Kipling Avenue in the west on Aug. 12 starting around 5 p.m., according a news release.
National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Anthony Koch: Gaza — the Palestinian state that could have been
History's tragedies are not always found in what happened. Sometimes they lie in what could have been — visions abandoned, possibilities squandered, peace betrayed not by inevitability, but by choice. Article content Nowhere is that clearer than in Gaza. Article content In 2005, Israel undertook an extraordinary political and moral gamble. Under the Disengagement Plan, conceived by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, himself a former general and champion of settlements in the region, Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip. Every soldier, every settler, every last trace of Israeli presence was removed. Twenty-one Jewish communities were dismantled. Thousands of citizens were evacuated from their homes by their own army. Synagogues were shuttered, cemeteries were relocated, and millions of dollars in greenhouses and agricultural infrastructure were left behind, intact, in a gesture of goodwill. Article content It was a rupture in Zionism's own narrative. Israel voluntarily relinquished territory acquired in war, territory with strategic, ideological, and religious significance, without any reciprocal agreement. In doing so, it tested its own democratic resilience by pitting its army against its own civilians for the sake of peace. Article content Article content And it was peace that was on offer. The message to the Palestinians, to the Arab world, to the international community, was unambiguous: We are leaving. Show us what you can build. Article content Had the Palestinian leadership taken up that challenge, had it chosen governance over grievance, nation-building over nihilism, the rule of law over the rule of Kalashnikovs, the consequences could have been historic. A stable, demilitarized, self-governed Gaza would have transformed the landscape of Israeli politics. It would have provided the proof of concept that the Israeli public, weary and cynical after the carnage of the Second Intifada, desperately needed: that withdrawal works, that peace is possible, that Palestinian sovereignty need not come at the expense of Israeli lives. Article content Article content It would have strengthened the hand of moderates and pragmatists in Israel. It would have dealt a mortal blow to the argument of Israel's right-wing politicians that any land given would only become a base for terror. It would have revived the Oslo-era hope that coexistence was not merely a slogan, but a strategy. Pressure would have mounted, internally, democratically, and morally, for Israel to take the next step and negotiate a final-status agreement over the West Bank and East Jerusalem. A two-state solution, long the darling of the diplomatic set, could have become not just desirable, but inevitable. Article content Article content Instead, Gaza became a dystopia. And that outcome was not imposed on the Palestinians. It was chosen, freely, consciously, and with open eyes. Article content Soon after disengagement, Gaza fell under the control of Hamas, a genocidal Islamist organization whose charter has called for the annihilation of Israel and the murder of Jews. Not only did Hamas win 7 of 10 councils in the Gaza strip in January 2005, they also won 74 out of 132 contested seats in the 2006 Palestinian Legislative Council elections (in both the West Bank and Gaza) held just under 6 months after disengagement was completed. Article content Once in power, Hamas executed its rivals, purged dissent, and transformed Gaza into a theocratic fortress. The ballot box vanished. Freedom of speech was extinguished. Billions in foreign aid were funnelled into terrorism, not infrastructure. Schools became indoctrination centres. Hospitals were used to store weapons. Civilians were turned into human shields in a perverse strategy of deterrence by child sacrifice. Article content And over the border, Israelis watched. And learned. Article content They learned that disengagement did not bring security. It brought rockets, thousands of them, raining down on Sderot, Ashkelon, and Be'er Sheva. They learned that ceding territory did not lead to normalization, but to escalation. They learned that the problem was not the occupation of Gaza, because there was no occupation. There was only jihad. Article content And so, a generation of Israelis changed its mind. Article content The Israeli left, once dominant, crumbled. Labour, which signed Oslo, all but disappeared. Meretz, a once prominent party founded to push explicitly for a two-state solution faded into irrelevance and did not win a single seat in the most recent Israeli elections. Kadima, the centrist party that led disengagement, dissolved. Article content As of early June, only 21 per cent of Israelis believed that a peaceful coexistence between a future Palestinian state and Israel is even possible. From center-left to far-right, the majority of Israelis believe that another Gaza is intolerable — that a Palestinian state in the West Bank, without ironclad security guarantees and a total transformation of Palestinian political culture, would be madness. Most Israelis have no appetite for another experiment. Article content And yet, the western left remains frozen in time. Article content Figures like Mark Carney continue to speak of Palestinian statehood as if the Gaza catastrophe never happened. He recently stated that he supports such a state 'if certain conditions are met.' But the most basic condition, demonstrated capacity for peaceful self-governance, has already been tested. And it failed. And it failed because the majority of Palestinians chose failure. Article content This is not a policy failure. It is a moral one. Article content But to admit that would require western liberals to abandon the illusion that animates so much of their worldview: that all violence is reactive, that the 'oppressed' are never accountable, that Palestinian terror is only ever the product of Israeli action, rather than Palestinian will. Article content Article content And so, western liberals cling to the wreckage of the two-state solution like a theology, as if Hamas is a fringe group and the Gaza blockade was the source or motivation of Gazan terrorism and the thousands of rockets launched from the strip towards Israeli civilian centres, not the other way around. They behave in such a way as to suggest that Israel's disengagement in the region didn't go far enough. And If only Israel would 'show good faith,' things might change. Article content It's all a lie. Article content The truth is that Gaza was not a tragedy. It was a test. And the Gazans failed it, not because they were denied the tools of statehood, but because when given them, they used those tools to wage war and spread hate. That failure lies with them. And until they are held to account for it, there will be no peace. Article content Israelis understand this. That is why they no longer believe in the dream of two states. It did not die in the Knesset. It died in Sderot. It died in the tunnels of Khan Yunis. It died in the ashes of October 7.
National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Terry Newman: Quebec's anti-Israel protesters mimicking early tactics of FLQ terrorists
On Thursday evening, protesters gathered outside of Industry Minister Mélanie Joly's Montreal residence to teach her two very important lessons: that there's no pleasing the demographics of her riding; and that speaking out of both sides of her mouth to appease voters doesn't pay. Article content In a video circulating on social media, protesters can be seen holding Palestinian flags. Viewers can hear the banging of pots in the background — a common protest accompaniment in Quebec. Several of those gathered have their faces covered with keffiyehs. Article content Article content Article content Hamas loyalists showed up at the private residence of @melaniejoly while flashing messages on her wall under the approval & protection of the @SPVM — Leviathan (@l3v1at4an) August 8, 2025 Article content Also visible is a stream of mostly English words projected across the top of her apartment building, proclaiming, 'Melanie war criminal — every time Melanie lies a child in Gaza dies. Israel terrorist. Melanie complice (complicit).' Article content Article content An unidentified woman with short blonde hair and a keffiyeh draped over her shoulders speaks through a megaphone in French. Her words translate to: 'Canada's arming of Israel during this genocide is the greatest stain of our generation. Ms. Joly's actions warrant immediate consequences.' She did not elaborate on what she felt those consequences should be. Article content This kind of aggressive and threatening behaviour toward politicians and school administrators who displease pro-Palestinian protesters in Montreal has escalated since the October 7 massacre. In October 2023, not long after Hamas's barbaric attack on Israel, sit-ins were already being held at the Montreal offices of Liberal MPs David Lametti, Rachel Bendayan and Joly, who was then serving as minister of foreign affairs. Article content The blood at the Nova Festival had barely dried, yet the protesters weren't there to condemn Hamas's actions. They were there to pressure MPs who had not yet signed a letter demanding a ceasefire. At the time, the Liberals still officially supported Israel's right to defend itself, though that seemed to be changing quickly — not even a month after the attacks, 33 MPs, including 23 Liberals, had already signed the letter. Article content Article content It was clear, even at the time, that there was a well-organized pressure campaign aimed at convincing MPs to speak out against Israel's war of self-defence. A Montreal Gazette report at the time noted that the demonstrations at political offices were 'part of a pan-Canadian series of sit-ins organizers said were taking place at 17 offices in 12 cities across the country in solidarity with Palestinians.' Article content The campaign has continued ever since. On Dec. 18, 2023, a rally of about 50 protesters organized by the Palestine Solidarity Network Canada gathered outside Steven Guilbeault's Montreal constituency office to pressure him to support a ceasefire.
