Senate swaps counsel for ethics investigation; Ethics Committee lays out rules
Photo illustration by Getty Images.
Senate President Matt Regier is changing lawyers after Senate Democrats objected to his pick as outside counsel to help in an ethics investigation into Hamilton Sen. Jason Ellsworth.
Earlier this week Regier announced he'd hired Matthew Monforton, a Bozeman-based lawyer, to work for himself and the GOP majority leadership and take on a 'prosecutorial' role in the ethics committee.
However, Senate Democrats expressed reservations about Monforton's role with the committee due to his contract naming Regier as the client, his history of partisanship, and recent social media posts disparaging Ellsworth.
Sen. Laura Smith, D-Helena, a former prosecutor, told the Senate Ethics Committee on Wednesday she was not comfortable working with Monforton, and wasn't sure they even needed outside counsel.
'Our citizens need to see an ethics process that's fair,' Smith said, saying any outside counsel should guide the committee by being 'unbiased, diligent and fair.'
Smith suggested they use in-house attorneys, or find someone mutually agreeable to all members of the committee.
On Thursday morning, Regier sent out an email to reporters indicating he is in the process of hiring a new attorney, Adam Duerk from Missoula, a highly qualified attorney 'without any of the political history' that Monforton had.
'Senator Ellsworth has his own outside legal counsel. I believe very strongly that it's important for the Senate to also have legal counsel in this matter,' Regier said in his email. 'There is no reason at this point for further objections or delays to the Senate Ethics Committee's important work. The people of Montana expect the Legislature to investigate and resolve allegations of impropriety in a timely manner, and it's time for the Ethics Committee to proceed accordingly.'
Reached by phone on Thursday morning, Duerk said he would not comment on a matter pending before the Senate.
Monforton, who attended the organizational meeting of the Ethics Committee Wednesday afternoon, told the Daily Montanan that based on what he heard, he believes 'Democrats are heavily invested in Ellsworth and don't want a prosecutor advocating for anything more than a slap on the wrist.'
At the start of the 69th Legislature, Senate Democrats, Ellsworth and eight other Republicans joined in a vote to change Senate rules related to committees, opposing Regier and GOP leadership.
A spokesperson for Senate Democrats said they are more optimistic about Duerk, appreciate the good-faith effort by Regier to address their concerns, and hope to meet with Duerk before fully endorsing his work with the Ethics Committee.
At its organizational meeting Wednesday, the Senate Ethics Committee discussed its rules and schedule for the investigation into Sen. Ellsworth.
The bipartisan Senate committee, comprising two Republicans and two Democrats, will hold hearings in February to determine whether actions Ellsworth took to enter a $170,100 no-bid contract with a business associate last year violated the state's code of ethics, or any legislative or state laws.
Members of the committee emphasized that their role is to be an independent fact-finding body, which will ultimately make a report and recommendation to the full Senate chamber to vote on 'whether good cause is shown to expel or punish' Ellsworth.
'We want to get to the facts of the case. We want to do it expeditiously,' Senate Majority Leader Tom McGillvray, R-Billings, said. 'We don't want to drag this out forever.'
Under the rules adopted by the committee, Ellsworth will have four days after an initial meeting on Feb. 3 to provide a written response to the allegations of misconduct against him, and a list of witnesses, documents and records that pertain to the investigation. The committee will then conduct hearings
Ellsworth tried to speak during the committee's meeting, but was overruled by chair Sen. Forrest Mandeville, R-Columbus.
The contract Ellsworth signed tasked his associate to analyze a series of judicial reform bills and their implementation after the session, but was flagged by legislative staff and senate leadership for skirting normal procurement rules. A recent report form the Legislative Audit Division concluded Ellsworth abused his powers as then-Senate president, and wasted government resources.
The next meeting of the Senate Ethics Committee will be on Feb. 3 at 11 a.m. in the old Supreme Court chambers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House slams LA ‘insurrection' as protests erupt over deportation raids
The White House slammed protests in Los Angeles on Saturday after some residents expressed outrage over raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, described demonstrations at the city's federal building as an 'insurrection.' 'An insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States,' Miller wrote in a Saturday post online. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said more than 800 protesters gathered to challenge the arrest of dozens of individuals by 'assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings' on Friday. Demonstrations continued near the sites of raids on Saturday, with authorities also conducting a raid in the nearby Paramount. McLaughlin said Los Angeles Police did not respond to the incident on Friday. 'A message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down. @ICEgov will continue to enforce the law,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote on the social media platform X Saturday. 'And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' she added. McLaughlin said there's been an uptick in assault on law enforcement officers across the country. 'Our ICE enforcement officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them. And we have seen, in recent days, their family members being doxxed and targeted, as well,' she wrote on Saturday. 'Make no mistake, politicians like @RepJeffries, @AOC, and @Tim_Walz are contributing to the assaults of our officers through vilification and demonization—calling ICE the modern day Nazi gestapo and calling for their doxxing,' she added. Some California Democrats said the arrests were illegal and condemned the detainment led by Trump administration officials as an 'abuse of power.' They said they were denied access to the ICE facility where immigrants were being held amid concerns about the welfare of detainees. 'That's not a misunderstanding—it's a violation of federal law,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) wrote in a Saturday post on X. 'I'm demanding @Sec_Noem launch an immediate investigation. If her agency won't follow the law, she needs to answer for it,' he added.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump warns Musk against supporting Democrats
US President Donald Trump warned tech billionaire Elon Musk of "very serious consequences" if he were to support Democrats in the future following their public falling-out. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump told NBC News in a phone interview set to air on Sunday. However Trump declined to share what those consequences might be should Musk support Democratic candidates to harm Republicans who voted for the president's tax and budget bill. The budget bill this week triggered the public dispute between Musk, the world's richest man, and Trump, the world's most powerful one. Musk is demanding far greater spending cuts and called the bill "a disgusting abomination." Trump refers to it as the "big beautiful bill." Since Thursday, Musk and Trump have been engaged in an open mudslinging match after months of unusually close cooperation. Trump does not want to reconcile with Musk In the NBC interview, Trump was asked whether he believed his relationship with Musk, who owns the social media platform X, the electric car company Tesla and the space voyage firm SpaceX, was over. "I would assume so, yeah," Trump said. He also reiterated that he was not interested in reconciling with Musk, saying he was too busy with other matters. "I have no intention of speaking to him." On Thursday, the brewing feud between the two powerful men exploded with Trump calling Musk "crazy" and Musk claiming that if it weren't for him, Trump would have lost the presidential election last year.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says his relationship with Musk is over, slamming the door on the once-staunch ally who tried to de-escalate their feud
The feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk appears to have caused irreparable damage as the president told NBC News that he has no desire to repair their relationship and assumes it is over. The comments came after Musk appeared to make attempts at de-escalating a feud that exploded in public on Thursday over Trump's budget bill. President Donald Trump is seemingly done with Tesla CEO Elon Musk after they engaged in a feud on Thursday that unfolded publicly and escalated stunningly. In an interview with NBC News on Saturday, Trump was asked if he has any desire to mend his relationship with Musk, and the president replied 'no.' And when asked if he thinks his relationship with Musk is over, Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah.' He added that he has 'no intention of speaking' to Musk anytime soon, saying 'I'm too busy doing other things' and accusing Musk of disrespecting the presidency. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' Trump said. The comments came after Musk, who once embraced the moniker 'first buddy' to Trump, appeared to make attempts at de-escalating their feud. On Saturday, he deleted his X posts about Trump's association with the infamous Jeffrey Epstein. On Thursday night, Musk replied to a post from Pershing Square CEO Bill Ackman calling for peace between the tech billionaire and Trump, saying 'You're not wrong.' Also on Thursday, Musk backtracked on a threat to decommission SpaceX Dragon vehicles, which have become workhorse capsules that the Pentagon and NASA rely on to access Earth orbit. But the damage was already done. Musk had suggested Trump should be impeached, took credit for Trump's election victory, and said his tariffs would cause a recession later this year. That's after trashing Trump's tax and spending bill in the days leading up to their meltdown. Trump's signal that Musk is now persona non grata dashes hopes from top Republicans like Vice President JD Vance and House Speakers Mike Johnson who said they hoped the two men would reconcile. Meanwhile, Trump also warned Musk—who was the top GOP donor last year with nearly $300 million in campaign contributions—against backing Democrats. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News, without elaborating. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' For his part, Musk asked X users on Thursday if it's time to form a new political party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle,' drawing support from 80% of respondents. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. This story was originally featured on