logo
War of words over anti-Semitism and university protests

War of words over anti-Semitism and university protests

The Advertiser18-05-2025
As bombs were being dropped on displaced refugees sheltering in tents in Gaza, university students across Australia camped out on pristine campus lawns to protest Israel's military actions.
Whether these sites remained places of legitimate protest or hotbeds for anti-Semitic activity is due to be explored on Monday.
The University of Sydney, UNSW, academics and student groups are among scores of stakeholders weighing into a NSW parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism on university campuses.
It will also examine anti-Semitic attacks in recent months, including graffiti sprayed on cars and homes and a firebombing of a childcare centre near a synagogue.
In its submission, the Australasian Union of Jewish Students said universities had become "flashpoints for anti-Semitic activity."
The union pointed to the proportion of Jewish-Australians who identify as Zionist.
Zionism is widely understood as a political movement that called for the founding of the state of Israel, but the union said it was much more than that.
"Jewish students may not consider themselves politically Zionist but may still have strong emotional or religious connection to Israel," it said.
"Given that the majority of Jewish Australians identify as Zionist, it is not credible to claim that threats or acts of hostility directed at 'Zionists' cannot also be acts of anti-Semitism."
Conservative Jewish groups have lambasted chants heard at weekly demonstrations and on uni campuses as anti-Semitic, most notably "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free."
But many submissions by Jewish Australians disputed the conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
The stance feeds "into a politicised and divisive discourse which seeks to label any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic," the progressive Jewish Council of Australia said.
Civil libertarians warned about its impact on political communication.
"Conflating legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism at a time when Israel is justifiably being criticised for failing to meet international human rights standards ... is dangerous," the NSW Council for Civil Liberties said.
"(It) treats Jewish people as having monolithic political beliefs, a view that is itself anti-Semitic."
Australia's 39 universities unanimously endorsed a new definition of anti-Semitism in February.
The definition, which includes harassment that impedes Jews' ability to participate as equals in educational and social life, has been contested by human rights groups as curbing political speech.
A Senate inquiry has also examined the student encampments that sprang up in 2023 in response to Israel's bombing and ground assault on Gaza.
More than 52,000 Palestinians, including about 18,000 children, have been killed so far in Gaza, according to the United Nations.
It was sparked by Hamas, a militant group in the blockaded enclave, killing more than 1200 Israelis and capturing 250 hostages in a cross-border attack on October 7, 2023.
As bombs were being dropped on displaced refugees sheltering in tents in Gaza, university students across Australia camped out on pristine campus lawns to protest Israel's military actions.
Whether these sites remained places of legitimate protest or hotbeds for anti-Semitic activity is due to be explored on Monday.
The University of Sydney, UNSW, academics and student groups are among scores of stakeholders weighing into a NSW parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism on university campuses.
It will also examine anti-Semitic attacks in recent months, including graffiti sprayed on cars and homes and a firebombing of a childcare centre near a synagogue.
In its submission, the Australasian Union of Jewish Students said universities had become "flashpoints for anti-Semitic activity."
The union pointed to the proportion of Jewish-Australians who identify as Zionist.
Zionism is widely understood as a political movement that called for the founding of the state of Israel, but the union said it was much more than that.
"Jewish students may not consider themselves politically Zionist but may still have strong emotional or religious connection to Israel," it said.
"Given that the majority of Jewish Australians identify as Zionist, it is not credible to claim that threats or acts of hostility directed at 'Zionists' cannot also be acts of anti-Semitism."
Conservative Jewish groups have lambasted chants heard at weekly demonstrations and on uni campuses as anti-Semitic, most notably "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free."
But many submissions by Jewish Australians disputed the conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
The stance feeds "into a politicised and divisive discourse which seeks to label any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic," the progressive Jewish Council of Australia said.
Civil libertarians warned about its impact on political communication.
"Conflating legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism at a time when Israel is justifiably being criticised for failing to meet international human rights standards ... is dangerous," the NSW Council for Civil Liberties said.
"(It) treats Jewish people as having monolithic political beliefs, a view that is itself anti-Semitic."
Australia's 39 universities unanimously endorsed a new definition of anti-Semitism in February.
The definition, which includes harassment that impedes Jews' ability to participate as equals in educational and social life, has been contested by human rights groups as curbing political speech.
A Senate inquiry has also examined the student encampments that sprang up in 2023 in response to Israel's bombing and ground assault on Gaza.
More than 52,000 Palestinians, including about 18,000 children, have been killed so far in Gaza, according to the United Nations.
It was sparked by Hamas, a militant group in the blockaded enclave, killing more than 1200 Israelis and capturing 250 hostages in a cross-border attack on October 7, 2023.
As bombs were being dropped on displaced refugees sheltering in tents in Gaza, university students across Australia camped out on pristine campus lawns to protest Israel's military actions.
Whether these sites remained places of legitimate protest or hotbeds for anti-Semitic activity is due to be explored on Monday.
The University of Sydney, UNSW, academics and student groups are among scores of stakeholders weighing into a NSW parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism on university campuses.
It will also examine anti-Semitic attacks in recent months, including graffiti sprayed on cars and homes and a firebombing of a childcare centre near a synagogue.
In its submission, the Australasian Union of Jewish Students said universities had become "flashpoints for anti-Semitic activity."
The union pointed to the proportion of Jewish-Australians who identify as Zionist.
Zionism is widely understood as a political movement that called for the founding of the state of Israel, but the union said it was much more than that.
"Jewish students may not consider themselves politically Zionist but may still have strong emotional or religious connection to Israel," it said.
"Given that the majority of Jewish Australians identify as Zionist, it is not credible to claim that threats or acts of hostility directed at 'Zionists' cannot also be acts of anti-Semitism."
Conservative Jewish groups have lambasted chants heard at weekly demonstrations and on uni campuses as anti-Semitic, most notably "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free."
But many submissions by Jewish Australians disputed the conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
The stance feeds "into a politicised and divisive discourse which seeks to label any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic," the progressive Jewish Council of Australia said.
Civil libertarians warned about its impact on political communication.
"Conflating legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism at a time when Israel is justifiably being criticised for failing to meet international human rights standards ... is dangerous," the NSW Council for Civil Liberties said.
"(It) treats Jewish people as having monolithic political beliefs, a view that is itself anti-Semitic."
Australia's 39 universities unanimously endorsed a new definition of anti-Semitism in February.
The definition, which includes harassment that impedes Jews' ability to participate as equals in educational and social life, has been contested by human rights groups as curbing political speech.
A Senate inquiry has also examined the student encampments that sprang up in 2023 in response to Israel's bombing and ground assault on Gaza.
More than 52,000 Palestinians, including about 18,000 children, have been killed so far in Gaza, according to the United Nations.
It was sparked by Hamas, a militant group in the blockaded enclave, killing more than 1200 Israelis and capturing 250 hostages in a cross-border attack on October 7, 2023.
As bombs were being dropped on displaced refugees sheltering in tents in Gaza, university students across Australia camped out on pristine campus lawns to protest Israel's military actions.
Whether these sites remained places of legitimate protest or hotbeds for anti-Semitic activity is due to be explored on Monday.
The University of Sydney, UNSW, academics and student groups are among scores of stakeholders weighing into a NSW parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism on university campuses.
It will also examine anti-Semitic attacks in recent months, including graffiti sprayed on cars and homes and a firebombing of a childcare centre near a synagogue.
In its submission, the Australasian Union of Jewish Students said universities had become "flashpoints for anti-Semitic activity."
The union pointed to the proportion of Jewish-Australians who identify as Zionist.
Zionism is widely understood as a political movement that called for the founding of the state of Israel, but the union said it was much more than that.
"Jewish students may not consider themselves politically Zionist but may still have strong emotional or religious connection to Israel," it said.
"Given that the majority of Jewish Australians identify as Zionist, it is not credible to claim that threats or acts of hostility directed at 'Zionists' cannot also be acts of anti-Semitism."
Conservative Jewish groups have lambasted chants heard at weekly demonstrations and on uni campuses as anti-Semitic, most notably "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free."
But many submissions by Jewish Australians disputed the conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
The stance feeds "into a politicised and divisive discourse which seeks to label any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic," the progressive Jewish Council of Australia said.
Civil libertarians warned about its impact on political communication.
"Conflating legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism at a time when Israel is justifiably being criticised for failing to meet international human rights standards ... is dangerous," the NSW Council for Civil Liberties said.
"(It) treats Jewish people as having monolithic political beliefs, a view that is itself anti-Semitic."
Australia's 39 universities unanimously endorsed a new definition of anti-Semitism in February.
The definition, which includes harassment that impedes Jews' ability to participate as equals in educational and social life, has been contested by human rights groups as curbing political speech.
A Senate inquiry has also examined the student encampments that sprang up in 2023 in response to Israel's bombing and ground assault on Gaza.
More than 52,000 Palestinians, including about 18,000 children, have been killed so far in Gaza, according to the United Nations.
It was sparked by Hamas, a militant group in the blockaded enclave, killing more than 1200 Israelis and capturing 250 hostages in a cross-border attack on October 7, 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat
Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat

West Australian

time21 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat

Australia's Health Minister has admitted he's 'very concerned' by Donald Trump's threat to raise pharmaceutical tariffs as high as 250 per cent and insisted PBS is off limits. Mark Butler has vowed Australia will continue to 'press the case' for the continuation of free trade with America — acknowledging it would be a major blow to Australian patients and producers. US President Donald Trump told CNBC this week he would expand this tariff regime by slapping new tariffs on foreign-made pharmaceuticals. 'It's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent,' he told the US business news channel. He said the final rate is expected to be announced within the next week or so, with a transitional period to give drug manufacturers time to adjust their supply chains. 'We are very concerned about the latest announcement from the administration around the possibility of pharmaceutical tariffs going as high as 250 per cent over the next couple of years,' Mr Butler told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. 'That is why we're working so hard to press the case for the continuation of free trade.' Under the $18 billion-dollar Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, the government negotiates with the drug companies to enable Australians to buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $25 a script. In a series of letters to 17 drug manufacturers on Friday, Mr Trump had also demanded they negotiate harder with 'foreign freeloading nations' he blamed for higher US drug prices. It comes after a submission was made to the US government March by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) claiming Australia's subsidised medical system was 'egregious and discriminatory'. Mr Butler said the US and Australian pharmaceutical trade relationship benefited both nations. 'America exports more pharmaceuticals to Australia than we do to them. They do it on a tariff-free basis,' he said. 'That's served both of our countries very well and we'll continue to argue the case for a continuation of free trade in pharmaceuticals.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would continue to support the PBS and spruiked his government's recent legislation in the first sitting black of the 48th Parliament to make PBS medicines even cheaper. 'We support the PBS. It is part of who we are as Australia. We're a sovereign nation, it's something that has produced massive benefits for Australia. It's a proud Labor creation and we are building on it,' he said on Thursday when asked if he was concerned by the latest development of Trump's ever-expanding tariffs. 'That's why we introduced legislation last week to reduce the cost of medicines to $25 that are listed on the PBS.' It comes as Mr Trump's country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs, first floated on 'Liberation Day' in April, were scheduled to take effect on August 7. The US imposed a 10 per cent baseline tariff on imported goods from Australia which was the lowest rate of other nations.

James Paterson says Labor must realise it has 'no mandate for tax increases' ahead of reform round table
James Paterson says Labor must realise it has 'no mandate for tax increases' ahead of reform round table

Sky News AU

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

James Paterson says Labor must realise it has 'no mandate for tax increases' ahead of reform round table

Shadow finance minister James Paterson has unleashed on the Albanese government for using the imminent economic reform roundtable as a forum to introduce fresh taxes. From August 19 to 21 the government will convene a group of 22 representatives from business, industry, unions and politics to discuss proposals aimed at kickstarting the economy and boosting Australia's record low productivity slump. The government has become increasingly concerned about the growing expectations attached to the three-day summit, according to the Sydney Morning Herald. Mr Albanese then dampened expectations on Monday and said: 'to be very clear, it's not a meeting of the cabinet … it's a meeting in the cabinet room.' With the Productivity Commission's five pillar platform having already received hundreds of ambitions tax submissions from a range of bodies, Mr Chalmers appeared to shift the goal posts of the roundtable on Tuesday, reorienting his priorities to reducing red tape and regulation and bolstering housing supply. The Coalition's finance spokesperson said the Treasurer had 'got ahead of himself' and that the government was now scrambling to alleviate mounting alarm in the business sector that the summit could be used to roll out sweeping tax hikes. 'It's very clear that the Treasurer has got ahead of himself, and the Prime Minister has pulled the reigns and brought him back to where he wants him be,' Mr Paterson told Sky News. 'I thought it was very pointed the other day when the PM said that just because this is a meeting in the cabinet room, it doesn't mean its subsuming the role of the cabinet – he is clearly very unhappy with how Jim Chalmers has allowed the scope to creep here." Although the purpose of the roundtable was aimed at lifting plummeting productivity, the ACTU used its submission to call on the government to limit negative gearing and the capital gains discount to one investment property. Mining giant Rio Tinto urged for the reimposition of an economy wide carbon tax. Mr Paterson said the Treasurer's sudden shift in tone showed the summit had become 'far bigger than the government intended it to be' and that ideas were being put on the table which 'the government had no mandate for.' 'It was also very illustrative yesterday in the Treasurer's walk back that he still said the government was going to use this exercise as a mandate for reform,' he said. 'You dint earn a mandate from a handpicked group of experts meeting in the cabinet room, you earn a mandate by taking policies to an election. 'This government has no mandate for any tax increases, and we will not be supporting them to increase taxes on Australians that they didn't have the decency or the honesty to put to them at the last election." Mr Paterson said the Prime Minister was slowly realising it would be 'unwise' to construct a process to make it appear that the government had a mandate for vast reform and vowed the Coalition would oppose a 'secret Labor agenda' to amend the taxation system. 'We will be constructive in the room as part of this process but that doesn't mean we are going to sign up to a secret Labor agenda or a union agenda of raising taxes,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store