logo
Maharashtra to amend child labour rules, allow hiring child artistes with riders

Maharashtra to amend child labour rules, allow hiring child artistes with riders

Hindustan Times2 days ago
MUMBAI: The state government has decided to amend the Maharashtra Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Rules, 1997, and set up a taskforce in 36 districts to draw up a comprehensive action plan to rescue children employed illegally. The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) (Amended) Act, 2016 prohibits the employment of children below 14 years in all occupations.
The draft of the revised rules was issued on August 7, and suggestions and objections have been sought from citizens within the next 30 days, which will be presented to the labour department. The new rules are being framed after a gap of nearly 30 years.
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) (Amended) Act, 2016 prohibits the employment of children below 14 years in all occupations. It also regulates the work of adolescents between 14-18 years in hazardous occupations and processes. The labour department also issued amended rules for children hired or employed illegally.
'A child may be allowed to work as an artiste subject to the certain conditions,' states the draft rules. While there are stipulated hours of work mandated in the draft, it underscores that production houses must obtain permission from the district collector before hiring the child. While screening films and programmes on television, a disclaimer must be added saying all measures were taken to protect the child during shooting.
'There is also a mandate to make proper arrangements to ensure there is no discontinuity in the child's academic lessons in school. Additionally, no child will be allowed to work consecutively for over 27 days,' said a senior officer from the state labour department.
It is also the responsibility of the parents to set aside at least 20% of the child's earnings in a fixed deposit account in a nationalised bank in his/ her name, which will be credited to the child on attaining majority. 'This provision will ensure that the entire income of the child as an artiste will not be spent by their parents and guardians, and a portion of it will be saved for his future,' the official explained. The rule book also underscores that no child will be made to participate 'in any audio visual and sports activity including informal entertainment against his or her will and consent'.
In a separate clause, the government has permitted only those children to work who need to support their families. However, to avoid their exploitation, they will be allowed to work only in family enterprises. In such cases, if a child remains absent from school consecutively for 30 days, the school's principal must report the matter to the nodal officer appointed by the district collector'.
The government has also decided to set up a Child and Adolescent Rehabilitation Fund, where the amount from fines and penalties in cases of offences will be transferred to the victim once he/ she turns 18. 'Against each case the state government will also deposit ₹15,000, the interest on the total amount will be transferred to the victim's bank account after six months,' informed another official. The accused will be charged between ₹20,000 to ₹50,000 apart from imprisonment between six months to two years.
Child rights activist Santosh Shinde termed the amended rules as 'insufficient'. 'The state government missed the opportunity to streamline the process of hiring children, especially those related to child artistes. The rules formulated are patchy, considering the need of the children employed in the film and TV industry. For instance, the government should have looked into the kind of language being used by children in the content shown on web series,' Shinde said.
He added that the government 'has tried to emulate the model rules and didn't try to formulate rules according to our need as most of the content is made in Mumbai'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

INDIA bloc considering motion to remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar
INDIA bloc considering motion to remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

INDIA bloc considering motion to remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar

The INDIA bloc is considering a motion against Chief Election Commission (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, seeking his removal. The idea was mooted at the meeting of the Opposition's Parliamentary floor leaders on Monday (August 18, 2025). Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow updates on August 18, 2025 According to sources, the Opposition discussed whether it should continue with protests against the Election Commission, especially after the Supreme Court, in an interim order, directed the poll body to publish the details of 65 lakh voters excluded from the draft electoral roll published on August 1, following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar. The leaders concurred that after the CEC's Sunday (August 17, 2025) press conference, in which he accused the Opposition of 'spreading misinformation', the protests had to continue. Congress leaders suggested that the Opposition should step up the pressure by moving a motion against Mr. Kumar for making 'politically charged accusations.' Congress general secretary (organisation) K.C. Venugopal told The Hindu that there was a consensus in the INDIA bloc on the issue. 'He (Mr. Kumar) spoke not like the Chief Election Commissioner but like a BJP politician. In the entire press conference, he did not answer the questions raised by the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and the other parties. Instead, he ridiculed the Opposition for raising the questions,' he said. 'Is it the duty of the CEC to indulge in politics?' Mr. Venugopal, who said that the Opposition has enough numbers to move the motion, flagged the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which provides immunity to the CEC and Election Commissioners for all decisions taken by them in present and the past. He said that one should 'read between the lines' why such an immunity was extended. According to the Act, the CEC can be removed in the same manner and grounds as a Supreme Court judge. Parliament can dismiss the CEC by a motion with two-thirds majority in both the Houses. In order for the motion to be accepted, at least 50 members have to sign in its favour. Later in the day, the INDIA bloc leaders held a press conference to 'rebut' Sunday's (August 17, 2025) presser by the CEC. They flagged that the CEC failed to answer questions on why the SIR was being done in 'such a hurry' when the State elections were three months away. Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Ramgopal Yadav said that while the poll body asked Mr. Gandhi to give an affidavit, the SP had submitted affidavits with complaints of around 18,000 voters being removed from the list in 2022. 'In the 2022 Uttar Pradesh polls, when Akhilesh Yadav said names of SP supporters had been removed from the voter list, we gave affidavits. But no action has been taken,' he said. Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra said that if the voter list on which the last General Election was conducted was incorrect, the Lok Sabha should be dissolved. 'Is the list on which the Lok Sabha election was held fraudulent? If that is true, the current and previous Election Commissioners should be prosecuted, and this Lok Sabha should be dissolved immediately,' she said. Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Manoj Jha attacked the CEC and said, 'Yesterday we were looking for our CEC, we found a new BJP spokesperson.'

Justice delayed: Fast-track special courts still aren't fast enough
Justice delayed: Fast-track special courts still aren't fast enough

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Justice delayed: Fast-track special courts still aren't fast enough

Many existing courts struggle with severe staffing shortages, procedural inefficiencies, and inadequate infrastructure premium Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article Fast-track special courts (FTSCs) were established to speed up trials in rape and child sexual-abuse cases. Yet, these very courts, meant to accelerate justice, are themselves moving at a slow pace, according to the data recently presented in the Lok Sabha by Union Law and Justice Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal. The numbers for Delhi are especially troubling: The place currently has 16 FTSCs, and of the 6,278 cases instituted since inception, only 2,718 were disposed of by June this year. Cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act take, on average, over 1,700 days (nearly five years)

Why Goa says no to plaster idols of Ganesh
Why Goa says no to plaster idols of Ganesh

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Why Goa says no to plaster idols of Ganesh

Ahead of August 27, when Ganesh Chaturthi, the most popular festival in Maharashtra and Goa, begins this year, the Goa government has banned the import, transportation and sale of Ganesh idols made from plaster of Paris (PoP) citing its adverse effects on public health and the environment. In South Goa, the district collectorate has issued a memorandum asking deputy collectors to monitor the situation, enforce the government's directive, and file complaints in court against violators under relevant sections of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Chitrashalas—the workshops where Ganesh idols are crafted and given finishing touches—are being inspected, says Egna Cleetus, Collector, South Goa Goa Pollution Control Board, too, is taking samples from the chitrashalas to check for the presence of PoP in idols, with or without clay, in the making and crafting of idols. No PoP traces have been detected so several PoP idols were being brought in from neighbouring states for sale in Goa during the Ganesh festival, the state government's department of environment and climate change notes in its directive that the idols manufactured from hydrated calcium sulphate by the calcification process harm the environment as they do not dissolve or disintegrate fast enough after immersion in water. Moreover, the chemical paints and dyes applied on the idols include toxic substances such as mercury, zinc oxide, chromium, lead and cadmium, which harm marine life. These are carcinogenic to humans when worship in Maharashtra used to be a modest, private ritual, with small, hand-crafted idols made from local clay, until 1893-94, when, following a series of Hindu-Muslim riots, Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak elevated the festival to a public spectacle. The most popular festival among both Muslims and Hindus in the 19th-century Bombay presidency had been Muharram. In Pune, the taziyas or taboots representing the tombs of the martyrs of the battle of Karbala were installed in the wadas (mansions) of prominent aristocratic families like the Rastes, the Khasgiwales and the Kunjirs. Tilak wrote against the British government's moves to curb Muharram processions during the bubonic plague epidemic. There is a photograph of the nationalist leader participating in one such procession at the Budhwar Chowk in Pune in 1892. The scholar 'Ahitagni' Shankar Ramchandra Rajwade writes how the Brahmin Bhikobadada Agashe, a renowned wrestler in the Lokhande Talim in Pune, would don the attire of a malang (Muslim faqir) and perform the lezim before the taziya procession of the Ghodepir dargah in Pune, with his disciples. The Ghodepir procession was so revered and popular that a bullock cart used to move around with it to collect the revdis (a sweet) showered on it by bystanders and with Hindus refusing to commemorate Muharram due to sectarian tensions, the number of taboots in Pune fell to around 50-75 in 1894 from a much higher 400 the previous year and Tilak began promoting the celebration of Ganesh Utsav, which soon replaced Muharram in its popularity among the masses. Though many credit Bhau Lakshman Javale a.k.a. Bhausaheb Rangari for launching the celebration, Tilak's massive popularity and mass contact helped popularise it. Soon it spread to the neighbouring states such as Goa and Karnataka, which have organic cultural and economic linkages with shift to plaster idols has its origins in tinsel town. The movie Navrang (1959), produced and directed by the legendary V. Shantaram, featured a 11-feet Ganpati idol, crafted in-house by his Rajkamal Kalamandir studio, in a dance scene depicting the Holi festival. This idol was later immersed ceremoniously, says his son Kiran Shantaram. Idols worshipped at the public Ganesh mandals used to be much smaller in comparison, but this trend of installing huge PoP idols gradually caught on. Gradually, even households switched to these and environmentalists note that PoP pollutes water sources and enters the human food chain through seafood. PoP is made by heating gypsum to remove water, resulting in a powder that hardens when mixed with water. A 2023 study on the Tapi river, which runs through Maharashtra's northern edge, found a clear correlation between PoP idol immersion and degraded water quality. The paints often contain toxic metals like lead and cadmium. PoP itself may take months—or even years—to dissolve, raising water hardness and harming aquatic life. The PoP clogs the burrows of fish and crabs, damages mangrove roots, and is blamed for affecting the breeding of Bombay duck, sponges and other marine annual use of PoP across Maharashtra is about 4,500 tonnes, with Mumbai alone accounting for 675 tonnes, notes the 2023 study. PoP and clay idols from Pen in Raigad district and nearby areas like Hamrapur, Tambadseth, Johe, Kalave and Dadar are exported to states like Goa and Gujarat, and even others say PoP idols are cheaper and lighter than those made of clay, leading to the end consumers preferring them. The idols are also said to be durable and 2000, the rationalist and anti-superstition group Maharashtra Andhashraddha Nirmulan Samiti (MANS) launched a campaign in Kolhapur seeking to dissuade citizens from immersing plaster idols in the Rankala lake, but its activists faced a wall of opposition. In 2005, the late Narendra Dabholkar of MANS filed a PIL with the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court. On January 30, the court, in an interim order, instructed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and other civic bodies in Maharashtra to strictly enforce the Central Pollution Control Board's (CPCB) 2020 guidelines—against the use and immersion of PoP idols, even in artificial tanks, during the Maghi Ganeshutsav (January-February).On June 9, the court modified its order, allowing the manufacture and sale of PoP idols, albeit with a caveat that they cannot be immersed in natural water bodies. This followed a submission by a CPCB expert panel that clarified the 2020 guidelines were advisory, not binding. In May, the state government's Rajiv Gandhi Science and Technology Commission had also submitted a report to the high court on eco-friendly approaches to the immersion of Ganesh idols, and strategies to minimise pollution of water bodies like the use of smaller idols and eco-friendly July 24, a bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne cleared the decks for the immersion of only those idols exceeding the height of 6 feet in natural water bodies. All idols below the height of 6 feet shall be immersed only in artificial water tanks. The court's order will prevail until March to India Today Magazine- Ends

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store