logo
Trump Sued by Immigrant Youth Over Deportation Risk

Trump Sued by Immigrant Youth Over Deportation Risk

Immigrant youths who have suffered abuse, neglect, or abandonment sued the Trump Administration on Thursday for ending a policy that protected them from deportation and enabled them to work legally in the U.S.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced last month that it would no longer grant young immigrants with Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) a classification that offered those protections, after quietly ceasing to do so earlier in the year.
The plaintiffs and others with SIJS, a pathway to legal residency given to youth who arrive in the U.S. under the age of 21 and have been abused, neglected, or abandoned by a parent, were granted a status known as deferred action under a Biden-era policy.
Immigration backlogs can last for years because of limits on the number of green cards USCIS can grant per year, often making changes in immigration status a lengthy process. But under the 2022 policy, SIJS recipients were automatically eligible for deferred action, allowing them to legally work in the U.S. and protecting them from deportation until they were able to adjust their status.
Beginning in April, however, USCIS began neither approving or denying SIJS recipients' work permit applications. The agency issued a policy alert months later stating that it would no longer be granting deferred action for undocumented immigrants with SIJS status.
Now, a coalition of immigrant youths with the status is asking that the 2022 policy be reinstated.
The lawsuit seeks class-action status to sue on behalf of the broader group of people impacted by the Trump Administration's policy change.
'The proposed class are people who have a legal path to apply for a permanent resident visa that Congress created. And while they're here, they were under the deferred action policy, able to support themselves,' John Magliery, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, a law firm representing plaintiffs in the suit, tells TIME. 'This puts them in a precarious position and also puts additional burdens on other social safety nets that they might be able to avoid if they could support themselves.'
USCIS spokesman Matthew J. Tragesser told TIME in a statement that the agency 'does not comment on pending litigation' as a 'matter of practice.'
The policy change impacts both newly accepted SIJS recipients and those who have already received deferred action and are due for renewal.
More than 100,000 SIJS recipients were awaiting their green card as of 2023, according to a report by the End SIJS Backlog coalition. Recipients come from 151 countries and live in every U.S. state, with the highest numbers in New York, California, and Maryland. Attorneys for the plaintiffs—who have expressed desires to be astronauts, lawyers, and medical professionals, according to the legal complaint—say that SIJS recipients have expressed serious fear that they could be uprooted from their home to the U.S.
Nineteen lawmakers sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in June asking for clarification about the changing policy, citing concerns due to 'reports from practitioners of increased occurrences of detention and deportation of SIJS recipients.'
The young immigrants are joined by The Central American Refugee Center and Centro Legal de la Raza in their lawsuit against the Trump Administration.
'The government has said, 'We agree that you should not return to your country. It's not safe for you there,'' says Rachel Davidson, director of the End SIJS Backlog Coalition at the National Immigration Project. 'They've been granted a pathway to that protection, and they deserve it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three Republican-led states to deploy National Guard troops to U.S. capital
Three Republican-led states to deploy National Guard troops to U.S. capital

CNBC

time28 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Three Republican-led states to deploy National Guard troops to U.S. capital

The Republican governors of three states are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., at the request of the administration of President Donald Trump, who has portrayed the city as awash in crime. The announcements on Saturday of troops from hundreds of miles away in West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio came a day after D.C. officials and the Trump administration negotiated a deal to keep Mayor Muriel Bowser's appointed police chief, Pamela Smith, in charge of the police department after D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit to block the federal takeover of the department. Trump, a Republican, said this week he was deploying hundreds of D.C. National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the Democratic-led city's police department to curb what he depicted as a crime and homelessness emergency. Justice Department data, however, showed violent crime in 2024 hit a 30-year low in Washington, a self-governing federal district under the jurisdiction of Congress. West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey's office said in a statement he was deploying 300 to 400 National Guard troops to D.C. in "a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation." The statement said he also was providing equipment and specialized training. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster responded to a Pentagon request by announcing that 200 of his state's National Guard troops would be sent. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he would send 150 military police members in the coming days, adding none of them were "currently serving as law enforcement officers in the state." After the announcements, Mayor Bowser posted on X: "American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican." The National Guard serves as a militia that answers to the governors of the 50 states except when called into federal service. The D.C. National Guard reports directly to the president. Trump, who has suggested he could take similar actions in other Democratic-controlled cities, has sought to expand the powers of the presidency in his second term, inserting himself into the affairs of major banks, law firms and elite universities. In June, Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Democratic governor, during protests over mass immigration raids by federal officials. South Carolina's McMaster said his troops would immediately return to South Carolina if needed to respond to a possible hurricane or other natural disaster. Hurricane Erin, now northeast of Puerto Rico, has become a catastrophic Category 5 storm that could bring ocean swells to the U.S. East Coast early next week, the U.S. National Hurricane Center said on Saturday. National Guard troops often respond to natural disasters and rarely police U.S. civilians. Drew Galang, a spokesperson for West Virginia's Morrisey, said the state's National Guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to D.C. late on Friday and was working to organize the deployment. A White House official said on Saturday that more National Guard troops would be called in to Washington to "protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime." A U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a formal order was expected to go out that would authorize National Guard troops in D.C. to carry firearms. The official said this order would affect mostly military police officers with sidearms. Reuters has reported that the National Guard troops would have weapons nearby, such as in their vehicles. The White House said on Saturday that D.C. National Guard members have conducted patrols on foot and in vehicles around the National Mall and Union Station. The White House said the National Guard troops are not making arrests now and that they may be armed. It is not clear how the administration could deploy National Guard troops elsewhere. A federal judge in San Francisco is expected in the coming weeks to issue a ruling on whether Trump violated the law with the Los Angeles deployments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store