Orban Says Police Will Not Disperse Budapest Pride March
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said police will not "break up" Saturday's Budapest Pride march despite issuing a ban, but warned attendees and organisers about the legal consequences.
Orban's ruling coalition amended laws and the constitution earlier this year to prohibit the annual celebration, advancing his widely condemned, years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights in the name of "child protection".
Last week, police banned the Pride march from taking place in Budapest, citing recent legal changes forbidding the promotion or display of homosexuality to under-18s.
But organisers, including the Budapest city hall, disputed the legality of the decision and pledged the parade would go ahead. The ban has drawn international condemnation.
"Of course, the police could break up such events, because they have the authority to do so, but Hungary is a civilised country, a civic society. We don't hurt each other," Orban told state radio during his weekly interview on Friday.
"There will be legal consequences, but it cannot reach the level of physical abuse."
Attendees risk a fine of up to 500 euros ($580) with police empowered to use facial recognition technology to identify them.
Organisers could face a one-year prison sentence.
However, opposition Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony insisted during a briefing with visiting EU equalities commissioner Hadja Lahbib that no attendee can face any reprisals as the march is a municipal event and does not require police approval.
"The police have only one task tomorrow, and it is a serious one: to ensure the safety of Hungarian and European citizens attending the event," Karacsony told journalists, warning that far-right actors could be emboldened by the government to disrupt the Pride march.
Far-right groups have announced multiple counterprotests along the planned route of the procession.
Dozens of EU lawmakers are expected to attend the Pride parade, as well as ministers and mayors from multiple European Union countries, according to the organisers.
Lahbib said she is still assessing whether to participate given her role as commissioner, but assured the Hungarian LGBTQ community of the EU's support.
"These attacks are part of a wider push to roll back progress and undo the rights that generations before us fought for," the Belgian commissioner told journalists.
"The right to gather peacefully is one of those rights. It must be protected and upheld across the European Union," she added.
Organisers hope Saturday's Pride march will see a record turnout of more than 35,000 to signal a strong rebuke of Orban's anti-LGBTQ policies.
Hungary's nationalist premier on Friday rejected calls from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to reverse the ban, comparing her to late Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev.
"She considers Hungary a subordinate country and she thinks she can dictate to Hungarians from Brussels how they should live, what they should like, what they should dislike, what their legal system should be like, what should be banned and what should not be. Exactly like Brezhnev," Orban said. Organisers hope Saturday's Pride march will see a record turnout despite a police ban AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
11 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Orban Says Police Will Not Disperse Budapest Pride March
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said police will not "break up" Saturday's Budapest Pride march despite issuing a ban, but warned attendees and organisers about the legal consequences. Orban's ruling coalition amended laws and the constitution earlier this year to prohibit the annual celebration, advancing his widely condemned, years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights in the name of "child protection". Last week, police banned the Pride march from taking place in Budapest, citing recent legal changes forbidding the promotion or display of homosexuality to under-18s. But organisers, including the Budapest city hall, disputed the legality of the decision and pledged the parade would go ahead. The ban has drawn international condemnation. "Of course, the police could break up such events, because they have the authority to do so, but Hungary is a civilised country, a civic society. We don't hurt each other," Orban told state radio during his weekly interview on Friday. "There will be legal consequences, but it cannot reach the level of physical abuse." Attendees risk a fine of up to 500 euros ($580) with police empowered to use facial recognition technology to identify them. Organisers could face a one-year prison sentence. However, opposition Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony insisted during a briefing with visiting EU equalities commissioner Hadja Lahbib that no attendee can face any reprisals as the march is a municipal event and does not require police approval. "The police have only one task tomorrow, and it is a serious one: to ensure the safety of Hungarian and European citizens attending the event," Karacsony told journalists, warning that far-right actors could be emboldened by the government to disrupt the Pride march. Far-right groups have announced multiple counterprotests along the planned route of the procession. Dozens of EU lawmakers are expected to attend the Pride parade, as well as ministers and mayors from multiple European Union countries, according to the organisers. Lahbib said she is still assessing whether to participate given her role as commissioner, but assured the Hungarian LGBTQ community of the EU's support. "These attacks are part of a wider push to roll back progress and undo the rights that generations before us fought for," the Belgian commissioner told journalists. "The right to gather peacefully is one of those rights. It must be protected and upheld across the European Union," she added. Organisers hope Saturday's Pride march will see a record turnout of more than 35,000 to signal a strong rebuke of Orban's anti-LGBTQ policies. Hungary's nationalist premier on Friday rejected calls from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to reverse the ban, comparing her to late Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. "She considers Hungary a subordinate country and she thinks she can dictate to Hungarians from Brussels how they should live, what they should like, what they should dislike, what their legal system should be like, what should be banned and what should not be. Exactly like Brezhnev," Orban said. Organisers hope Saturday's Pride march will see a record turnout despite a police ban AFP
DW
13 hours ago
- DW
Spain slams EU inaction on Israel trade deal – DW – 06/26/2025
Spanish PM Sanchez wants the bloc to suspend a major trade deal with Israel over its Gaza conduct. But that looks unlikely. A brief hardening towards Israel appears to have dissipated after recent tensions with Iran. In the wake of a damning EU review of Israel's human rights record in Gaza, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez slammed his colleagues for not moving to suspend a trade deal with Israel despite what he called "the catastrophic situation of genocide." More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed in the enclave over more than 18 months of Israeli bombardment, according to Hamas-run Gazan authorities. Israel vehemently denies accusations of genocide, maintaining that it is at war with the ruling militant Islamist group Hamas following a massive terror attack on Israeli territory in 2023. In a report distributed to the member states last week based on the findings and allegations of major international bodies, the European External Action Service found "indications" that Israel was breaching its duty to respect to human rights. The document, not public but made available to DW, highlighted possible indiscriminate attacks affecting the civilian population, Israel's blockade on food and medicine plus attacks on medical facilities as potential breaches. "There are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations," the report concluded. Arriving at an EU summit in Brussels on Thursday, Sanchez said it was "more than obvious that Israel is violating Article 2 of the EU-Israel agreement." "We have had 18 sanctions packages against Russia for its aggression [in Ukraine], and Europe, with its double standards, is not capable of suspending an association agreement," Sanchez said. Spain and Ireland are isolated among the 27 EU states in openly calling for the suspension of the deal in full, a move that would require unanimity and has therefore never been a serious prospect. Greece, Germany, Hungary, Austria, and Bulgaria remain close allies of Israel. Berlin in particular has made its views clear, with Chancellor Friedrich Merz describing the move as "out of the question with the federal [German] government." Doing so would be a major commercial disruption, particularly for Israel, which buys a third of its goods from the EU. The accord, in force since 2000, covers everything from the two sides trading relationship – worth $50 billion each year for goods alone – up to political dialogue, and cooperation on research and technology. Another possibility, requiring only a qualified majority of 15 out of 27, would be the partial suspension of the deal, for example, its provisions on free trade or shutting Israel out of EU research funding programme Horizon. But multiple diplomatic sources told DW that the numbers weren't there either. Earlier in the week, EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas officially presented the document to the member states for a first debate, already making clear there would be no immediate moves. "It is not intended to punish Israel, but to trigger concrete improvements for the people and the lives of people in Gaza," she said on Monday. "If the situation does not improve, then we can also discuss further measures and come back to this in July." On Thursday, EU leaders at the summit only "took note" of the report in their joint statement, making no reference to potential rights breaches, and said ministers should revisit the topic next month. At the same time, the 27 leaders deplored the "dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the unacceptable number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation." Spain has also been calling for an EU embargo on the sale of arms to Israel, with Germany one of the country's major suppliers, as well as more sanctions. However, Berlin recently reaffirmed it would keep selling Israel weapons, and without Germany on board, the move wouldn't have much impact. A few other countries, including Belgium, France and Sweden, have supported imposing additional EU sanctions on Israel, but these too require unanimity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Echoing Sanchez, Irish leader Michael Martin said he would tell his colleagues at the summit that "the people of Europe find it incomprehensible that Europe does not seem to be in a position to put pressure on Israel." According to Lisa Musiol of conflict resolution think tank Crisis Group, maximum pressure would entail an arms embargo, large-scale sanctions against members of the government or a full suspension of the Association Agreement. "But almost no European leader speaks about such measures," Musiol told DW in a written statement. "There is probably no foreign policy topic within the EU where member states are so divided." Last month, it looked for a brief moment like the EU was indeed collectively hardening its stance. The Dutch proposed the review of the Association Agreement, and the move was greenlit by a majority of EU states on May 20. This came shortly after France, Britain and Canada issued a rare joint statement condemning Israel's latest offensive in Gaza and described its restrictions on aid as being "wholly disproportionate," and possibly in breach of international humanitarian law. There was a distinctive feeling that policy could be shifting. Musiol of Crisis Group said that that window seemed now to have closed. "It seems that after the recent escalation between Israel and Iran, many member states have fallen into their old positions," she said. "Even those member states that have traditionally been strong supporters of Israel but had started to be more outspoken or critical, such as Germany or Italy, have changed their tone."
Int'l Business Times
13 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
The 'Revenge Tax' Revolution: How Governments Are Clamping Down On Corporate Giants
In recent months, governments around the world—including the U.S. and European Union members—have accelerated efforts to clamp down on multinational corporations with what's increasingly called the "revenge tax." This global push aims to reclaim billions lost to corporate tax avoidance, signaling a new era where loopholes are closing and accountability is rising. But what exactly is this revenge tax, and why is it reshaping the global business landscape? What Is the "Revenge Tax"? At its core, the revenge tax is a series of new laws and policies designed to prevent companies from dodging their fair share of taxes. Multinationals have long used strategies like profit shifting—moving earnings to countries with low or no taxes—to minimize their tax bills. In recent years, governments have fought back by creating rules that limit these practices. Notably, the OECD's 2021 global minimum tax agreement, which sets a 15% minimum tax on multinational profits, has become a foundation for this fight. As Reuters reports, countries are now adding penalties and tighter regulations to ensure corporations comply. Why Now? The Political and Economic Stakes The revenge tax reflects growing frustration among citizens and policymakers. The public's outrage over tax avoidance—especially against the backdrop of rising inequality and strained public services—has fueled momentum for tougher measures. As highlighted in The Guardian, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed glaring revenue shortfalls, intensifying calls for governments to secure funds through fair taxation. The revenge tax thus symbolizes a broader shift toward fiscal responsibility and economic justice. What It Means for Businesses and Consumers For corporations, the crackdown means increased compliance burdens and potential penalties if they fail to meet new tax obligations. Some companies might respond by raising prices to offset higher costs. Analysts at Bloomberg argue, however, that the additional tax revenue could bolster public services and help reduce economic inequality—potentially benefiting society in the long run. More Than Just "Revenge" Despite its dramatic nickname, the revenge tax isn't about retaliation. It's about leveling the playing field and ensuring that corporations contribute their fair share to the countries where they operate. This marks a departure from decades of lax enforcement and competition among countries to offer the lowest taxes. Instead, global cooperation and transparency are becoming the new norm, signaling a fundamental change in how the world handles corporate taxation. What's Next on the Horizon? Expect continued global efforts to tighten tax rules, increase transparency, and close remaining loopholes. Multinational companies must adapt quickly or face escalating penalties. For everyday taxpayers, the hope is clear: a fairer tax system that funds essential services without shifting undue burdens onto ordinary citizens.
