
Traitor or hero? Statue of George Washington stirs mixed reaction in London.
Why was a rebel commander and vanquisher of redcoats — the confounding father of a breakaway republic — ascending a pedestal in a plaza devoted to Britain's own heroes, including the eldest son of the king Washington routed in the Revolution?
Related
:
Advertisement
To most of those pausing to watch, there were no hard feelings about that 18th-century unpleasantness. But Washington's arrival was a bit of a head-scratcher to many, given the current transatlantic tumult and the state of the special relationship 46 presidents later.
'At least it's not Trump,' Townshend concluded with a shrug before going on her way.
'We're not completely happy with America right now,' said Judith Webster, visiting London from the city of Sheffield in the north of England. 'I'm not really sure I want him here.'
Families walking to school passed the statue of Washington.
Gabriella Demczuk
In fact, the metal commander in chief was not a newcomer.
The sculpture was sent in 1914 by the Commonwealth of Virginia, a gift from former colony to former colonizer to mark the 100-year anniversary of the Treaty of Ghent, which formally ended decades of war between the United States and the United Kingdom. It was a cast copy of a marble statue by French master Jean-Antoine Houdon, sculpted from a plaster mask of Washington's face. The original statue stands in the Virginia Capitol to this day.
Advertisement
Trafalgar Square, near the Charing Cross rail station in central London, is a bit more exposed to the elements. So after a century of the replica steeping in London pollution, a group of Virginians had it taken away in May for restoration and the construction of a new limestone plinth.
It was rededicated Wednesday in a ceremony featuring Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, the American and British ambassadors, and former prime ministers Theresa May and David Cameron.
But Washington's spot flanking the entrance of the National Gallery —
Britain's
National Gallery — has always been an oddity, showing up on lists of London's weird wonders and a fun fact for taxi drivers to share with American tourists. Tour guide legend holds that the statute was set on a patch of dirt transported from Virginia to honor Washington's reputed pledge to never again set foot on English soil.
Locals, meanwhile, in online message boards and tour groups, periodically debate the propriety of honoring a British subject who went on to best the British army and slice off a valuable hunk of the empire.
'George Washington was indeed a traitor to the crown,' a poster said last year in a thread on the topic on Quora.
But to most of the visitors and workers surging through Trafalgar every day, he is just one more garden-variety great man in the sculptural clutter of central London.
Advertisement
A crowd watched as conservators placed the Washington statue in front of the National Gallery in Trafalgar Square.
Gabriella Demczuk
'Everyone walks past statues all the time without looking at them,' said Alexandra Jackson, a Blue Badge tourist guide. 'It was really more noticed when it disappeared. People were wondering if it was taken away because someone might throw something at it.'
The rebooting of Trafalgar's Washington began when John Gerber, an architect and developer from McLean, Va.irginia, did a double take when he passed the familiar figure during a visit last year. He was delighted to read the inscription that it was a gift of his home state but distressed to see how worn it was, particularly the pedestal.
Gerber formed a fund-raising group, Friends of the Washington Statue, and pitched the idea of a rehab to Youngkin and British architect Norman Foster, who agreed to oversee the work. In May, workers wrangled the figure and the 1.3-ton pedestal to the studio of art conservator Rupert Harris.
'It's never touched the ground since it's been here,' Harris said in his east London workshop this month, with the Father of America standing serenely amid the dismembered heads and torsos.
Related
:
For weeks, Washington stood elevated on a wooden pallet as he was stripped of grime, repaired, and buffed to high gloss with repeated coats of the black wax used on many London sculptures. That just was normal procedure, but Harris was also aware of the whole never-touch-English-soil thing.
Which, as it turns out, is not true. Nothing the researchers could find suggests Washington ever said he was loath to set foot in England, nor that Virginia clay was brought for the statue to stand on.
Advertisement
'It seems to be completely made up,' said Douglas Bradburn, president of Mount Vernon, Washington's Virginia home, now a museum and popular tourist stop. 'It goes completely against the character of George Washington, who made it clear he did not resent the people of England.'
Washington never visited Britain (his only trip abroad was to Barbados), but he considered himself a proud English subject for the first part of his life, Bradburn said. He was popular in Britain even during the American Revolution, known to be magnanimous in victory and respectful to defeated officers.
George III himself, upon hearing that the general who pried America from his royal grasp gave up his command and returned to farming, called Washington 'the greatest man of the age,' according to Troy Bickham, a Texas A&M University historian who has written about the post-Revolution relationship between the two countries.
'The English public were frustrated with their own generals, who weren't able to win,' Bickham said. 'And here was this American guy, a gentleman farmer. He wouldn't even take a salary.'
This reputation made it an easy sell when, 131 years after the Revolutionary War, Virginia offered London a Washington of its own. The statue arrived in 1914, and King George V personally approved Trafalgar for its home.
World War I intervened, and it wasn't until 1921 that the statue was dedicated. By then the countries had become true allies, this time fighting together in a devastating war. It was the moment some scholars say the special relationship actually began.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Congo and Rwanda will sign peace deal on June 27, a major step in ending fighting in eastern Congo
DAKAR, Senegal — Congo and Rwanda will sign a peace agreement in Washington on June 27, a joint press release from the nations and the U.S. State Department said Wednesday. Both countries have agreed to the terms of the deal aimed at ending fighting in eastern Congo. Congo has accused Rwanda of backing M23 rebels in the east of the country. U.N. experts say the rebels are supported by about 4,000 troops from the neighboring nation. The decades-long conflict escalated in January , when the M23 rebels advanced and seized the strategic Congolese city of Goma, followed by the town of Bukavu in February. The draft agreement includes 'provisions on respect for territorial integrity and a prohibition of hostilities; disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration of non-state armed groups,' the joint statement said. The agreement that will be signed also includes a commitment to respecting territorial integrity and the conditional integration of non-state armed groups. Both countries have in the past held peace talks that have largely stalled, including talks hosted by Qatar . Corneille Nangaa, leader of the Congo River Alliance, a coalition of rebel groups, told The Associated Press in April that international sanctions and Congo's proposed minerals deal with the United States in search of peace would not stop the fighting . M23 is one of about 100 armed groups that have been vying for a foothold in mineral-rich eastern Congo near the border with Rwanda. The conflict has created one of the world's worst humanitarian crises and has displaced more than 7 million people.


Politico
40 minutes ago
- Politico
Israel strikes Iran's Arak heavy water reactor, state television says
Israel has attacked Iran's Arak heavy water reactor, Iranian state television said Thursday. The report said there was 'no radiation danger whatsoever' and that the facility had already been evacuated before the attack. Israel had warned earlier Thursday morning it would attack the facility and urged the public to flee the area. The warning came in a social media post on X. It included a satellite image of the plant in a red circle like other warnings that preceded strikes. The Israeli military said Thursday's round of airstrikes targeted Tehran and other areas of Iran, without elaborating. It later said Iran fired a new salvo of missiles at Israel and told the public to take shelter. Israel's seventh day of airstrikes on Iran came a day after Iran's supreme leader rejected U.S. calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them.' Israel also lifted some restrictions on daily life, suggesting the missile threat from Iran on its territory was easing. Already, Israel's campaign has targeted Iran's enrichment site at Natanz, centrifuge workshops around Tehran and a nuclear site in Isfahan. Its strikes have also killed top generals and nuclear scientists. A Washington-based Iranian human rights group said at least 639 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 1,300 wounded. In retaliation, Iran has fired some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones, killing at least 24 people in Israel and wounding hundreds. Some have hit apartment buildings in central Israel, causing heavy damage. The Arak heavy water reactor is 250 kilometers (155 miles) southwest of Tehran. Heavy water helps cool nuclear reactors, but it produces plutonium as a byproduct that can potentially be used in nuclear weapons. That would provide Iran another path to the bomb beyond enriched uranium, should it choose to pursue the weapon. Iran had agreed under its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to redesign the facility to relieve proliferation concerns. In 2019, Iran started up the heavy water reactor's secondary circuit, which at the time did not violate Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. Britain at the time was helping Iran redesign the Arak reactor to limit the amount of plutonium it produces, stepping in for the U.S., which had withdrawn from the project after President Donald Trump's decision in 2018 to unilaterally withdraw America from the nuclear deal. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, has been urging Israel not to strike Iranian nuclear sites. IAEA inspectors reportedly last visited Arak on May 14. Due to restrictions Iran imposed on inspectors, the IAEA has said it lost 'continuity of knowledge' about Iran's heavy water production -- meaning it could not absolutely verify Tehran's production and stockpile. As part of negotiations around the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to sell off its heavy water to the West to remain in compliance with the accord's terms. Even the U.S. purchased some 32 tons of heavy water for over $8 million in one deal. That was one issue that drew criticism from opponents to the deal.


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Trump coy on fire aid for ‘incompetent' Newsom
Programming note: We'll be off this Thursday but back in your inboxes on Monday. DRIVING THE DAY: Donald Trump is keeping up his multi-front war on California, saying, 'Yeah, maybe,' when asked today if his 'recent dust-ups' with Gov. Gavin Newsom will affect the state's wildfire aid. 'Hatred is never a good thing in politics,' the president told reporters, calling Newsom 'incompetent.' 'When you don't like somebody, don't respect somebody, it's harder for that person to get money if you're on top.' Newsom said in an X post that 'sucking up to the President should not be a requirement for him to do the right thing for the American people.' 'These are families who've lost their homes, their belongings — the irreplaceable pieces of a life built over decades, reduced to ash,' the governor said. 'Only a truly disturbed person would threaten to withhold aid from victims because they don't like someone.' ON THE GROUND: Southern California Democratic lawmakers are taking stock of Trump's immigration crackdown, as protests in the region have ebbed. Recent ICE raids have hit garment manufacturers, Home Depots, farms and churches. In Assemblymember Isaac Bryan's west Los Angeles district, federal agents rounded up people at car washes. (The Los Angeles Times reported ICE has swept at least nine such businesses in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Labor advocates said agents took at least 26 people from five area car washes.) 'We are seeing kind of the fear and anxiety magnify and continue to play out while this is happening,' Bryan said. Playbook talked to Bryan about how the raids have affected his district and what he's doing in the aftermath. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. How many people have been reaching out to you recently as a result of the raids, and what are they telling you? [As of Monday] I've gotten 30 to 40 phone calls and text messages. There are a bunch of community group chats where screenshots get sent kind of in rapid time. And that's a decision of the federal government. By choosing not to work with local partners, work with the state, to give advance notice, everybody is operating that kind of way. They're telling me where ICE is in the district, whether they're stationed in Palms or Mar Vista, whether it's a staging area or a place where the vehicles are just parked, or whether it's somewhere where a raid is happening … we find out pretty quickly. And community rallies together, and we try to figure out, what can we do? What are some of the things you've tried to do? Be there for the families. Observe and document who is being picked up … and then follow up with the families to see if we can locate where their loved ones have been taken. We're moving a little bit away from the big protests and events of last week — how do you see things unfolding moving forward? I don't see a lot of options for this administration. I saw them talking recently about how they wouldn't like to do it this way, but they're casting a wide net … I'm worried that asylum-seekers aren't safe. I'm worried that nobody trying to go [through] the legal process is safe because we are hearing that they are disrupting all of those legal proceedings and just apprehending folks there, as well. It's a very scary time if you are trying to seek refuge in the United States. Is there anything more you think the Legislature is going to do on this front? A number of us are thinking about potential legislative interventions and trying to wrap our head around the different constitutional and preemption concerns — what is in our authority, what is in our purview, what is not. But those conversations are actively happening. I know I have some Senate colleagues who talked to me ahead of time about things that they were thinking about. And some folks were willing to even just be challenged in court, to make the stand for California. And so I think all things are on the table right now. IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY GENDER-AFFIRMING DEFEAT: The Supreme Court today dealt transgender rights advocates a blow, upholding a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming medical care for minors, our Josh Gerstein reports. In a 6-3 ruling, the court's conservative majority rejected a challenge from transgender adolescents and their families who argued that the ban violates the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection. Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the majority opinion that the ban, passed in 2023, does not discriminate against people based on their 'transgender status.' The majority also rejected arguments from the law's challengers that it amounts to unconstitutional discrimination on the basis of sex. 'The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound,' Roberts wrote. 'The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best.' The court's liberals dissented, arguing that the law clearly draws sex-based distinctions and that Tennessee should have been required to prove in court the measure was necessary to advance an important state interest. 'The majority refuses to call a spade a spade,' Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. 'Instead, it obfuscates a sex classification that is plain on the face of this statute.' IN OTHER NEWS CALIFORNIA'S A TRENDSETTER: Blue-state lawmakers are following in the Golden State's footsteps and pushing Big Tech to pony up cash for struggling newsrooms, fearful that President Donald Trump's policies could crush already reeling local outlets, our Tyler Katzenberger reports today. Democrats in five blue states — Hawaii, Illinois, New York, Oregon and Washington — have been trying to make tech companies pay outlets in exchange for displaying news content, building off an idea Assemblymember Buffy Wicks pushed in California last year. That was already a tall task. But the White House is making it even harder, as Trump seeks spending cuts for public media and champions economic policies that states say have hurt their ability to backstop local newsroom funding. 'Whether it's tariffs on newsprint imported from Canada or a reduction in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and others — all of these have a negative impact,' said Democratic Washington state Sen. Marko Liias, who introduced a tech tax proposal this year. 'What they're doing at the federal level is pushing us in the wrong direction.' Read more from Tyler. SCREEN TIME: International students' social media will be subject to screening from U.S. diplomats, our Nahal Toosi and Eric Bazail-Eimil report. POLITICO obtained a State Department cable directing consular officers to review the online presence of foreign nationals applying for student and other educational visas. Diplomats were directed to review applicants' online presence for 'any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States.' The cable also instructs embassies to flag any 'advocacy for, aid or support for foreign terrorists and other threats to U.S. national security' and 'support for unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence.' The cable appears to be the latest salvo in the Trump administration's efforts to punish American colleges and universities for their handling of pro-Palestinian protests on campus and root out what it alleges is rampant antisemitism and liberalism at elite institutions of higher learning. WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — The U.S. Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in a lawsuit from Huntington Beach that attempted to overturn California's sanctuary law that restricts the involvement of local law enforcement in federal immigration enforcement. (Orange County Register) — Trump indicated that his administration will not provide more funding for California's high-speed rail, which falls in line with an earlier threat this month from the U.S. Department of Transportation to withhold billions in aid from the project. (Sacramento Bee) — Transportation officials plan to halt service along five bus lines in San Francisco starting Saturday. (San Francisco Chronicle) AROUND THE STATE — The Los Angeles Dodgers have remained quiet amid protests and upheaval within immigrant neighborhoods in its hometown even as 40 percent of its fan base is Latino. (The Bulwark) — PG&E has placed more than a dozen counties on notice for a potential public safety power shutoff as wildfire concerns grow amid hot and windy weather. (Fresno Bee) — San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria applied a scarcely used tool called a line-item veto and blocked millions in spending, which included vetoing the full restoration of recreation programs at two of the area's most popular reservoirs and fixing issues in the city's wildfire prevention system. (San Diego Union-Tribune) — compiled by Juliann Ventura