Bushiri twist: NGO goes for accountant as she turns State witness
The non-governmental organisation Right to Justice has called for perjury and obstruction of justice charges against Landiwe Ntlokwana, the accountant of controversial preacher Shepherd Bushiri, after the leak of her affidavit in the ongoing fraud case.
Ntlokwana, initially one of the accused in the 2021 case, has since indicated a shift to state witness status, raising serious questions about the timing of her testimony and the integrity of the legal process.
The NGO's concerns centre around the potential implications of Ntlokwana's sudden decision to cooperate with the prosecution after four years of silence. Right to Justice argues that this move could undermine the case and believes Ntlokwana should be investigated for perjury, given the inconsistencies and omissions within her affidavit.
They assert that her actions may have been aimed at shielding *Bushiri* while implicating other co-accused.'It's deeply concerning that Ntlokwana has remained silent all this time,' said Siphesihle Jele, chairperson of Right to Justice.
'Now, she wants to flip the script, claiming to be a state witness when she could have spoken out years ago. We believe she is guilty of perjury and defeating the ends of justice by withholding crucial information and only revealing it now when it suits her.'
The case in question involves allegations of financial misconduct and fraud, dating back to 2021, surrounding Bushiri's church and his Commodities Trading Platform. Ntlokwana's affidavit, which provides detailed accounts of her role, has caused an uproar due to the timing of its submission, as it comes after the prosecution has struggled to secure a conviction in the case.
In the affidavit, Ntlokwana reveals that she was recruited by Bushiri to assist with the Commodities Project, noting that she believed in him as a prophet and was motivated by his promise of helping others. 'I believed that he was a prophet of God... I truly believed that he was going to help the people and myself the way that other businessmen had never done,' Ntlokwana states in the affidavit.
She further explains that she was actively involved in the administration of the Commodities Trading Platform, admitting: 'I put my hand up to serve in the Administration Committee for the Commodities Trading Platform.'
This admission has raised questions about her level of involvement in the operation and whether she was complicit in any illicit activities during her tenure.The leak of the affidavit has also prompted allegations that Ntlokwana's decision to cooperate with the prosecution could be a strategic move to distance herself from potential criminal liability while helping the state strengthen its case.
Under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an accused person can turn state witness in exchange for immunity if their testimony is crucial in securing a conviction.
However, Right to Justice argues that Ntlokwana's actions should be scrutinized, especially given the long delay in her cooperation. The NGO questions why she waited for four years to reveal what she now claims to know. They contend that this delay could be an attempt to obstruct justice by withholding critical evidence that could have led to earlier proceedings.
'If Ntlokwana was truly acting in the interest of justice, why didn't she speak up when the case began in 2021?' asked Jele.
'Her recent decision to turn state witness seems more like a tactic to exonerate herself while implicating others. This is a clear violation of the principles of fairness and transparency in legal proceedings.'
Right to Justice insists that the authorities investigate whether Ntlokwana's actions constitute perjury and obstruction, and they are calling for her to be charged accordingly. The organization is also urging the prosecution to explain why it has allowed a previously accused individual to shift roles in such a significant manner and whether this could undermine the integrity of the entire case.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
5 days ago
- The Citizen
Northern Cape man who killed sister's baby while high on tik escapes life sentence
The sister told the court during trial that she had forgiven her brother. A 39-year-old man who killed his sister's one-year-old child while under the influence of the drug tik (crystal meth) has avoided a life sentence. The accused, referred to only as D.F., was recently sentenced to five years' imprisonment by the Northern Cape High Court in Kimberly. Background D.F. faced four charges of assault with the intent to do grievous bodily harm (GBH), kidnapping, murder, and housebreaking with intent to commit a crime. He had already spent approximately two years and four months in custody at the time of sentencing, awaiting the conclusion of his trial. Although the judgment did not provide detailed facts about the incident, arrest, or trial proceedings, it confirmed that D.F., who was 34 at the time of the offence, underwent a 30-day psychiatric evaluation due to his history of drug addiction. ALSO READ: Mother in custody after video of 3-year-old boy allegedly smoking drugs [VIDEO] A psychiatric report concluded that the accused was mentally fit to stand trial, but had been so heavily intoxicated at the time of the offences that his ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of his actions was negatively impacted. As a result, the 39-year-old man was not convicted on the original charges, but rather under Section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act (CLAA), which applies to crimes committed while an individual is voluntarily intoxicated. Correctional services report A witness for the state, Ms Klaaste, a correctional services officer, had presented a report to the court during the trial, arguing against a non-custodial sentence under Section 276(1)(h) of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA). She stressed the seriousness of D.F's actions and the inadequacy of state-run rehabilitation services outside prison due to overcrowding and placement delays. Private facilities, she told the court, were too expensive and unaffordable for the accused. READ MORE: Criminal record? These are the options for children bust with drugs Klaaste testified that the Kimberley Correctional Centre had a full-time doctor and trained nursing staff with experience in managing mental health conditions. This, she added, would enable D.F to take his prescribed medication consistently for his chronic drug-induced psychotic mood disorder and epilepsy. Such support was not available at the Hopetown Correctional Centre, which is closer to D.F's home and family. Northern Cape High Court sentencing In delivering his judgment, Northern Cape High Court Judge Lawrence Lever considered the nature of the offences, the accused's personal circumstances, and the broader interests of society. D.F's background included a Grade 11 education, casual work on a farm earning R1 200 every two weeks, and fatherhood to two children. The judge also took into account the 39-year-old man's time already served in custody and the fact that he committed the offences while in a drug-induced psychotic state. 'Dr Kirimi described the accused as acting as if he were an automaton,' the judgment reads. Lever also reflected on the testimony of D.F's sister, who was both the victim of the assault and the mother of the deceased child. READ MORE: Why isn't it more difficult to do drugs in South Africa? While acknowledging the deep impact of her child's death, she told the court she had forgiven her brother. She also shared that she had suffered from drug addiction herself, starting before D.F., and that her brother had once tried to help her overcome it, which she ultimately did. 'Ms F seemed to understand her brother's addiction. She also seemed to have a genuine desire to help him. 'It is clear from the evidence placed before this court prior to the conviction of the accused and during the sentencing process that abuse of the drug tik was central to this tragedy. That were it not for his addiction, this tragedy would not have happened,' Lever said. Minimum sentence not applicable Noting the seriousness of the murder and kidnapping, the judge concluded that the prescribed minimum sentences for serious offences, including life imprisonment under Section 51 of the CLAA, did not apply in this case. Referring to a previous judgment, Lever said that although punishment must fit both the criminal and the crime, 'it is appropriate to show the accused a measure of mercy' under the circumstances. 'The accused must also receive treatment to optimise his chances of rehabilitation and optimise the chances of preventing a similar tragedy in the future.' Lever, therefore, imposed a custodial sentence, ordering that D.F serve his sentence at the Kimberley Correctional Centre. The court handed down sentences for each conviction: five years for murder, three years for kidnapping, six months for assault, and three months for housebreaking, which will run concurrently. As a result, D.F received an effective sentence of five years' imprisonment, which includes the more than two years he has already served in custody during the trial process. NOW READ: Drug-addicted mother who killed son and went to church gets 20 years

IOL News
7 days ago
- IOL News
Trial of Lusikisiki massacre accused postponed for new evidence review
IOL The eight accused of the Lusikisiki mass murder trial set. Image: Picture: Supplied/ NPA The highly anticipated trial of six men accused of mass murder in Ngobozana Village, Lusikisiki, faced a delay on Tuesday when the state unexpectedly provided previously undisclosed evidence to the defence just hours before court proceedings were set to begin. The trial stems from the horrific events of September 28, 2024, when 18 people were brutally gunned down at two neighbouring homesteads in Ngobozana Village, near the rural town of Lusikisiki in the Eastern Cape. The newly submitted material includes three witness statements and a SAP13 exhibit register, documents which were not part of the original docket. Prosecutors told the court that the evidence only came to light following recent consultations with state witnesses. During court proceedings, defence counsel raised concern about receiving fresh evidence so late, saying it required full re-consultation with the accused. "It seems there are cases developing day by day, we need time to consider the advice given to clients and determine our next direction." The court agreed that it would not be fair for the defence to face witness testimony without proper preparation. The judge ruled that the trial would stand down until tomorrow morning, giving all legal teams time to review the new material and take further instructions. In another development, it was confirmed that Accused No. 2, one of the six men on trial, is refusing to sign admissions under Section 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act. His legal representative informed the court that, despite being advised on the legal implications, the accused did not wish to admit to any facts. As a result, the state will need to present full evidence on those matters. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The court also addressed, Mzukisi Ndamase, who is representing himself. He was instructed to use the rest of the day to review the new documents, including the SAP13 register. The judge explained the register's importance as it contains records of crime scene evidence booked into police custody. The matter will resume on Wednesday, July 30, with the expectation that the state will begin leading its first witness. IOL News

IOL News
27-07-2025
- IOL News
Leaked affidavit exposing Landiwe Ntlokwana's involvement in a multi-million rand scheme
According to the affidavit, Ntlokwana managed investor data, tracked payments, and even used her company's bank account — GTT Wealth (Pty) Ltd — to receive millions of rands from individuals drawn into Bushiri's now-notorious commodities investment platform. Image: Supplied A leaked affidavit has exposed Landiwe Ntlokwana, a former auditor and financial coordinator for Prophet Shepherd Bushiri, as a key figure in a multi-million rand investment scheme — and strongly suggests she is using her testimony under Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act in a strategic bid to escape prosecution. According to the affidavit, Ntlokwana managed investor data, tracked payments, and even used her company's bank account — GTT Wealth (Pty) Ltd — to receive millions of rands from individuals drawn into Bushiri's now-notorious commodities investment platform. Her phone, she claims, was used by multiple committee members as the central point of contact for investor communication. 'The committee and I continued our administrative duties as described previously. My phone continued being passed around for whoever wanted to focus on that function,' she said. With a strong background in Microsoft Excel, Ntlokwana took responsibility for consolidating all investor information into a single master file, which she says was used by the IT team for internal reporting and to generate investor statements. The affidavit details the rapid expansion of the scheme and growing unrest within the church community. Ntlokwana describes how popularity surged beyond South Africa's borders, leading to complaints from international followers of Bushiri's Enlightened Christian Gathering Church who felt excluded from the opportunity. 'They started saying what was the point of belonging to a community where only a select few can participate in empowerment initiatives,' she said. These concerns, she claims, were taken directly to response, Ntlokwana says Bushiri called a closed-door meeting with her and five other women in his inner circle — Gladness, Rosemary, Shirley, Jumoke, and Memory. During the meeting, Bushiri announced the launch of a new investment round: Commodities Trade Cycle 3. This phase, however, was exclusive to high-net-worth individuals, with a minimum investment of R1 million. Despite her corporate background at firms like Grant Thornton and Allan Gray, Ntlokwana admits there were no formal contracts governing her role. Legal experts find this highly questionable. 'She's not an amateur. She knows how finance works,' said a senior investigator. 'The absence of contracts and the use of her company account are not rookie mistakes — they point to direct involvement.'Under Section 204, an accused may be granted immunity in exchange for full and truthful testimony. ''But such a deal hinges on credibility — something that could be Ntlokwana's biggest hurdle.'She handled the money, the records, and the investor lists,' the investigator continued. 'Now she's trying to claim she was just assisting — but this affidavit proves she was in control.' With Bushiri still in Malawi and his extradition proceedings stalled, Ntlokwana's testimony could close the case but she if found to be self-serving or unreliable, the prosecution could be left with little to stand on