
Explainer: What just happened in the U.S. Treasury market?
LONDON, April 10 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to pause the hefty duties he had said he would impose on dozens of countries one week ago followed turmoil in financial markets that included an acute selloff in the $29 trillion Treasury market.
Trump said on Wednesday the bond market had recovered well after investors became queasy about it in reaction to his tariff announcements.
The selloff is the latest sign of the power of government bond markets to act as a restraint on policymakers, while talk of a return of so-called bond vigilantes has risen in recent years.
WHAT HAPPENED IN BOND MARKETS THIS WEEK?
In short, the U.S. Treasury market -- a central pillar of the global financial system -- came under heavy selling pressure, sending 10-year borrowing costs surging.
At one-point, 10-year bond yields were set for their biggest weekly jump in more than a decade. Bond yields move inversely to the price. Trading at 4.27% on Thursday, those yields are comfortably below Wednesday's peak of 4.51% . They are also well below the high of almost 5% hit in late 2023 and the double-digit levels seen in the 1980s.
Notably, this jump was a sharp reversal of the initial fall seen after Trump's sweeping tariff announcement last week that raised U.S. recession risks and expectations for rate cuts.
WHY DO WE CARE?
Because the Treasury market is crucial to financial market stability at home and abroad.
A government can raise revenue to fund spending through income such as tax receipts or borrow money on the bond markets.
Not only does it face higher borrowing costs it there's a bond selloff but those increases filter across to mortgages and corporate loans, spreading out the economic damage.
The 30-year mortgage rate for instance is benchmarked to 10-year Treasuries , which surged by more than 20 bps at one point on Wednesday - before the tariff pause brought calm.
Yields on U.S. corporate bonds, which are priced off of U.S. Treasuries, have shot up. Yields on U.S. junk bonds closed Wednesday nearly a percentage point higher than a week ago at 8.38%, an ICE BofA index shows (.MERH0A0), opens new tab
Higher Treasury yields also pushed up borrowing costs across the globe, a headache for countries such as Britain or France that are already grappling with high amounts of debt.
Heavily indebted Japan's 30-year bond yield this week surged to 21-year highs, and Britain's 30-year bond yields hit their highest since 1998. Both were below those peaks on Thursday , .
HOW BAD WAS THE STRESS?
The speed and the scale of the selloff in Treasuries meant signs of dislocation emerged as hedge funds unwound some debt-fuelled bets.
While market participants, who include brokers, traders and investors, said the selloff was orderly, indicators such as bid-ask spreads -- or the difference between buyers' and sellers' price offers -- widened on Wednesday before Trump's announcement. One trading desk said the bid-ask spread was double its normal levels.
Investors and analysts likened this week's moves to the frantic "dash-for-cash" of March 2020, when a crash in the Treasury market forced the Federal Reserve to step in with a massive $1.6 trillion bond-buying rescue.
The scale of the selloff, highlighting vulnerabilities in a key market, also drew parallels with Britain's 2022 mini-budget crisis that sparked a UK bond rout.
DID HEDGE FUNDS CAUSE THE SELLING?
One explanation for the sharp selloff was that a rapid unwinding of so-called basis trades was exacerbating the selling.
Basis trades, typically the domain of macro hedge funds, rely on selling futures contracts or paying swaps and buying cash Treasuries with borrowed money, with a view to exploiting slight price differences.
If a prime brokerage, which lends money to hedge funds, asks for their money back that can lead to an unwinding of the basis trade.
There was also some concern that China could offload U.S. Treasuries, something that would take time to show up in official numbers. China is the second-biggest foreign holder of U.S. government debt after Japan, holding almost $761 billion of bonds in January.
WHERE DO THE BOND VIGILANTES COME INTO IT?
The term bond vigilantes, coined in the 1980s, refers to debt investors who seek to impose fiscal discipline on governments they perceive as profligate by raising their borrowing costs.
In the context of this week, the term is also being used to describe the bond market selloff as a sign of investors expressing concern about the consequences of erratic policymaking.
"The Bond Vigilantes have struck again," Yardeni Research said in a note, adding that they were the only players with a 100% success rate in U.S. markets. "As far as we can tell, at least with respect to U.S. financial markets, they are the only 1.000 hitters in history."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘No doubt' Trump will back nuclear submarine deal, says Starmer
There is 'no doubt' that Donald Trump will end up backing the Aukus nuclear submarine deal, Sir Keir Starmer has said during his trip to Canada ahead of the G7 summit. The pact between Australia, the UK and the US, known by its acronym, was thrown into doubt last week when the Pentagon announced a review into it. The agreement was signed in 2021 and is worth £176 billion, giving Australia nuclear-powered submarines for the first time. It is designed to counter the influence of China in the Indo-Pacific. The US president has appointed Elbridge Colby to head up the review. The former US deputy assistant secretary of defence questioned the deal in a speech last year, asking why the US was giving away 'this crown jewel asset when we most need it'. Both the US and the UK are under pressure to boost defence spending from Mr Trump, who has demanded Western allies do more to protect their own security. Sir Keir is expected to hold talks with Mr Trump during the G7 summit in Canada, giving him the opportunity to sway his counterpart to remain committed to the Aukus pact. Travelling with reporters on a plane to Canada, Sir Keir was asked what his message would be to Mr Trump about the importance of the alliance. Sir Keir said: 'Aukus is really important. We're fully committed to it. 'It's not unusual for an incoming government to do a review of a project like that. We, of course, looked into the issue when we came into government... and they're doing their own review. 'But I'm 100 per cent committed to it. I'm really clear about that.' Asked if he was confident Mr Trump would end up backing Aukus, Sir Keir said: 'Yeah, I think so. It's a really important project. So I don't have any doubt that this will progress.' The public optimism has been echoed in Australia, where Richard Marles, the defence minister, recently said of the review: 'I'm very confident this is going to happen.' Concerns about whether Mr Trump would remain fully behind Aukus were flagged early internally by Downing Street when he won the US presidential election last November. The agreement was signed by Joe Biden, the Democrat who defeated Mr Trump in the 2020 presidential election and has often been a focus of his criticism. Indeed, the other two leaders who signed the pact have also changed, with Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison long gone as the leaders of the UK and Australia respectively. Mr Trump appeared not to know what the acronym Aukus meant when it was mentioned in the Oval Office during Sir Keir's first visit to the new US president in February. But the Prime Minister seems hopeful that, like the deal to hand sovereignty over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius that was waved through by Mr Biden, Mr Trump will eventually give it his backing. A Pentagon official told the BBC last week when the review was announced that the process was to ensure Aukus meets 'common sense, America First criteria'. Australia is buying up to five nuclear-powered submarines at a huge expense from the US, potentially making it easy to frame the deal as a boost for the American economy. Meanwhile, the date for implementation of the UK-US free trade deal, signed off by Sir Keir and Mr Trump in May, appears to be days away. It is possible Sir Keir will announce that the agreement is finally kicking in during the G7 summit, should he hold a formal bilateral meeting with the US president.


The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer in desperate bid to finalise trade deal with Trump as steel tariff deadline looms
Keir Starmer has admitted that the clock is ticking on getting his much-vaunted trade deal with Donald Trump in place before the steel industry is hit by crippling 50 per cent tariffs. The two men unveiled their trade deal last month to great fanfare as the first of a number that the US President hopes to get across the line following his decision to impose worldwide tariffs. The issue is one of a number Sir Keir will hope can be dealt with at a crucial G7 summit in Canada. However, a deadline of Wednesday looms large, leaving Sir Keir just days to get his deal implemented before subsequent tariffs announced by Trump of 50 per cent on steel imports also apply to the UK. The 50 per cent rate already applies to the rest of the world, but the UK government managed to get a grace period because of its earlier deal to keep them at 25 per cent. Speaking to journalists on the plane to the G7 in Alberta, Sir Keir suggested he was confident about getting the job done but could not guarantee he would hit the deadline. He is due to meet the US president at his first G7 summit in a bilateral meeting on the fringes of the gathering of world leaders, as well as at social events. He said: 'We've shaken on the deal and we're at the implementing stage now, which doesn't actually require another shake of the hand, although I am sure there will be many shakes of the hand. I mean, we have reached the agreement and are now implementing it and that is going on. Asked if it was 'job done', he added: 'Well, we are at the final stages. We had to do various things, they had to do various things, but I am very confident we're implementing it.' The issue is of added importance for Sir Keir because the US deal is one of his major successes in a premiership of less than a year, fraught with rows and controversy. Labour also effectively nationalised British Steel as an emergency measure, which leaves the British taxpayer on the hook if markets in America are lost. The issue is not the only headache for the prime minister, who now also has to ensure President Trump does not abandon the UK, US and Australia submarine pact Aukus, having put it under review. Sir Keir said: 'Aukus is really important. We're fully committed to it. It's not unusual for an incoming government to do a review of a project like that. We, of course, looked into the issue when we came into government, we got Steven to look at it, and they're doing their own review. But I'm 100 per cent committed to it. I'm really clear about that.' Asked if he was confident President Trump would continue with the deal, he said: 'I think so. It's a really important project. So I don't have any doubt that this will progress.'


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump won't sink crucial nuclear submarine deal, Keir Starmer says
Keir Starmer insisted the landmark AUKUS deal signed by Australia, the UK and the US was 'really important' - and dismissed fears Donald Trump could abandon the crucial pact Donald Trump will back a multi-billion pound nuclear submarine pact despite a Washington review, Keir Starmer has suggested. The PM insisted the landmark deal signed by Australia, the UK and the US, which would give Australia its first nuclear powered subs, was "really important". It was first agreed by former PM Boris Johnson and ex-US President Joe Biden in 2021. The Aukus deal involves the three nations building a new generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines and cooperating in other areas of advanced defence technology. The deal will also see Australia buy three Virginia-class submarines from the US ahead of the new vessels being built. But last week it was reported the White House was reviewing the deal, saying the security pact must fit with Trump's "America First" agenda. It raised fears the US administration could pull out of the deal. But asked whether he was confident Mr Trump would back it in the end, Mr Starmer replied: 'Yeah, I think so. It's a really important project. So I don't have any doubt that this will progress.' He added: 'Aukus is really important. We're fully committed to it. "It's not unusual for an incoming government to do a review of a project like that. But I'm 100% committed to it. I'm really clear about that. "We, of course, looked into the issue when we came into they're doing their own review. But I'm 100% committed to it. I'm really clear about that." Last week, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds branded it a "first class" partnership. He told a press gallery lunch in Westminster: "The US is reviewing a lot of its international relationships, whether those are with multilateral bodies or agreements like that. "AUKUS is, on both the defence and industrial level, a genuinely first class agreement of how we treat each other's suppliers and the supply chain, and what outcome we're seeking to do and the level of collaboration. "So I would have a lot of confidence in anyone looking at the various bits of that agreement and saying that it is an incredibly strong and important agreement for the future. "So US colleagues want to look at it? Okay, that's their right to do so. "I think it is an incredibly compelling and strong agreement. When they look at it, I'm pretty certain they'll be in agreement."