Over half of Americans say ‘big, beautiful bill' going to raise health care costs: Poll
Thirteen percent in the CBS/YouGov poll released Sunday said that the 'big, beautiful bill' will lower their health-care costs and 33 percent said there will be no impact.
While the Congressional Budget Office has not yet released a final estimate for the measure as enacted, it projected that 16 million people would lose their health insurance by 2034 under an earlier House-passed version of the bill. This analysis has been the basis for many Democrats' messaging around health care, and health-care advocates have still warned that the final version could be devastating to communities relying on Medicaid.
The sprawling package permanently extends many of the temporary tax cuts passed by Republicans during President Trump's first term, alongside making deep spending reductions to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other welfare programs. The measure would primarily benefit wealthy Americans, an analysis by the Yale Budget Lab found last month.
Democrats have assailed the legislation as a historic transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich and are looking to message around its cuts to health care for the 2026 midterms — even if some of the package's most significant changes don't kick in until 2028.
Overall, six in 10 questioned in the CBS/YouGov survey disapprove of the GOP megabill. A similar percentage said that it will help wealthy people and hurt poor people. A separate AP-NORC poll released Saturday found that nearly two-thirds of Americans think the legislation will do more to help wealthy people.
In the CBS/YouGov poll, 40 percent of respondents said they thought the measure will increase their taxes. Another 32 percent said they thought their taxes will not be impacted either way.
A majority — 56 percent — said that they tied issues regarding the megabill significantly to how they evaluate President Trump's second term. A plurality of Americans, 44 percent, said they had a 'general sense' of the content of the legislation alongside some specifics. Meanwhile, roughly two in 10 — 22 percent — said they had a general idea of it but lacked specifics.
The CBS/YouGov poll was conducted between July 16 and July 18, with a sample of 2,343 and a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul picks an abortion fight — to boost her re-election bid, inspire Dems
A new war between the states is erupting — this time over abortion. And if Gov. Kathy Hochul has her way, it will be the top talking point in her re-election campaign. A dozen states, including Texas and Louisiana, have enacted near-total bans on abortion. New York and seven other states are going on the offense against them. Hochul seeks to establish herself as America's Supreme Leader on abortion, dictating policy across the country through the shield law she signed in 2023. The law promises legal protection to New York doctors who prescribe abortion drugs via telemedicine to patients in states that restrict such treatments. Doctors are mailing abortion drugs to patients, sometimes without even a consultation, to thwart state laws. Texas and Louisiana are coming after some of these doctors, including New York's Dr. Margaret Carpenter. Her offense is especially outrageous: She prescribed a cocktail of abortion drugs to a Louisiana woman — without confirming the woman was actually pregnant. The recipient, who herself faces prosecution, allegedly forced the drugs on her pregnant 17-year-old daughter, who wanted to keep the baby. Louisiana wants to extradite Carpenter and try her in criminal court. A Texas court has slapped her with a $100,000 civil penalty. Hochul says there's 'no way in hell' she'll enforce the Texas penalty, or surrender Carpenter to Louisiana authorities. Hochul buttressed her shield law this spring, when she signed additional measures allowing abortion docs to keep their names off prescription bottles — making it harder for out-of-state law enforcement to track them down. Rep. Mike Lawler, a Republican from the Hudson Valley, worries that Hochul 'has invited New York to be the abortion capital of the world.' Count on this battle to roil the New York governor's race in 2026. Lawler is frequently mentioned as Hochul's possible opponent, as is ardent pro-lifer Rep. Elise Stefanik. Stefanik gets an A+ rating from Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a leading anti-abortion non-profit, for her work 'defend[ing] the lives of the unborn' and 'stopping hard-earned tax dollars from paying for abortion.' In 2023 she co-sponsored the SAVE Mothers and Babies Act, which would have barred the FDA from approving new abortion drugs and required abortion pills to be administered in person by a doctor or nurse — effectively outlawing their use in states with abortion bans. After the Supreme Court's 2022 Dobbs ruling made abortion a local issue, Stefanik said it was time for the states to 'embrace this debate' over abortion. Democrats in New York would like nothing more. Expect them to run hard on abortion next year — because they won't have much else. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters With the Empire State's population in decline, energy costs soaring, and high taxes and regulation throttling the economy, a hot-button issue like abortion is one of the few ways Democrats can inspire the party's leftist base. As if crusading for abortion access in Texas could possibly make up for New York's dead-last ranking in economic prospects, according to the Rich States, Poor States index. In her last gubernatorial race, Hochul was a one-trick pony. She unleashed millions of dollars' worth of ads against Republican nominee Lee Zeldin, slamming his pro-life stance — and she won. Lesson to the GOP: Take that issue off the table. In New York, women's reproductive rights are safely enshrined in the state's constitution. The question is closed — or it should be. New York's clash with anti-abortion states is widely expected to reach the Supreme Court, perhaps ahead of the November 2026 gubernatorial vote. It's a big deal. Every month, some 7,700 women in anti-abortion states terminate pregnancies with pills prescribed by telehealth doctors, according to the Society of Family Planning. New Yorkers should be asking why they are footing the bill for this legal battle. Shouldn't the state just mind its own business? The Dobbs decision empowered each state to make its own decisions about abortion. But Hochul is actually helping New York doctors break the laws of other states, using state taxpayer resources to do so. She has long made New York a sanctuary state for illegal migrants. Now she wants to make New York a sanctuary for lawless abortion providers. Expect New York to get clobbered when this case reaches the highest court: Hochul's efforts to evade and obstruct the laws of Texas and Louisiana violate the principles of federalism, as well as the spirit of Dobbs. Meanwhile, don't let the 2026 gubernatorial race devolve into a fistfight over abortion. Politicians running for the state's top job should be forced to focus on how to make New York affordable, safe and prosperous. And they should keep their noses out of other states' business. Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and co-founder of the Committee to Save Our City.
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
US Olympic and Paralympic Committee bans transgender athletes in compliance with Trump order
The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee is falling in line with an executive order from President Donald Trump banning transgender women from women's sports. The committee quietly updated its eligibility rules Monday, adding a paragraph to its 27-page 'Athlete Safety Policy' posted to its website that includes language that implies it bars transgender women from competing in women's divisions. Trump signed the 'Keeping Men out of Women's Sports' executive order — also known as Executive Order 14201 — in February. Advertisement The LA2028 official Olympic flag at Los Angeles City Hall on September 23, 2024. Getty Images 'The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act,' the added language in the document stated. It's not clearly stated how the policy will be enforced, and it is unclear whether any American Olympians will be banned from the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympics taking place in Los Angeles. Advertisement A USOPC spokesperson told the New York Times that the committee had been having 'a series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials' following the president's executive order. The committee said it would work with national governing bodies to implement the new policy. 'As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations,' the USOPC statement read. President Donald Trump reacts after the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 Final match between Chelsea FC and Paris Saint-Germain. FIFA via Getty Images Advertisement No openly transgender woman has won an Olympic medal. The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee's former policy based its rulings on 'real data and science-based evidence rather than ideology,' and that it would be 'making science-based decisions, sport by sport and discipline by discipline, within both the Olympic and Paralympic movements.' The International Olympic Committee has struggled to address the issue of transgender athletes in sports. USA Fencing updated its policy last week in response to criticism that it had been facing for allowing biological males to compete in the women's category. Part of the requirements to compete in a domestic women's competition include the language, 'Athletes who are of the female sex, provided all other entry criteria have been met.'
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kevin O'Leary: ‘Nobody gives a poop' about Epstein files
'Shark Tank' investor Kevin O'Leary on Monday downplayed emotions surrounding files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'The reason why people care about this a lot, not just because of the very real Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking and the crimes that were committed, it is the fact that Donald Trump himself spent years, him and his allies promised their base, 'We are going to deliver the Epstein client list that's going to take down all of your Democratic enemies,'' journalist Ahmed Baba told CNN's Abby Phillip in a clip highlighted by Mediate. 'Bring it,' O'Leary cut in. 'Bring it.' 'Well, yes, bring it, Donald. Please, Donald, bring it,' Baba retorted. 'Nobody gives a poop,' the 'Shark Tank' investor responded. In the last few weeks, the Trump administration has faced backlash over its handling of files linked to the Epstein case. Right-wing influencers who had long pushed conspiracy theories about Epstein turned their fury toward the Trump administration, especially Attorney General Pam Bondi, due to a recent Justice Department memo, which dispelled many of the theories. The Epstein saga has also continued to cause chaos in the House, with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) blocking votes on the matter until September after Democrats threatened to force votes about the files, which would put House Republicans in a politically challenging spot. 'Donald Trump and House Republicans have the power to release the Epstein files today. They refuse to do it. What are they hiding from the American people?' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said in a post on the social platform X on Monday.
