Key Dates To Watch In EU Debate On Sustainability Reporting
The requirements for sustainability reporting in the European Union are on the verge of being reduced as legislators consider sweeping changes to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The Commission proposed reforms in the Omnibus Simplification Package. Now, those proposals are being debated in the Parliament and Council in anticipation of final approval by the end of 2025. However, with so many moving parts, it is difficult to keep track of when important votes may happen.
Reforms to the CSDDD, also known as the CS3D, and the CSRD were proposed by the Commission in February, then sent to the Council and the Parliament for approval. The Council's deliberations are mostly behind closed doors. In the Parliament, the debate is public and working through multiple committees, giving interest parties and MEPs the opportunity to voice their opinions.
The Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs, known as JURI, is the primary committee that will produce the legislation that will be sent to the full Parliament for a vote. However, related committees will draft opinions to be considered during the process.
Both the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, known as ECON, and the Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, known as ENVI, posted amendments proposed by their respective members. ECON received 514 proposed amendments while ENVI received 473.
Other committees that will be drafting opinions are Foreign Affairs, known as AFET, International Trade, known as INTA, and Employment and Social Affairs, known as EMPL. While AFET and INTA have not released any documents, EMPL has posted their draft opinion with 49 proposed amendments.
Below are important dates to watch in the legislative process. The most important committee to follow will be JURI.
June 3 - 5: Committee meetings for JURI, ECON, ENVI, EMPL, and AFET.
For now, the Omnibus is not on the agenda for JURI. However, June 4 is the anticipated date for JURI to release the amendments proposed by committee members.
EMPL will meet and vote on their draft opinion on June 4. EMPL members have until June 3 to offer amendments.
ECON will meet and vote on their proposed amendments on June 4. With 514 proposed amendments, it is unclear how the committee will approach the opinion.
The agendas for AFET, ECON, and ENVI do not include the omnibus.
June 23 - 26: Committee meetings for JURI, ECON, ENVI, EMPL, AFET, INTA.
June 27: Deadline for political groups to offer amendments.
Following the deadline for amendments, the Parliament will enter into intergroup negotiations. These are 'informal exchanges' organized by the chairs of the political groups to allow MEPs to discuss proposals.
July 14 - 15, September 1, and September 22 - 23: JURI Committee meetings.
October 13: This is final regular JURI Committee meeting and the anticipated date that the Parliament will make their final vote on the Omnibus.
October - December: Trilogue. Following the vote of the Parliament, designated representatives from the Parliament, Council, and Commission will enter into "trilogue" negotiations. The proposals from each of the three bodies will vary. The trilogue will negotiate the differences to produce a final directive. That directive will be sent to the Council and Parliament for a final vote.
October 31: EFRAG will submit revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards to the Commission. These standards will be adopted by the Commission after the final passage of the omnibus.
December: Final vote in Council and Parliament. The Commission is pushing hard for the Omnibus Simplification Package to be adopted by the end of 2025. However, there is a possibility it spills over into early 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'This is a merger out of distress, not progression' – can ABF-Hovis deal bolster UK bread businesses?
Leaf through at least the last ten years of Associated British Foods' annual reports and it's clear the UK bread market has been no cakewalk for the food, ingredients and retail group. There have been years in which ABF has reported year-on-year revenue growth from its Allied Bakeries arm in the UK but the last decade has been mostly one of sluggish sales and of striving to turn a profit. ABF's struggles in UK bread have long begged questions about its future in the category. Back in 2019, then finance director John Bason, after reporting the third consecutive year in which Allied Bakeries had made an operating loss, told Just Food the company remained committed to the market and ruled out a sale. And the debate stretches back at least as far as this correspondent has covered the food sector. In ABF's 2008 financial year, the Kingsmill bread brand owner said Allied Bakeries had performed 'poorly' in the face of rising commodity costs and fierce competition in the UK bread market (it was ever thus). Some City analysts had begun asking whether ABF should remain in bread, a business central to the start of the company in the 1930s. Fast-forward five years to 2013 and there was speculation ABF might swoop for Hovis, then owned by UK manufacturer Premier Foods. Robert Lawson, the managing partner at European consultancy Food Strategy Associates, remembers the opposite transaction was mooted when he was at Premier in the late 2000s. 'The synergies were significant – consolidation of factories and of the two businesses' expensive direct-store-distribution systems delivering on a daily basis, rationalisation of the management teams running the businesses, consolidation of mills and procurement synergies. On top, there was also the opportunity to rejuvenate Hovis's aged bakery network, which even then was much older than ABF's,' Lawson says. This week, a deal did come to pass – and was something of a surprise to some industry watchers. When ABF announced in April it was putting Allied Bakeries up for strategic review – and, days later, said it was in talks with Hovis's owners, the private-equity firm Endless – many onlookers assumed the group was set to leave the UK bread market. 'Getting bigger in bread is probably not what investors want to see,' Barclays analysts covering ABF said in a note to clients on Friday (15 August). 'No doubt investors would have preferred ABF to have exited UK bread altogether but this wasn't really a realistic option given the structure of the industry with market leader Warburtons family-controlled and Hovis owned by private equity.' City analysts estimate ABF has lost hundreds of millions of pounds in the over-supplied and stagnant UK bread market in recent years. Demand for sliced bread has been soft for a number of years, while Kingsmill and Hovis, with their product ranges largely centred on conventional fare, have faced a trio of competitive threats: private label, more artisan products like sourdough and the strength of the privately owned Warburtons, which has built the largest branded business on solid marketing and innovation. 'We reckon that Allied has lost anywhere between £500m ($673.4m) and £750m over the last 15 years in UK bread,' Shore Capital analyst Clive Black tells Just Food. 'If it hadn't been for the envelope of ABF, [Allied Bakeries] would have been probably closed some time ago. Those numbers are the accumulated trading losses, the redundancies, restructuring and impairments that have taken place. At the moment, we would suggest it's losing on an annualised basis somewhere between £25m and £40m a year.' UK competition scrutiny ABF believes the combined Allied Bakeries and Hovis business can be a more robust operator. 'This transaction will create a UK bakeries business that is both profitable and sustainable over the long term. Supporting the Hovis and Kingsmill brands with well-invested and efficient operations will also enable innovation and growth,' George Weston, ABF's CEO, said on Friday. 'This solution will create value for shareholders, provide greater choice for consumers and increase efficiencies for customers.' The completion of the transaction is subject to the approval of the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, which will likely look closely at a deal bringing together two of the largest branded players in the country's bread market. Shore Capital's Black believes the CMA should let the transaction through, pointing to the choice presented by private label, by regional manufacturers like Roberts Bakery and Jackson's Bakery and, of course, by Warburtons. 'This is a merger out of distress, not out of progression,' he says. 'If it doesn't take place, I think there will be very substantial, potentially irrational, rationalisation. If it does take place, then a necessary evil will probably occur. I don't think it is detrimental to the UK shopper's interest.' When Lawson was at Premier, the mooted cost benefits of an Allied Bakeries-Hovis combination made the idea of a deal 'compelling'. He adds: 'The view then was that [competition approval] was unlikely. Today, Kingsmill is a much-diminished presence on shelf so retailers no longer have the same ability to punish the consolidation with brand rationalisation – and there is limited alternative to retailers of branded suppliers, so the synergies may hold.' ABF does not disclose detailed sales and profit numbers for Allied Bakeries. In the group's 2024 fiscal year (the 12 months to 14 September), Allied Bakeries saw a 'much-reduced operating loss' amid what ABF called 'improved sales and operational performance'. However, when the Sunblest brand owner announced its results for the first half of the company's current financial year in April, it appeared Allied Bakeries was again finding the going tough. 'Our UK-focused businesses declined overall,' the Ryvita crispbread and Jordans granola maker said. 'As expected, this was primarily due to lower volumes and sales in Allied Bakeries, which resulted in an increased operating loss. Allied Bakeries continues to face a very challenging market.' Endless snapped up Hovis from Premier and US investor Gores Group in late 2020. Companies House, the UK business register, has two full years of financial results since the change of ownership. The most recent set of numbers cover the 52 weeks to 28 September 2024, when revenue stood at £446.8m, down almost 9% on a year earlier, an operating loss of £2.9m (compared to one of £3.2m the previous year) and a net loss of £4.7m (against one of £3.6m). 'The group has achieved positive financial progress despite continued tough trading conditions,' commentary alongside the figures reads, highlighting improved EBITDA. 'These results highlight our focus on managing the cost base in a highly competitive market and demonstrating good progress during the year, which will continue into 2025.' Cost synergies to be captured Should the CMA clear the deal, how might ABF go about creating that long-term 'profitable and sustainable' UK bakery business its CEO touted last week? Barclays' analysts believe the synergies ABF might extract from the deal 'could be very significant'. They argue the £50m in cost savings suggested by unnamed industry sources to Sky News 'could be conservative', adding: 'The acquisition will combine the production and distribution activities of the two businesses, driving significant cost synergies and efficiencies with the aim of creating a sustainable and profitable UK bread business in the long term. It could free up money to invest in the more interesting parts of market – high-protein breads, breakfast goods. If ABF could turn a £30m loss into a £20-30m profit on a two- to three-year view and pay around £75m for the business, that would be an attractive payback.' At Shore Capital, Black is sceptical about the prospect of substantial revenue synergies but says ABF could look across the business, from the C-suite, through manufacturing and distribution and onto product ranges, in order to find efficiencies. 'Once they've worked out the assortment, starting to put the production plan together, which ultimately may lead to the closure of bakeries or the rationalisation of lines,' he suggests. 'Then, perhaps under the radar, but most significantly, combining the distribution model. Like milk, bread is one of the few products that is still delivered to store and combining distribution with materially improved vehicle utilisation means saved costs. From the centre right through to the distribution process, removing duplication, going to a single business model and taking a lot of costs. Whether this deal actually does make for more innovation in product and for the development of brands in revenue-based synergies remains to be seen. I've been around too long to trust revenue-based synergies.' Now it's over to the CMA where competition officials will sift through the financials of both businesses. Warburtons will be watching closely. 'It is hard to argue that manufacturers have the whip hand over retailers given the scale of industry losses,' Barclays adds. "'This is a merger out of distress, not progression' – can ABF-Hovis deal bolster UK bread businesses?" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joly: Visits to Saab, Lockheed 'normal' part of her job amid F-35 review
OTTAWA — Industry Minister Mélanie Joly says Canadians shouldn't read too much into her visit to a Swedish defence manufacturer that comes right in the middle of a major government review of the F-35 fighter jet procurement. Joly says she visited Saab's facilities in Sweden this week and was shown the Gripen-E jet, which is one of the possible contenders to replace the controversial U.S.-made F-35 fighter jet. Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered the review shortly after he became prime minister in March, as Canada sought tighter security and defence ties with Europe in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. The review is to be completed by the end of the summer and Joly says her role in it is to ensure the Canadian government understands all its options and what the industrial benefits to Canada would be in its final decision. Joly says this is a "normal" part of her job, and that she will also be meeting with Lockheed Martin, which makes the F-35, in the coming weeks. Joly is wrapping up a trip to Sweden and Finland with Secretary of State for Defence Stephen Fuhr, which was focused on strengthening defence-industrial ties in Europe. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 20, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Defense ETFs Could Gain Ground As Europe's War Premium Deflates
European defense stocks experienced a sharp sell-off this week, reminding investors just how news-oriented the sector can be. A call for peace negotiations in Ukraine and a ceasefire in Gaza took almost 6% out of Goldman Sachs's portfolio of European defense stocks, per Bloomberg, with Rheinmetall, Renk, Leonardo and Saab posting the biggest losses. Invest in Gold Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation ITA ETF is up more than 33% this year. Track its prices live, here. The decline occurred as the 'war premium' that pushed European shares this year started to unwind. Investors are less keen to pay a premium for defense stocks when the risks of conflict seem to be declining, even if Europe's long-term rearmament program holds. That volatility, though, is precisely why most investors prefer U.S.-listed defense ETFs as a more stable way to tap the theme. Also Read: U.S. Defense ETFs Hold The Edge Funds such as the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (BATS:ITA), SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (NYSE:XAR), and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (NYSE:PPA) provide exposure to U.S. contractors including Lockheed Martin Corp (NYSE:LMT), Northrop Grumman Corp (NYSE:NOC), and Rtx Corp (NYSE:RTX). Such companies are insulated by the Pentagon's persistently high budgets, multi-year contracts for procurement and strong export pipelines, all of which insulate them from the political whirlwind of peace talks (and failures) overseas. While European stocks had a good run earlier this year, U.S. defense ETFs have been steadier performers. ITA, for instance, has climbed more than 33%, while XAR and PPA are also higher by 28% and 26%, respectively, showing resilient defense spending and increased aerospace technology demand. A Long-Term Spending Tailwind Experts point out that international defense budgets will not meaningfully contract even if fighting in Ukraine or Gaza dries up. NATO partners remain pressured to hit or surpass spending levels, and American defense companies can gain from both domestic budgets and foreign military sales. European defense is more likely to be vulnerable to political news, but the U.S. defense sector is supported by multi-decade procurement cycles. That provides U.S. ETFs with a degree of robustness that investors prefer. This week's slip in European defense stocks highlights the dangers of wagering too much on short-term conflict dynamics. For those looking for steady exposure to the industry, U.S.-listed defense ETFs continue to offer an attractive alternative — less volatile, better diversified, and securely tied to Washington's defense spending commitments. Read Next: Donald Trump Says He's 'At the Bottom Of The Totem Pole' With God, Links Ukraine Peace Push To Getting Into Heaven Photo: Funtap via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article US Defense ETFs Could Gain Ground As Europe's War Premium Deflates originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
