China announces anti-dumping duties on plastics from US, EU, Japan and Taiwan
China's commerce ministry on Sunday levied anti-dumping duties of as high as 74.9% on imports of POM copolymers, a type of engineering plastic, from the EU, US, Japan and Taiwan, according to an official announcement.
The highest anti-dumping rates of 74.9% were levied on imports from the US, while European shipments will face 34.5% duties.
China also slapped 35.5% duties on Japanese imports, except in the case of Asahi Kasei Corp, which was given a company-specific rate of 24.5%.
Gen duties of 32.6% were placed on imports from Taiwan, but Formosa Plastics and Polyplastics Taiwan received lower rates of 4% and 3.8%, respectively
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
Orlando Pirates want elite German coach but there's massive catch
Orlando Pirates have set their sights on a high-profile target to fill the coaching void left by Jose Riveiro, German tactician Marco Rose. The Soweto giants are reportedly interested in appointing Rose as their next head coach ahead of the new season. However, there's a major stumbling block that could derail this bold pursuit. Marco Rose, recently in charge of Bundesliga outfit RB Leipzig, has caught the attention of Pirates' top brass. At 48, the German coach boasts a wealth of European experience and a UEFA Pro Licence, credentials that make him a standout candidate to continue the progressive work started by Riveiro. But Pirates may be punching above their financial weight. Due to his successful stints at top clubs and proven track record as a 'serial winner', Rose operates in a salary bracket significantly higher than what the Buccaneers have typically paid their coaches. Sources close to the negotiations admit this could be a deal-breaker. In an effort to secure a coach with European pedigree, Pirates have enlisted the expertise of Analytics FC. The data-driven consultancy is tasked with casting a wider net to find the ideal candidate to build on the solid foundations left by Riveiro, who recently joined Egyptian giants Al Ahly. 'Rose fits the profile,' a source said. 'But his demands could be more than what the Buccaneers are willing to spend per month.' Interestingly, Pirates are planning to hold their pre-season in Germany, a move that on paper, aligns perfectly with Rose's background and could ease the transition for a European coach. The location would offer the club a unique opportunity to integrate a new manager in a familiar environment. Despite the logistical advantages, the source says the financial implications remain a significant obstacle. For now, Rose appears to have been ruled out, but his name lingers as an indication of the club's ambitions. Should Orlando Pirates go for Marco Rose? Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
11 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA loses as its entrepreneurs move companies to Estonia
The Baltic country's e-Residency programme offers access to a highly efficient digital-first business environment with alluring prospects for local tech companies. Imagine being a very small country (a landmass about the size of Gauteng) with 1.3 million residents and a declining population rate, no significant natural resources except some shale gas, and a previously hostile neighbour in the form of the Soviet Union, which fell in 1991. That's Estonia, whose strategy to increase its tax base has involved establishing an e-residency programme to lure foreign businesses in return for exporting its world-leading digital government services. For a growing number of South African tech entrepreneurs, the key to unlocking global markets, EU-based investment and a bureaucracy-free future doesn't lie in Sandton or Stellenbosch – it's in Tallinn. Estonia's fabled e-Residency programme, once a curiosity for digital nomads and crypto-optimists, has found a surprising following in South Africa's start-up scene, and 436 of Mzansi's finest are already enrolled. But although the Baltic republic promises digital freedom and access to European capital, the decision to incorporate one's company offshore isn't as simple as clicking 'register' for the government's e-Residency programme. 'E-residency is just an access to our digital ecosystem,' says Katrin Vaga, a former journalist who heads PR for the programme. 'It's not tax residency, it's not a golden visa; it's not even about physically moving to Estonia. It simply gives entrepreneurs a secure way to operate in our digital-first business environment.' This digital infrastructure, built over two decades, allows foreign founders to register and run a European company entirely online – and in English. For software developers, marketing consultants and other knowledge workers, it's a frictionless gateway to EU business. 'It's a 15-minute process,' Vaga explains. 'From application to launching a company. It's all remote, all online, all verified with a secure digital ID.' One standout feature is Estonia's 0% corporate tax on reinvested profits. 'It's built for start-ups,' she says. 'If you're reinvesting into growth, you don't pay corporate tax until you distribute dividends.' Next stop, EU funding Access to European venture capital is the big draw. 'If you want to raise funding from European sources, it derisks the project to be based in the EU,' says Dr Armid Azadeh, founder of the Namibian medtech solution company OnCall. '[Venture capital funders] are more comfortable when the intellectual property is domiciled in a jurisdiction they understand and trust.' This isn't just about Estonia. It's about a broader initiative by African start-ups to move their intellectual property (IP) offshore to investor-friendly territories – from Mauritius to the Netherlands – so that global funders will take them seriously. Renier Kriel, founder of The Founder Collab and a stalwart of the local start-up scene, says all South African company founders who have to raise venture capital want to take their IP offshore because funders are typically 'not comfortable for IP to stay in South Africa'. The trend is driven less by tax arbitrage and more by South Africa's cumbersome exchange controls and employment legislation. 'Moving money out of South Africa is a major pain,' Kriel says. 'You need approval. It slows down everything.' Add to this labour regulations that, though protective of workers, can be punitive for start-ups. 'The cost of 'mishiring' is massive,' Kriel adds. 'We need specific reform for hi-tech or early-stage businesses. The current laws create less employment because of the cost of hiring.' The combination of local friction and global opportunity makes Estonia's promise deeply appealing. 'You get to tailor your lifestyle,' says one Estonian e-Resident entrepreneur quoted in Vaga's documentation. 'I pay more taxes than I maybe would have back home, but I have a bigger market and more business opportunity. And I save so much time that actually I still win.' But Estonian e-residency isn't a silver bullet. 'It doesn't make sense for everyone,' Vaga cautions. 'If you're bootstrapped, already have reliable banking, or you want a physical shop in Europe, it's probably not for you.' How Estonia stacks up Estonia is now part of an elite club of favoured offshoring destinations, each with distinct strengths and pitfalls. London offers prestige, investor networks and familiarity. But it also comes with high operational costs, post-Brexit trade frictions and looming tax changes for non-domiciled founders. Delaware is ideal for US expansion and venture capital fundraising, thanks to flexible corporate laws and low state-level taxes. But the complexity of US federal tax and substance rules can trip up founders. Amsterdam provides full EU access, a deep talent pool and vibrant start-up culture, but it is costlier than Estonia and requires a more involved set-up process. Mauritius remains a go-to for African-facing businesses with its 3% effective tax rate and strong treaty network – though it requires real substance (offices, local directors) to stay compliant. Estonia, through its e-residency programme, wins on speed, cost and digital ease. 'You can run a company entirely remotely from anywhere,' says Vaga. 'And your encrypted digital signature is accepted across the EU.' That said, it's not perfect. 'Banking can still be a hurdle,' she concedes. South Africa risks losing more than tax revenue when founders go offshore. It loses jobs, IP and long-term innovation. 'If we want to compete with Mauritius or Estonia, we need to reform exchange controls and court major investors – show them we can be a real partner in building wealth,' says Kriel. 'Cut the red tape, combine the SDL [skills development levy], UIF, PAYE and income tax into one simplified system. If we want to compete with the places [venture capital funders] like, we need to make it easier to build here.' For the right type of business, mostly digital, lean and global in mindset, Estonia offers a near-frictionless way to plug into the EU economy. The e-Residency programme isn't for everyone. But for the increasing number of South African entrepreneurs stuck between red tape locally and global opportunity, it might just be the digital lifeline they've been waiting for. 'It's not about escaping,' says Vaga. 'It's about enabling.' DM
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Europe's Left Must Unite to Oppose NATO's Rearmament and Austerity
U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth (left) and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in conversation ahead of the meeting of NATO defence ministers at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on June 5, 2025. Image: AFP John Ross As Europe approaches NATO's 24–26 June summit in The Hague, its 750 million people face a decisive strategic choice that will affect their lives for years to come – and one with a far wider global impact. The policies implemented in Europe in recent years have been disastrous socially, economically, politically, and militarily. Europe is experiencing worsening social conditions, its largest war since 1945 in Ukraine, and the biggest rise of far-right authoritarian, racist, and xenophobic forces since the Nazis in the 1930s. The proposals to the NATO summit would worsen that situation. The key question is therefore whether Europe will continue down this destructive, disastrous path or adopt policies that offer a way out. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has proposed to the 32 NATO members that 'the NATO summit… aim for 3.5% hard military spending by 2032' – a 75% increase from the previous 2.0% GDP target. Trump calls for even higher military expenditure of 5% of GDP. Rutte opened the door to this by supporting a commitment to '1.5% related spending, such as infrastructure, cybersecurity and things like that. Also achievable by 2032'. The 3.5% plus 1.5% adds up to Trump's 5%. The social and political consequences of such a course are already clear. Europe's economies are nearly stagnant, with the EU's annual per capita GDP growth averaging less than 1% from 2007 to 2024. The IMF, somewhat optimistically, projects an increase to only 1.3% by 2030. With rising inequality and reductions in social spending due to austerity policies, hundreds of millions of people in Europe have already experienced stagnant or declining living standards. Diverting more resources into military spending, already being accompanied by social spending cuts to finance it, will worsen that situation further. The political consequences are also clear. Far-right and neo-fascist forces, exploiting the worsening conditions, which are caused by austerity measures and increased military spending, by demagogically blaming immigrants and ethnic and religious minorities, will gain further strength. The disastrous consequences for traditional left-wing and progressive parties supporting or enacting these rearmament and austerity policies, even before their support for the new NATO rearmament policies, are already known in major European countries. The SPD in Germany in 2025 saw its vote drop to 16%, the lowest since 1887. In the last elections at which they stood independently, the French Socialist Party gained only 6%. In Britain, the Labour Party, which already received one of its lowest votes since the 1930s at the last election, is now in the polls behind the far-right Reform Party. In contrast, left-wing parties that have opposed austerity and NATO policies – La France Insoumise in France, Die Linke in Germany, and the Belgian Workers Party – have maintained or significantly increased their support. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ This disastrous collapse suffered by traditional left-wing parties that have supported war and austerity is extremely dangerous in the context of the rise of far-right parties across Europe. The reason for the collapsing support for such parties is obvious. Such policies attack the population's living standards. If parties claiming to be on the left continue to support austerity and rearmament, this trend of decline will just continue. The only way out of this situation for both Europe's population and the left is a complete policy reversal to one that prioritises social progress and economic development. Following the end of the Cold War, Europe should have focused on fostering economic cooperation and minimising military tensions and expenditures. This would have created a balanced economic area, equivalent to the US, with a strong potential for growth by combining Western Europe's manufacturing and services with Russia's energy and raw materials. What was possible was shown in Asia by ASEAN, which, in a continent that had suffered the worst conflicts of the Cold War, the Korean and Vietnam wars, became the world's most rapidly growing economic region through a concentration on economic development and the absence of military blocs. But, because an economically cooperating Europe could have been a successful competitor to the United States, US administrations pursued a path to prevent it – primarily through NATO's eastward expansion, which was carried out in direct violation of US promises to then-Soviet Premier Gorbachev that NATO would not advance 'an inch' eastward after Germany's reunification. Instead, in 1999, 2004, 2009, 2017, and 2020, new countries were added to NATO, and the door was deliberately left open to admitting Ukraine, known to be a red line for Russia due to Ukraine's proximity to Russia and its position as a historical route for invasion. Numerous US experts on Eastern Europe opposed this, led by George Kennan, the original architect of US Cold War strategy, who warned NATO expansion would be 'the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era'. But their warnings were ignored, with results culminating in the Ukraine war. Now NATO demands rearmament and cuts in social protection to finance this war. NATO forces simultaneously expanded outside Europe to participate in wars in the Global South, Afghanistan and Libya, and set up numerous organisations and initiatives to prepare for intervention in the Global South – such as the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, the Strategic Direction-South HUB, the Liaison Office in Addis Ababa – and has begun to expand into the Pacific – with Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea attending every NATO summit since 2022. Such NATO expansion would involve Europe in even more conflicts and more calls for military expenditure. What is required is the complete opposite – priority to social progress and investment for economic growth. Both require more spending and are therefore directly contrary to a military build-up. Europe's need for social spending is obvious. But Europe's investment, the key to economic growth, has also collapsed. In the EU, investment, once depreciation (the wearing out of existing means of production) is taken into account, has halved from 7.4% of GDP in 2007 to only 3.5% on the latest data. International comparisons show this is enough only to generate 1% annual economic growth. Additionally, the US is now pressing for further policies harmful to Europe and its people. The US has already enormously damaged Europe by its conscious policy of cutting off Western Europe's source of cheap energy from Russia, achieved via the Ukraine war and the blowing up of the Nord Stream pipeline, which anyone who looks seriously at the matter knows was carried out by the US.
