Three southern councils still plan to team up to deliver water services
Photo:
RNZ
Three southern councils still plan to team up to deliver water services despite an expected fourth backing out last week.
Councils have to submit water service delivery plans to the Department of Internal Affairs by early September.
Four southern councils have worked towards a jointly owned, council-controlled organisation - the Southern Water Done Well model, but last week, the
Waitaki District Council
voted to exit the partnership and manage its services in-house for at least two years.
It left the remaining councils trying to work out if the model - which aims to share expertise, save costs and improve service delivery by working together - would work with fewer councils onboard.
Within days of Waitaki's decision, Central Otago and Clutha district councils agreed to join in principle.
On Monday, the Gore District Council followed suit, voting to join the three-council model if the updated figures stack up.
Gore District Mayor Ben Bell said the community could not afford the estimated $500 million bill to invest in projected infrastructure over the next 30 years.
"In this instance, bigger is better in terms of economies of scale and financial sustainability," Bell said.
"By working with like-minded councils, we can provide a water services delivery model that balances regional efficiency with local accountability."
The future of water service delivery was intergenerational, he said.
Central Otago District Mayor and Southern Water Done Well chair, Tamah Alley, said that councils knew they were stronger together and could deliver better long-term outcomes for their communities.
It was a testament to the significant amount of work done to ensure councillors and communities had what they needed to make informed decisions, she said.
"There's still work to be done, though, to understand what a group of three councils looks like and get a compliant Water Services Delivery Plan submitted by the deadline," she said.
The plans need to show how council will deliver water services that meet new quality and infrastructure standards and are financially sustainable long term.
They will then be assessed with councils possibly facing intervention if they do not meet the brief.
Local Government Minister Simon Watts has made it clear to the southern councils in a letter that there would be no time extension to submit a plan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
What happens if my partner dies without a will?
RNZ money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Got questions? RNZ is launching a new podcast, No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds, next month. We'd love to hear more of your questions about money and the economy. You can send through written questions, like these ones, but - even better - you can drop us a voice memo to our email questions@ What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies without a will? I have been living with my partner since the late 1980s. Our house, main bank accounts and one car are in both names. Our latest car - bought last year from joint bank accounts - could only be registered in his name, due to changes in NZTA rules. I have a separate bank account in my name, which has a small amount of inherited money. He also has a separate bank account with some money from his family and a few shares in his name, which were acquired through his work. Many years ago, I was told that if either of us died, then any assets in joint names would go to the surviving partner. We have not made wills, have no children, my parents have both died and his father has died, but recently, I saw that if someone has a spouse or partner, and parents, but no children, the spouse received the personal effects, $155,000 and two-thirds of what is left. The deceased person's parents get the remaining third. That means, if I die first, all I have goes to him, which is what I want, but if my partner dies before me, does his remaining parent inherit a third of our house (meaning I will need to sell it, as I do not have funds to buy her out in my 60s), plus a third of our two cars, a third of our joint bank account money, and a third of his KiwiSaver, private superannuation, bank accounts, insurance payouts and shares in his name? His mother is in residential care with dementia and already has enough funds to cover her care for decades. I am worried I may become homeless. What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies? As a starting point, it might be re-assuring to note that assets that you hold in a joint name would pass to you, so if you own your house jointly, it would be yours, if your partner died. I went to Public Trust principal trustee Michelle Pope for more detail to answer the rest of your question. She said, when someone died, their estate would be distributed according to the Administration Act. "In the writer's case, if they die first without a will, their entire estate would pass to their partner, as they have no children or surviving parents," she said. "Assets held in joint names, listed by the writer as the house, main bank accounts and a car, will automatically pass to the surviving partner. However, it's important to confirm whether the property is legally owned jointly or in equal/unequal shares. "If it's jointly owned, it will pass by survivorship. If not, the deceased's share will need to be administered as part of their estate, which can add complexity. "If the writer's partner dies first without a will and has a surviving parent, Section 77(3) of the Administration Act 1969 applies. In this scenario, the writer would receive all personal chattels (including the car solely owned by the partner), a prescribed amount of $155,000 plus interest and two-thirds of the remaining estate. "The surviving parent would receive the remaining one-third of the estate. For clarity, the assets owned solely by the partner would appear to be a bank account, some shares, KiwiSaver, private superannuation and insurance. "Given the house is owned jointly, the writer can expect that the house will pass to them by what's called 'survivorship' in legal language and will not form part of their partner's estate. "It goes without saying that I'd encourage the writer and their partner to create wills. A will that clearly outlines their wishes can help remove any uncertainty when a person dies and can make the estate administration process a lot easier for loved ones." Having separated earlier this year, I chose to move out of the family home where my ex still resides. She is paying the mortgage, refuses to pay the house insurance or rates etc. the roof is leaking and she refuses to agree to making repairs, the ceiling is now ruined and mouldy. Though she has indicated she wishes to buy me out, she has not shared any form of offer or plan. She now refuses to engage in any form of correspondence at all. My questions - how do I go about necessary repairs to the house and how do I get her to move out, so that the house can be sold? Online research seems to point to tenancy/landlord situations which don't apply in this case. Is it actually just time for a lawyer to sort this out? Yes, I think the best - and really only - way to deal with this is to go to a lawyer as soon as possible. Can you please answer some questions about the way supermarkets operate. If I deliberately deceive customers, it's called deception. If I deliberately load, unload prices to make you think you are getting a better deal when you are not, this is manipulation to enhance your profit. Surely both of the above are profiteering and fraudulent. Supermarkets - and all retailers - have rules they have to comply with, when it comes to discounting, and it is illegal for businesses to mislead shoppers about prices. You can complain to the Commerce Commission, if you think someone has got it wrong. There is a lot of focus on supermarket pricing at the moment and Consumer NZ has been vocal about the current regime not being effective enough. It is calling for tougher penalties and infringement notice powers. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Waitaki District Council's new logo causes backlash online
Critics described the earlier design as 'uncannily similar' to the logo of sustainable wool company Woolchemy, which is trademarked in New Zealand. The council defended the work, saying the resemblance was coincidental and that the logo would be redesigned before adoption. The new logo, which was developed at no extra cost, is a stylised lowercase 'a', which some Facebook users joked looked like a 'boy racer burnout circle' or even 'a rates increase.' The WDC, however, are once again standing by the design saying it represents a thoughtful evolution shaped by community input. 'All I see are the letters AI. Where's our W... or the river... or something relatable to Waitaki?' wrote one Facebook user. The evolution of Waitaki District Council's brand and logo from 1989 through to 2025. Image / Supplied In response to the Herald, a WDC spokesperson said the new logo is rooted in local meaning. 'The new logo is a cleaner, more simplified evolution of the previous logo. It is deliberately ambiguous and reflects many aspects of our district without being too literal.' According to the council, the new logo incorporates several layers of symbolism, including architectural heritage, limestone fossils the district is famous for, and its lines reflecting furrows in the earth from farming as a reference to agricultural heritage. They said the logo built on the broader Waitaki district logo, which 'symbolises the tributaries of our rivers, flowing to the ocean.' The region's architectural history is intended to be referenced by the logo. Photo / Kurt Hay The new logo was developed entirely in-house. 'All design and branding work was completed in-house by Council's Communications and Engagement team, meaning there were no external design or consultant costs,' the Council said. 'The new brand will be rolled out over time as signage and materials come up for renewal using existing budgets.' For the past 35 years, Waitaki's logo has centred on a literal Ionic column, reflecting Ōamaru's Victorian heritage. That focus, the council says, needed to expand. The previous logo was approved in March this year. Image / Supplied 'We see it as a natural evolution... The previous logo, while much loved, was a literal illustration of a Greek Ionic column and centred on Ōamaru's Victorian architecture, which tied it to one time and place.' 'As the district continues to grow and change, it's important that Council's brand can be used by all of the Waitaki district – its landscapes, communities, and future direction.' The council acknowledged there was no standalone consultation on the logo itself, but said the branding direction was shaped by years of feedback. 'The Communications and Engagement Strategy and design direction was informed by community feedback gathered through: Annual Residents Surveys and consultations, Community Conversations, [and] the Waitaki Story and logo project – which included extensive engagement with key stakeholders and iwi.' That feedback, they say, 'highlighted a desire for more consistent, inclusive and modern communications from Council – and a brand identity that could be used by the entire district, not just one town or heritage style.' Only a few design iterations were needed, they add, since the logo is both 'an extension of the Waitaki district logo and an evolution of the previous logo.' Some Facebook users are unconvinced. 'I don't even live in the district and I have no idea what that logo represents,' one person wrote. 'Certainly doesn't project Waitaki.' Ben Tomsett is a multimedia journalist based in Dunedin. He joined the Herald in 2023.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Minister Shane Jones looks to coal as businesses grapple with gas shortage
Shane Jones Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Resources Minister Shane Jones is seeking advice on where the electricity system can use more coal as businesses grapple with a gas shortage. Big industrial gas users met with Jones, who is also the Associate Minster for Energy, in Auckland on Friday to discuss the problems with securing an affordable supply. "From their perspective, the Crown needs to contemplate a triage system so that the gentailers don't drive businesses and manufacturers out of existence," Jones told Checkpoint . "The gentailers, due to the profiteering, always have more money to out bid everyone else." Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) figures show natural gas reserves are down 27 percent compared to last year . Jones said he has sought advice on where the electricity system can use more coal to reduce reliance on gas. "I am a politician that is pro-coal, I'm a politician that's pro-fossil fuels because I don't believe in these indulgences and luxury beliefs any longer," Jones said. "... Unless we pace ourselves on the decarbonisation journey, we are going to hallow out the manufacturing sector and no one is going to thank me, as a politician, for mass unemployment. There is so much fiction associated with the costs and period of time it is going to take for decarbonisation." It comes after a Taranaki fertiliser manufacturer revealed it was looking to shutdown production for up to four months because it cant get a guaranteed gas supply. The manufacturer, Ballance Agri-Nutrients, uses the gas to power its production and as a raw ingredient for fertilisers. It lost its supply to Contact Energy, which essentially outbid Ballance to secure the gas for electricity consumption. Ballance said it cant find a reliable replacement supply and prices quoted are up to 100 percent more than what the co-op is currently paying. It will keep its 120 plant workers on during the hiatus while it hunts for a solution. Jones believes there is good news on the way for short term supply of gas, after meeting with various gas extraction companies on Friday morning. He said they told him they were confident they could continue to excelerate the delivery of gas over the next nine to 12 months and beyond. "But lets not pretend that this isn't a very gruelling time for a lot of gas users," Jones said. The Business NZ Energy Council has long been warning a gas shortage could lead to business closures. Business NZ Energy Council executive director Tina Schirr said the biggest concern for gas-using businesses over the last couple of years was securing long-term contracts and the rise in gas prices. Schirr said as a result some companies could consider swapping to "dirtier substitutes" or otherwise shut down, which would result in job losses. "The long term problem is we need more energy in the system, and in this case, more gas. There were a few users in the room today that could switch to electricity for example, or bio-gas, but obviously the short term problem is the same - you've got to build infrastructure around it," Schirr said. She said the idea of prioritising certain businesses in the queue for gas contracts was floated, but that would only be an emergency short time solution. "It wouldn't be healthy or sustainable long term in the market." Schirr said programmes are being rolled out to potentially support businesses that can switch energy sources and there is talk about the government providing cheaper or interest free loans. She said there will be follow-up conversations on how to solve energy shortages long-term.
