logo
Inside the battle to save a once award-winning building which is now crumbling from neglect

Inside the battle to save a once award-winning building which is now crumbling from neglect

Independenta day ago
When 73-year-old pensioner Pat Findley moved into Lillington and Longmoore Gardens before the turn of the millennium, she was ecstatic.
The 1970s Grade-II listed estate in Pimlico, with around 1,000 homes, was an award-winning complex boasting 'beautiful' brutalist architecture and a quaint garden room at its centre. The council was attentive; the community was close-knit.
But fast forward three decades, and Ms Findley says she feels like she's 'at war'.
In the past year, roofs have collapsed, flats have flooded, residents have been hospitalised by scalding or 'contaminated' water, and sewage pipes have burst, causing the smell of faeces to permeate through the estate. Ms Findley says there is a new issue 'every three months'. Her own flat is infested with woodlice.
Families have been evacuated, and residents have been left sleep-deprived and struggling to work after failed attempts to fix leaks and persistent mould.
A recent Freedom of Information request found that the estate needed 2,086 plumbing repairs between January 2020 and March 2025. The estate has since been nicknamed 'leaky Lillington'.
Leaseholders, nevertheless, have seen their maintenance bills skyrocket, as they foot half the costs of the council's decisions.
But Westminster Council, she says, which owns and manages the estate, is stubborn in the face of the residents' complaints. One leaseholder, who asked to be anonymous out of fear for reprisal from the council, put it plainly: 'The council see us as the enemy.'
The council has dismissed these allegations, saying they have a 'thorough complaints process', adding that they 'have apologised for any stress caused'. When asked about the specific issue of leaking, they claimed it was due to 'an ageing communal hot water and heating system that needs to be replaced', adding that they were 'working towards finding a more efficient, reliable and sustainable option'.
Their acceptance of problems notwithstanding, the council received top marks when the housing regulator inspected the estate in February this year. This prompted at least 55 residents to co-sign a letter disputing the result to Labour deputy prime minister Angela Rayner. They accused the council and the regulator of 'marking their own homework'. A response from Ms Rayner's team, three months later, directed the residents to make a complaint to Westminster Council.
Now, Ms Findley says she wishes she had 'never moved into that plot in the first place'.
'They don't give a toss and we're treated like dirt,' she says. 'I don't need the stress anymore. It's grinding me down.'
The only relief is the community of residents that have rallied around one another.
In the time that Ms Findley has lived in Lillington, social housing across the UK has fallen into disrepair following chronic underinvestment and neglect, as the central government has shifted the burden of responsibility for these homes onto less well-funded local councils.
When The Independent visited the estate and spoke to residents from houses across the complex, one theme was common: Lillington and Longmoore Gardens are dangerous and a disaster is waiting to happen. London Fire Brigade last year raised concerns with Westminster Council about safety issues in the estate.
Many of the residents asked to be quoted anonymously because they feared repercussions from the council, even eviction. Ernest Stafford, from the Residents' Association, urged the council to reassure residents that they are allowed to voice concerns about the estate without fear of being evicted but the council reportedly declined to intervene, prompting accusations from the residents that the council was 'quite happy to intimidate' people into silence.
One resident, a mother of three, says she is 'extremely concerned' by the council's lackadaisical approach to dangerous situations. She has spent the past year battling a repeatedly collapsing and leaking ceiling in her flat. 'My life can't get any worse than it is sadly,' she says. 'I've been through it all.'
She describes an incident in January in which the block's fuse box was left on fire after an electrician contracted by the council declined to properly investigate why the lights in several flats were flickering. The blazing fuse box was discovered by an employee of the UK power network after the resident called them for help.
'I dread to think what might have happened if they hadn't come when they did,' she says, adding that her block is full of vulnerable and elderly people. 'It posed a real and serious danger to the safety of everyone in the building.'
Another resident in a different house in the estate says she 'suffered long periods of sleep deprivation and stress' after the roof on her building began badly leaking, partially flooding her flat. A poor repair meant the leaking persisted for years. A previous leak in her flat took months for the council to fix.
'I have never felt the council take into account the impact of their poor repairs processes on residents' day-to-day life and wellbeing,' she says. 'There was generally little sense of urgency or understanding of my issues, it was just another job number to them.'
Underscoring what the residents say is apathy from the council is the poor management of costs and a lack of accountability and transparency.
The role of head of repairs for Westminster Council has changed four times in the last two years, stifling attempts to remedy the issues with repairs. An advert was put out for the role of head of repairs last year, listing the salary as up to £120,000, further upsetting the residents.
A leaseholder in another building provided documents that showed her maintenance costs had doubled to nearly £7,000 in just a few years.
Included in those costs was a bill to be paid by all the leaseholders of that block for £8,300, to cover the insurance and maintenance of the lifts. She said she had not seen a single lift operator tending to the elevators since she moved in.
'If the contractor says they have to do something, the council just says yes,' she says. 'There is no traceability of any kind.'
Ed Pitt Ford, the Conservative councillor for Pimlico North, says the current Labour council in place since 2022 is 'wasting a huge amount of money' without oversight.
'It feels like the contractors are operating unsupervised, the contracts are not being managed and hence a huge amount of money is being wasted,' he says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Old labrador rescued after falling down 18ft well in Middlezoy
Old labrador rescued after falling down 18ft well in Middlezoy

BBC News

time18 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Old labrador rescued after falling down 18ft well in Middlezoy

An old black labrador was rescued by firefighters from three stations after falling down an 18ft (5.5m) 11, had to tread water "for some time" while the fire teams pumped out water before lifting him out with ropes. The dog was unharmed but needed a long rest following the misadventure on Sunday morning in Somerset, owner Aymee Smith thanked Taunton and Bridgwater fire stations, writing on Facebook: "Massive thank you again, you were all amazing!" Ms Smith, who has owned Jackson since he was seven weeks old, added: "He's spent the whole afternoon sleeping, just thankful he's OK."Fire crews had been called to the well, which was on a private property in Middlezoy, at around 10:35 BST on Sunday.

Swimmers row with council after sea rafts removed over health and safety fears
Swimmers row with council after sea rafts removed over health and safety fears

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Swimmers row with council after sea rafts removed over health and safety fears

Swimmers in Weymouth took to the sea to protest against the removal of 'much loved' floating sea rafts over health and safety concerns. Two platforms, which had been in place 300 yards off Weymouth beach in Dorset since 1939, were removed at the beginning of the summer holidays after risk assessment advice from the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI). But residents have now staged a protest against Weymouth town council, criticising the measure as an 'overreaction'. Almost 3,000 people have signed a petition calling for the pontoons to be reinstated as soon as possible. Members of the Weymouth Bluetits swimming club took to the sea to protest against their removal and demand they be returned. The council said that the rafts had been deemed a 'blind spot for the lifeguards', which 'therefore pose a risk to members of the public'. As a result Weymouth town council's insurance company refused to provide cover in the event of claim for incident or accident for less than £30m. Christine James, from the Weymouth Bluetits swimming club, said she was 'really angry' as the rafts had been in place for 'decades without the need for insurance'. She added: 'They were something that was fun for everyone and helped keep people fit. 'We go out there and push the kids off and sit and have a chat for a while before swimming back. 'Anybody who goes into the sea does so at their own risk. Why can't the council just put up signs saying, 'Use the rafts at your own risk'? 'Taking them away is only going to encourage the kids to jump off the harbour wall or the rock groynes, which is unsafe.' Tim Spooner, a resident, said the rafts 'are a much-loved feature of the beach'. He added: 'It does seem like an overreaction from the town council and I will be supporting any cause to have them reinstated.' Jade O'Brien, who launched a petition to the council, said: 'For over 40 years the rafts have stood in these waters, providing safe recreation and cherished experiences for generations. 'Weymouth town council decided to remove these beloved rafts, citing safety concerns of blind spots to the lifeguard on duty. 'However, incidents have been rare, and Greenhill Beach has consistently maintained a strong safety record. It doesn't make sense.' A spokesman for the council said: 'The RNLI have informed us that the swim rafts are outside of the lifeguard's primary response area. 'They create a blind spot for the lifeguards, which operate on the beach, and therefore pose a risk to members of the public. 'The safety of residents and visitors must come first. This means that we have no option but to remove our swim rafts in the sea at Greenhill. A spokesman for the RNLI explained that the swimming rafts had 'always' been outside its lifeguards' primary response area, which is between its red and yellow flags and up to 300 metres out. He added: 'Nothing has changed from previous years in terms of our operating procedures or areas of responsibility. 'The council owns and manages their swim rafts. They have always been located outside of the RNLI lifeguards' primary response area. 'The RNLI has no position regarding the use of swimming rafts by landowners, but shares information regarding lifeguard operations and limitations to support landowners in their risk assessment process.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store