logo
Trade threats consume the U.S. economy

Trade threats consume the U.S. economy

Axios4 days ago

An upbeat inflation report on Friday was overshadowed by President Trump's warning about escalating U.S.-China trade tensions.
Why it matters: Little captures the rattled state of the American economy like the morning's sequence of events.
Inflation kept decelerating in April, defying gloomy warnings about tariff-related price hikes.
But Trump's social media post about China, pushed out minutes before the data hit the tape, was a clear reminder that the economy is largely at the mercy of the White House's trade agenda.
By the numbers: The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index — the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge — was benign for yet another month.
After a streak of hot reports, the economy looks to be solidly back on a disinflationary path. The core measure that excludes food and energy increased 2.5% from a year ago, the lowest annual gain since February 2021.
By another measure, core PCE rose at a 2.7% annualized rate over the last three months — down sharply from 3.5% in March.
What to watch: So far, Trump's trade drama has played out against a largely favorable economic backdrop.
But spending data released with the upbeat inflation figures offers an early warning that this backdrop might be shifting.
Personal consumption expenditures rose 0.2%, a pullback from the 0.7% increase in March. Spending on services was partially offset by a drop in goods purchases.
That is despite another jump in disposable income, which rose 0.8% last month, up from the 0.7% increase in March. The Commerce Department said that jump largely reflected new legislation that allowed certain public sector employees to receive more Social Security benefits.
The personal saving rate soared by 0.6 percentage point to 4.9%, as consumers socked away more of their income than they spent.
What they're saying:"The U.S. consumer remains resilient, though that resilience, to some degree, is underpinned by fear of what's likely to come," Olu Sonola, an economist at Fitch Ratings, wrote in a note Friday morning — referring to tariff-related disruptions.
"The Fed will welcome the favorable inflation reading in this report, but they are likely to interpret it as the calm before the storm. They will continue to wait for the storm—unless consumer spending buckles and the unemployment rate rises rapidly," Sonola added.
State of play: Trump implemented the steepest tariff rates to date in April before backing off days later. China was the exception, with U.S.-bound goods taxed at 145% for much of April.
Economists don't expect price pressures to seep into the data until the summer months. Retailers are rolling through inventory stockpiled before the worst of the tariffs took effect.
The bottom line: Even if the courts decide Trump's expansive tariffs are illegal, the White House can implement the levies through other authorities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold retreats from near four-week peak as dollar ticks up
Gold retreats from near four-week peak as dollar ticks up

CNBC

time35 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Gold retreats from near four-week peak as dollar ticks up

Gold prices fell on Tuesday, retreating from near a four-week high, as a modest rise in the dollar weighed on the metal, although uncertainty over the U.S.-China trade agreement kept investors cautious and limited the bullion's decline. Spot gold fell 0.3% to $3,369.98 an ounce, as of 0249 GMT, after hitting its highest level since May 8 earlier in the session. U.S. gold futures were steady at $3,390. The metal gained about 2.7% in the previous session, marking its strongest daily performance in more than three weeks. "Dollar recovered slightly and gold came down so it has been inversely correlated at this point of time," said Brian Lan, managing director at GoldSilver Central, Singapore. However, gold is still closely tracking developments around global trade, and while investors have slightly reduced their positions in gold it is not to the extent seen in previous instances when tensions appeared to ease, said Lan. The U.S. dollar index recovered slightly from a six-week low. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. U.S. tariffs on imported steel and aluminum are scheduled to double to 50% starting on Wednesday, coinciding with the Trump administration's deadline for countries to submit their best offers in trade negotiations. The European Commission said on Monday it would make a strong case this week for the U.S. to reduce or eliminate tariffs despite Trump's decision to double import duties on steel and aluminum. Meanwhile, Russia told Ukraine at peace talks on Monday that it would only agree to end the war if Kyiv gives up big new chunks of territory and accepts limits on the size of its army, according to a memorandum reported by Russian media. Elsewhere, spot silver fell 2.1% to $34.07 an ounce, platinum was steady at $1,062.46 and palladium was up 0.1% at $990.26.

Commerce Secretary Lutnick outlines fast pace for U.S.-India trade talks under Trump's tariff approach
Commerce Secretary Lutnick outlines fast pace for U.S.-India trade talks under Trump's tariff approach

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Commerce Secretary Lutnick outlines fast pace for U.S.-India trade talks under Trump's tariff approach

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking at the 2025 U.S.-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF), outlined the future of U.S.-India trade ties, urging deeper economic cooperation in line with President Trump's tariff-driven push. "Earlier countries get a better deal. That's the way it is," Lutnick remarked during his keynote address at the USISPF on Monday in Washington D.C. "Those who come in, you know, July 4th to July 9th, there's just going to be a pile. But those who are earlier—and I think India's trying hard to be one of the earlier countries, which I appreciate." The commerce secretary acknowledged the unusually rapid timeline the administration is pursuing in contrast to traditional multi-year negotiations. "These kinds of deals used to take 2 or 3 years, and we're trying to get them done in a month, which is, you know, just not the ordinary DNA of trading relationships between countries," he said. India Has Been Open To Mkaing Big Trade Progress, Kevin Hassett Says Lutnick argued that the administration is not advocating for sweeping concessions from India, but "reasonable access to the markets of India." Read On The Fox Business App "We would like our businesses to have reasonable access to the markets of India," he said. "Now, it's not going to be everything and it's not going to be everywhere. But we want to have the trade deficit reduced." "Now in exchange for that, what India is going to want is they're going to get certain key markets that they are going to want to make sure that they have special access to the American marketplace," he said. "And so that's the tradeoff." He said that ongoing talks between India and the U.S. are in a "very good place." "We've managed, I think, to be in a very, very good place, and you should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future, because I think we found a place that really works for both countries," he said. In a Monday evening TruthSocial post, Trump doubled down on his core trade doctrine: "If other Countries are allowed to use Tariffs against us, and we're not allowed to counter them, quickly and nimbly, with Tariffs against them, our Country doesn't have, even a small chance, of Economic survival." President Trump, India's Modi To Tackle Trade, Tariff Tensions At High-stakes Meeting In April, Trump imposed a 27% reciprocal tariff on most Indian exports to pressure India into lowering its tariffs. While strategic sectors like pharmaceuticals were exempt, industries such as textiles and machinery were affected. Click Here To Read More On Fox Business India has since avoided retaliation, opting instead to negotiate with the administration to ease the article source: Commerce Secretary Lutnick outlines fast pace for U.S.-India trade talks under Trump's tariff approach Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Judge dismisses California's lawsuit over Trump tariffs, citing jurisdiction issue
Judge dismisses California's lawsuit over Trump tariffs, citing jurisdiction issue

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge dismisses California's lawsuit over Trump tariffs, citing jurisdiction issue

SACRAMENTO, California — A U.S. District Court judge on Monday dismissed California officials' lawsuit over President Donald Trump's tariffs, concluding the case belongs in an out-of-state court that specializes in trade disputes. The ruling — separate from a pair of high-profile rulings in other courts last week — partially sides with the Trump administration, which argued the case belongs in the New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade rather than the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Attorney General Rob Bonta earlier filed their case. But Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley dismissed the case outright rather than immediately transfer it to the trade court, as Trump's attorneys had requested. By doing so, she granted the state's request to leave a path open for California to appeal the ruling to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, a famously liberal-leaning bench. Still, Scott Corley's decision is a blow to California officials who had hoped the district court would rule on the legality of Trump's unilateral tariffs. Last week, a D.C. District Court judge went the opposite direction and invalidated Trump's tariffs, ruling in favor of two toy-import companies. The trade court also struck down Trump's tariffs last week, although his taxes on imports have largely been left in place while federal litigation plays out. Scott Corley's ruling against California was expected. She had previously signaled that her San Francisco court likely didn't have jurisdiction in the case, noting the trade court has authority over tariff cases — which was designed to prevent a patchwork of tariffs rulings in federal district courts. California in April became the first state to sue Trump over his so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs, claiming the president has no authority to unilaterally tax imports under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Trump has invoked tariffs without congressional approval by claiming the country faces a national emergency due to its trade deficits with other countries. Representatives for Newsom and Bonta didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. While Scott Corley's ruling is a setback for the state, California officials joined Democratic leaders across the country last week in celebrating the pair of federal court rulings that determined Trump had overstepped his executive powers. 'It's raining tacos today,' Newsom said on the MeidasTouch Podcast on Thursday, an apparent reference to the TACO acronym that Wall Street investors have used to refer to whiplash over Trump's see-sawing import taxes. The president has bristled at the name, which stands for 'Trump always chickens out.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store