Got the sniffles? Here's what to know about summer colds, COVID-19 and more
The three may not go together in many people's minds: partly owing to common myths about germs and partly because many viruses really do have lower activity levels in the summer.
But it is possible to get the sniffles — or worse — in the summer. Federal data released Friday, for example, shows COVID-19 is trending up in many parts of the country, with emergency department visits up among people of all ages.
Here's what to know about summer viruses.
How much are colds and flu circulating right now?
The number of people seeking medical care for three key illnesses — COVID-19, flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV — is currently low, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Flu is trending down and RSV was steady this week. But COVID-19 is trending up in many mid-Atlantic, southeast, Southern and West Coast states.
The expectation is that COVID-19 will eventually settle into a winter seasonal pattern like other coronaviruses, but the past few years have brought a late summer surge, said Dr. Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at University of California Davis Children's Hospital.
Other viruses circulating this time of year include the one that causes 'hand, foot and mouth' disease — which has symptoms similar to a cold, plus sores and rashes — and norovirus, sometimes called the stomach flu.
Do viruses spread less in the summer?
Many viruses circulate seasonally, picking up as the weather cools in the fall and winter. So it's true that fewer people get stuffy noses and coughs in the summer — but cold weather itself does not cause colds.
It's not just about seasonality. The other factor is our behavior, experts say. Nice weather means people are opening windows and gathering outside where it's harder for germs to spread.
But respiratory viruses are still around. When the weather gets too hot and everyone heads inside for the air conditioning, doctors say they start seeing more sickness. In places where it gets really hot for a long time, summer can be cold season in its own right.
'I grew up on the East Coast and everybody gets sick in the winter,' said Dr. Frank LoVecchio, an emergency room doctor and Arizona State University researcher. 'A lot of people get sick in the summer here. Why is that? Because you spend more time indoors.'
Should you get another COVID-19 booster now?
For people who are otherwise healthy, timing is a key consideration to getting any vaccine. You want to get it a few weeks before that big trip or wedding, if that's the reason for getting boosted, doctors say. But, for most people, it may be worth waiting until the fall in anticipation of winter cases of COVID-19 really tick up.
'You want to be fully protected at the time that it's most important for you,' said Dr. Costi Sifri, of the University of Virginia Health System.
People at higher risk of complications should always talk with their doctor about what is best for them, Sifri added. Older adults and those with weak immune systems may need more boosters than others, he said.
Are more younger kids getting sick with COVID-19?
Last week, the CDC noted emergency room visits among children younger than 4 were rising. That makes sense, Blumberg said, because many young kids are getting it for the first time or are unvaccinated.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in May that the shots would no longer be recommended for healthy kids, a decision that health experts have said lacks scientific basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics still endorses COVID-19 shots for children older than 6 months.
How else can I lower my risk?
The same things that help prevent colds, flu and COVID any other time of the year work in the summer, doctors say.
Spend time outside when you can, wash your hands, wear a mask. And if you're sick, stay home.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine fixation is a menace to public health
Robert Kennedy Jr. is trying to convince Americans that vaccines will hurt them. No matter what superficial throwaway statements he offers the public to the contrary, that's the obvious goal. In the newest front in his cause, the secretary of Health and Human Services has canceled $500 million in mRNA research, an effort President Donald Trump once called a 'modern-day miracle.' Advertisement The HHS head, who in 2023 said no vaccine was 'safe and effective,' says he still supports 'safe, effective vaccines.' Yet he has canceled 22 research projects focused not only on COVID vaccines but also on influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and other communicable ailments. It should be noted that new research often leads scientists to unexpected results and uses, as well. Advertisement However, Kennedy contends that 'mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses.' How does he know? Maybe the technology that uses fragments of the genetic code to manipulate the body to defend itself against infection and disease won't produce any significant breakthroughs. But RFK Jr. wants Americans to believe that RNA, a molecule in every living cell, isn't just ineffective but dangerous. Advertisement Of course, the real purpose of the cancellation is to preemptively undermine the credibility of this vaccine research — which will almost surely continue, if the private sector sees value in it. In the past, Kennedy argued for the need for greater research to understand vaccines before recommending them — yet in this case, he demands less research. The pattern is clear. Advertisement Example: After visiting Texas children who were needlessly struggling with measles earlier in the year, Kennedy also visited 'two extraordinary healers' named Dr. Richard Bartlett and Dr. Ben Edwards, who 'have treated and healed some 300 measles-stricken Mennonite children using aerosolized budesonide and clarithromycin.' The purpose of the juxtaposition was to create the impression that alternative medicine is enough. It's not. If you want to use that therapy, go for it, I guess. As far as I can tell, there's no evidence that inhaled steroids such as budesonide or oral antibiotics like clarithromycin are effective in treating measles; many doctors think it's junk science. Bartlett was disciplined by the Texas Medical Board in 2003 for 'unusual use of risk-filled medications' of this variety. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But RFK Jr., you'll notice, didn't bother to wait for the research to praise those doctors or their methods. A quack who once claimed that the polio vaccine causes cancer that killed 'many, many, many, many, many more people' than polio itself, and lied about the connection between autism and vaccines long after the hoax had been exposed — grossly comparing it to a 'holocaust' — doesn't give one whit about any inquiry that proves or disproves the efficacy of vaccines, live attenuated or inactivated or mRNA. Advertisement He's reflexively against them. Not long ago, RFK Jr. fired the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and replaced its members with his people, to create the impression that he had more fairly represented the scientific debate over vaccines. 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science,' was Kennedy's reasoning. Advertisement The former committee members, he argued, had too many 'conflicts of interest,' a euphemism for working or advising 'Big Pharma.' Imagine creating an advisory board for an industry without including people who understand how it works. Granted, I'm a layman. But I don't believe COVID mRNA vaccines are detrimental (as a lot of people seem to think). Nor does it seem that they are miraculous, as proponents claim. Advertisement My problem with the COVID-vaccine regime was the compulsion — not the efforts to mitigate a pandemic, nor the development of new technology that might head off future ones. Pharma companies can't compel you to inject anything. Only the state can do that. And the Luddite demonization of pharma, which saves and improves millions of lives, is still one of the big mysteries of the modern age. Now, the same people who claim that public health institutions can't be trusted believe everything the new head of HHS tells them. Advertisement It's a shame that so many groups like the American Medical Association, which went all-in on the authoritarian COVID regime, have burned the public's trust and goodwill. However — and it needs to be stressed whenever possible — RFK Jr. is no better than the hacks who undermined our trust in science under former President Joe Biden. In some ways, he is worse. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter: @davidharsanyi
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NHS issues vaccination warning for pregnant women over dangerous virus currently surging in Australia
Expectant mothers and people over 75 are being urged to get vaccinated against a potentially deadly virus following a record number of cases in Australia. Health chiefs say the Australian winter often predicts how viruses will spread in the UK, and already this year cases of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have steadily risen in many areas. The virus, which is a common cause of coughs and colds, may also cause a chest infection called bronchiolitis. Some people have a high risk of becoming seriously ill with it, including babies and adults over 75. According to NHS England, RSV is a leading cause of infant deaths worldwide and a main cause of children being taken into hospital. Last winter, almost 7,000 bed days in England were taken up by children with RSV. NHS England is encouraging pregnant women to get a jab that protects against RSV so their babies are protected after birth. Kate Brintworth, chief midwifery officer for NHS England, said: 'While for most adults RSV only causes mild, cold-like symptoms, for older adults and young children it can lead to serious breathing problems that can end up in hospitalisation. 'Getting vaccinated while pregnant is the best way to protect your baby from the moment they are born, and now is the time for mums to act, to make sure their babies are protected ahead of their first few months this winter, when there tends to be more bugs circulating.' Yusra Osman says that when her son, Zakariya, was three months old, he developed bronchiolitis from the virus. He had a fever and was gasping for breath. The 34-year-old, from north London, said: 'Everything was a blur, but I remember his chest was caving in and out and he was really struggling to catch his breath.' Nurses found her son's oxygen levels were dangerously low. Ms Osman, a student midwife, said: 'That was one of those things you don't want to hear as a mum. He was crying, and we kept trying to put an oxygen mask on, but he was fighting to get it off and didn't want to be touched.' Zakariya, who is now seven, needed oxygen and a feeding tube in hospital. 'It's a mum's worst nightmare. Had the RSV vaccine been available then, I'd definitely have had it,' Ms Osman said. The RSV vaccine was offered to pregnant women in England for the first time last September and health officials say it has since helped to protect more than 300,000 mothers and babies. Pregnant mothers from 28 weeks onwards are eligible, as are adults aged 75 to 79. In the coming weeks, NHS England is set to invite more than a million people to have a jab, before the season for infections, which starts in October. Greta Hayward, consultant midwife at the UK Health Security Agency, said babies born in late summer or the autumn are most likely to be admitted to hospital with the virus. 'Hundreds of babies attend emergency departments each day for bronchiolitis through most of November and December,' she said.
an hour ago
What are ultra-processed foods and how do they impact our health?
The term "ultra-processed foods" has become common when discussing how healthy -- or unhealthy -- American diets are. A report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published early Thursday found that U.S. children and adults are getting more than 50% of their total calories from ultra-processed foods. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has warned about the dangers of ultra-processed foods, saying they are one of the reasons behind the rise of chronic diseases in the U.S. But knowing what an ultra-processed food is and how to identify it can be difficult. ABC News spoke to public health experts about what constitutes as an ultra-processed food and the negative effects they can have on human health. What are ultra-processed foods? There is no standard definition in the U.S. of what ultra-processed foods are so most nutritionists, dietitians and food policy experts rely on the NOVA classification system developed by researchers at the University of São Paolo in Brazil in 2009. The NOVA system divides foods into four groups, with group one being unprocessed or minimally processed such as fruits and vegetables; group two being processed culinary ingredients such as salt, sugar and oil; and group three being processed foods such as canned fruits and vegetables or salted meats. Group four, or ultra-processed foods, are foods that are significantly altered from their original state through industrial formulations. They can be made in a laboratory using substances extracted or derived from foods, additives, flavor enhancers or colorings. They generally contain little to no whole foods. Examples include sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet or savory packaged snacks, instant soups, breakfast cereals, energy bars, mass-produced packaged breads, ready-to-eat meals, ice cream and pizza. "These foods typically contain little of the original foods," Dr. Brian Wojeck, an assistant professor of medicine at Yale School of Medicine, told ABC News. "So, the difference between apple ice cream and an apple -- there's very little apple in apple ice cream. A lot of it is other ingredients." How to identify ultra-processed foods Experts say the best way to identify ultra-processed foods in the supermarket or grocery store is to read the ingredients list and nutritional facts panel. If the ingredients are not items that would be found in the kitchen, it is likely an ultra-processed food. "Sometimes the longer the list is, or the harder for you to understand those ingredients, it's going to be maybe a little tip-off that these are going to be an ultra-processed food," Jennifer Taylor, a registered dietitian nutritionist and Rutgers Family and Community Health sciences educator, told ABC News. She went on, "Then looking at your nutrition facts panel is your other important thing. What you really want to look at is your added sugars, your fat content and calories." Michele Polacsek, a professor of public health and director of the Center for Excellence in Public Health at the University of New England, said the one problem with reading food labels is they don't list the industrial processes that led to the creation of the ultra-processed item. "It tells you what's in it, but it doesn't really tell you how it was made," she told ABC News. "So, if there was some way to tell that, you might be able to have more information, but that's not something that is shared with the public at the moment." Are ultra-processed foods unhealthy? Studies have shown that consumption of ultra-processed foods has been linked to weight gain. However, research has also found an association between ultra-processed foods and a higher risk of disease, such as cardiovascular disease, and even death. A 2024 study led by researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that a high intake of ultra-processed foods may increase risk of early death. Participants who ate the most ultra-processed food of any kind had a 4% higher risk of death from any cause and an 8% higher risk of death from neurodegenerative diseases. Another 2024 study from researchers in the U.S., France, Ireland and Australia found a direct association between greater ultra-processed food exposure and higher risk of deaths from cardiovascular disease. To limit the amount of ultra-processed foods you are consuming, Taylor recommends making as many meals at home as possible and, on every trip to the grocery store, switching out one item that is typically bought for a less processed item. "It can be very overwhelming, and that's why we want to make sure that people feel in control and able to make these small steps, because every little step is going to make a big difference in their health," she said. Polacsek also recommends that policy makers create a standard definition for ultra-processed foods "so that manufacturers, supermarkets, schools, everybody can use that definition to decide, 'Do we sell this? Do we buy this? Do we not?'"
