Tasmania is facing another hung parliament. It could cost the state its AFL team
The future of Tasmania's AFL team and the state's fiscal health hang in the balance amid a deep political divide over the proposed Hobart stadium, which is backed by the major parties but fiercely opposed by the Greens and some of the crossbench.
Voters will head to the polls on Saturday for the second time in 16 months - and the fourth state election in seven years. But few are optimistic it will lead to a new period of political stability.
How we got here
The election was called after Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, who led a minority government relying on independents and a Jacqui Lambie Network MP, lost a motion of no confidence in the lower house on June 5.
Opposition Leader Dean Winter used his budget reply speech to table the motion, which was won by 18-17 votes, saying it was in response to the state's budget, plans to sell power companies and the bungled delivery of new Spirit of Tasmania ships.
Six days after the motion, Rockcliff visited Governor Barbara Baker to request an early election instead of being forced to quit.
'Another election is not what I wanted, and I know that it's not what Tasmanians wanted,' Rockcliff said on June 11.
'But it was forced upon us by the Leader of the Opposition.'
What's footy got to do with it?
The proposed $945 million Macquarie Point Stadium in Hobart remains a hot-button topic for many Tasmanians going into the election.
In 2023, after years of lobbying and negotiations, the state was finally given a license to build a team – The Tasmanian Devils– and is slated to join the league in 2028. The AFL signed commitments with the Tasmanian and federal government for the construction of a 23,000-seat roofed stadium – a condition of the club's entry into the AFL.
No stadium, no team. Since then, the stadium has been embroiled in political turmoil and economic uncertainty, with recent opinion polling showing 60 per cent of Tasmanians oppose the development demanded by the AFL.
The election means a vote to approve the new stadium has been delayed. So what happens now?
The state government has already missed a June 30 deadline from the AFL to obtain all required planning and environmental approvals for the stadium. Legislation to approve the stadium will need to be tabled under the next government, with new numbers in the lower house.
Loading
Both Labor and Liberal leaders have said they will support the stadium, however the Greens, Nationals and some independents oppose the development.
It's unlikely that either major party will win a majority of seats in this election, so they'll need the support of the Greens or crossbench to form government.
One threat is that anti-stadium crossbenchers demand the stadium plans be dropped or altered, a big no-go for the AFL.
The 18 AFL club presidents unanimously backed the league's plan for a 19th team. However, they'll have a chance to withdraw their support if the stadium deal falls through. Until the election results become clearer, the stadium and the Devils hang in limbo.
Who said what?
Governor Barbara Baker in June: 'Notwithstanding the recent 2024 election, the public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election, I have granted Premier Rockliff a dissolution.'
Opposition Leader Dean Winter: 'Today I have tabled a notice of motion that says this House has no confidence in the Premier. Because he has wrecked the budget. Because he is planning to sell our power companies, our ports and our public transport. And because no one can trust him after his handling of the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco.'
AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon: 'As we sit here now, 2028 is still on the agenda. We are looking forward to working with the government to deliver a stadium for all of Tasmania.'
What do Tasmanians actually care about?
University of Melbourne election analyst Adrian Beaumont said a new AFL team was not the central issue for most Tasmanians.
Rather, many were more concerned with the state of the budget, housing and health.
In a recent YouGov poll, 52 per cent of Tasmanian voters cited health as one of their top priorities and 45 per cent ranked building more public housing as a key concern.
Reducing state debt was a top concern for 41 per cent of voters, while 34 per cent opposed the privatisation of state assets and 33 per cent cited opposition to the Macquarie Point stadium as one of their top priorities.
Only 22 per cent supported the stadium proposal, while less than one in five voters prioritised policies supporting privatisation or cutting public services.
Meanwhile, a survey of 842 Tasmanian voters, conducted for The Australia Institute, found Tasmanians overwhelmingly felt dudded by the AFL and believed the state should renegotiate with the league.
Beaumont said the two major parties' steadfast support of a new stadium could lead to a surge in support for minor parties and independents.
Loading
'People who oppose the stadium have to vote for someone other than the major parties,' he said.
Beaumont also believes Labor's refusal to do a deal with the Greens to form government in 2024 has lost them support from the left.
What do the polls say?
Most polls indicate a hung parliament is the most likely outcome, which would force the major parties to negotiate with the Greens or independents to form government.
Labor could form government with the Greens, a partnership the party rejected after the 2024 election. But Winter has maintained his position that he would only do deals with 'sensible' independents.
Election analyst Kevin Bonham said that while he initially expected Labor to win the most seats, more recent polls suggest otherwise.
'This has led to a view that Labor's bringing down of the government could have actually backfired or at least failed to impress,' Bonham wrote on his blog.
'Tasmanians could be voting for more of the same or perhaps even a better Liberal position.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
7 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Latham portrait stays on the hook in Labor party room
A picture of former Labor leader Mark Latham will keep hanging in the party's caucus room as he faces domestic violence allegations. Mr Latham is accused by his former partner Nathalie Matthews of a "sustained pattern" of abuse. Her allegations include he pressured her to take part in "degrading" sex acts. Mr Latham strongly denies the untested claims made in a civil court apprehended violence order application by Ms Matthews, saying he has "broken no laws". Calls have grown since the allegations were raised for his official portrait in Labor's federal party room to be removed. But a Labor caucus meeting on Monday was told a "unanimous consensus position" had been reached where the photo would remain, but with a caption providing context. The words will read: "In 2017 Mark Latham was expelled from the Australian Labor Party and banned for life. His actions do not accord with Labor values and fail to meet the standards we expect and demand." Mr Latham sits as an independent in the NSW upper house and faces calls to resign over sexually explicit messages allegedly sent to his former partner while sitting in the chamber of parliament. The decision to add context to Mr Latham's portrait was the right one, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher said. "It's finding the balance, you can't erase history, we can't pretend he wasn't our leader, he was and so there he sits in the leaders' timeline," she told reporters in Canberra."But it's a recognition ... his behaviour and attitudes don't reflect the modern Australian Labor Party." Senator Gallagher said the wording allowed people to feel something had been done. "It will exist there forever on our leaders wall," she said. "It's a pretty strong statement." Mr Latham lost his bid for the nation's top job at the 2004 federal election to former Liberal prime minister John Howard. The campaign was marked by his aggressive handshake with Mr Howard outside the ABC's radio studios on election-eve. The infamous episode was largely blamed for his election defeat and delivered the Howard government a fourth term. The Federal Court in 2024 ordered Mr Latham pay independent NSW politician Alex Greenwich $140,000 in damages over a homophobic social media post. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491


Perth Now
37 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Millions to win from huge change to this debt
The Albanese government has chosen their first winners in the new parliament, as it promises to shave 20 per cent off all student debt in its first sitting week. Labor is set to introduce legislation as parliament returns this week that will wipe $16bn in student debt for approximately three million Australians. It will target loans including HELP debt, VET loans and apprenticeship loans. The government said the average debt-holder will have a $5520 reduction. NewsWire / Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia According to calculations from the government someone with the average HELP debt of $27,600 will have $5520 wiped from their outstanding loans. People at the upper end of debt, exceeding $60,000, could see a reduction of more than $12,000. The legislation, if it passes, will also raised the minimum repayment threshold from $54,000 to $67,000, meaning low-income earners will not have to start paying back their debt. Following the passage debt-holders will not have to do anything to get the reduction, it will be applied by the Australian Taxation Office automatically. Education Minister Jason Clare said the change would 'take a lot of weight off the shoulders' for recent graduates 'You don't start paying off your university degree until your degree starts to pay off for you,' he said. Education Minister Jason Clare said the reform will 'take a lot of weight off' young people. Canberra. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia The reform was first promised in November 2024, well before the election, after the government changed the way student loans were indexed. At the time this brought down student debts by about $3bn. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the 20 per cent reduction following the indexation reform as a pitch for his government to make the education system 'fairer and affordable for every Australian'. 'No matter where you live or how much your parents earn, my Government will work to ensure the doors of opportunity are open for you,' Mr Albanese said in November. Now, with the new Parliament beginning on Tuesday, the government is promising the 20 per cent cut will be the first thing it does. 'We promised cutting student debt would be the first thing we did back in Parliament,' Mr Albanese said. 'And this week we're introducing the legislation to make it happen. 'Because getting an education shouldn't mean a lifetime of debt.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the reduction would be the first thing his new government does. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia The legislation will be introduced on Tuesday, but the government will need the support of either the Greens of the Coalition to get the it through the Senate. This means it will likely be a few weeks before it actually comes into effect. Both the Greens and the Coalition have indicated they are unlikely to block the bill, but both have voiced concerns. Liberal education spokesman Jonno Duniam told the ABC's Insiders program on Sunday that Australians 'spoke pretty clearly at the last election' about this key Labor policy. 'We're not really in business of standing in the way of cost-of-living relief,' Senator Duniam said. 'We'll go through our process but I expect this will pass the parliament.' Senator Jonno Duniam indicated the Coalition would likely help pass the bill. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia For their part, the Greens requested the Parliamentary Library analyse how much the debt reforms will reduce balances since 2022. It found that a student who had a $30,000 debt in 2022 would have a $27,619 debt after the 20 per cent cut, meaning it would only be a 7.9 per cent cut on that 2022 level. This is because student debt increases each year relative to inflation. The Greens position is that it wants all student debt to be wiped and free university and TAFE to be reintroduced. Greens higher education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi said that 'one-off debt reduction won't fix the enormous burden' of university fees and outstanding student debt. 'Of course any student debt relief is better than none, but we are demanding all student debt be wiped and a return to free uni and TAFE, funded by taxing big corporations to pay their fair share,' she said. Greens higher education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi said the change will not fix 'the enormous burden' of student debt. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Student debt massively increased since the previous Coalition government introduced its 'Job-Ready Graduates' scheme in 2021 which increased the costs students have to pay for degrees that were purportedly less desirable. This was designed to incentivise students to study degrees in fields such as science and engineering. In practice there was only a marginal reduction in the number of students studying arts degrees, but the costs for those courses increased as much as 140 per cent – massively increasing the debt burden for some students.

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on
The Greens co-founder booted from the party on the weekend has hit back, accusing the organisation of becoming 'too weird and unlikeable' for electoral success and urging the federal leader to intervene. Drew Hutton, who helped found the Greens in 1991, was expelled from the party on Sunday in part for refusing to delete comments made by others on his Facebook page deemed to be transphobic. Hutton, 78, told this masthead he was considering his legal options and urged new federal party leader Larissa Waters to intervene. 'She should be using her stature to say to the Australian Greens, no more expulsions, no more bullying of green people who have given sometimes decades to the party over this gender issue,' he said. 'And secondly, she should be calling for inquiry into all of the processes of the Greens and to ensure that the principle of democracy is embedded in them. Loading 'Now she's got to show that she's got the character and the courage to do that – if she doesn't do it, the Greens risk becoming, in the view of most Australian electors, just weird and unlikable.' Waters backed her party's processes, which she said showed 'nobody is above the rules'. 'Good governance means that people can put their case forward, including the right to appeal a decision. In this case the appeal was unsuccessful,' she said.