logo
Boarding school pupils ‘exposed to paedophiles' amid ‘cover-up'

Boarding school pupils ‘exposed to paedophiles' amid ‘cover-up'

William Bain admitted 11 charges and was jailed for nine years in June at the High Court in Glasgow, after a criminal investigation was sparked by evidence at the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) in 2021.
In a report published on Wednesday, chair of the inquiry Lady Smith condemned the school's failure to investigate Bain and said it was a 'disgraceful abdication of responsibility' which allowed predators 'free rein', including another recently convicted paedophile ex-teacher.
Bain, of Crieff, Perthshire, was described as a sadist by detectives and the scale of his abuse of pupils aged between 11 and 14 was deemed 'horrendous', following his sentencing at the High Court in Glasgow on June 30.
Lady Smith found that school leaders carried out a 'cover-up' to protect its reputation and hailed the 'fresh prosecutions' of Bain and another recently convicted paedophile, following evidence heard at the inquiry.
She warned that further abusers could be prosecuted as a result of the SCAI.
The findings are part of SCAI's Boarding Schools case study including Loretto School, Gordonstoun, and Merchiston Castle School.
Keil School was established by philanthropists to educate rural boys, and moved to Dumbarton in the 1920s where it became an environment where pupils 'were expected to endure violence and suffer in silence', according to the SCAI.
By the 1950s until the 1980s, abuse was 'normalised', with prolific abuser Bain remaining at the school until it closed in 2000, and other offences carried out by paedophile English teacher David Gutteridge in the early 1990s.
Both men were house tutors, and the SCAI condemned a lack of oversight.
Bain, who worked there for 23 years, was previously convicted in May 2016 of offences at Keil and jailed for six-and-a-half years, while Gutteridge was jailed last year for indecent assault of a pupil at the school, set up by the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust.
William Bain was jailed earlier this year (Image: Police Scotland/PA)
In her report, Lady Smith said that a headteacher was responsible for a 'cover-up', while abusers such as Bain had 'free rein on a daily basis'.
Lady Smith said: 'Protection of the reputation of the school was prioritised over the interests of children, that was a disgraceful abdication of responsibility. The prevailing culture allowed two paedophiles to operate without fear.
'William Bain sexually abused some children on hundreds of occasions, on an almost daily basis. The abuse Bain perpetrated persisted for years, despite concerns arising early on, after a parent complained.'
She branded an investigation 'inadequate' and said parents were falsely reassured.
Lady Smith said: 'The problem was covered up by headmaster Christopher Tongue and other senior staff. Despite parents being assured that reports would go on record, this did not happen. Tongue's successor was never told about it.'
Gutteridge, who taught at Keil from 1989 to 1991, abused a pupil having 'carefully engineered the circumstances', according to the SCAI. He was jailed for 17 months following a conviction for indecent assault at Forfar Sheriff Court in September 2024.
But his predatory behaviour towards teenage boys predated Keil, and in 2015 he was jailed for 18 months after being convicted of two charges of indecent assault at Harrow Crown Court, committed in England in the 1980s.
Other staff physically abused pupils justifying it as 'officially sanctioned punishment', including a housemaster remembered for his 'sadistic brutality' and 'mass beatings' including using the belt, according to the SCAI.
Lady Smith said: 'Keil was a school with inadequate senior leadership and a lack of the most basic of child protection systems.'
She branded it a 'remarkable example of naivety and false optimism trumping reality' which resulted in children being abused.
Lady Smith added: 'The cases of Bain and Gutteridge are examples of a significant outcome.
'Fresh prosecutions followed exposure of their behaviour through the inquiry's investigations and evidence – demonstrating that those who abuse children in care may find it catching up with them decades later.'
Responsibility for running boarding houses was left to senior boys appointed 'chiefs', who controlled squads of junior boys, with some staff considering themselves 'immune from management', a report from the inquiry said.
Governors of the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust 'failed to challenge the situation', and have since apologised for the abuse, according to the SCAI.
READ MORE:
Lady Smith said: 'I would encourage anyone who has relevant information on any aspect of our work to get in touch with our witness support team. We want to hear from you.'
On Wednesday, nuns from a Catholic order, Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, said that children were abused in the care of their establishments for deaf and disabled children.
Sister Eileen Glancy, speaking about St Vincent's School for the Deaf and Blind in Glasgow, told a hearing of the inquiry in Edinburgh: 'We'd have to accept some children were abused.'
She added: 'Children weren't as well protected as they should have been.'
A former pupil of St Vincent's, using the pseudonym Gordon, said in a witness statement that he told his mother about abuse from nuns, and was punished after she contacted police.
The man said that he told his mother on two occasions, and said: 'The physical abuse used to shock me as these were Christians. We lived with fear and intimidation all the time.'
He said: 'My mum spoke to a nun and challenged her about the treatment of children. I know the nun told my mum it wasn't true and I had been a bad boy.
'After that, I was assaulted again and my mum told the police, but nothing happened.'
Gordon alleged that he was subjected to sexual abuse as well as physical violence, including having his head 'batted against a desk'.
He said that the nuns and a priest were 'hypocrites', and that the school felt like a 'prison' as it was surrounded by 15-foot walls – but there was no alternative, as it was the only school for deaf children.
Gordon said: 'There was so much cruelty at St Vincent's and none of us could understand that, the Sisters were supposed to be so holy and caring but were so cruel. This was a period of suffering for all deaf children of my generation. We all suffered, we were all terrified.
'I would like to see charges brought against the people who were responsible.'
The inquiry continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher

Powys County Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher

Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'

Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher

ITV News

time2 hours ago

  • ITV News

Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher

Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. Gavin Millar KC The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'

Hotels braced for a wave of protests: Up to 30 targeted as residents turn up heat to follow Epping precedent
Hotels braced for a wave of protests: Up to 30 targeted as residents turn up heat to follow Epping precedent

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Hotels braced for a wave of protests: Up to 30 targeted as residents turn up heat to follow Epping precedent

A wave of protests are set to sweep the country this weekend targeting migrant hotels. Anti-immigration campaigners are looking to ride on the back of this week's landmark judgment that saw the High Court order the removal of migrants from a hotel in Epping, Essex. Protests at up to 30 hotels are believed to be planned as communities seek to replicate the ruling for The Bell Hotel, which, pending an appeal, must be closed within weeks. The hotel had been at the centre of protests after an asylum seeker living there was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl, which he denies. Hotels in Cannock, Chichester and Tamworth are among those expected to be targeted by demonstrations, with anti-racism groups already organising counter-protests in 15 locations across the three-day Bank Holiday weekend. They are prepared to turn up tonight in the likes of Bournemouth, Portsmouth, Leicester, Leeds, Orpington, Perth, Aberdeen and Altrincham. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has used Epping as a rallying cry, saying: 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside hotels and put pressure on councils to go to court to try to get illegal immigrants out.' On Tuesday, a judge granted a temporary injunction against migrants being housed at The Bell Hotel after Epping Forest council argued that it was necessary for 'the safety of nearby residents' and to reduce the threat of 'violent protests'. As it tried, unsuccessfully, to intervene in the case at the eleventh hour, the Home Office argued that granting Epping's application 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. The ruling threatens to collapse Labour's asylum system as protesters take to the streets and councils across the country prepare to hit the Home Office with copycat litigation over the use of hotels in their areas. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has written to all Conservative councils pledging support for any legal action, while Reform UK's leaders have encouraged people to protest at their local asylum hotels. But anti-racism groups have warned the ruling sets a 'dangerous precedent', with Stand Up To Racism saying that it will 'embolden the far-Right to call more protests outside hotels housing refugees'. Labour grandee Lord Falconer urged the Home Office to appeal against the Epping judgment on Thursday as he admitted the ruling 'causes great problems' for the Government. The peer, who served as justice secretary under Sir Tony Blair and as Sir Keir Starmer's shadow attorney general, said it 'gives rise to the expectation that some asylum hotels can be closed'. Lord Falconer said the ruling presents Labour with a 'very troublesome issue, namely does demonstrations outside these hotels lead to it being more likely that they will be closed'. Urging the Government 'very strongly' to appeal, he told Radio 4's Today programme: 'It puts the courts and the politicians in a difficult position. 'There should be clarity on that and the authority in relation to that can only come from the Court of Appeal.' The Home Office still could not say whether or not it plans to appeal on Thursday. But pressure was mounting on the Government as all Tory councillors were sent a draft motion, produced by the Conservative Research Department and the Conservative Councillors' Association, 'strongly urging' them to follow Epping's example. It included instructions on how to influence their local authorities. Stevenage became the latest Labour-run council to say it would consider taking legal action over an asylum hotel in the Hertfordshire borough as the internal revolt grew. The council had already warned a Novotel hotel it must stop housing asylum seekers or face planning enforcement action, and on Thursday said it was 'actively investigating alleged breaches' as it considered legal action similar to Epping's. Ministers were scrambling to find contingency plans to house migrants, with officials looking at houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), empty tower blocks, disused teacher training colleges and old student accommodation as alternatives. The asylum minister, Dame Angela Eagle, told the Commons home affairs committee in June that the Government had shifted its focus from old military barracks to smaller locations such as tower blocks. However, the Guardian reported officials are still considering placing people removed from hotels in the RAF Wethersfield base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. Meanwhile, it was also reported that asylum accommodation contractors working for the Home Office have contacted property specialists, seeking 5,000 residential units in towns and cities to house migrants. But a Government minister could not answer when quizzed on where asylum seekers should go instead of hotels on Thursday. Asked 'where will they go?', schools minister Catherine McKinnell said: 'Well, I mean, that's a big question.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store