Jefferies sees, China restricting rare earth resources to get access to advanced semiconductors of US
China's recent restrictions on rare earth resources are being seen as a response to US export controls on advanced semiconductor technology, according to a report by Jefferies.
The report highlighted that China is taking a strong stance because it wants access to advanced US semiconductors, which are crucial for upgrading its economy.
It said, "US needs China's rare earth resources just as much, if not more so, as China wants access to US
advanced semiconductors
".
Jefferies noted that the United States needs China's rare earth materials just as much, if not more, than China needs American semiconductors. These
rare earth elements
are essential for the production of many high-tech devices and defence equipment.
As per the report, Beijing views US restrictions on the export of technology products as an economic attack, as it blocks China from advancing its tech sector. The Jefferies agrees with this view.
It added that the semiconductor export restrictions also harm America's own national interests. This is because the ban has cut off American tech companies from one of their largest customers, China.
Additionally, the restrictions have pushed China to speed up efforts to develop its own semiconductor technologies, reducing its future reliance on US firms.
The rare earth issue is also seen as a reminder to the US national security establishment that America may not have as much leverage over China as previously thought.
At the same time, China has denied making any specific promises about rare earth exports during recent discussions in Geneva.
Jefferies also pointed out that China's Ministry of Commerce defended the export controls by stating that "implementing export controls on items with clear dual-use military and civilian attributes is a common international practice."
The report concludes that it is unrealistic for Washington to expect China to ease restrictions on rare earths unless the US also lifts some of its tech export curbs. China views mutual respect and reciprocity as essential in global trade, and the current actions by the US do not reflect that spirit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Flexiloans raises another Rs 375 crore from Fundamentum, Accion and others
New-age non-banking finance company Flexiloans has raised Rs 375 crore in a mix of primary and secondary capital to fuel its expansion plan. The funding was led by existing investors Nandan Nilekani 's Fundamentum, US-based impact investor Accion Digital Transformation, American asset management firm Nuveen, and Denmark-based asset management major Maj Invest. 'Through this round, we have given exits to the high networth individuals who had invested in the company in 2017. Most of our existing institutional investors have doubled down in the company,' said Deepak Jain, a cofounder of Flexiloans. Jain did not comment on the valuation at which this round was closed. UK's development finance firm British International Investment was the new investor. Sanjay Nayyar-backed Flexiloans, founded in 2016 in Mumbai, focuses on small businesses, offering them term loans and working capital. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories The funding round comes on the back of a Rs 290-crore infusion in October 2024. ET had reported then that the round had pushed Flexiloans' valuation to $140 million. While the October round was all primary capital, this round had a significant secondary component. This comes at a time when the MSME-focused lending opportunity in the country has opened following heightened regulatory scrutiny in unsecured consumer loans. Jain said that despite the headwinds that the sector has faced, Flexiloans has managed to report three years of profitability, which helped the company raise funding even at a time when equity infusion has been hard for lending fintechs. Flexiloans closed FY24 with total revenue of Rs 263 crore and a net profit of Rs 3 crore. The company is yet to file its FY25 financials. Backed by its own NBFC Epimoney, Flexiloans has built a book worth Rs 2,300 crore. Jain said about 50% of the assets under management (AUM) sits on its own books and the rest is with partner lenders. Flexiloans sources business from ecommerce portals and food delivery platforms by financing sellers on these platforms. It also uses digital marketing to get leads on its own website. The startup also works with online marketplaces such as Paisabazaar . 'We will scale up our products with a target of achieving Rs 3,500 to 4,000 crore in AUM by FY2026,' Jain said. Eventually, the target for the company is to achieve the Rs 5,000-crore milestone in the next 18 to 24 months. While the startup offers unsecured business loans, its plan is to expand into secured lending, launch new credit products like dealer and vendor financing, and get into insurance distribution as well. Jain said the management is planning to apply for a corporate agent licence from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India. Also Read: Flexiloans secures Rs 290 crore in funding from Accion, Fundamentum, others
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
US puts hard terms on table, presents a take-it-or-leave-it offer; demands access to agriculture, dairy, pharma
The final stretch of India-US trade talks is centred around sensitive sectors such as dairy, agriculture, digital and medical services, three people aware of the matter said, with Washington keen to open them up while New Delhi is pushing back with demand for a balanced agreement that safeguards vital sectors. A US team led by Brendan Lynch, Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia, was in New Delhi for the face-to-face bilateral talks from 4 June to 10 June. While half of the team has returned, the rest in New Delhi have sought definitive commitments on market access in sensitive areas, the people cited above said on the condition of anonymity. The talks will continue virtually to seal the deal. Also read | Mint Exclusive: India-US trade deal before 8 July India has traditionally resisted opening these areas due to concerns over unregulated competition and social sensitivities. Indian negotiators now navigate political and economic complexities related to sectors vital to rural livelihoods and food security, amid the hardened US stance. 'The negotiations are not progressing as expected. The talks were meant to be two-way, as agreed. However, the US team's insistence on opening certain critical sectors comes across as a take-it-or-leave-it offer," said the first among the three people cited above. Queries emailed to the spokespersons of US Secretary of Commerce, USTR and US Embassy in New Delhi, along with spokespersons of ministries of commerce and external affairs remained unanswered. Two-way road Mint reported on 21 April that Indian negotiators have made it clear that unless the US changes its animal feeding practices—specifically the use of non-vegetarian feed for cattle—or adopts India's vegetarian certification process, US dairy products such as cheese and butter won't be allowed in. At the same time, India has conveyed its willingness to consider tariff concessions on certain nuts and fruits. Tying up a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by 9 July is critical to stop the 10% universal tariff and the additional 16% country-specific US tariffs. According to the second person cited above, the Indian side views the US insistence as a breach of the 13 February joint statement issued by both leaderships to negotiate a mutually beneficial BTA by fall 2025. Also read | 'Talks are moving, things on track': India-US interim trade deal by June 25? The US wants India to significantly reduce duties on American agricultural goods, dairy products, and shrimp, as well as to remove non-tariff barriers that currently restrict US dairy exports, all without offering substantial market access to Indian goods in return, the officials cited above said. India still sees hope, with about a month remaining before the 90-day pause on Trump's reciprocal tariff ends on 8 July, to finalize the first tranche of the deal. 'It's not that it can't be done—it's possible, as both countries are in favour of it. In fact, India was the first country to be offered a trade agreement. We are trying our best to make it happen and keep the trade dialogue on track," said the third person. However, this person denied that changing geopolitical situations were affecting the ongoing BTA talks, citing recent developments where the US successfully concluded trade agreements with the UK and China as evidence. For an open market A Niti Aayog working paper last month suggested that India open its market to a broad range of US agricultural products, including rice, pepper, soybean oil, shrimp, tea, coffee, dairy and poultry under the BTA. However, these recommendations ignore risks to India's 700 million farm-dependent citizens, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a thinktank. Co-founder Ajay Srivastava has called for a broader public consultation on these recommendations. Meanwhile, Indian negotiators have raised concerns over stringent US sanitary and phytosanitary norms, drug regulations, and provisions such as the destruction of entire consignments of fruits if even a few units fail to meet prescribed standards. These are viewed as excessively harsh and trade-restrictive. Also read | India-US trade deal announcement soon: Scott Bessent At present, India imposes a basic customs duty of ₹35 per kg on shelled almonds, ₹100 per kg on in-shell almonds, along with a 10% Agriculture Infrastructure Development Cess. Walnuts—both in-shell and shelled—attract a 100% duty when imported from the US, while pistachios face a 10% duty calculated on the cost, insurance, and freight (CIF) value. In 2024, US exports of agricultural and allied products to India stood at nearly $2 billion, including $452 million worth of alcoholic beverages and $1.3 billion worth of fruits and vegetables. In comparison, India's total agricultural exports to the US in FY24 were valued at $2.12 billion. Sharp asymmetry Tariff comparisons show a sharp asymmetry. India imposes an average tariff of 37.66% on US agriculture, meat, while US tariffs on Indian goods in the same category stand at just 5.29%. In the chemicals and pharmaceuticals sector, US goods face a 9.68% duty in India, whereas Indian products are subject to only 1.06% in the US. Dairy products from the US attract a high duty of 28.42% in India, while Indian dairy exports to the US face a minimal 0.59% tariff. Similarly, US processed food, sugar, cocoa, and related preparations are subject to a 29.66% duty in India, compared to just 4.67% for Indian goods of the same categories in the US. Also read | India, US aim to finalize first tranche of trade deal by autumn: FM On cereals, vegetables, fruits, and spices, US exports to India are taxed at an average rate of 8.82%, while Indian products in these categories face only 3.1% in the US. For pharmaceuticals, US exports to India face a 10.91% duty, whereas Indian pharma products exported to the US attract a negligible 0.01% tariff. After UK's industries faced American tariffs of 25% on all aluminium, steel and derivatives (announced on 12 March), 25% tariff on passenger vehicles (announced on 3 April ), 25% tariff on automobile parts (beginning 3 May ), and a 10% baseline tariff on all imports (from 5 April) – the UK and the US on 8 May announced an economic prosperity deal (EPD). The mini deal secured some concessions for the UK, but the 10% baseline tariff continued.
Economic Times
37 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Scott Bessent also a contender to succeed Fed Chief Powell
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel New York: A growing chorus of advisers inside and outside the Trump administration are pushing another name to serve as the next chair of the Federal Reserve: Treasury Secretary Scott Donald Trump said Friday he would name a successor "very soon" to replace Jerome Powell , whose term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. The small list of candidates under consideration has included Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official whom Trump interviewed for the Treasury secretary role in November, according to people familiar with the Bessent - who is leading Trump's effort to kickstart the US economy with sweeping changes to trade, taxes and regulation - is also now one of the contenders for the job, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Formal interviews for the position have not begun, two of the people said."I have the best job in Washington," Bessent said in response to a request for comment. "The president will decide who's best for the economy and the American people."As Treasury chief, Bessent would traditionally play a key role in the search and interview process for the next Fed chair. It's unclear if he would recuse himself as Trump begins to make his decision."Given the amount of trust and confidence that the global financial community has in Scott Bessent, he's an obvious candidate," said Tim Adams, president and CEO of the Institute of International Finance. "He's a dark horse candidate," Adams said, adding that Warsh - who served as a governor on the Fed board from 2006 to 2011 - would also be a good specifically about Warsh on Friday, Trump said: "He's very highly thought of."Bessent has been at the forefront of negotiations on a US-China trade deal, arguably the most important of the pacts the president is seeking to forge as part of his effort to reshape the global trade landscape. "Scott Bessent proved he could implement President Trump's agenda during an incredibly turbulent first six months," said Steve Bannon, former chief White House strategist and outside adviser to the president.
