Google's Veo 3 goes viral with Will Smith eating Spaghetti test that once broke the internet
Image credit: X/ Javi Lopez
Google
unveiled its latest AI video generation tool – Veo 3 at its annual developer conference I/O 2025.
Google Veo 3
directly competes with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI's Sora video generator and allows users to generate videos with speech such as dialogues and voice-overs; and audio, such as music and sound effects with text and image prompts.
Every time a company unveils a new AI video generation tool, there's a now-familiar ritual: someone creates a video of actor
Will Smith eating spaghetti
. What started as a meme has evolved into a quirky benchmark for testing the realism and capability of AI-generated video. The bizarre scenario—Smith slurping noodles—has become a litmus test for how well a model can handle facial expressions, hand movements, and messy textures like food.
Video of Will Smith eating spaghetti as generated by Veo 3
With the rollout of Veo 3 in the US, users have wasted no time putting Google's new AI video tool to the test—by generating fresh videos of Will Smith eating spaghetti. Take a look at the video as shared by X user Javi Lopez
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Redefine Your Finance Career
IIMK-AF
Apply Now
Undo
Now, take a look at the 2023 AI-video of Smith eating spaghetti
Same video as generated by Veo 2
The 2023 video was criticized for its lack of realism, with unnatural movements and visual artifacts that made it clear it was AI-generated. In contrast, the Veo 3-generated video exhibits a much-improved level of visual fidelity. The textures, lighting, and details of the spaghetti, the fork, and Will Smith's facial expressions are rendered with a high degree of accuracy, showing subtle changes that convey emotion and reaction.
Xbox and PlayStation Price Hikes Explained
When Will Smith poked fun at the trend
The meme became so widespread that even Will Smith acknowledged. In an Instagram post in February last year, the actor posted a humorous parody of the trend on Instagram, further fueling its popularity and solidifying its place in internet culture.
'This is getting out of hand!,' he captioned the post
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rati Agnihotri's son Tanuj Virwani talks about pressures of proving himself in the industry: 'For my mother, they would meet me, but...'
Tanuj Virwani, son of Rati Agnihotri, navigates Bollywood with determination, acknowledging his mother's influence opened doors but securing roles depended on his talent. He values her advice on emotional resilience, crucial for handling the industry's highs and lows. Off-screen, Tanuj prioritizes family, balancing his career with his roles as a husband and father. Tanuj Virwani , son of iconic Bollywood actress Rati Agnihotri , may come from a celebrated film legacy, but his journey in the industry has been one of quiet determination and personal grit. Currently in the spotlight for his role in Rana Naidu 2, Tanuj has opened up about the challenges of carving his own path, the pressure of living up to his mother's name, and the life lessons that have kept him grounded—both on and off screen. In an interview with Bollywood Shaadis, he acknowledged that being a star kid gave him access to people in the industry, but clarified that it never guaranteed work. Tanuj explained that while some were willing to meet him out of respect for his mother, landing roles still depended entirely on his own talent and hard work. He also noted that the nepotism debate wasn't as prominent when he started out, unlike the buzz that followed the Kangana Ranaut-Karan Johar controversy years later. Tanuj further revealed that his mother, Rati Agnihotri, has always been both his closest confidante and toughest critic. Despite their shared background in cinema, they rarely discuss films at home. Instead, their conversations focus on personal growth—how to carry oneself, lead by example, and stay grounded. He shared that when he first told her about his decision to pursue acting, she offered him heartfelt but realistic advice. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Need To Kill Time On Your Computer, This Popular Strategy Game Is A Must Forge Of Empires Undo Rati emphasized that while the industry may appear glamorous, it comes with its share of struggles—failures, insecurities, rejection, and emotional toll. Her guidance was less about the craft of acting and more about developing the mental strength needed to survive and succeed in such a challenging space. He also shared that one of the most valuable lessons his mother, Rati Agnihotri, taught him—and one he lives by—is to remain grounded during the highs and not be consumed by negativity during the lows. She stressed the importance of emotional balance, reminding him that both extremes can be unhealthy. Off-screen, Tanuj is also a devoted family man, known for being a loving husband and a doting father.
Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Apple Paper questions path to AGI, sparks division in GenAI group
New Delhi: A recent research paper from Apple focusing on the limitations of large reasoning models in artificial intelligence has left the generative AI community divided, sparking significant debate whether the current path taken by AI companies towards artificial general intelligence is the right one to take. The paper, titled The Illusion of Thinking, published earlier this week, demonstrates that even the most sophisticated large reasoning models do not genuinely think or reason in a human-like way. Instead, they excel at pattern recognition and mimicry, generating responses that only appear intelligent, but lack true comprehension or conceptual understanding. The study used controlled puzzle environments, such as the popular Tower of Hanoi puzzle, to systematically test reasoning abilities across varying complexities by large reasoning models such as OpenAI's o3 Mini, DeepSeek's R1, Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google Gemini Flash. The findings show that while large reasoning and language models may handle simple or moderately complex tasks, they experience total failure when faced with high-complexity problems, which occur despite having sufficient computational resources. Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist and a known sceptic of the claims surrounding large language models, views Apple's work as providing compelling empirical evidence that today's models primarily repeat patterns learned during training from vast datasets without genuine understanding or true reasoning capabilities. "If you can't use a billion-dollar AI system to solve a problem that Herb Simon (one of the actual godfathers of AI, current hype aside) solved with AI in 1957, and that first semester AI students solve routinely, the chances that models like Claude or o3 are going to reach AGI seem truly remote," Marcus wrote in his blog. Marcus' arguments are also echoed in earlier comments of Meta's chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, who has argued that current AI systems are mainly sophisticated pattern recognition tools rather than true thinkers. The release of Apple's paper ignited a polarised debate across the broader AI community, with many panning the design of the study than its findings.A published critique of the paper by researchers from Anthropic and San-Francisco based Open Philanthropy said the study has issues in the experimental design, that it overlooks output an alternate demonstration, the researchers tested the models on the same problems but allowed them to use code, resulting in high accuracy across all the tested models. The critique around the study's failure to take in the output limits and the limitations in coding by the models have also been highlighted by other AI commentators and researchers including Matthew Berman, a popular AI commentator and researcher."SOTA models failed The Tower of Hanoi puzzle at a complexity threshold of >8 discs when using natural language alone to solve it. However, ask it to write code to solve it, and it flawlessly does up to seemingly unlimited complexity," Berman wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter).The study highlights Apple's more cautious approach to AI compared to rivals like Google and Samsung, who have aggressively integrated AI into their products. Apple's research explains its hesitancy to fully commit to AI, contrasting with the industry's prevailing narrative of rapid questioned the timing of the release of the study, coinciding with Apple's annual WWDC event where it announces its next software across online forums said the study was more about managing expectations in light of Apple's own struggles with said, practitioners and business users argue that the findings do not change the immediate utility of AI tools for everyday applications.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Neuralink babies'? Scale AI's Alexandr Wang says he is waiting for Elon Musk's brain chips before having kids
In a statement that straddles science fiction and near-future reality, Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang has revealed he's putting off parenthood—for now. But not because of career demands or personal timing. His reason? He's waiting for Elon Musk 's Neuralink to become mainstream. Yes, Wang wants his future children to be among the first humans enhanced by brain-computer interfaces from birth. During a recent appearance on The Shawn Ryan Show , the 28-year-old tech prodigy shared a vision that feels pulled from the pages of a futuristic novel. 'When we get Neuralink and we get these other technologies, kids who are born with them are gonna learn how to use them in like crazy, crazy ways,' Wang said, explaining that the first seven years of life—when neuroplasticity is at its peak—present the most fertile ground for integrating superintelligence into the human experience. Neuralink, Meet Nature Neuralink, founded by Elon Musk, is currently trialing a brain-chip implant the size of a coin. Though still in early clinical stages, the device has already shown stunning potential: one patient with ALS reportedly edited a video using only his mind. But Neuralink isn't alone. Synchron, backed by heavyweights like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, is collaborating with Apple to help patients with disabilities use iPhones through brain signals. Motif Neurotech, another contender, is developing a neurostimulator that treats severe depression and functions like a pacemaker for the brain. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Wang, who is also taking on a new role at Meta to lead its superintelligence initiatives, seems to believe these brain-machine hybrids are not just medical miracles—they are the future of human learning, cognition, and possibly even evolution. Born to Compute? His vision hinges on a well-documented trait: the astonishing neuroplasticity of young brains. A 2009 study published in Brain Dev. found that children's brains, particularly in the early years, are primed for adaptation. This plasticity not only helps kids learn languages or recover from injury but, in Wang's vision, could also help them learn how to "think" alongside or even through artificial intelligence. It's a radical idea—one that flips the conventional approach to parenting. Instead of shielding children from screen time or tech overload, Wang imagines a future where babies are born wired for the digital age, quite literally. Ethics, Science, and the Silicon Valley Dream As startling as Wang's perspective may seem, it's emblematic of a growing mindset in tech circles: that human limitations are solvable problems. But while Wang may be planning for AI-enhanced progeny, ethical concerns continue to hover over Neuralink and its competitors—from long-term brain health to consent, privacy, and the ever-blurring boundary between human and machine. Still, in a world racing toward a post-human horizon, Alexandr Wang's statement isn't just provocative—it might be prophetic. The question isn't whether Neuralink babies will happen. It's who dares to go first. And Wang, it seems, is ready to raise the world's first AI-native child—as soon as the software is ready.
