logo
Louisville air pollution regulator to contest grant termination for air toxics study

Louisville air pollution regulator to contest grant termination for air toxics study

Yahoo01-05-2025
A logo on the side of an electric car for the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District. (Kentucky Lantern photo by Liam Niemeyer)
Louisville's air pollution regulator will dispute the Trump administration's termination of a grant that funded an air toxics monitoring study in West Louisville, a larger community effort to study air pollution health impacts in neighborhoods near the Rubbertown industrial complex.
The Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (APCD) received a memo from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 31 stating a $1 million grant from the Environmental Justice Government-to-Government Program would be terminated because, in part, it was 'inconsistent with, and no longer effectuates, agency priorities.' An EPA official in a court filing wrote recently that the agency was canceling hundreds of EPA grants, most of them involving environmental justice programs.
Matt Mudd, a spokesperson with APCD, told the Lantern Wednesday the regulator planned to dispute the grant termination with the EPA through an internal process. Rachael Hamilton, the executive director of APCD, in an April 16 board meeting described the option to dispute the grant termination as an 'administrative remedy' that would be sent to a regional EPA administrator. Hamilton said in the meeting last month there had been a 'fair amount' of litigation from other grantees that have had grants terminated.
The funding, announced in 2023 during the Biden administration, was set to support the placement of canisters measuring volatile organic compounds and two other monitors measuring airborne metals. Some of the monitors were to be placed downwind of Rubbertown, a cluster of chemical plants near West Louisville that have long been the subject of complaints from the adjacent neighborhoods and beyond.
The monitors were to be a part of a one-year study to compare the amount of air pollution and health impacts to a previous study done in the early 2000s that found levels of a number of cancer-causing pollutants to be unacceptable high. Mudd said the study's start date was 'imminent' before the grant was terminated.
Terry Johnson, a spokesperson for the EPA regional office that covers Kentucky, in a statement said the EPA was reviewing all awarded grants 'to ensure each is an appropriate use of taxpayer dollars and to understand how those programs align with administration priorities.'
'Maybe the Biden-Harris Administration shouldn't have forced their radical agenda of wasteful DEI programs and 'environmental justice' preferencing on the EPA's core mission of protecting human health and the environment,' Johnson said in his statement.
Johnson did not answer emailed follow-up questions from the Lantern asking what specific issues the agency had with the grant.
Rep. Joshua Watkins, D-Louisville, who represents parts of West Louisville neighborhoods in the state legislature, said he hoped the city would exhaust all resources 'to ensure that their mission isn't hindered by any changes — this sort of whiplash of changes — that we see coming from the federal government.'
'Environmental justice is a freedom issue, and if you don't have a high quality of air, you aren't free to breathe and live a quality of life,' Watkins told the Lantern. 'Clean air is nonpartisan. You need it if you're Republican, you need it if you're a Democrat.'
Watkins, who noted city residents in predominantly Black neighborhoods in West Louisville have significantly lower life expectancies compared to the east half of the city, questioned why the air toxics monitoring study wouldn't align with the EPA's mission of protecting human health and the environment.
'What neighborhoods align, I guess, with the EPA mission?' he said. 'If not for the residents of West Louisville who have documented evidence of significantly worse health outcomes, why would we not focus on those citizens?'
The air monitoring study was a piece of a larger project addressing the health impacts of air pollution, involving other community partners including the University of Louisville's Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, the West Jefferson County Community Task Force, Park DuValle Community Health Centers and Louisville's public health and wellness department.
UofL researchers planned to conduct a wastewater sampling study alongside the air toxics monitoring study and collect data from both to determine 'community health risks'; Park DuValle Community Health Centers would use the health impact findings from the project to train health professionals on how to treat exposure to air pollution; and the West Jefferson Community Task Force would hold community meetings to provide feedback on the project's findings and policy recommendations.
Arnita Gadson, the executive director of the West Jefferson County Community Task Force, told the Lantern she was especially interested in how the 'much needed' project planned to help inform community health workers and doctors on how to treat the impacts of exposure to air pollution. She said the health impacts of air pollution can also extend beyond West Louisville, given that residents impacted by pollution can move elsewhere and bring their health issues with them.
'This grant was to help everybody,' Gadson said. 'I think we were on the precipice of actually establishing a platform that meant that doctors really could start using some of this.'
Attempts on Wednesday to reach the CEO of Park DuValle Community Health Centers and a key UofL researcher involved with the project were not successful.
Eboni Cochran, the co-director of the grassroots organization Rubbertown Emergency ACTion that seeks to push back against pollution from industries in Rubbertown, told the Lantern while the termination of the grant was sad, APCD could do more to address immediate air pollution impacts. Cochran pointed to ongoing complaints of dust and fires at an industrial plant in the Parkland neighborhood of Louisville.
'An important part of what they were doing was to engage medical professionals, right? I think that is vital to the work of environmental justice,' Cochran said. 'However, you can even prevent or reduce people's likelihood of them even having to get to the medical professional if you listened to the people who live near these industries.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge
PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge

Boston Globe

time8 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge

'I've long understood Maine's leadership, nationally and internationally, on the issue of banning PFAS, banning biosolids, centering farms, and supporting farmers,' Comerford told reporters outside the Maine State House in Augusta Tuesday afternoon. 'I leave with a renewed fire in my belly that in Massachusetts, we have to turn off the tap for PFAS,' the Northampton Democrat added. 'We must follow Maine. There is a saying in Massachusetts, 'Where goes Maine, there goes the nation.' And so in Massachusetts, we must ban PFAS.' Advertisement The US Environmental Protection Agency on its website promotes the land application of sewage sludge, outlining environmental benefits such as 'improved soil health, carbon sequestration, and reduced demand on non-renewable resources like phosphorus.' The EPA says it defines biosolids as sewage sludge that's been treated and meets regulatory standards to be used as fertilizer. Still, PFAS are 'nearly universal' within the chemicals that the EPA detects in wastewater sludge, according to the Maine Morning Star. Advertisement When PFAS enter soil that is used to grow crops, the contamination can be passed on to farmers and consumers, according to Comerford's office, which said that small doses of PFAS are linked to cancer, harm to the reproductive and immune systems, and other diseases. The legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa calls for the creation of a statewide plan for reducing and managing sludge. It also authorizes legal and financial protections for farmers and a relief fund to help farmers who have suffered financial losses 'resulting from standard agricultural practices that may have resulted in the actual or suspected presence of PFAS in soil, water or agricultural products,' according to the bills. 'We want to encourage testing, but we have to do it in a way that people aren't going to be afraid to test,' Arena-DeRosa said. 'Right now, we're dealing with that in Massachusetts because we're worried about the cost, so we have to think about mitigation strategies and the funding that it's going to take.' The bills are awaiting a hearing before the Agricultural and Fisheries Committee. Comerford is vice chair of the panel. During their day trip on Tuesday, the Massachusetts delegation visited a PFAS-impacted farm in Arundel, attended a lunch and 'storytelling session' at the Maine State House, and participated in a roundtable discussion with farmers, advocates, and lawmakers, Comerford's office said. Massachusetts lawmakers on the trip included Reps. Arena-DeRosa, Michelle Ciccolo, Steven Owens, and Senators Comerford and Jamie Eldridge. They were joined by Maine Representatives Bill Pluecker and Lori Gramlich, and Senator Henry Ingwersen. Advertisement Pluecker said he sponsored the landmark legislation in Maine that prohibited applying sludge on farms. 'This toxic contaminant, which knows no bounds regionally, flows downhill. It poisons our water, fish, and drinking water,' he said. 'And what we need to do is stand together as politicians and activists across the states, regionally looking at how we can address this issue and how we can move the issue forward to protect farmers, wherever you may be.' Ingwersen recalled how his work confronting PFAS started in 2016 in his hometown of Arundel, where a dairy farmer discovered his property was contaminated. The farmer had to slaughter cows, pause selling products, and spend thousands of dollars out of pocket to mitigate the issue, he said. 'We know we must keep up the fight here and share what we've learned with anyone looking to do the same,' Ingwersen said. 'So I was really happy to be able to talk to our folks in Massachusetts and hopefully begin relationships we can work together on in their state.' Comerford said she asked Maine lawmakers about the lessons they've learned and about any approaches they would have done differently. 'I do feel like we've benefitted greatly from the wisdom, and the experience, and the knowledge base that Maine has built,' Comerford said. 'We have to think as upstream as we could possibly go, and that is the manufacturers, the chemical companies who make these chemicals and have polluted our rivers and polluted our food systems.' The Massachusetts chapter of the Northeast Organic Farming Association, which supports the legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa, says a relief fund 'will be critical for increasing PFAS testing and protecting farmers' business liability and their health.' Advertisement 'While it's anticipated that some farms will have higher than acceptable levels of PFAS in their soil and/or water, farmers are hesitant to test until they know they'll be protected in case they need to cease production,' NOFA/Mass The legislation is also a priority for environmental advocacy group Clean Water Action. 'Farmers across the nation are learning that the fertilizer they used may have contained high levels of PFAS, and they need our help to identify and remediate PFAS contamination to ensure that our food supply is safe,' Clean Water Action

Mayor Brandon Johnson-aligned school board members balk at CPS budget plan that sidesteps city pension payment, borrowing
Mayor Brandon Johnson-aligned school board members balk at CPS budget plan that sidesteps city pension payment, borrowing

Chicago Tribune

time9 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Mayor Brandon Johnson-aligned school board members balk at CPS budget plan that sidesteps city pension payment, borrowing

Despite the presentation of a balanced budget containing no loan for the upcoming Chicago Public Schools academic year after months of debates over a multi-million dollar budget deficit, the entirety of the Chicago Board of Education is not sold on the $10.25 billion plan. The proposal was the result of weeks of planning and bolstered by community engagement. It combines cuts to expenditures — that avoid cuts to classrooms — with input from outside partners such as the city and state, according to the district's Chief Budget Officer Mike Sitkowski, who presented the plan to the school board at their bi-monthly meeting Wednesday. Notably, it balances the budget without a $200 million borrowing scenario or a $175 million pension reimbursement to the city, as proposed by Mayor Brandon Johnson. Interim CPS CEO Macquline King drew attention in recent days for pushing back on Johnson's proposals to rely on borrowing and make the pension payment. King took over in June as the district was confronting a $734 million budget crisis in the wake of leadership upheaval. Just days earlier, the former schools chief Pedro Martinez had left the district for a new job in Massachusetts after a protracted public disagreement with Johnson about how to balance last year's budget, which ultimately cost him his job. The interim CEO stepped into the role with two immediate priorities: settling the budget and ensuring a smooth start to the school year. While King, a former city employee, has taken a stance against Johnson, it remains unclear if the board will follow suit. And it remains to be seen how her relationship with Johnson will fare in light of the budget reveal. A majority of the 21-member hybrid board members are Johnson-aligned, meaning they have significant sway over the final vote on a budget, which requires a simple majority, or 11 members to vote in favor. During the meeting, while some Johnson-aligned members recognized the blood, sweat and tears that Sitkowski put into the proposal, they also expressed consternation about its potential to rupture relationships with City Hall. Meanwhile, several elected board members backed the proposal, saying it puts students first. Sitkowski maintained that this year's plan, in agreement with King's approach, stays away from dangerous borrowing and helps the district in the long term, significantly decreasing the projected budget deficit in the next five years. He emphasized that the proposal fulfills all labor commitments as outlined in a new teachers contract finalized this spring — upholding promises to teachers' wages, class sizes and bilingual education support. It also offers protections to principals in their recently approved contract, he added. He assured board members that he 'reviewed every line' to identify all cost-saving measures, such as cutting the CPS' central office budget by $50 million. He laid out a variety of strategies to ensure the most money would be funneled to the district, including using $65 million in one-time resources from the district's debt stabilization fund, which is designed to account for debt expenditures. The plan also saves $29 million by repurposing existing state and federal dollars, he said. 'This budget is designed to avoid the possibility of mid-year cuts. We're confident that it does that,' Sitkowski said. 'We also want to make good on this commitment, and work with our partners at the city, at the state level, on every level of government to continue to address these shared obligations that we don't, as a city, have the resources to currently address.' He stressed that the city's $200 million borrowing plan would substantially hurt CPS' credit rating, as occurred during borrowing in the 2010s. 'We are now paying nearly $200 million per year for this crisis debt,' Sitkowski said, lamenting the previous borrowing undertaken by CPS. 'If we had access to this funding or our classrooms, rather than to pay off this debt, we could hire at least 2,000 additional teachers.' The question of whether CPS accepts responsibility for a pension payment previously covered by the city took up a large amount of discussion at Wednesday's board meeting. It is the city's responsibility to pay into the municipal pension, even though over half of the pensioners are CPS nonteaching staff, such as support staff and central office employees. The city covered the costs of the pension until 2021, when it shifted to the district under former Mayor Lori Lightfoot. The district's proposal does not to commit to the pension payment, keeping the option open contingent on additional resources from the city and state. That is different from last year, when a budget was settled without leaving that option open, meaning a budget amendment was required to make the pension payment. This March, the board postponed a vote on a budget amendment to engage in borrowing when it was clear it didn't have sufficient votes. The city ultimately took on the costs of the payment. The partly-elected, partly-appointed board needs a supermajority — 14 out of 21 votes — to pass a budget amendment, but just a simple majority to pass the budget. Sitkowski isn't ruling out making the payment, but rather saying that CPS needs extra money from outside partners. That means this year, compared to in March, it just needs a simple majority to pass, Sitkowski said. The proposal relies on an extra $79 million from special tax increment financing districts, called TIF, an economic development fund that collects taxpayer money to be used for special projects by aldermen in their districts. CPS received $300 million in TIF funding last year and expects to get more this year, according to Sitkowski. But the district needs even more money from TIF, and potentially from the state, in order to make the pension payment, Sitkowski said. Aldermen have publicly stated that they won't vote to allocate their extra TIF dollars to the district if CPS does not agree to make the pension payment. But they also need their chunk of that money to balance a challenging city budget come this fall. Board member Michilla Blaise, who represents District 5B on the West Side and was appointed by the mayor, advocated for completing the pension payment to maintain a collaborative relationship with the city, noting that the district had already made a misstep by not making the payment last fiscal year. She questioned why the city would allocate TIF funding to the district without a promise of a pension payment. 'We have to be good partners. We have to collaborate. And if we're going to act like we don't care about the city budget, why should they care about ours?' she asked. Meanwhile, elected board member Carlos Rivas, who represents District 3B on the Northwest Side, pushed back on the idea that the city might withhold TIF funding without the promise of a pension payment, since the city allocates a TIF surplus each year. He said he expects another record surplus. 'There is no mechanism right now to give us less TIF money because they're mad at us,' Rivas said. King remained stoic for most of the meeting, chiming in only when directly asked to confirm that she hasn't 'had any conversation to date about specific dollars in City Council.' Two top aides to Johnson, including Kennedy Bartley, the mayor's chief of external affairs, and Jason Lee, Johnson's senior adviser, were also at the meeting Wednesday. Lee spoke to board members during a recess, according to city spokesman Cassio Mendoza. While CPS is a large city agency and the budget is of high importance to the mayor's office, it is unusual to see a high level delegation from the mayor's office at a school board meeting. The city did not respond immediately to a request for further comment. The district's shortfall ultimately stems far beyond current relationships with aldermen. It is the result of years of aggressive borrowing, chronically underfunded pension obligations and ongoing budget gaps. At the same time, federal pandemic relief funding — which had previously bolstered student performance in math and literacy — expired in late 2024. And adding to the uncertainty are potential cuts proposed by the Trump administration to eliminate nearly 16% of the resources relied upon by many CPS families, according to a district presentation from a budget briefing with city officials, CPS and other stakeholders on Tuesday. In talks about the deficit, CPS officials have repeatedly cited data showing that the district is missing $1.6 billion in funding from the state, despite a recent $45 million allocation. Board member Anusha Thotakura, who was appointed by the mayor and represents District 6A on the South Side, emphasized that relationships between board members and state officials will be vital moving forward. 'The only thing, aside from money falling out of the sky, that can help us close that gap is us in this room, and our partners, being serious about advocating for revenue,' Thotakura said. For weeks, district leaders have been working closely to determine the best way to address the massive gap. They've already made cuts, trying to keep the reductions as far away from the classroom as possible. So far, that has meant restructuring of the special education department, cuts to custodial staff and hot lunches, among other measures. Before the meeting, dozens of workers and community members dressed in matching purple Service Employees International Union Local 1 shirts gathered outside the CPS headquarters to criticize the recent layoffs of hundreds of custodians. They advocated for the district to ensure no more reductions will be made to custodial staffing moving forward. SEIU Local 1 Vice President Greg King called the layoffs a failure of CPS and city leadership. 'Parents will be worried whether their kids are in a healthy environment or a safe environment. Our community has lost trust,' King said. 'Our students deserve to be safe and in a clean classroom, and our custodians deserve respect, and I'm going to say this, stop balancing your missed budget off the backs of our Black and brown kids.'

Lake County officials discuss the challenges of public transportation during townhall meeting
Lake County officials discuss the challenges of public transportation during townhall meeting

Chicago Tribune

time11 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Lake County officials discuss the challenges of public transportation during townhall meeting

Hours before the 104th Illinois General Assembly adjourned its initial session May 31 by law, the State Senate voted 32-22 for legislation creating the Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA) to help avoid a $771 million fiscal cliff facing public transportation in northeastern Illinois. With little time remaining in the session, the Illinois House of Representatives was unable to consider the Senate-amended version of the bill, postponing a final vote and elimination of the fiscal cliff until the legislature's veto session in October. Along with helping public transportation keep running in Chicagoland at its current level without reducing service or cutting jobs, the NITA bill provides for a variety of improvements to meet the needs of at least the next two decades. When the coronavirus pandemic shuttered much of the economy in March 2020, state Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said federal funding helped offset the nosedive in revenue to public transportation. When the money runs out at the end of the year, Johnson said Metra, Pace, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), and the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) will be $771 million short of what they need to operate, leading to decreased service and jobs. State Sen. Ram Vallivalam, D-Chicago, chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said keeping public transportation as it is is insufficient for the needs. As he and others went to work on the bill, it became a $1.5 billion package taking the public transit two decades into the future. 'We have a robust public transportation system that moves one million people every day,' Vallivalam said. 'Every dollar we spend on public transportation brings $13 to the local economy. This is a huge undertaking. This is something we have to do.' 'It has to be accessible, equitable, safe, reliable, and affordable,' added Johnson. Johnson, Vallivalam, state Sen. Mary Edly-Allen, D-Libertyville, and Lake County Board Chair Sandy Hart, D-Lake Bluff, presented their ideas on the future of public transportation in the Chicago area at a town hall on Monday in Vernon Hills to gather ideas and urge support. With $200 million earmarked for downstate Illinois, Vallivalam said the rest of the money will be spent on public transportation in Chicago, suburban Cook County, and collar counties Lake, McHenry, DuPage, Kane, and Will counties. Governance of NITA will consist of a 20-person board with five people from collar counties, five from suburban Cook County, five from Chicago, and five from the state. Vallivalam said it is structured to avoid dominance of any area. The current organizations will remain. Part of the funding package includes a $1.50 home delivery fee for goods purchased online and delivered to an individual's home. Vallivalam said legislation must include revenue sources, but he and his colleagues are open to suggestions from state House members. Finding ways to better coordinate bus and train schedules in Lake County is important. Vallivalam said waiting a long time is not helpful to people getting to and from work, especially when traveling between distant suburbs and the city. 'We don't want the last Pace bus to arrive at the Metra station after the last train has left for Chicago,' Vallivalam said. Some things that changed during the pandemic have remained because of the way people work. Vallivalam said Metra ridership has returned midweek but not on Mondays and Fridays. Working remotely on Mondays and Fridays is becoming the norm for some. Not everyone can use an automobile to travel where they need or want to go. Johnson said public transportation is an economic necessity for some, and they need to be accommodated by public transit. All four public officials urged people at the town hall to talk to their state representative and let them know their ideas about public transportation. When they return to Springfield, they want to be in a position to send the bill to Gov. J.B. Pritzker's desk. Vallivalam said he is confident. 'I do believe we're 99% there,' Vallivalam said. 'We have done the heavy negotiating. You need to inform your (state representatives) now because the opponents of this bill are doing that. We don't want to go off the cliff.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store