Trump can put geothermal in a position to power America's future
Utilizing the full range of energy options we have here at home will bolster American energy manufacturing, creating economic boosts in communities across the country and strengthening our national security.
Geothermal energy is a small but mighty part of our nation's energy mix. In 2023, this unique energy source generated only 3.9 gigawatts (GW) of electricity onto America's electric grid — just 0.4 percent of our total electricity.
This underutilized technology taps into heat stored in the earth to generate electricity or provide heating and cooling for a variety of applications. Geothermal energy is reliable, resilient and affordable nearly 100 percent of the time.
Traditionally, these technologies are only useful in areas with easily accessible heat resources, such as those in the American West or in Iceland. However, by adopting innovations from the oil and gas industry — such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling — geothermal hot spots are much more accessible.
Some estimates suggest that these innovations could eventually unlock up to 5,000 GW of energy right here in the U.S. That's more than four times the capacity of all current U.S. power plants combined.
Today, geothermal energy's benefits are already making a difference for many Americans, especially in Texas. Since 2010, almost every school in Denton Independent School District has used geothermal cooling systems to improve air conditioning efficiency, lowering energy costs in the hot Texas summer. That's making high-quality education more of a reality for students.
The military also sees value in geothermal energy. Last September, the U.S. Air Force signed a deal with Sage Geosystems, a Houston-based startup company, to construct a demonstration project that utilizes geothermal energy for energy storage in Starr County, Texas. If successful, the Air Force may develop a full-scale project at Ellington Field Joint Air Reserve Base in Houston, providing the reliable energy needed for America's military installations.
Although geothermal energy is on the cusp of significant growth, it is not widely known by the public. That makes our mission simple: educating Americans about the untapped potential of this critical resource, promoting policies that unlock American resources and combatting policies that reduce investments into domestic energy research, development and deployment.
Last month, CRES Forum and Project Innerspace co-hosted an event on Capitol Hill to do just that. The event, which was open to the public, brought together industry leaders, policymakers, advocates and academics to highlight the opportunity presented by advanced geothermal technologies. During the event, we shared our strong support for geothermal energy and provided a conservative case for the technology. We were also joined by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, Rep. August Pfluger (another Texan) and Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), who all voiced strong support as well.
But talk is cheap, and securing federal support that incentivizes private investment is not an easy task. That's why we pledge to work with the president and Congress to enact meaningful policies that lower energy prices, promote domestic energy production and achieve energy dominance.
And with new, private investments into geothermal projects exceeding $1 billion since September 2022, we have a leg up to advance President Trump's robust energy agenda. Not to mention, this will benefit Americans nationwide, from our hometowns of Virginia Beach, Va., to Friendswood, Texas, and beyond.
Now, with renewed conservative leadership in the White House, American energy dominance isn't just possible, it's inevitable. But we must play our cards right. Advancing federal energy policy using an 'all-of-the-above-and-below' approach will allow us to bolster domestic energy production, curb our reliance on foreign entities, lower energy costs and create good paying jobs nationwide. And a kicker for those skeptical? We can utilize geothermal with essentially no emissions. Sounds like a win-win.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia and AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenues to US government, FT reports
(Reuters) -Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of the revenues from chip sales in China, as part of an arrangement with the Trump administration to obtain export licenses for the semiconductors, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Vance: ‘We're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business'
Vice President Vance on Sunday said he wants peace and to stop funding the Ukraine war, ahead of a Friday meeting in Alaska between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss a ceasefire deal. 'We're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing,' Vance told Fox News's Maria Bartiromo on 'Sunday Morning Futures.' In Alaska, the Trump administration hopes for a breakthrough in peace negotiations with Moscow and a discussion around territorial acquisitions. Earlier this week, the Kremlin shared a ceasefire deal with the Trump administration, asking for control of Eastern Ukraine in exchange for a halt in hostilities. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky adamantly opposed the deal, stating on X, 'Ukraine is ready for real decisions that can bring peace. Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace.' Zelensky was not invited to the summit, but the White House and the NATO Ambassador, Matthew Whitaker, have said that it's a possibility and Trump is open to a trilateral summit. This uneven deal led to an intense response from European leaders, who said they would support Trump's effort diplomatically and through economic and military means but that a resolution 'must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests.' Trump vowed to end the conflict in 24 hours during his presidential campaign, but negotiations are harder than anticipated and the 3-year-long conflict is costly for both America and Europe. 'Americans, I think, are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars of this particular conflict but if the Europeans want to step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers were okay with that but were not gonna fund it ourselves anymore,' Vance continued. This is not the first time the vice president has asked European leaders to take on a bigger role. However, in June, Trump secured a historic deal for NATO allies to spend five percent of their GDP on defense. In July, the president made another deal with NATO for the U.S. to send lethal weapons to Ukraine that were purchased by other NATO countries. These two steps significantly grew Europe's economic involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war. Vance went to England on Saturday to discuss Trump's efforts towards peace. 'What we said to Europeans is simply, first of all, this is in your neck of the woods, this is in your backdoor, you guys have got to step up and take a bigger role in this thing, and if you care so much about this conflict you should be willing to play a more direct and a more substantial way in funding this war yourself,' Vance said on Fox News.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans
Republican-led states are leading the charge to ban soda and candy from their food stamp programs, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement flips traditional partisanship on its head. Colorado is the only blue state to seek and have a soda ban waiver approved, and the only waiver state to propose expanding SNAP benefits in conjunction with limiting its scope. Both parties at times have expressed interest in eliminating soda from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but the Trump administration is the first to encourage states to do so. Recent attempts at soda regulation have mostly been concentrated in blue cities. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) infamously tried to ban the sale of supersized sugary drinks in 2013, prompting Republicans to decry his 'nanny state' tactics. With the healthy-eating push now under the MAHA branding, GOP states are jumping aboard. Kennedy doesn't run SNAP — that falls under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). But as the face of MAHA, Kennedy has been alongside Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to promote soda and candy bans. In just the first six months of the new administration, 12 state waivers have been approved by USDA that restrict SNAP recipients from purchasing some combination of soft drinks, sugary beverages, energy drinks and candy 'We all believe in free choice, we live in a democracy … if you want to buy sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that. The U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said during a recent press conference. The states that have claimed waivers are Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. SNAP dollars can be used to buy any food or beverage from a grocery store except alcohol, nutritional supplements or hot food. The idea of policing the shopping carts of low-income Americans has never sat well with anti-hunger advocates, who've argued it's paternalistic and stigmatizing for low-income Americans. Additionally, while federal data show sugary drinks are the leading source of added sugars in the American diet, nutrition experts said there is limited evidence that shows SNAP soda bans lead to better health outcomes. There's even less evidence that banning candy and dessert foods from SNAP can positively impact a person's diet. 'Claiming that implementing these restrictions will absolutely lead to a curb in diet-related diseases, you cannot confidently say that. There is no evidence to support that statement,' said Joelle Johnson, the deputy director for Healthy Food Access at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a group that advocates for stronger nutrition regulation. The SNAP waivers are for pilot programs only, so they won't immediately lead to long-term policy changes. They are a chance for states to conduct the research that's been missing — if they want to find out. Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, said he thinks waivers are toothless ways for states to show their MAHA bonafides. 'None of these states are doing more than pleasing MAHA, doing what's easy. They can do this internally. They don't have to go to the politicians [and pass laws],' Popkin said, 'Waivers do nothing except allow a state to say you can't buy junk food.' Experts said historically, Republicans who have wanted to ban soda from SNAP also viewed it as a way to trim spending on the program. Some advocates continue to view the latest push with skepticism. One of the groups pushing hard for state SNAP waivers is the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank based in Florida that's been working for over a decade to reshape the nation's public assistance programs and significantly cut spending. Johnson said she is worried about a slippery slope. If fewer items are eligible for SNAP, she's concerned GOP leaders will use that as an excuse to cut back on people's monthly benefits. Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University's Global Food Institute, said there could be benefits in trying to focus SNAP purchases on healthy food. But it's hard to look at a soda-and-candy ban in isolation, she said. The Agriculture Department slashed about $1 billion in funding that let schools and food banks buy food directly from local farms and ranchers. The White House is proposing deep cuts to fruit and vegetable benefits under the WIC program (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children). The GOP's new tax cut law is projected to cut $186 billion from SNAP in the next decade and disqualify millions from eligibility. 'It's hard to separate the soda ban from the larger political efforts to shrink SNAP overall. So are these bans about promoting health or are they about shrinking SNAP? And I think the distinction really matters,' Fielding-Singh said. She added that any moves to restrict what people can buy with SNAP should be paired with efforts to give people the 'means and access and resources to eat more healthfully.' But so far, none of the red state waivers does that. Gov. Jared Polis (D) in a statement on Colorado's waiver, called it 'a big step towards improving the health of Coloradans, and reducing obesity rates, diabetes, and tooth decay' that 'will help to ensure that more Coloradans participating in SNAP have access to healthy foods.' The Trump administration has not yet given them the green light on a separate waiver to cover hot foods from grocery stores like rotisserie chicken or soup. Democratic Govs. Laura Kelly (Kan.) and Katie Hobbs (Ariz.) each vetoed bills that called for their states to submit waivers to ban candy and soda. 'I support the idea that Kansans should eat healthier. However, changes to the SNAP food assistance program should be made at the federal level, not on a patchwork, state-by-state basis,' Kelly wrote in her veto message. She also noted the language in the bill would have mandated businesses to stop accepting food assistance benefits for 'healthy' items like protein bars and trail mix while continuing to allow Twix, Kit Kat, and Twizzlers. Kennedy this week said he expects more blue states to be filing waivers. 'I was at the governors' conference in Colorado last week, and I met with a whole string of Democratic governors and they all committed to filing SNAP waivers,' Kennedy said. Kennedy also said those governors also committed to put forward other 'MAHA legislation' but he acknowledged they may not want to be associated with the term because it's become 'kind of a partisan brand.' As she signed Colorado's waiver, Rollins said healthy eating should be bipartisan. 'This is not red or blue, Republican or Democrat,' Rollins said. 'We are discussing and working with every state, so really excited to continue to work with Gov. Polis.'
