logo
Mayor of DC pushes back on Trump's incursion as national guard troops patrol the streets

Mayor of DC pushes back on Trump's incursion as national guard troops patrol the streets

The Guardian3 days ago
National guard and federal law enforcement agents were spotted on the streets of Washington DC overnight Wednesday, as part of Donald Trump's campaign to quell a 'crime crisis' in the capital that local officials say does not exist.
National guard troops were spotted arriving on the National Mall late Tuesday as agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), FBI and Department of Homeland Security fanned out across neighborhoods in the capital, sometimes accompanied by local police officers. Video circulating on local media showed police and federal agents arresting at least one person that evening in Columbia Heights, home to the city's largest Hispanic population.
Around 800 national guard troops are expected to be deployed for the mission, defense officials have said. A White House official said the national guard 'is currently providing support to federal law enforcement agents. Their role is to protect federal assets, provide a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests, and deter violent crime with a visible law enforcement presence'.
It was unclear how many arrests were made on Tuesday night and by which agencies. The US attorney's office, Metropolitan police department and DEA, whose head has been appointed temporary administrator of the police department, did not immediately respond to requests for comments.
After months of maintaining a diplomatic tone in her dealings with Trump, Muriel Bowser changed tack as the federal deployment intensified. During a social media event Tuesday evening, DC's Democratic mayor urged residents and voters 'to protect our city, to protect our autonomy, to protect our home rule and get to the other side of this guy and make sure we elect a Democratic House so that we have a backstop to this authoritarian push'.
The Trump administration has said the deployment of troops and first-ever takeover of the city's police department were necessary to fight out-of-control crime, but city officials have disagreed. Data shows that crime rates plunged last year to the lowest levels in three decades, though the capital does have a higher rate of some violent crimes than cities with similar populations.
Democrats have condemned Trump's incursion as an authoritarian move intended to distract his supporters from outrage over his refusal to make public files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, a one-time friend who has become a fixation of conspiracy theorists.
Washington DC is the second US city to which Trump has deployed troops since taking office in January. In June, he ordered US marines and federalized national guard into Los Angeles to quell protests over his immigration crackdown.
In an opinion piece published in the Washington Post, Jeanine Pirro, the Fox News personality recently confirmed as Washington DC's US attorney, said Trump had drawn 'much-needed attention to public safety in this city to make DC safe and beautiful'. She added she would push to change laws around criminal sentencing, particularly for the juveniles she blamed for violence in the city.
'Young criminals have been emboldened to think they can get away with committing crime in this city, and, very often, they do. But together with our local and federal partners, our message to them today is: we will identify you, prosecute you and convict you,' Pirro said.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
The 700,000 residents of the federal district have no voting representation in Congress and the president and Congress have the power to meddle in laws passed by the city council. In addition to deploying the guard, Trump took over the police department for the first time ever, exercising a clause in a law outlining the city's governing structure that was passed in 1973.
On Monday night, the White House said about 850 officers and agents took part in a 'massive law enforcement surge' and made nearly two dozen arrests.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Frantic search for seven-month-old boy kidnapped during attack on mom outside store
Frantic search for seven-month-old boy kidnapped during attack on mom outside store

Daily Mail​

time14 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Frantic search for seven-month-old boy kidnapped during attack on mom outside store

A seven-month-old baby is missing after being kidnapped from his mother's truck as she tried to change his diaper outside a California sporting goods store. A frantic search is underway from Emmanuel Haro after he was wrenched from his mother Rebecca Haro, who was knocked unconscious during the attack. Haro was running an errand at a Big 5 retail store in Yucaipa on Thursday when she says a stranger suddenly attacked her from behind as she prepared to change her son's diaper, according to KTLA 5 News. When she regained consciousness with a black eye and no memory of what had happened, she quickly realized her infant son was nowhere to be found. The family is desperately pleading for help in bringing Emmanuel home, as search teams and tracking dogs have yet to uncover any trace of the missing infant. 'I'm begging you please, if you know anything, I'm begging you please bring him back,' Haro begged the public, as reported by CBS News. Haro had been watching her son and stepson at football practice when one of them needed a mouthguard, prompting her to leave the local stadium around 7pm to pick one up - and change Emmanuel's diaper. The mom says the last thing she remembers is someone greeting her in Spanish before she was knocked out in the parking lot. 'I was going to get the diaper and somebody said, "Hola,"' the mother told KTLA News. 'I don't remember anything since. I woke up here on the floor and I didn't see Emmanuel.' With a fresh black eye, the mother was overcome by a wave of crippling fear as she realized Emmanuel was missing. 'I checked all around my truck,' Rebecca told the outlet. 'And I ran into Big 5, and I asked the lady if she saw a baby or someone with a baby. She said no.' 'He's a happy boy,' she added. 'He was a healthy baby, he was crawling, he was kicking, he was playing with his toys. Whoever took our son, please give him back.' Officers with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Office arrived at the scene just before 8pm, where they brought along additional search tools, including K9 scent-tracking dogs to track either the child or a suspect down. 'Everybody came,' Rebecca told KTLA. 'The dogs, the helicopters.' Despite exhaustive search efforts, the family remains both confused and fearful, insisting they have no enemies and cannot understand who would want to harm them. 'Whoever took my son, please return him,' Emmanuel's father, Jake Haro, told the outlet. 'We just want him back. We won't do anything to you. Just give us our son. Keep him safe, don't hurt him, make sure you feed him and change him,' he added in tears. Rebecca echoed her husband's plea, adding: 'If you know anything, please come forward or take him to the cops. Please come and bring my son back. I'm begging you.' On Friday evening, friends and family gathered outside the sporting goods store to begin their own search efforts, armed with flyers they had prepared. Emmanuel is described as weighing approximately 21 pounds, standing about 24 inches tall, with brown hair, brown eyes, and a noticeable cross-eye. He was last seen wearing a black Nike onesie. Authorities have not released a suspect description, as the case remains under active investigation. Anyone with information about Emmanuel's whereabouts or details related to the case is urged to call 911 or contact the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Dispatch at 909-387-8313.

Trump and Putin Alaska summit: Five takeaways from the meeting
Trump and Putin Alaska summit: Five takeaways from the meeting

BBC News

time14 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trump and Putin Alaska summit: Five takeaways from the meeting

Putin welcomed back on world stage with red carpet When President Vladimir Putin landed back onto the world stage on Friday, the skies in Alaska were cloudy. Waiting with a red carpet spread across the tarmac of the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was US President Donald Putin approached, Trump clapped. The two leaders warmly shook hands and was a remarkable moment for Putin – a leader who most Western nations have shunned since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. His international travel has since been largely limited to nations friendly to the Russian Federation, such as North Korea and fact that the Alaska summit happened at all was a victory for Putin. But this welcome would have surpassed the Kremlin's wildest dreams. In a short six months Putin went from being a pariah in the eyes of the West to being welcomed on US soil like a partner and cap it off, in an apparently unscripted moment, Putin decided to accept a lift to the airbase in Trump's armoured limousine instead of driving in his own Moscow-plated presidential state the vehicle pulled away, the cameras zoomed in on Putin, sitting in the backseat and laughing. Putin faced with questions he never gets asked In his 25 years as Russian president, Putin has achieved complete control over the media, crushing journalistic freedoms and replacing information with propaganda. Within Russia he doesn't often – if ever – come up against unfriendly it was only minutes after landing in Alaska that one journalist shouted in his direction: "Will you stop killing civilians?" If the question bothered him, he didn't show it, appearing instead to shrug and diverting his a brief and somewhat chaotic photo op, more questions were shouted, including one in Russian about whether Putin would be ready to meet President Zelensky for a trilateral summit. Again, there was no obvious reaction from the Russian president beyond a cryptic smirk. LIVE UPDATES: Trump says no deal but 'progress made' after Ukraine talks with PutinANALYSIS: No ceasefire, no deal. What summit means for Trump, Putin and UkraineWATCH: How the Trump-Putin summit unfolded in 82 secondsVISUALS: The war-ravaged Ukrainian territories in mapsVERIFY: Russian attacks on Ukraine double since Trump inauguration What was said when talks ended earlier than expected The world's media gathered in the room with Putin and Trump had been led to expect a press conference; instead, the two leaders gave statements and took no questions from Putin was the first to speak. He praised the "constructive atmosphere of mutual respect" of the "neighbourly" talks, and then launching into a condensed history of Alaska's past as a Russian Putin spoke, Trump stood in silence. It was several minutes before the Russian president mentioned what he called the "situation in Ukraine" – ostensibly the catalyst for the summit. When he did, it was to state that although an unspecified "agreement" had been reached, the "root causes" of the conflict had to be eliminated before peace could be phrase will have set off alarm bells in Kyiv and beyond. Since the start of the war it has become shorthand for a series of intractable and maximalist demands that Putin say stand in the way of a include recognition of Russian sovereignty over the Ukrainian regions of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson as well as Ukraine agreeing to demilitarisation, neutrality, no foreign military involvement and new elections. Essentially, they amount to capitulation – unacceptable to Kyiv, but clearly – even after three and a half years of bloody conflict – still paramount to this, it was clear that there was no deal. And what was not said Extraordinarily – given the context and the premise for the summit – when it was Trump's turn to speak he did not mention Ukraine or the possibility of a ceasefire once. The closest he came to referencing the conflict was saying that "five, six, seven thousand people a week" are killed and noting that Putin too wanted to see an end to the usually loquacious Trump seemed to have less to say than Putin. His statement was notable for its relative, and unusual, brevity – but primarily for its vagueness. "There were many, many points that we agreed on," Trump said, adding that "great progress" had been made in an "extremely productive meeting".But he did not share any details and it did not appear that any concrete steps taken towards a resolution of the Ukrainian conflict. No major agreements or a trilateral meeting with President Zelensky were – to Moscow's relief – there was no mention of any "severe consequences" that Trump threatened would follow if a ceasefire wasn't reached."We didn't get there," Trump optimistically though vaguely, he added: "But we have a very good chance of getting there." 'Next time in Moscow' - Putin makes rare aside in English The summit may have failed to yield any tangible progress towards peace in Ukraine, but it cemented the rapprochement between Russia and the of the two presidents repeatedly shaking hands and grinning travelled far and wide on social media – as did images of American servicemen kneeling as they rolled out the red carpet at the foot of Putin's wrapping up his statement, Putin referenced one of the US president's frequent talking points – that the conflict in Ukraine would have never started had Trump been in Trump's assertion of "great progress", nothing of substance was unveiled at the Alaska summit – yet the two leaders left the door open for another meeting, this time on Russian soil. "I'll probably see you again very soon," Trump off a joint statement where he had to make no promises, no concessions and no compromises, Putin may have felt at ease enough to break into English – a rare occurrence. Chuckling, he looked at Trump and said: "Next time in Moscow.""Oh, that's an interesting one," Trump said. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I – I could see it possibly happening."

The town rocked by youth violence where parents face jail time if their kids commit crime
The town rocked by youth violence where parents face jail time if their kids commit crime

Daily Mail​

time14 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The town rocked by youth violence where parents face jail time if their kids commit crime

Parents in a New Jersey township could be hit with fines or even jail time if their kids cause a public disturbance thanks to new rules brought in to curb antisocial behavior. Gloucester Township Council have adopted the new measure after a series of incidents involving 'unruly juveniles' ruining a town festival two years in a row. Last year the township's annual community day in June descended into chaos after around 500 people started causing disruptions, according to WPVI. Disruption ran on for two hours and resulted in the arrest of 10 juveniles aged between 13 and 17, along with two adults. Officers were reportedly spat on, cursed at and assaulted according to Police Chief David Harkins. This year the event was due to go ahead, but was postponed over threats of violence being made. Now new rules specify that parents of a minor who is found guilty of a first offense may be 'ordered to provide supervision of the minor'. Another offense could see the parent or legal guardian hit with a fine of $2,000, or face a jail sentence of 90 days, or both, the ordinance says. Speaking with ABC News, Chief Harkins emphasized that punishment isn't the primary goal with the new rules. He said: 'We're not looking to put anybody in jail. This is about warning parents and due process. 'We've gotten overwhelming support from our community. People recognize the need for parental responsibility.' Speaking on the youth violence, he added: 'I've never experienced anything like it in 30 years as a police officer the disrespect, the violent behavior that ruined a family event. 'We understand being a parent is a tough job. We're committed to giving help to those that need it. 'Many times interviewing the parents, they had no idea who their kids were with or what they were doing. That's got to change.' Harkins told the outlet that so far no parents have been charged since the new rules were brought in. Speaking with NewsNation, Mayor David Mayer said: 'We have a juvenile crisis in this country. This is not unique to Gloucester Township. 'It is symptomatic of a larger societal juvenile crisis. I'll tell you, I don't have all the answers. But one possible answer is to hold parents accountable for their children. 'We have to get parents' attention to make sure they're tracking their children, juveniles, in a proper way, and hold them responsible.' The outlet also spoke with parents who are outraged over the move and believe it has set a dangerous precedent. Alexandra Bougher with the group Moms for Liberty, told the outlet: 'Blaming parents for what a child does? They are their own person. 'Sure, the brain is not fully formed yet, but if they are getting the correct guidance, they should be making the right decisions, and they know the difference between right and wrong. 'And if they choose to do something wrong, that child should be held accountable for it, not the parent. 'I think if we start this, what does it open up? What else are we going to be at fault for? If a child gets in a car accident, is it my fault? I was at home.' Nicole Stouffer, founder of parental rights group 'The New Jersey Project', pointed to lax marijuana laws and changes in police policies. In a statement, the council said: 'By emphasizing parental accountability, the ordinance encourages guardians to be actively involved in guiding their children and preventing juvenile misconduct. 'This measure is part of the township's ongoing efforts to keep Gloucester Township safe and ensure it remains a community where residents and visitors can feel secure.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store