Warren Buffett's favorite stock market indicator says it's time to buy
Warren Buffett's favorite valuation measure is flashing a buy signal.
The Buffett Indicator measures total stock market value against US GDP.
Investors will flock to Omaha, Nebraska, this weekend to hear Buffett speak at his firm's annual meeting.
Warren Buffett's favorite gauge of stock market valuations has pulled back, indicating to investors that it might be time to buy after a month of wild volatility in April.
This Buffett Indicator — which was coined by the legendary investor in 2001 and which measures the total market capitalization of US stocks relative to US GDP — has been dropping, indicating that the market's current rebound could translate into a more durable rally.
Buffett has previously warned of danger if the gauge ever climbed past 200%, which it did in late 2024. By December, it was breaching all-time highs and touching levels it reached during the pandemic market craze and the dot-com bubble.
But it's recently declined to around 180%. To be sure, that's still elevated, and well above lows associated with past market bottoms. The gauge fell close to 100% during the pandemic sell-off in 2020.
Still, the latest drop could help assuage investors' anxiety in the wake of April's market upheaval sparked by tariffs. President Donald Trump's trade war sent the market tumbling in a historic rout, with the S&P 500 briefly dipping into bear market territory before Trump relented and paused the reciprocal duties.
Following some strong tech earnings and encouraging data, the S&P 500 on Friday was headed for a nine-day winning streak. However, Wall Street analysts are debating whether any rally can really last without concrete trade deals announced by the White House.
Otherwise, Morgan Stanley expects the index to remain range-bound until the Federal Reserve cuts rates, earnings revisions improve, and Treasury bond yields ease.
Berkshire Hathaway ended 2024 with a record $334 billion in cash, shielding it from much of the tariff damage. Many of Buffett's favorite stocks are beating the market this year and shares of the conglomerate are up 17% this year.
This weekend, investors will flock to Omaha, Nebraska, to hear him speak at Berkshire's annual meeting.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending review now settled, says Downing Street
The government's latest spending plans are settled, the prime minister's official spokesman has said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence, along with a number of infrastructure projects, when she sets out her day-to-say spending and investment plans for each department in Wednesday's Spending Review. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last to fix a deal on Monday afternoon, following public warnings from police chiefs, calling for more money. Housing Secretary Angela Rayner reached a deal with Reeves and the Treasury on Sunday evening. Reeves has loosened Treasury borrowing rules to free up about £113bn for investment in infrastructure projects, but will need to squeeze budgets elsewhere in order meet her own rules, which include not borrowing to fund day-to-day spending. Last week, she admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back. Ministers seeking to protect their budgets remained locked in budget talks over the weekend. Announcing ministerial negotiations over the government's spending review had been completed, the prime minister's official spokesman said the chancellor would be investing in public services and growth. "The spending review is settled - we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off," he said. "The first job of the government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change." The Home Office had argued privately that police numbers must be maintained for the government to deliver its policy commitments on neighbourhood policing, but that under the spending proposals this would not be possible. Police chiefs including Sir Mark Rowley, the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, had publicly lobbyied the government for more money in recent weeks, and there were suggestions the Treasury might have "imposed" a settlement on the Home Office. Over the weekend, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg the chancellor was facing pressure from all departments for additional funding. Kyle said "every part of society was struggling" and declined to rule out a squeeze on policing. The last-minute talks with Cooper come ahead of what is set to be a highly significant week for every part of government. Reeves has already U-turned on removing Winter Fuel payments from all but the poorest pensioners, and will now give these 75% of pensioners, which will cost an estimated £1.25bn. The government has also pledged to hike defence spending, invest £86bn in science and technology, and give free school meals to half a million more children. To balance the spending, Reeves has announced a £14bn package of savings in March, including £4.8bn of welfare cuts. However, opponents have accused the government of having the wrong priorities. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "They have chosen to prioritise spending on Ed Miliband's mad green projects, on inflation-busting pay rises for their trade union paymasters and spending £100bn a year – five times the police budget – on debt interest payments." Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has urged the chancellor to rule out cuts to social care, which is financed through local councils. He said the government would have "more money in the pot, more growth, more revenue" if it pursued closer trading ties with Europe. Home secretary yet to agree deal days before spending review Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is floating a federal tax boycott
As tensions escalate between California and the Trump administration over immigration, another potential battlefront is emerging over taxes. The spat began with reports that the Trump administration is considering cutting funding for California's university system, the largest higher education system in the nation with about 12% of all U.S. enrolled students. In response, Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote Friday afternoon in a social media post that California provides about $80 billion more in taxes to the federal government than it receives in return. "Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump," Newsom said. What is a donor state? A donor state is one that provides more in taxes to the federal government than they receive in return. The largest one, by far, is California, according to tax data. In 2022, California's residents and businesses provided $692 billion in tax revenue to the federal government. In return, the state received $609 billion in federal funding, leaving a gap of about $83 billion, according to the California Budget and Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank. See which states are the biggest donors California's gap is so large partly due to the large number of high-income residents in the state, who pay a larger share of their income toward federal taxes than lower-income workers, the California Budget and Policy Center says. !function(){"use strict"; 0!== e= t in r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if( d= Overall, 11 U.S. states contribute more in taxes to the federal government than they get back, according to the Rockefeller Institute of Government: California ($83 billion gap)New Jersey ($28.9 billion)Massachusetts ($27 billion)Washington state ($17.8 billion)New York ($7.1 billion)Minnesota ($4.5 billion)Colorada ($2.9 billion)Illinois ($2.6 billion)New Hampshire ($2.4 billion)Connecticut ($1.9 billion)Utah ($709 million) Other states receive more in funding than they provide to the federal government, according to the tax data. The imbalance stems from a mix of reasons, ranging from some states having a larger share of residents on federal aid programs, such as Medicaid, to a larger number of federal facilities, such as military bases, compared with other states, according to the California Budget and Policy Center. What has the Trump administration said? In response to Newsom's post about boycotting federal tax payments, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned in a Sunday social media post that the governor "is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion." "His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes," Bessent wrote. Bessent added, "Instead of committing criminal tax evasion, Governor Newsom should consider a tax plan for California that follows the Trump Tax Cuts model and reduces the onerous state tax burden to allow families to keep more of their hard-earned money." Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater Trump blasts Newsom as "grossly incompetent" as tensions rise over L.A. protests
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street's $500M Gold Heist: How Top Banks Exploited a Rare Market Glitch
Wall Street's commodity traders just pulled off a classic playbook moveand it paid handsomely. In Q1 2025, top banks including JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) and Morgan Stanley hauled in around $500 million in revenue from precious metals trading, according to data from Crisil Coalition Greenwich. That figure is nearly double their decade-long quarterly average and ranks as one of the highest in ten years. What sparked the surge? An unusual arbitrage opportunity: gold and silver prices on the US Comex exchange shot above those in global hubs like London and Hong Kong. That gap opened the door for traders to buy low overseas and deliver into US futures contracts at a premium, just as fears over incoming tariffs on bullion hit the market. Morgan Stanley delivered 67 metric tons of gold to settle its proprietary Comex positionsthe most of any bankvalued at roughly $7 billion based on current prices. JPMorgan wasn't far behind, moving more than $4 billion worth of gold to settle February futures in one of the largest delivery days on record. The flurry of activity began to cool in April after the US government clarified that bullion would be exempt from President Donald Trump's proposed tariffs. But the damageor rather, the profitwas done. Much like in 2020, when the pandemic disrupted logistics and created another arbitrage window, banks with the operational muscle to execute physical trades found themselves in the driver's seat. For investors, this quarter may offer more than just impressive P&Ls. It's a reminder of how quickly geopolitical uncertainty can reshape commodity marketsand create asymmetric opportunities for the players who move fast. While the window may have closed for now, the surge in physical deliveries highlights how nimble trading desks are still thriving in old-school ways. As tariff talk, election noise, and macro shocks swirl around global markets, don't be surprised if this isn't the last time physical arbitrage drives headlinesand results. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
