
TOM UTLEY: I no longer have the slightest wish to 'save' the decaying NHS. But, for the sake of our mental health, please leave our pubs alone
This is up from 350 closures last year, and will bring the number remaining open to its lowest in more than a century, even though the population has swollen by roughly 50 per cent since the 1920s.
Miserably, too, it will add thousands more to the toll of 69,000 jobs in hospitality that have already disappeared since Rachel Reeves 's Budget less than nine months ago.
As regular readers will know, pubs have been close to my heart all my life, since those Sundays in my childhood, when, as a special treat after church, my siblings and I would drink fizzy orange in the garden of the Dundas Arms in Kintbury, Berkshire, while our parents drank inside.
They have been an invaluable source of employment to millions like me, my wife and all four of our sons – all of whom did shift-work behind bars in our younger days, either to bring in a little welcome pocket money during our gap years and holidays, or to help pay the rent when we were looking for full-time careers.
Indeed, as I may have mentioned before, when I proposed to Mrs U on our first ever meeting she was pulling pints behind the bar at my then London local, to top up her wages as a secretary.
True, the money was less than generous. But pub work was always a convivial and readily available introduction to the grown-up world in which we would have to make our living.
I just wonder how many of the opportunities we enjoyed will be open to students and others in the future, after this present Government has done its worst?
It's almost as if Sir Keir Starmer called his ministers together for a brainstorming session when he came to power, demanding answers to the question: 'How can we destroy as many jobs as possible, while at the same time causing maximum damage to a cherished British institution?'
They certainly had no shortage of ideas.
'How about raising the minimum wage to a level that pub landlords can't afford to pay?'
'Brilliant! And we could tighten the thumbscrews by cranking up business rates and employers' National Insurance contributions. That should force them to lay off staff and banish any thoughts they may have had of recruiting more!'
'I like it. What about you, Angela? Anything to throw into the pot?'
Ms Rayner: 'Well, don't laugh, but what about including an anti-banter clause in my Bill to increase workers' rights? We could give bar staff the power to sue their bosses if they happen to overhear something a customer says that upsets them.'
Sir Keir: 'That's just the sort of off-the-wall thinking I'm looking for. There's nothing like the stress of an unaffordable lawsuit to drive job-creators out of business. Good for us human rights lawyers, too. Any other thoughts?'
'Here's something. You know how smokers have always been among the most loyal pub-goers in the land? Well, we've already driven a lot of them away by banning smoking inside pubs. How about getting rid of most of the rest by banning it in the open air, too, on the pavement or in the beer garden?'
Sir Keir: 'Great! But I'm looking for a real clincher to dissuade anyone from applying for bar-work, in the unlikely event that any will be available.'
Up speaks another bright spark: 'Got it! Why don't we increase both taxes and state benefits, to the point where it pays people more to slob around at home doing nothing, claiming they feel depressed, than to work full-time behind a bar?'
Sir Keir: 'Superb! This has been a hugely valuable session, guys. With ideas like these, just think how we'll be able to wreck the pub trade, among many others, before the next election. Let's get out there and do it.'
Of course, no such meeting actually took place. But what we do know is that the Government has been busy putting every one of these moronic ideas into practice.
Meanwhile, the Treasury's hapless spokesman can only bluster: 'We are a pro-business Government, and we know the vital importance of pubs to local communities and the economy.' (To which millions will no doubt reply: 'You have a funny way of showing it!')
The spokesman goes on: 'That is why we are supporting them with business rates relief, a 1p cut to alcohol duty on draught pints, capping corporation tax and are protecting the smallest businesses from the employer National Insurance rise, which is helping to fund the NHS.'
Let's focus on that 1p cut in the duty on a pint of draught beer. Is the Chancellor really so out of touch that she's unaware how, thanks largely to her policies, the average price of a pint in the UK has risen by no less than 21p since last year, when Labour came to office?
If you ask me, it would almost have been wiser of Rachel Reeves to have announced no cut in beer duty at all, rather than insulting us by pretending she was doing the pub trade a massive favour by shaving off that derisory penny. We're not as stupid as she seems to think.
As for that reference to funding the NHS, the message there was as clear as it was economically crass: 'Only by introducing these job-destroying, growth-crushing policies will we be able to carry on shovelling taxpayers' billions into the voracious craw of the unreformed health service.'
Well, there was once a time when citing the needs of the NHS might have tugged at the nation's heart-strings – an age when most of us truly believed that the NHS was the envy of the world.
But that was long before the multiple scandals of recent years, with all those tales of horrendous bureaucratic waste, patients cruelly neglected in decaying hospitals and others kept waiting in pain for month after month for desperately needed operations.
How many of us still love the NHS, at this time when resident doctors are dragging it ever further into disgrace, by threatening to inflict pain and untold misery on patients until taxpayers are forced to meet yet another wildly exorbitant pay demand?
No, the health service loses more and more friends as every month goes by.
Meanwhile, Britain's pubs retain the place they've held for centuries in the nation's hearts, as the hubs of our communities, forums of laughter, gossip and common sense, and blessed refuges from the strains and irritations of an increasingly crazy world.
As for me, I no longer have the slightest wish to save the NHS, in its current unreformed state. But for the sake of our mental health, leave our pubs alone!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-Labour whip admits ‘sleepless nights' over welfare cuts resignation
Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft has urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to listen more closely to his MPs, who she says reflect the worries of their constituents. Ms Foxcroft resigned as a government whip in June over concerns about proposed welfare cuts, specifically to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for disabled people. She said she could not support or whip for the proposals, which were later abandoned after a significant rebellion within the party. Ms Foxcroft described her decision to resign as difficult, causing "sleepless nights", and occurring during a challenging personal period that included the death of her father. Sir Keir's support among the public reached new depths of minus 43 after the £5bn welfare U-turn, according to polling published in July.


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Newcastle make club-record £69.9m bid for RB Leipzig forward Benjamin Sesko as they look to beat Man United to striker's signature - with Alexander Isak's future at St James' Park still up in the air
Newcastle have tabled an official club-record bid for RB Leipzig forward Benjamin Sesko. Despite securing Champions League football under Eddie Howe last season the Magpies have endured a difficult start to the transfer window. The club's previous record arrival, Alexander Isak, appears to be intent on departing the North East this summer, with Premier League champions Liverpool interest in securing his signature. With their top goalscorer potentially on his way out of the club, Newcastle have made a bid for Sesko of £65.5m plus an additional £4.4m in add-ons. More to follow


The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wes Streeting said to be eyeing up No 10 – but how will doctors' strikes affect his chances?
From Jeremy Hunt and Alan Johnson to Andy Burnham and Ken Clarke, politics is littered with ambitious former health secretaries who did not make it into No 10. The aspirational current health secretary, Wes Streeting, is believed by colleagues to have his sights on bucking that trend, and one day replacing Keir Starmer in Downing Street. However, the resident doctors' strike represents a moment of danger for the health secretary, with the medics pitching themselves against the government by demanding a return to the real-terms pay levels of 2008. It would be 25% salary increase on top of a 29% rise over the past three years, with the government outright refusing to open pay discussions and restricting any talks to negotiating on other benefits such as pensions. Streeting has personally taken a robust approach to the doctors – telling them 'if you go to war with us, you'll lose' – which on some levels appears in tune with the public mood. Polling from More in Common shows that overall, people do not back the doctors' strikes, and feeling has turned further against increasing the pay of medics over the past two weeks. Support for them dropped from -10% to -15% while the industrial action was going on. Luke Tryl, the director of More In Common, said: 'The biggest shift between the two weeks is people are now more likely to say the government should not do whatever it takes to end the strikes. My previous view was that it didn't really matter if the public were on side with Streeting against the doctors because the doctors could just bring the NHS to a halt, people would just rather it worked. Even two weeks ago people thought that, but the fact that it has now flipped is interesting and people are more likely to say 'dig in'. 'I do think it's because Wes Streeting has been out there making the arguments. In focus groups, it seems like his message has landed. People are slightly, for the first time, more likely to say resident doctors are paid too much rather than too little.' However, there are two difficult caveats in the data for Streeting. The first is that most of the public blame the government for the strikes in the first place, with 39% saying it is ministers' fault, 31% pointing the figure at resident doctors and 11% at hospital management. The second is that Labour voters are now the only political grouping who back the striking doctors, with a net 3% in favour of the strikes, down from a net 12% in favour before they started. Labour members tend to be even more sympathetic to strike action than Labour voters, so this group of people who choose the next party leader are not on board with the government's arguments. And while there are no public rumblings of discontent about Streeting's approach, some Labour MPs question the wisdom of pitching the industrial dispute as a battle – rather than taking a more emollient tone. 'Jeremy Hunt never really recovered from his bruising encounter with the doctors,' says one Labour MP. 'It never looks good to be talking about 'war' with public servants in a caring profession.' However, Labour sources say there is a huge difference between now and the strikes that Hunt was opposing in 2016 – then the first industrial action taken in more than 40 years, which centred more around shift patterns and contract changes. 'The fact that public opinion has shifted so far against resident doctor strikes shows how different the landscape is,' the senior source said. 'The truth is that, slowly but surely, people are noticing some of their family and friends are being seen quicker by the NHS. They don't want to go backwards. 'The Tories drove the NHS into the ground. In a large part, the malaise felt by resident doctors is that they're just sick and tired of how poor working conditions have become over the 15 years of Tory government. 'But the BMA's leadership should recognise how they now have a government that is far different to deal with. Two above-inflation pay rises, the biggest hike in the public sector, work already under way on improving working conditions and so much more we can do if they chose to actually just work with government.' Ultimately, though, the wider mood about the strikes and Streeting's leadership through the turmoil is likely to depend on how the NHS manages to hold up operationally. NHS sources said the first five-day strike had led to some services being cancelled but many fewer than on previous occasions, with trust leaders suggesting appointments and operations were at about 90-95% of usual activity. Figures for how many doctors turned out on strike were not yet available but sources suggested it had been patchy, and that trusts were 'better at managing' the situation as they had practice now from prior strikes. The British Medical Association, the doctors' union behind the strikes, has said hospitals were opting for unsafe cover rather than cancellation of operations, in a 'reckless' approach to the strikes. But if Streeting can oversee minimal disruption in the NHS while doctors are on strike or reach a deal on other financial conditions, then the government could emerge strengthened. And while Labour voters support the doctors' aims, they also like to see a government demonstrating operational competence and avoiding crisis. Tryl says: 'If Labour fails on their mission of reducing waiting lists, that's what will cut through and would damage Wes. But equally, if he holds firm and wins, it could help the government. 'There is a sense that government isn't in control any more is such a big driver of the 'broken Britain' mood, it kind of goes beyond individual services. If Wes can show the government is in control on this, that could end up helping.'