logo
Archaeologists Were Digging Up a Hospital—and Found the Skeletons of 4 Confederate Soldiers

Archaeologists Were Digging Up a Hospital—and Found the Skeletons of 4 Confederate Soldiers

Yahoo10-06-2025
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story:
Archeologists working for the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation discovered the remains of four Confederate soldiers.
The crew was excavating a site that once stored gunpowder during the American Revolution when they came across the Civil War-era discovery.
The four soldiers' remains were likely from when a makeshift hospital treated wounded soldiers during the Civil War's Battle of Williamsburg.
Digging through an American Revolution gunpowder storage site resulted a discovery from a completely different war: the remains of four Confederate soldiers who likely died following a Civil War battle.
As archaeologists with the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation excavated a site in search of American Revolution history, the team instead first came across the eye sockets of a human skull, according to a report from the Associated Press, before uncovering four skeletons and three amputated legs the experts believe are from Civil War casualties.
One skeleton has a Minié bullet—a common round of ammunition used in the Civil War—lodged in the spine, as does the foot of one of the amputated legs. With the available evidence, the experts deduced that the remains were likely from a makeshift hospital that functioned near the site during the Civil War, and they later dug through archives to find handwritten lists of soldiers that were admitted to the hospital following the Battle of Williamsburg.
With the lists in hand, the research team was able to start the process of identifying the soldiers. 'It is the key,' Jack Gary, Colonial Williamsburg's executive director of archaeology, told the AP. 'If these men were found in a mass grave on a battlefield, and there was no other information, we probably wouldn't be trying to do this.'
The list of the wounded was part of a private family's archival documents which, at some point, were given to nearby William & Mary University. The researchers went through the detailed documentation, which included everything from names and regiments to dates of deaths and amputation information, for over 60 soldiers.
Using the thorough information from the list, experts believe the four soldiers came from regiments tied to Alabama, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Virginia. They even have some individual names in mind, keeping those close to the vest until they can work with possible descendants using DNA from the soldiers' teeth. Gary said the goal is to ensure an 'ironclad' identification.
The Battle of Williamsburg occurred on May 5, 1862. Experts believe that the roughly 25,000 men who fought for the Union and Confederate armies included 2,283 Union soldiers killed, wounded, captured, or missing and 1,560 for the Confederates.
The remains, which were initially discovered in 2023, were carefully buried with their arms crossed, indication they did not die during the battle, as those men were traditionally placed in trenches and then moved to a cemetery, Gary said.
The four soldiers were out of uniform, as evidenced by buttons and a buckle, commonly found on more comfortable clothes, that the archaeologists also found. Archaeologist Eric Schweickart told the AP that one soldier had two $5 gold coins from 1852, and they also found a toothbrush made from animal bone and a snuff bottle.
The AP reports that William & Mary's Institute for Historical Biology believes the youngest soldier was between 15 and 19 years old and the oldest could have been up to 55 years old.
The remains were given a true burial, even as the investigation into their identity continues. 'Everyone deserves dignity in death,' Gary said. 'And being stored in a drawer inside a laboratory does not do that.'
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Veterans Are 'Guinea Pigs' in Trump's First National Abortion Ban Experiment
Veterans Are 'Guinea Pigs' in Trump's First National Abortion Ban Experiment

The Intercept

time11 hours ago

  • The Intercept

Veterans Are 'Guinea Pigs' in Trump's First National Abortion Ban Experiment

Ash Wallis knows she likely wouldn't survive another pregnancy. Doctors said as much years earlier after she suffered a pulmonary embolism following a miscarriage, and got a second blood clot. Getting pregnant again isn't a risk she is willing or able to take. 'I have two sons,' said Wallis. 'I don't want to leave them motherless.' Wallis, 40, begged her health care provider to give her an IUD — her best chance at preventing another pregnancy and protecting her life. But her provider, the Department of Veterans Affairs, refused to cover the procedure. Despite three years of service in the Army, Wallis was forced to pay out of pocket at a local clinic. 'The risks of me getting pregnant and there being a significant health issue were too much risk for me to gamble on,' she said. Access to reproductive care and abortion has long been a problem for those who rely on VA care. But a policy change by the Trump administration stands to make reproductive health for service members and veterans even worse. Last week, the administration posted a proposed rule for VA facilities that would severely narrow access to abortion — eliminating exceptions for health, rape, and incest, and only allowing the procedure in situations deemed to threaten the life of the mother. The rule would also ban any counseling for abortion through the VA. The proposed policy now enters a mandatory 30-day comment period, after which it can go into effect. Experts told The Intercept that the rule change will have devastating consequences for the millions of service members and veterans reliant on health care through the VA, as well as their families. 'It's the worst-case scenario,' said Rachel Fey, vice president of policy and strategic partnerships at Power to Decide, a nonprofit focused on reproductive and sexual health. The Department of Veterans Affairs has long excluded abortion care and abortion counseling from its medical benefits package, with a narrow exception for the 'life of the mother.' That changed in 2022 when the Biden administration, recognizing the danger posed to veterans and service members by the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, instituted a new rule allowing for abortion counseling and abortion care in an expanded list of circumstances. It's this Biden-era change that is under attack by the Trump administration. The administration describes the proposed policy shift as a return to form. 'Prior to the Biden Administration's politically motivated change in 2022, federal law and longstanding precedent across Democrat and Republican administrations prevented VA from providing abortions and abortion counseling,' wrote Gary Kunich, a Veterans Affairs spokesperson, in a statement to the Intercept. Fey and other reproductive health experts had anticipated the Trump administration would institute an abortion ban at the VA. But they told The Intercept that this version is particularly draconian considering the dramatic fall-off in abortion access following the Dobbs decision. 'This new policy would be one of the strictest abortion bans in the country, and for veterans living in the 12 states that ban abortion, it would further close off what may be their only opportunity to access urgently needed abortion care,' said Liz McCaman Taylor, senior federal policy counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights, in a statement. 'For veterans living in these states, they may now be forced to carry pregnancies to term even if they were raped or the pregnancy puts their health in jeopardy.' The proposed rule would 'reinstate the full exclusion on abortions and abortion counseling.' Unlike under the Biden rule, which allowed for abortion counseling and abortion care to protect the health of the mother or in cases of rape and incest, the new proposed rule only includes a vague, narrow exception for 'life of the mother.' 'For the avoidance of doubt, the proposed rule would make clear that the exclusion for abortion does not apply 'when a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,'' wrote the administration in a summary of the draft proposal. However, in a potentially complicating line, the administration wrote: 'Taken together, claims in the prior administration's rule that abortions throughout pregnancy are needed to save the lives of pregnant women are incorrect.' Jaclyn Dean, director of congressional relations, reproductive health, at the National Partnership for Women & Families, said that the lack of medical clarity around when doctors are allowed to intervene is going to cost lives. 'If I'm a doctor for the VA,' said Dean, 'I'm very confused about what I'm legally allowed to do.' Fey said her organization, Power to Decide, was 'not aware of any circumstances' where the VA covered abortion care under the life exception in place before the Biden rule. 'There was always sort of supposed to be this very, very narrow life exception, but similar to what's happening now in the post-Dobbs world, we're seeing that those life exceptions don't work in practice,' she said. Lindsay Church, executive director of Minority Veterans of America, said the counseling ban adds another layer of risk because providers are prevented from even discussing the option of abortion until it may be too late. 'Good luck if you get to a place where you're dying,' said Church, 'because you can't get abortion counseling before that. And that, to me, is insulting. Not only that, but it could have deadly consequences.' Read Our Complete Coverage The counseling ban also means veterans or active-duty service members referred to the Veterans Affairs administration for care after being sexually assaulted can't discuss abortion as an option with their provider. 'We already know that women veterans experience Military Sexual Trauma at alarming rates, and many of us continue to fight battles long after our service ends,' said Stephanie Gattas, founder of the Pink Berets, which offers support for women veterans struggling with PTSD, military sexual assault, and other mental health issues. Over 8,000 service members, who can also be referred to the VA for care, reported being sexually assaulted last year. And nearly 500 people reported being sexually assaulted while on a VA campus last year, according to Church. Both numbers are likely a severe undercount. 'The military community is wrought with sexual violence,' said Church. 'Now, if you get raped and become pregnant … because of assault at the Department of Veterans Affairs, they won't help you.' Sylvia Andersh, a former service member who worked at Veterans Affairs hospitals as a nurse, called the lack of exceptions for rape 'cruel.' 'My faith in humanity has been quite tested with the fact that they're willing to blatantly hurt women,' said Andersh. For Wallis, who was sexually assaulted while serving in the military, the lack of rape exceptions is especially troubling. 'It feels like being spit in my face,' she said. 'I wrote a check up to and including my life for this country, and I'm not provided equal access to care,' Wallis said. Wallis also worries that this new policy could increase suicidal ideation among service members. 'An unexpected pregnancy, whether it's due to rape, incest, or contraceptive failure, doesn't matter what the cause is,' she said, 'it increases suicidal ideation, and in the lack of access to care, you add that in, and that risk increases further.' The biggest impact is going to fall on veterans and service members living in states with abortion bans, experts told The Intercept. The Department of Veterans Affairs is the largest integrated health care system in the United States, serving 2 million women veterans, over 400,000 of whom live in states with abortion bans. 'We were living in a much different world the last time this total ban was in effect.' Though the Trump administration insists the policy change would be a return to standard VA practice, Taylor, of Center for Reproductive Rights, points out that the landscape has changed following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision. 'We were living in a much different world the last time this total ban was in effect. This is the first time there has been a total abortion ban in VA health care facilities since Roe v. Wade was overturned,' said Taylor. 'Before Roe fell, if a veteran couldn't get an abortion at a VA health care facility, they could seek one elsewhere in their state. Now, abortion is banned in many states, and over 100 clinics have closed, meaning veterans living in those states will be totally out of options.' Wallis said she feels as if the administration is testing how far it can restrict access to care, pointing to the abortion ban and new restrictions on gender-affirming care at the VA. 'We're the guinea pigs they want to test what they're able to do to the general public,' she said. 'I truly feel like they're testing what they want to do with the rest of the country on us, and it's scary to me.'

Dire wolf meet-up: Watch Colossal's female wolf frolic with older brothers
Dire wolf meet-up: Watch Colossal's female wolf frolic with older brothers

USA Today

time2 days ago

  • USA Today

Dire wolf meet-up: Watch Colossal's female wolf frolic with older brothers

Colossal Biosciences created three dire wolves using genetic engineering. Now that the wolves have gotten older – the two males are approaching one year old – they are being assimilated into a pack. Those cute dire wolves are forming a pack. If you remember, Colossal Biosciences, the company seeking to bring back the woolly mammoth, revealed in April 2025 it had successfully birthed a trio of dire wolf puppies. Using dire wolf DNA extracted from fossils – yes, dire wolves aren't just the stuff of "Game of Thrones" fiction, they existed tens of thousands of years ago – the Colossal researchers created dire wolf genomes. They used those as a guide to editing a gray wolf genome to express dire wolf traits. The resultant fertilized dire wolf eggs were implanted into and born by surrogate dog mothers, resulting in the successful resurrection of an Ice Age-era species. Two male dire wolves, Romulus and Remus, born in October 2024, are approaching their first birthday – each weighed more than 90 pounds at six months old, significantly larger than standard gray wolves, the Dallas, Texas-based biotech company says – while a female, Khaleesi (named after the "Game of Thrones" character), is about six months old. Home delivery: A meteorite crashes into a Georgia home. Turns out it's older than Earth. 'She's completely been accepted into the pack': All in the dire wolf family Recently, the Colossal team thought it was time to introduce the brothers to their sister. "We're working through the socialization and the introduction of Khaleesi into the pack," Colossal CEO and co-founder Ben Lamm told USA TODAY. "They're starting to behave more and more like wolves," he said. "We don't want them to be lap dogs." You can see Khaleesi come into a grassy, fenced six-acre section of Colossal's 2,000-acre ecological preserve where she first gets to meet Romulus, in a video posted Aug. 12 on Colossal's YouTube channel. "At first, she was a little like, 'Whoa, he's right there," said Paige McNickle, manager of animal husbandry at Colossal and manager of the team that takes care of the dire wolves. The older male wolf, Romulus, came up to Khaleesi, and they smelled each other and then she took off on a run and he followed her. "They were playing with each other. Their ears were up the entire time, which is a good, happy, calm, wolf behavior that we were hoping to see," McNickle said. After a bit, Romulus is ushered away and Remus is brought into the area. "They were both excited. Everybody was so good in play, but Remus is almost more gentle than Romulus," McNickle said. "Romulus is just a little bit bigger, and Remus did really good. We saw lots of play behaviors," she said. "They kept their ears up, they wagged their tails. They followed each other around. They all got to explore the pool together. When they got hot, they went right over and cooled themselves off, especially Khaleesi." The trio then got to play together, although in coming days, she will get extended time with one brother on one day and another on the next day, McNickle said. The play area has a collection of logs, which Khaleesi is small enough to fit under, where she occasionally played hide and seek from her larger brothers. "We want to make sure that … (when) they're playing, they can separate, they can socialize, they can smell each other, but then, you know, if Khaleesi wants to get away – or Romulus or Remus want to get away – we need to make sure that we give them that comfort so they don't feel overwhelmed or feel pressured," Lamm said. "But the great news about it is she's completely been accepted into the pack." Leader of the dire wolf pack That pack will likely be growing. Colossal is planning to engineer two to four more dire wolves over the next year, Lamm said. Rather than let these wolves breed, the researchers want future pups from "a couple different cell lines," he said. "We will actually get more genetic diversity." And wolves of different ages, as they are adopted in the pack, will grow up "in some kind of social hierarchy." As of now, Remus, the smaller of the male wolves, appears to be emerging as the leader, having exhibited Alpha male characteristics. When the dire wolves were first introduced to the world, Remus "kind of became the star," Lamm said. "Remus really has this take-charge attitude. … Romulus has always been bigger and I just thought, natural selection, the biggest and strongest." Recently, Romulus and Remus began receiving larger carcasses for feeding – from rabbits to deer legs and cattle portions, beyond their regular menu of ground meat, meat chunks, and other foods – so they would learn important social skills. Colossal is currently working with Grizzly Systems and Yellowstone National Park's Wolf Project, deploying audiovisual recording devices to understand pack behavior and wolf populations. Artificial intelligence software helps identify "specific wolves in that setting and then begin to understand how we can estimate population size based on how many times we count the same wolf," said Matt James, Colossal's chief animal officer, in another video on the company's YouTube channel. Those devices will eventually be deployed in Colossal's reserve to monitor its growing dire wolf pack. Those tools will make it "so that we can just be observing them in a more passive manner," Lamm said. "This is just the next chapter in their story." Colossal continues other projects amid dire wolf controversy Critics have argued that the pups are not truly dire wolves, but genetically-modified gray wolves. Colossal has countered that their dire wolves share 99.5% of the same genetics as the original dire wolf. Some have also scolded Colossal for tinkering with genetics, but the tech firm insists its work will aid in the conservation and protection of endangered species. Recently, Colossal announced plans to resurrect the long-extinct New Zealand bird species, the moa, at the urging of filmmaker Peter Jackson, who is an investor in Colossal. Colossal first gained attention with its 2021 announced goal of bringing back the woolly mammoth. Earlier this year, the company unveiled its Colossal Woolly Mouse, which was genetically engineered to have characteristics that could eventually be used in creating a next-generation woolly mammoth embryo to be born by a female elephant. In August 2022, the company said it also planned to de-extinct the Australian thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger. Another project: the return of the dodo, which was killed off about 350 years ago. Mike Snider is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @ & @mikesnider & msnider@ What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day

How the Energy secretary picked a fight with climate science
How the Energy secretary picked a fight with climate science

Politico

time2 days ago

  • Politico

How the Energy secretary picked a fight with climate science

The Department of Energy isn't traditionally the federal government's vanguard for grand debates about climate research. But Energy Secretary Chris Wright is trying to change that — in a bid to shore up President Donald Trump's rollback of climate regulations. The most striking result to date is a DOE report issued last month that questions the traditional underpinnings of climate science. The report, inked by a tag team of climate contrarians handpicked by the secretary, came out on the same day that the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would overturn the Obama-era legal doctrine that undergirds most federal climate rules. Wright, a former fracking services executive who also serves as second-in-command of the White House's National Energy Dominance Council, personally gathered the researchers for his climate-questioning squad just weeks into the job, writes my colleague Benjamin Storrow. They included Roy Spencer, a former NASA scientist; Judith Curry, a climatologist and retired professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology; John Christy, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville; Steven Koonin, a former chief scientist for BP who also served as an undersecretary at the Energy Department during the Obama administration; and Canadian environmental economist Ross McKitrick. Each researcher has publicly questioned some of the broader findings accepted by the world's climate scientists, including numerous previously published federal reports. And several have worked to downplay the risks of fossil-fuel-driven climate change. Those proved strong credentials for Wright, who has long preached that fossil fuels can solve global energy poverty. He's accused mainstream scientists, and the media, of overhyping the risks of a planet rapidly heating up. Carbon dioxide is a 'life-giving plant food,' Wright said in a podcast earlier this month with Wall Street Journal columnist Kim Strassel. 'It does absorb infrared radiation so we can have a real dialogue about too much of it or too little of it … but calling it a pollutant is just nuts,' he said. (Note: Other kinds of 'plant food' — for example, nitrogen and phosphorus — are also pollutants when found in excessive quantities.) By May, Wright's team had compiled a 141-page report questioning the veracity of climate models, the threat of sea-level rise and the connection between burning fossil fuels and extreme weather, Ben writes. It withheld the report's release until last month to coincide with EPA's proposal to reverse the 'endangerment finding,' its 2009 legal conclusion that greenhouse gases are a harmful pollutant that the agency must regulate. The administration hasn't yet spelled out how widely it will deploy the DOE report in its coming legal and regulatory battles over Trump's efforts to smooth the path for fossil fuels — although the EPA proposal cited the report 16 times, Ben notes. But if the study was meant to disrupt mainstream science — or spawn what Strassel has hailed as a 'healthy, vigorous debate' over the research — it doesn't seem to have done that. Instead, other academics and scientists in the field have accused the team of cherry-picking or misrepresenting past research to support its favored conclusion. Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University, panned the study on the social media site X as 'a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide.' It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Heather Richards. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to hrichards@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Kelsey Tamborrino and Alex Guillén break down the Trump administration's latest attacks on wind and solar power. Power Centers Interior gets 'hostile' on windTrump's escalating moves against wind energy have alarmed advocates of renewable energy and free markets, Ian M. Stevenson writes. Since mid-July, the Interior Department has halted spending on projects and required high-level signoff for any action on renewables. Administration officials have said renewable power is an unreliable source of electricity, and Trump has often targeted 'windmills' during attacks on former President Joe Biden's energy policy. 'It's a hostile way to kill and bottleneck these projects,' Ashna Aggarwal, director of analysis at the research firm Greenline Insights, told Ian. 'Targeting wind specifically seems to be an agenda of this administration.' Trump 2.0's first FERC chair exitsMark Christie came in as chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in lockstep with Trump's vision of energy dominance, even if he was at odds with the White House on executive power in his tenure that ended Friday, Francisco 'A.J.' Camacho writes. He stepped in, for example, to write letters on behalf of FERC staff when the Trump administration asked federal workers to justify their jobs. 'He's no shrinking violet,' Albert Pollard, a former state lawmaker in Virginia, said of Christie. The exit of Republican Christie leaves FERC with a 2-1 Democratic majority. POLITICO on Friday reported that Trump plans to elevate Democratic Commissioner David Rosner to chair. If Rosner gets the nod, he could be temporary. The White House is waiting for Senate confirmation of two Republican commissioners. Either one could be named chair by Trump. The AI race gets politicalThe push by companies like OpenAI and Google to win the artificial intelligence race has led to a proliferation of energy-hungry data centers across the country. The rise of these server farms has sparked fierce battles from Virginia to Arizona and beyond. City and county governments are grappling with how to balance new jobs and new revenue streams against the strain data centers put on water and energy resources, Jordan Wolman and Lisa Kashinsky report. The surge is proving polarizing, particularly in northern Virginia — considered the tip of the spear on this issue with the world's largest and fastest-growing data center market. And across the U.S., the debate is inching up the ballot as state lawmakers race to regulate and governors rush to embrace a new economic boon. In Other News Cleaner power: A microgrid run on lithium-ion batteries and liquid hydrogen has replaced diesel backup generators in a California town that frequently lost power because of wildfires. Reuse: Aluminum recycling is a faster and less energy-intensive way for U.S. companies to get around a 50 percent tariff on imports, metals executives and analysts say. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Artificial intelligence could need electricity equal to half of the nation's nuclear power fleet by 2030, according to a new analysis. The majority owner of the coal-fired Four Corners power plant in New Mexico plans to extend its use rather than retire it in 2031 to help avert an electricity reliability crunch in the West. Republicans in Congress are again looking to place a federal fee on electric vehicles to boost the Highway Trust Fund. One person is dead, another is unaccounted for and at least 10 are injured following an explosion at a U.S. Steel plant near Pittsburgh. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store