Equipment malfunction, dropped messages looked at by NTSB in midair crash near D.C.
The National Transportation Safety Board is looking into flight data discrepancies, potential altimeter malfunctions and a possible miscommunication with air traffic control in the midair collision of an Army helicopter and a commercial airplane last month in the deadliest U.S. air crash in almost a quarter century.
'We are looking at the possibility of there may be bad data,' NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy said at a news conference on Friday. 'We have a lot of work to do till we get to that.'
The Jan. 29 collision near Washington, D.C., that killed everyone aboard the plane and in the helicopter, 67 people in all, has prompted fears of flying in the busy airspace above the nation's capital, which transports roughly 25 million people each year.
The deadly accident has raised questions about whether helicopters — in particular military training flights — should be allowed to share such a narrow and busy airspace with commercial airplanes. It was the first major fatal commercial plane crash in the U.S. since 2009.
Video captured the moment the UH 60 Black Hawk crashed into American Eagle Flight 5342, the explosion lighting up the night sky as the aircraft plummeted into the Potomac River.
More than two dozen people connected to the sport of figure skating, including many young Olympic hopefuls, were on the American Eagle flight traveling from Wichita, Kansas. Among the three Army soldiers who died on the Black Hawk was a 28-year-old helicopter repairer who leaves behind an 18-month-old son.
Homendy said Friday the pilot flying the helicopter was on a 'combined annual and night vision goggle check ride.' Check rides are generally an exam pilots must pass to perform specific aircrew or mission duties.
Investigators believe the crew was wearing night vision goggles throughout the flight, she said. Homendy noted that if the goggles had been removed, the crew was required to have a discussion about going unaided.
'There is no evidence on the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) of such a discussion,' she said at the news conference.
Homendy noted that there has been some discrepancy in the altitude of the helicopter. At 8:43 p.m. ET, the pilot flying indicated they were at about 300 feet, but an instructor pilot indicated they were at about 400 feet.
'Neither pilot made a comment discussing an altitude discrepancy,' she said. 'At this time, we don't know why there was a discrepancy between the two. That's something the investigative team is analyzing.'
The helicopter also may not have received crucial information from air traffic control before the collision, she said.
At 8:46 p.m. a radio transmission from the tower was heard on the plane's cockpit voice recorder informing the helicopter that a plane at 1,200 feet was circling just south of the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge.
But cockpit voice recorder data from the helicopter indicates that the portion of the transition about the plane 'may not have been received by the Black Hawk crew,' Homendy said.
She said the words "circling" could be heard on air traffic control communications but not on the helicopter's cockpit voice recorder. The agency is investigating how that happened.
The American Eagle plane was descending to land around 9 p.m. when the military chopper was shifting from one flight path to another, a common move often performed in the airspace.
Seconds before the crash, the air traffic control tower had asked the Black Hawk whether it had the airplane in sight and advised it to directly pass behind the jet, audio from the tower shows.
Homendy said based on the helicopter's cockpit voice recorder data 'a portion of the transmission that stated 'pass behind the' may not have been received by the Black Hawk crew.'
'Transmission was stepped on by a point eight-second mic key from the Black Hawk,' Homendy said, noting that the chopper's crew was trying to communicate with air traffic control at that time.
An air traffic control supervisor in the tower at Reagan National had let a controller end their shift early, a source familiar with the investigation confirmed to NBC News. That left one controller to handle both plane and helicopter traffic in the area, which is allowed under FAA regulations but not typical for that time of day at Reagan.
Officials say the Black Hawk was equipped with an advanced surveillance technology that helps the aircraft share more accurate data with air traffic controllers, known as an Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast, or ADS–B. Homendy said they could not say whether it was turned off.
'A lot of people are asking about was it turned off, there are other things we have to rule out first,' she said.
The three Black Hawk crew members were experienced Army aviators from Fort Belvoir, Virginia, who were conducting a training flight, said Jonathan Koziol, a senior Army aviation adviser who's helping with the investigation.
Capt. Rebecca Lobach, the flight's co-pilot, was undergoing the night portion of an annual evaluation to test a pilot's knowledge and proficiency in the cockpit, Koziol said. Lobach's unit in particular also has to be able to transport senior government officials out of the area without an instructor in the event of an emergency, Koziol added.
Lobach, an aviation officer since 2019, had about 500 flying hours, which Koziol said was 'right on target.' Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves had double the amount, Koziol said.
The Black Hawk crew members were also believed to be wearing night-vision goggles, Homendy said, meaning their field of view may have been restricted.
'We're going to have to see what was possible for them to see at the time leading up to the collision and the accident sequence,' she said.
Night-vision goggles can help pilots navigate dark terrain and obstacles, but it is like 'looking through soda straws,' said Dean Winslow, a retired Air Force colonel and onboard physician, who is not involved in the investigation.
Koziol said the pilots likely would not have needed to wear goggles while flying through well-lit areas by the airport, but that they likely would have needed to wear them while flying over the water.
Aviation experts say accidents are rarely caused by a single issue.
'You have to have a chain of events that leads to this,' said Joe Nadock, who was an air traffic controller at Reagan National airport for about a dozen years.
Nadock, who worked at Reagan from 1988 to 2000, said he and other air traffic controllers understood that the runway for helicopters and planes was narrow, but he did not recall hearing concerns or complaints about the path's configuration. 'We knew it was close, but you knew you had to do your job,' he said.
Air traffic controllers have to act as soon as they see helicopters go above an altitude of 200 ft., which did sometimes happen, he said. 'You tell them to verify your altitude,' Nadock said. 'You tell them you're at the wrong altitude. Descend now.'
Since the crash, the FAA said it has restricted helicopter traffic near Reagan National Airport until it can review the findings of the NTSB investigation. The FAA also said it has started reviewing other airports with high volumes of mixed helicopter and airplane traffic nearby, but insisted 'air travel is the safest mode of transportation.'
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the FAA needed to 'surge' more air traffic controllers 'into the system' and had a plan to do so. He also said officials have to 'remake our airspace,' including upgrading outdated technology.
Meanwhile, after lawmakers raised concern about the appropriateness of conducting military training missions near a busy airport, Daniel Driscoll, President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Army, said he planned to review the protocols.
The crash came on the heels of the Army's highest number of serious aviation accidents, including fatalities, in a decade.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
WWII Veteran recalls landing on Utah Beach in Normandy
ABINGDON, Va. (WJHL) — 81 years ago, World War II allies invaded Normandy, liberating France and Western Europe, and laying the path to victory. 'We came in on a landing craft with the front down, and we jumped into the water,' Army veteran Don Parker recalled of landing on Utah Beach a few days later. 'They had some – we'll call them cannons, they may have been 88s. That's what finally hit me. Well, it wasn't exactly comfortable, I don't know how else to describe it. It was bloody, it was messy.' Landing in Normandy is something most people read about in history books, but Parker lived it. 'We crawled in front of Patton's tanks, and we probed with our bayonets to get the pressure bombs that were down under there. We had to get and disable the bombs,' he said. 'Patton brought his tanks across after that… He didn't lose any tanks there anyway.' The rifleman remembers capturing a German outpost and earning a Bronze Star. 'I didn't think the choices were very good, but I had enough patriotism that it had to be done,' he said. 'It was necessary. That's about the only sensible thing to say. We had to do it and we did it.' PREVIOUS STORY: World War II Army veteran celebrates 100th birthday He said there is a mix of emotions about his time in the 79th Division during WWII. 'I was in college, I wanted to stay there. But when they drafted me, I didn't run to Canada,' he said. 'They want me? I'll go. And I went.' Parker was later injured, almost losing his foot to gangrene. 'I was digging a foxhole, and a shell come in and [my feet were in fragments]. And then when they got me back to the surgeon, he looks at me and puts his hand on my shoulder and says, 'I'm sorry, son, but I have to cut off your left foot,'' Parker recalled. 'They were right, I was going to die, but I mean the timing was wrong because I've still got the foot and that was some years ago.' SEE MORE: Abingdon veteran celebrates 100th birthday And the 101-year-old has a message for those who are now the 'boots on the ground.' 'We did our best, that's what we'd want to see of the young soldiers now,' he said. 'D-Day | The Greatest Victory' is airing on WJHL+ at 9 p.m. on Friday to mark the 81st anniversary. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
After an American Airlines plane caught fire, the National Transportation Safety Board finds engine parts installed backward
On March 13, an American Airlines flight was diverted from its destination after the flight crew reported engine vibrations, and its engine caught fire once it landed. The National Transportation Safety Board said in a report this week the engine leaked fuel because of loose and improperly installed parts. Despite numerous reported aviation safety incidents, air travel is safer than it was decades ago, experts say. An American Airlines engine that burst into flames after its aircraft was diverted in March was found to have fuel leaks and improperly installed parts, the National Transportation Safety Board said in a report released Thursday. The NTSB identified a damaged fan blade on the right side of the two-engine jet, as well as a loose airflow control component that was installed backward and a loose rod end that caused fuel to leak from the fitting. The report did not give a reason for the fire, as the NTSB has not yet finished its investigation on the incident. The purpose of the document is to find the root cause of the incident, not assign blame for it. On March 13, Flight 1006 en route from the Colorado Springs Airport to Dallas Fort Worth International Airport diverted to Denver International Airport after the flight crew reported engine vibrations. The Boeing 737-823 aircraft caught fire while taxiing to the gate, incurring 'substantial damage,' according to the report. 'They thought they had what we would call the degraded engine,' Cary Grant, an associate professor of aeronautical science at Embry‑Riddle Aeronautical University, told Fortune. 'It wasn't performing. It wasn't a failed engine, but it wasn't providing all the thrust and capability that it could produce.' The jet was carrying two flight crew members, four cabin crew members, and 172 passengers, 12 of whom were hospitalized for minor injuries. According to the report, gate ramp personnel extinguished the fire on the right side of the plane one minute after it began. Passengers evacuated the aircraft onto the left overwing and a slide from the jet's right door. NTSB's photos of the evacuated aircraft show burn marks and damage from the jet's right wing, main landing gear, and landing gear wheel well. 'The safety of our customers and team members is our top priority, and we are cooperating with the National Transportation Safety Board in its investigation of American Airlines flight 1006,' an American Airlines spokesperson told Fortune in a statement. The March flight diversion was one of several highly scrutinized aviation safety incidents early in the year. In January, an American Airlines jet collided with an Army helicopter in Washington, D.C., killing 67 people. Later that month, a small, private plane crashed in Northeast Philadelphia, resulting in multiple deaths. Most recently, Newark Liberty International Airport experienced a series of radio outages, which resulted in a slew of flight delays and cancellations. These incidents can have financial repercussions for airlines. American Airlines reported in its first-quarter earnings challenges to resuscitate its corporate travel business as a result of 'economic uncertainty that pressured domestic leisure demand and the tragic accident of American Eagle Flight 5342,' referring to the January incident. Despite the multiple safety blunders, aviation experts maintain it is still safe to fly. Boeing—though it has struggled in the past couple of years with safety concerns—reported a significant decline in fatalities in 2024, saying there has been a 40% decline in total accident rates and 65% decline in fatal accident rates in the past 20 years, while the number of flights has increased 20% in that same time period. Grant said the engine issues with Flight 1006 are rare, speaking to the dependability of its CFM56-7B engine. 'The engine is extremely reliable,' he said. 'The fact that we don't see situations like this occurring frequently is testament to the reliability of the motors. It's an extremely reliable part.' He maintains the flight crew did what was 'reasonably expected' of them, given the information they had at the time—especially since they had to evacuate passengers from the jet when it was taxiing at a gate, a situation that usually necessitates deplaning procedures. Combined with statistics that aviation accidents have actually decreased, the rarity of the engine degradation points to the continued security of air travel, Grant said. 'If we go back and look from the '50s on to where we're at today, the accident trend is very, very small compared to the hundreds of thousands, millions of hours of flight time that are being flown every year,' he said. 'The data does not support that air travel is riskier. It's actually just the opposite.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
World War Two veteran turns 100 on D-Day anniversary
An RAF veteran has said he would not change a thing about his life as he celebrated his 100th birthday on the anniversary of D-Day. Edward 'Ted' Carter from Caerphilly turned 19 on D-Day, 81 years ago on 6 June 1944. He was deployed in India at the time, a memory he described as "wonderful". Reflecting on becoming a centenarian, Mr Carter said he had had "a very, very happy life". "I think we should all live a peaceful, happy life, helping people as much as we can, give back as much as we can," he said. I partied outside Buckingham Palace on VE Day WW2 tank driver stopped on VE Day by flat battery 101-year-old WW2 codebreakers reunite for VE Day After leaving school at 16, Mr Carter joined the railway and said his father told him "you won't make much money". "I didn't want to work anywhere else," he said. He initially worked in the signal boxes, then "on the trains", When he was called up to serve in the war effort, he did not want to join the Army. "And I couldn't swim, so I thought the air force was best for me," he added. For four-and-a-half years, he served in the Royal Air Force as an engineer, working on Wellington and Lancaster bombers. "You had to learn in six months what in peace time would take you three years." Reflecting on the conflict, Mr Carter said: "I think, I hope, the world has got a better place. "All we want is a quiet, peaceful life." When he left the RAF, he joined what is now Great Western Railway. Returning to Wales in 1946, home became the cottage he shared with his late wife Margaret. They met as teenagers, and married aged 22 and 23. "I'm so glad I met Margaret when she was 15," he said. "We had 61 years of a lovely life together." With savings of £380, they spent £320 on their cottage in Bedwas and £11 on solicitors fees and went on to raise three children there – Paul, Sharon and Ann. In fact, the letter he recently received from the King, marking his big birthday, was actually his second correspondence from a monarch, having also had one for his 60th wedding anniversary from Elizabeth II. "[Our dad] taught us to be hard working, kind," said Sharon. Paul added: "He's been an exceptional human being. He's terrific." At 98, Mr Carter was still regularly seen tending to his beloved garden at the cottage, particularly its orchard with pear, apple and plum trees. "We grew everything," he recalled. He now lives at Castle View care home in Caerphilly, where staff and residents threw him a birthday party. "All my life I've had very good luck and health. What can you ask for more than that? "If I had to do it all over again I wouldn't change it." Wales' oldest person celebrates her 112th birthday Lost medals replaced for veteran, 100