Palace: Reconciliation shouldn't come with conditions, centered on Dutertes
Following the statement of President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. that he is open to reconcile with the Dutertes, Malacañang stressed that the offer of reconciliation should not come with any conditions.
''Opo, ito man po ay para sa taumbayan at para sa bansa,'' Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said in a briefing when asked if the reconciliation should not come with conditions.
(Yes, this is for the public and for our country.)
Castro also said the reconciliation should not center on the Duterte family. She also pointed out that in this reconciliation, the President will not disregard the rule of law as he will always abide by it.
''Tandaan po natin, huwag po tayo magfocus sa sinasabing open for reconciliation para lamang sa mga Duterte. Maliwanag po ang sinabi ng Pangulo, sa lahat ng tao na maaaring hindi kapareho ng kanyang paniniwala o ng prinsipyo o ng polisiya,'' Castro said.
(Let's remember, let's not focus on the Dutertes regarding the President's openness for reconciliation. The remarks of the President were clear, it's for everybody whom he doesn't share the same values, principles, and policies with.)
''Mas maganda kung ang lahat ng tao ay makakasundo niya para po sa taumbayan, para magkaroon na po ng tuloy-tuloy na pagtratrabaho para sa bansa. So huwag nating i-sentro ang open for reconciliation sa mga Duterte. Hindi po gagawin ng Pangulo na lumabag sa batas para lamang sa isang rekonsilyasyon,'' she added.
(It's better if he is in good relations with everyone for the welfare of the public and for the continuity of governance. So, let's not center this openness to reconciliation on the Dutertes. The President will not break the law just for this reconciliation.)
The Palace official said Marcos would always ''choose'' the law over ''friends.''
''Hindi po tatalikuran at babaligtarin ng Pangulo ang batas para lamang pagsilbihan ang personal na interes ng iilan. So, tandaan po natin, lagi pong sa batas ang Pangulo. Kaibigan o batas? Batas pa rin po ang pipiliin ng Pangulo,'' she said.
(The President will not disregard the law just to serve the interest of others. The President will always side with the law. Friends or law? The President will choose the law.)
In a podcast with broadcaster Anthony Taberna, Marcos answered in the affirmative when asked if he is open to reconciling with the Dutertes, noting that he wants stability in the government.
Marcos and Vice President Sara Duterte were runningmates in Eleksyon 2022, with the latter being appointed as Education chief. Their relations, however, had gone sour which led to Duterte eventually quitting the Cabinet post.
The rift between the Marcos and Duterte families widened after the arrest of former president Rodrigo Duterte due to crimes against humanity charges before the International Criminal Court, a move that was defended by the administration, saying that it only honored its commitment to the Interpol. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
5 hours ago
- GMA Network
Ateneo School of Gov't joins call for VP Sara impeachment trial
The Ateneo School of Government (ASoG) is the latest member of the academe that joined the call for the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. 'We stand for ethical leadership in public service,' ASoG said in a statement released on Saturday. 'We call on the Senate to fulfill its Constitutional duty and to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte,' it said. ASoG's statement came on the heels of San Beda University Graduate School of Law professors' —including retired Supreme Court Associate Justices Adolf Azcuna and Jose Vitug, and graduate school dean Fr. Ranhilio Aquino— call for the Senate to hear the articles of impeachment against the Vice President. Meanwhile, over 100 members of the UP College of Law faculty called on the Senate to start the impeachment trial and "let the truth unfold." In an open letter, the UP College of Law faculty members called on the Senate to comply with the constitutional duty to "forthwith proceed" with the trial. 'Dereliction of duty' ASoG, in its statement, said that 'dispensing the case without the benefit of a trial is a dereliction of duty and a clear attempt to whitewash the accusations raised against a public official.' 'The impeachment process is a sacred duty enshrined in our Constitution. It is the primary mechanism to ensure that our elected officials would remain faithful to their sworn duty to serve the public with dedication, commitment, and, most importantly, integrity,' the Ateneo institution said. ASoG reminded senators that 'they are public servants and their mandate is based on the people's trust.' 'We pray that they would remain true to what the Senate institution stands for: upholding the Constitution, promoting democratic values, and serving the national interest,' it added. In a similar call, the Philippine Political Science Association (PPSA) Board of Trustees urged the Senate 'to fulfill its constitutional mandate by immediately commencing the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Z. Duterte.' 'This long-overdue obligation has been delayed and such inaction raises serious concerns regarding transparency and institutional integrity,' PPSA said. 'While impeachment is inherently political, it is first and foremost a constitutional mechanism for ensuring accountability among the country's highest officials. In a functioning democracy, no public official, regardless of their popularity or political influence, is above scrutiny,' PPSA added. 19th Congress The House impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Articles of Impeachment were transmitted to the Senate the same day but the Upper Chamber adjourned without addressing the case. On February 25, Escudero said the processes related to Duterte's impeachment trial would start on June 2. However, Escudero on May 29 said the presentation of the articles of impeachment before the Senate was moved to June 11 to prioritize the passage of the items in the administration's legislative agenda before the end of the 19th Congress. Escudero said that based on the law, Duterte will be given 10 days, or up to June 21, to respond, which could be extended upon her request. The 19th Congress is set to end on June 30. Senator Francis Tolentino on Monday said the impeachment case against Duterte will be considered 'functionally dismissed' if the Senate impeachment court is unable to finish the trial before June 30. Asked if Duterte's impeachment trial is considered dead or will be pushed through in the 20th Congress, Escudero said the senators will vote on the matter. Duterte was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Vice President has denied the allegations. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
ICC denounces Trump's sanctions vs. 4 judges
The International Criminal Court (ICC) has denounced the sanctions imposed by US President Donald Trump's administration against four of its judges, including one who is handling the case of former President Rodrigo Duterte, saying this will only embolden those who believe they can act with impunity. In a statement dated June 5, the ICC said that it provides justice and hope to victims of atrocities and upholds the highest standard in protecting the rights of both suspects and victims. 'Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict. It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity,' the ICC said. Trump's administration imposed sanctions after the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and opened an investigation into alleged war crimes committed by US troops in Afghanistan. The sanctioned judges are Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin, and Beti Hohler of Slovenia. Alapini Gansou is among the judges handling Duterte's crimes against humanity case over his administration's war on drugs.. For the ICC, the sanctions also target those who support the court, including nationals and corporate entities of state parties. 'They are aimed against innocent victims in all Situations before the Court, as well as the rule of law, peace, security and the prevention of the gravest crimes that shock the conscience of humanity,' it said. Despite the sanctions, the ICC vowed that it will remain undeterred in its work to bring justice to victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and the crime of aggression. Duterte is currently under the custody of the ICC in The Hague, Netherlands. The confirmation of charges will take place on September 23, 2025. Based on government records, around 6,200 drug suspects were killed during the Duterte administration's anti-drug operations. Human rights organizations, however, say that the number may reach 30,000 due to the unreported related slays. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Labor groups 'worried' about Marcos' statement on wage hike
Labor groups on Friday expressed concerns over President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr.'s statement about reviewing the proposed hike in minimum wage for workers. Lawyer Sonny Matula of the Federation of Free Workers emphasized that the bill granting a P200 increase on the daily minimum wage has already undergone scrutiny by lawmakers. 'Nababahala kami sa statement na dapat dumaan pa ito sa comprehensive review. Hindi na kinakailangan ang opinion ng Wage Boards sapagkat dumaan na ito sa mga debate and deliberation sa House at saka sa Senado,' Matula said. (We are concerned about it being subjected to a review and the Palace seeking the opinion of the wage boards. This bill has gone through debates in the House and Senate.) "Hindi naman po Court of Appeals ng Kongreso ang ating mga Wage board na dapat i-consulta pa sila sa nangyaring pagpasa o pinasang panukalang batas," added Matula. (The wage board is not the Court of Appeals which should be consulted over a bill already passed by Congress.) The statement comes after Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said that Marcos will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase. 'We will look at the economic implications of this and how to resolve this with the opinion of the wage boards since the wage boards are also the creations of the Congress,''' Castro said. Matula, however, urged Marcos to support the bill. "Dapat ay aprobahan na [ang wage hike] sapagkat matagal na itong kinakailangan," he said. (This should be approved as soon as possible because the public needs it badly.) "Palagay ko ay isang insulto para sa mga representante sa House at sa ating mga Senador na konsultahin pa yung ating mga regional wage boards," added Matula. (It would be an insult to the House and Senate members if they still had to consult the regional wage boards.) GMA News Online has reached out to the Palace for comment, but it has yet to reply as of posting time. Long overdue Jerome Adonis of Kilusang Mayo Uno backed Matula's call and also emphasized that a wage increase has been "long overdue." 'The labor sector has long fought for the P200 wage hike for minimum wage earners, and this is even small compared with the family living wage. Even so, we welcome this increase because this is long overdue. The Senate even passed its version way back in 2024,' Adonis said. 'Dahil dumaan na nga sa mahabang debate sa Kongreso, sa Senado, nag-present na ang both sides ng mga statistics na ito po ay kayang kaya at, in fact, mas maliit pa nga [sa ideal]. So wala nang rason ang presidente para hindi ito pirmahan,' he added. (This has already been debated in the House, Senate, and both sides have already put forward their points. It has been proven that this is doable, and the proposed amounts are even lower than what is ideal, so the President has no reason not to sign it.) The House version of the wage hike measure is P200 per day, a higher amount compared to the Senate version, which is just pegged at P100. The House and the Senate will have to reconcile their differing versions and ratify the reconciled version before the 19th Congress ends on June 13 for the bill to be ready for the President's signature. Veto? Senator Joel Villanueva on Thursday expressed concern regarding the House of Representatives' approval of the bill and said that it might only get vetoed if adopted by the Senate. 'Parang ang tingin natin 'pag nangyari 'yan, diretsong veto. 'Yan ang kailangan din natin pagtuunan ng pansin kung ia-adopt natin 'yan kasi baka 'yan din 'yung dahilan ng iba na nandun sa Kamara para masiguro na ma-veto 'yan,' Villanueva told reporters. (I think that it may be directly vetoed by the President. That's what we also need to look at if we are going to adopt that because some House members may just use that to ensure that the bill will get vetoed.) Adonis, however, believes that this should not be a hindrance. 'Kaya bagaman magkaibang bersyon, sana hindi na siya hadlang at kaagad mag-convene ang bicameral committee ng Senado at Kongreso para i-decide kung magkano talaga... Huwag na nilang paghintayin yung mga manggagawa kasi 36 years tayong naghintay para sa legislative wage increase,' Adonis said. (So even if the bill has different versions, this should not be a hurdle, and Congress should immediately decide on the final amount and send it to the President for signature. They should not make the workers wait even longer because they have been waiting for this for 36 years.) —VAL, GMA Integrated News
