
Post-Brexit border control post in Wales to sit empty
A £51m border control post built to handle post-Brexit checks on imports will sit empty for now, Wales's deputy first minister said.
Huw Irranca-Davies said the facility at Parc Cybi near the port of Holyhead in Anglesey was commissioned last year to follow the post- Brexit requirements of border controls on imports, including live animals and goods such as food, from the EU.
The facility received £44m in funding from the UK government, and the border control post (BCP) is now nearing completion. It is set to be handed over to the Welsh government in the autumn.
But the post will sit empty for now following an announcement by the UK government that it was set to negotiate with the EU to exempt many imports of live animals and goods from sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) checks at the border, according to Mr Irranca-Davies.
He said the Welsh government was committed to "ensuring an acceptable level of biosecurity protection over the interim period whilst the agreement is negotiated and implemented".
Although physical and identity checks on imports from the EU began in April 2024, Mr Irranca-Davies highlighted that no start date for SPS checks on imports from Ireland has been announced.
"I have decided not to proceed with the final commissioning and staffing of the Holyhead BCP, and not to take forward construction of BCPs at Fishguard and Pembroke Dock," Wales's deputy first minister said in a statement.
Mr Irranca-Davies added that he will "keep that decision under review until the final details of the agreement with the EU are known", at which point longer-term plans for the site would be made.
"In the meantime, it is crucial that it remains ready and available as a potential BCP facility," he said.
Holyhead is the busiest ferry port on the Irish Sea, with over three-quarters of imports to Great Britain from Ireland.
Mr Irranca-Davies said the Welsh government remains committed to providing sufficient notice for traders and delivery partners "should any new border checks need to be introduced".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
15 minutes ago
- The National
Here's what we learned from John Curtice's new polling report
It comes in response to figures in a new report penned by Professor John Curtice and published by the National Centre for Social Research as part of the latest British Social Attitudes survey, released on Wednesday. Curtice's report, titled Repairing Britain, found that almost two-thirds of the public (63%) were likely to vote to rejoin the European Union in a second referendum. When the public are given more than a binary option, Curtice reported that 'only 21% say that the UK should be outside the EU, the lowest proportion to do so since 2008'. READ MORE: Pressure piles on Anas Sarwar as 10th Scottish Labour MP joins rebellion The polling expert further reported that the 'latest survey shows that as many as 69% believe that the economy is worse off as a result of Brexit, well up on the 40% who anticipated such an outcome in 2015'. He noted that Labour were aiming to win over pro-Brexit voters who had backed Boris Johnson in the 2019 General Election, but added: 'However, Labour's support came overwhelmingly from those who say they would vote to rejoin the EU.' Elsewhere, a majority of the UK public (61%) said they believed that the tax burden on people with low incomes was 'too high', up nine points on 2016. Conversely, a plurality (44%) said that the tax burden on the UK's highest earners was too low, up ten points on 2016. Only one in 10 UK adults support spending less on disability benefits (Image: PA) The report also said that, by 45% to 11%, people think the UK Government should spend more – not less – on disability benefits. However, the support for spending more is at a 'record low', down 22 points on 2017. The Labour Government is currently facing down the biggest rebellion of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's leadership, with more than 100 MPs opposing plans to cut disability benefit spending by £5 billion per year. Elsewhere, the report found: A record 26% of people say they are struggling to live on their current income, up from 16% before the pandemic. Satisfaction with the health service has plummeted in the wake of the pandemic. A record 59% are now dissatisfied with the NHS, compared with just 25% in 2019. In total, 40% of people now support increasing taxes and spending more on health, education, and social benefits, down from 55% in early 2023. However, this is still above the 31% support reported in 2010, when taxes were a lower proportion of GDP than currently. 58% of those who voted Labour in 2024 are in favour of increasing taxes to spend more on health, education and social benefits. 'NIMBYism' is on the rise: the proportion of people who support building more homes in their local area has fallen from 57% in 2018 to 41%. Conversely, 32% are opposed, up from 23% over the same period. SNP MSP Clare Adamson said: "This report shows what we all already know – that Britain is broken beyond repair. "Whether it's on EU membership, taxation, or cuts to welfare, the UK Government and the rest of the political bubble is totally out of step with voters. "What Scotland really needs isn't a change of Government in Edinburgh or London – it's a full change of the system with independence." Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie also took aim at Labour over Brexit, saying there was 'no question' that leaving the EU had contributed to 'higher bills, poorer services, and a struggling economy'. READ MORE: Jonathon Shafi: West's imperial arrogance takes propaganda to farcical levels 'It's no surprise that an overwhelming majority across the UK now support rejoining the EU,' he went on. 'Yet despite this, Labour refuses to acknowledge the harm it's done and begin taking the urgent action we need to reverse it. 'Like on so many issues, whether it be immigration, tax or Brexit, they ignore the public and the good of the country in order to pander to a small number of right-wing newspapers and Reform voters.' The campaign group Yes for EU said the high support for rejoining the EU was 'no surprise', with a spokesperson adding: 'What is surprising, indeed scandalous, is that the UK Labour Government continues to reject calls to rejoin.' Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer further hit out at Labour over taxation, calling for a more progressive UK system. 'Labour claim there isn't enough money to end cruel policies like the two-child benefit cap and rape clause, yet in the recently published Rich List we saw that the top 1% increase their net worth yet again,' he said. 'Working and middle class people are struggling with the cost of living, but super-rich elites are doing better than ever. Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer (Image: NQ) 'Keir Starmer was elected on a commitment to end at least one tax avoidance loophole enjoyed by some of these billionaires, but he dropped that as soon as he got the keys to Downing Street and instead he is slashing the support provided to disabled people to 'balance the books'.' Curtice, a senior research fellow at the National Centre for Social Research, said: 'The public are well aware of Britain's problems – not least those of a failing health service and an economy in which many are struggling to make ends meet. Yet rather than turning their back on the state, for the most part, the public are still inclined to look to government to provide solutions. And while they feel that most people on low and middle incomes are already paying enough tax, they suspect that some of the better off could pay more. 'As a result, while voters have perhaps now begun to react against the marked increase in the size of the state during the last Parliament, that reaction is still, it seems, relatively muted – and especially so among those who voted Labour. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: SNP must woo voters to turn our indy hopes into reality 'Yet this does not mean that voters are necessarily ready to back the various remedies that Labour have been offering to overcome the country's difficulties. They are not necessarily prepared to embrace a dash for more infrastructure building, including perhaps not least anything that appears in their own backyard. 'Tightening up on disability benefits is potentially controversial too, as the government has already discovered. 'The political difficulty with these policies is there are potentially identifiable winners and losers, and it is often the losers who shout the loudest. Pursuing economic growth rather than tax rises as the route out of fiscal constraint will not necessarily be the easier path for Labour to tread.'


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Brexit revelations: A mandate for Labour to rejoin the EU?
This is, of course, no surprise, given Brexit was always the most foolish of ideas. And the damage from the particularly ill-judged Tory version involving loss of free movement of people between the UK and European Economic Area and the ending of frictionless trade with the country's largest trading partner was inevitably going to be enormous. YouGov observed as it published its latest poll on Brexit that Monday June 23 marked nine years since the UK voted to leave the European Union. It added: 'YouGov polling has long since shown that the public are 'Bregretful' about that outcome, with our latest survey showing 56% think it was wrong for Britain to vote to leave the EU.' There might still be the sounds of 'non, je ne Bregret rien' from those who voted for the folly. And some of those who led voters down the Brexit path continue to bump their gums rather noisily. However, the quieter majority clearly knows what is actually going on. YouGov's latest findings show, as its polls have for years now, a clear majority believes the UK was wrong to leave the EU. Only 31% now think the UK was right to leave. Interestingly, 68% of Leave voters still believe they made the right choice. Having said that, that is a long, long way away from 100%, signalling the penny has dropped for many. Most people in the UK want to see the country return to the EU - 56%. This is way ahead of the 34% opposing such a move, with 10% of those polled saying they do not know. While there is a clear majority for rejoining the EU, the proportion of Leave voters supporting the UK going back into the bloc is 24%. However, although such a move is desirable to only a minority of Leavers, it is surely interesting that nearly one-quarter of the Brexit voters of 2016 would support the UK being a member of the EU once again. For Tory and Reform UK voters, the respective proportions supporting the UK rejoining the EU are 28% and 16%. The first of these figures is perhaps surprisingly low, although it maybe reflects the extent to which the Conservative Party has been taken over by the Brexiters. The second seems surprisingly high given the policy stances of Reform UK and the fact that its leader, Nigel Farage, has been such a poster boy of the Brexit camp. One demoralising aspect of the YouGov poll is that - while there are clear overall majorities believing the UK was wrong to leave the EU and supporting a return to the bloc - the proportion thinking that rejoining is the right priority at the current time is outweighed by that which considers such a move to be the wrong priority at the moment. YouGov observed: 'While most Britons may support a return to the EU, they are less convinced that it is a priority at the current time. More than four in ten (44%) said attempting a 'Breturn' would be the wrong priority for the Government at the current time when balanced against the other issues the UK currently faces, compared to 37% who believe it would be the right priority.' That said, the breakdown on this is interesting. And it is perhaps one that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer should reflect on, given that his moves to rebuild ties with the EU are dispiritingly limited in scope, with Labour's 'red lines' embracing the key elements of the Tory hard Brexit: loss of frictionless trade and the ending of free movement. The most eye-catching aspect of the breakdown is that most people who voted for the Labour Government at last July's general election believe that rejoining the EU is the right priority at the current time. Read more YouGov noted: 'The majority of those who elected this Government last year say that rejoining the EU is the right priority (56%), as do similar numbers of Green (59%) and Lib Dem (55%) voters. Only between 25% [and] 30% of these voters think attempting to rejoin is the wrong priority at the current time.' It could easily be argued that Sir Keir, if he so wished, could take this majority view among those who voted for Labour at the last election as a mandate to pursue rejoining the EU, especially given there is overall support for such a move in the UK. What is more, the fact that 56% of those who voted for Labour last July consider rejoining the EU to be the right priority, right now, raises the question of why Sir Keir and his colleagues seem hell-bent on going along with the views of the minority in their policymaking. Labour has made it clear that it is absolutely intent on maintaining its 'red lines', a truly lamentable state of affairs. Another point worth making is that sometimes, when people are asked about priorities in polls generally, they seem to treat Brexit and the economy as two different things (albeit this is sometimes to do with the way the surveys are framed). It is a surreal situation. After all, rejoining the EU or even the European single market would give the UK a huge economic boost at a time when everyone seems to be getting in a lather about minuscule rises in long-term annual economic output from this or that trade deal. The recent free trade deal with India is a case in point, with Labour making something of a song and dance about a 0.1% boost to annual gross domestic product in the long run. You would not imagine people are going to feel that kind of boost in their living standards, which have come under so much pressure since the global financial crisis, with Brexit among the key factors in this misery. In stark contrast, if the economy and living standards and so forth are the priorities of people in the UK, then simple arithmetic and logic should dictate that rejoining the EU or at least the single market should also most definitely be a priority for them. Office for Budget Responsibility chairman Richard Hughes said in spring 2023 of Brexit's effect: 'We think that in the long run it reduces our overall output by around 4% compared with had we remained in the EU.' That loss is 40 times the forecast boost from the India trade deal. Given the noise from the Labour Government about the likes of the India trade deal, triumphalism which has in some ways been so reminiscent of the Tory Brexiters, the electorate could be forgiven for not realising just how colossally greater would be the boost from rejoining the single market or EU in economic terms. And it is not just about GDP – a more prosperous economy would obviously boost living standards after years in which growth has proven very hard to come by indeed. Sir Keir should surely take a long look at his own priorities, and take on board the views about the EU among the majority who voted him in, rather than paying disproportionate attention to, or pandering to, that rather noisy, entrenched Brexit camp.


North Wales Live
an hour ago
- North Wales Live
£48m border control post may be obsolete as 'yet another Brexit bonus' slammed
North Wales Live readers are unhappy to hear that a facility designed to handle the additional red tape resulting from Brexit could become obsolete before it even opens its doors. The UK's departure from the EU in 2020 introduced extra bureaucracy at the border between the UK and the European Union, including sanitary and phytosanitary checks on fresh produce from the EU. The previous UK Government postponed implementing these checks due to fears of price increases for businesses and consumers. However, they did not abandon these checks and continued to develop the necessary building. In North Wales, the UK Government allocated £47.8m for the construction of a border control post at Holyhead, which would be managed by the Welsh Government. Kier Group was awarded a £41m construction contract last summer, and work began on the development at Parc Cybi, just outside Holyhead, with completion expected by autumn. However, the site could potentially become an expensive folly before it even becomes operational. In May, the UK and EU reached a new SPS agreement aimed at reducing trade barriers for food, plants, and animal products, thereby making trade between the UK and EU more affordable and straightforward. The Welsh Government has stated: "We are considering the implications of a potential SPS agreement with the EU on the future implementation of the Border Target Operating Model in Wales. The Deputy First Minister will make a statement to the Senedd in the coming weeks." On Tuesday, they confirmed they will not push on with final commissioning and staffing of the site. Huw Irranca-Davies MS, Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Rural Affairs, said he would keep that decision under review until the final details of the agreement with the EU are known. Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth, MS for Ynys Mon, commented on the situation saying: "The chaotic situation regarding the need – or not – for border control posts is symptomatic of the chaos and costs surrounding Brexit as a whole. Large sums of public money have been spent, Anglesey Council has faced significant pressures, and we even lost the very important truck stop that went to make way for post-Brexit border infrastructure. We need assurances now that the taxpayer won't be left further out of pocket, but the sad thing is that much of the damage caused will remain with us for many years to come." Commenter Driver123456 says: 'Why did they have to take the truck stop? It was an absolute joke, but they insisted they wanted that site instead of the clear land across the way. They could have built on that, but paid way over the odds for the land!' ThePickledLiver replies: 'There will still be 100 HGV parking spaces, and while the inspection shed might not be useful, there's the admin block which would make an excellent drivers' R&R. "Small layout changes and it'll be perfectly usable/re-useable as something other than a border post. Not quite 'white elephant' stuff. We could perhaps copy what they do (and I've used) on the continent and provide 1 and 2-bed rooms for drivers. 10/15 euro a night, nothing fancy but better than bunking in the cab. Must pay for itself 'cos there's plenty of them. And that's before factoring-in the times that the ferries are delayed by weather. That would cover at least, erm, 2 million, ish.' Captcheese thinks: 'Quite eye watering at 47 million for a shower block and bogs for HGV drivers.' LlainPeris thinks: 'We are all paying for the Brexit Mess - 'taking back control' was always very misleading at best: what needs controlling is the way multi-national companies pay so little tax, and for that you need multi-national action by governments not Little Britain acting on its own.' Northwalessaint agrees: 'Yet another 'Brexit Bonus'!' Marti1 adds: 'It seems leaving the EU cost more than staying.' PaulLuckock writes: 'The Welsh electorate voted for Brexit and so we collectively have to take responsibility for the settled will of the people in 2016.' Steamnut points out: 'And that wonderful Holyhead truck-stop would still be open. Amazing how we keep doing this at all levels both national and local. And yes, Conwy we are talking about you. We need more accountability; people who sign-off on expensive schemes ought to pay the price for their mistakes.' Jnrm replies: 'Well the Welsh people voted for, and therefore 'signed off' on Brexit, a really expensive scheme, so I guess they should be footing the bill then. It was the UK Government that paid £47.8 million to fund this facility, not the Welsh Government. Plaid states there was a large sum of public money spent which has been wasted and that taxpayers shouldn't be left out of pocket. Well it's the English taxpayer who should be complaining as they funded it!'