logo
Brexit revelations: A mandate for Labour to rejoin the EU?

Brexit revelations: A mandate for Labour to rejoin the EU?

This is, of course, no surprise, given Brexit was always the most foolish of ideas. And the damage from the particularly ill-judged Tory version involving loss of free movement of people between the UK and European Economic Area and the ending of frictionless trade with the country's largest trading partner was inevitably going to be enormous.
YouGov observed as it published its latest poll on Brexit that Monday June 23 marked nine years since the UK voted to leave the European Union.
It added: 'YouGov polling has long since shown that the public are 'Bregretful' about that outcome, with our latest survey showing 56% think it was wrong for Britain to vote to leave the EU.'
There might still be the sounds of 'non, je ne Bregret rien' from those who voted for the folly. And some of those who led voters down the Brexit path continue to bump their gums rather noisily.
However, the quieter majority clearly knows what is actually going on.
YouGov's latest findings show, as its polls have for years now, a clear majority believes the UK was wrong to leave the EU. Only 31% now think the UK was right to leave.
Interestingly, 68% of Leave voters still believe they made the right choice. Having said that, that is a long, long way away from 100%, signalling the penny has dropped for many.
Most people in the UK want to see the country return to the EU - 56%. This is way ahead of the 34% opposing such a move, with 10% of those polled saying they do not know.
While there is a clear majority for rejoining the EU, the proportion of Leave voters supporting the UK going back into the bloc is 24%. However, although such a move is desirable to only a minority of Leavers, it is surely interesting that nearly one-quarter of the Brexit voters of 2016 would support the UK being a member of the EU once again.
For Tory and Reform UK voters, the respective proportions supporting the UK rejoining the EU are 28% and 16%. The first of these figures is perhaps surprisingly low, although it maybe reflects the extent to which the Conservative Party has been taken over by the Brexiters. The second seems surprisingly high given the policy stances of Reform UK and the fact that its leader, Nigel Farage, has been such a poster boy of the Brexit camp.
One demoralising aspect of the YouGov poll is that - while there are clear overall majorities believing the UK was wrong to leave the EU and supporting a return to the bloc - the proportion thinking that rejoining is the right priority at the current time is outweighed by that which considers such a move to be the wrong priority at the moment.
YouGov observed: 'While most Britons may support a return to the EU, they are less convinced that it is a priority at the current time. More than four in ten (44%) said attempting a 'Breturn' would be the wrong priority for the Government at the current time when balanced against the other issues the UK currently faces, compared to 37% who believe it would be the right priority.'
That said, the breakdown on this is interesting. And it is perhaps one that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer should reflect on, given that his moves to rebuild ties with the EU are dispiritingly limited in scope, with Labour's 'red lines' embracing the key elements of the Tory hard Brexit: loss of frictionless trade and the ending of free movement.
The most eye-catching aspect of the breakdown is that most people who voted for the Labour Government at last July's general election believe that rejoining the EU is the right priority at the current time.
Read more
YouGov noted: 'The majority of those who elected this Government last year say that rejoining the EU is the right priority (56%), as do similar numbers of Green (59%) and Lib Dem (55%) voters. Only between 25% [and] 30% of these voters think attempting to rejoin is the wrong priority at the current time.'
It could easily be argued that Sir Keir, if he so wished, could take this majority view among those who voted for Labour at the last election as a mandate to pursue rejoining the EU, especially given there is overall support for such a move in the UK.
What is more, the fact that 56% of those who voted for Labour last July consider rejoining the EU to be the right priority, right now, raises the question of why Sir Keir and his colleagues seem hell-bent on going along with the views of the minority in their policymaking. Labour has made it clear that it is absolutely intent on maintaining its 'red lines', a truly lamentable state of affairs.
Another point worth making is that sometimes, when people are asked about priorities in polls generally, they seem to treat Brexit and the economy as two different things (albeit this is sometimes to do with the way the surveys are framed).
It is a surreal situation.
After all, rejoining the EU or even the European single market would give the UK a huge economic boost at a time when everyone seems to be getting in a lather about minuscule rises in long-term annual economic output from this or that trade deal. The recent free trade deal with India is a case in point, with Labour making something of a song and dance about a 0.1% boost to annual gross domestic product in the long run.
You would not imagine people are going to feel that kind of boost in their living standards, which have come under so much pressure since the global financial crisis, with Brexit among the key factors in this misery.
In stark contrast, if the economy and living standards and so forth are the priorities of people in the UK, then simple arithmetic and logic should dictate that rejoining the EU or at least the single market should also most definitely be a priority for them.
Office for Budget Responsibility chairman Richard Hughes said in spring 2023 of Brexit's effect: 'We think that in the long run it reduces our overall output by around 4% compared with had we remained in the EU.'
That loss is 40 times the forecast boost from the India trade deal.
Given the noise from the Labour Government about the likes of the India trade deal, triumphalism which has in some ways been so reminiscent of the Tory Brexiters, the electorate could be forgiven for not realising just how colossally greater would be the boost from rejoining the single market or EU in economic terms. And it is not just about GDP – a more prosperous economy would obviously boost living standards after years in which growth has proven very hard to come by indeed.
Sir Keir should surely take a long look at his own priorities, and take on board the views about the EU among the majority who voted him in, rather than paying disproportionate attention to, or pandering to, that rather noisy, entrenched Brexit camp.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge
Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge

Wales Online

time9 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge

Ryanair baggage rule change could see passengers hit with extra £70 charge Ryanair has updated its cabin baggage rules for summer 2025 and there's one rule that could catch you out if you're unprepared The summer holidays are now upon us and many Britons are desperate to escape the UK for some well-deserved sunshine and coastal tranquillity. Unfortunately there are countless airport rules that could dampen the enthusiasm before it even starts. ‌ One rule, concerning Ryanair luggage, risks creating problems for passengers at the airport if they turn up ill-prepared. It's frequently seen as travellers' biggest nightmare – being singled out by airport personnel to check their hand luggage dimensions with sizing frames just before take-off. ‌ With budget airline Ryanair passengers are permitted to take a "personal bag" free of charge though it must comply with their strict size requirements. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . ‌ After a recent change in line with EU rules these dimensions have been increased to 40 x 30 x 20cm. If their bag surpasses these boundaries passengers face a fee as high as £70. Ryanair operates a card-only payment system at its boarding gates, which could create problems for some holidaymakers. This means that if a passenger is prepared to pay the fee, without a payment card to hand, they could be prevented from boarding with their baggage, reports Lincolnshire Live. A Ryanair spokesman told the Daily Mail: "Our bag policy is simple; if it fits in our bag sizer (which is bigger than our agreed dimensions) it gets on free of charge. Article continues below "If it doesn't fit in our bag sizer you pay a gate bag fee. As our boarding gates are cashless gate bag fees cannot be paid in cash. "These fees are paid by less than 0.1% of passengers who don't comply with our agreed bags rules. For the 99.9% of our passengers who comply with our rules we say thank you and keep flying as you have nothing to worry about." Therefore if you're travelling with Ryanair this summer it would be wise to bring a card to guarantee your holiday begins without a hitch. ‌ This warning emerges following reports that a new four-hour regulation has been implemented before the summer holidays, affecting travellers with Ryanair, easyJet, TUI, and Jet2. Following a European Union ruling, the timeframe for claiming compensation for delayed flights has been lengthened. After more than a decade of discussions it has been determined that compensation claims for short-haul flights will only be acceptable following a delay of no less than four hours, which has increased from the earlier three-hour limit. For long-distance trips travellers must endure a delay of six hours or longer before pursuing compensation. The type of delay also influences the amount of compensation granted. Article continues below A4E, which represents leading European carriers, voiced frustration. A spokesman said: "Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to deliver [...] member states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity."

Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry
Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry

Speaking at an on-stage conversation with Matt Forde on Wednesday, the lawyer said Ms Sturgeon's top-down approach lay behind the party failing to recognise concerns around gender self-identification, and its failure to achieve Scottish independence post-Brexit. She said that unlike her predecessor Alex Salmond, Ms Sturgeon had shut down debate within the party on strategy and policy discussions, and that 'it was her way or the highway', and dissenters were viewed with 'deep suspicion'. The former Edinburgh South West MP added that she had never been friends with Ms Sturgeon, but that their differences were political rather than personal. 'I've never been close to her. This is not a personality clash. This is a clash based on the way that we do politics,' she said. 'I believe in open debates and discussion. And I don't think she does. I think she was Stalinist in the way in which she ran the party and the country.' She also criticised Ms Sturgeon's strategy for securing a Scottish independence in the post-Brexit period, when she said she 'repeatedly' pursued a mandate for a second referendum from the UK Government without considering a plan B. 'The ideal thing would have been to get a second referendum, but it was unwise to close down other options, and we needed to discuss other options,' Ms Cherry said. 'She never wanted to discuss a plan B, and she never wanted to discuss the possibility of treating an election as a de facto referendum. 'And when she eventually decided to do that, it was only because she'd run out of options, and she did it without any debate or discussion.' She added: 'The reason that I feel that her strategy failed and was so wrong was it was very narrow, and she repeatedly banged her head off the brick wall of the British Government's refusal to grant a section 30 order, rather than having a multi-faceted strategy to put pressure on them to do so, whilst also having a back-up plan if they said no. 'A more skilled politician of the sort of person that Alex Salmond was would have had that kind of a plan, and she didn't have it.' Ms Cherry also described the independence referendum in 2014 as a 'flowering of ideas' that had come about from the 'grassroots up'. She said: 'I think Nicola and her husband, as chief executive of the party, set out to undermine that grassroots power because it scared them, and to make everything imposed in the top-down, and that has had disastrous results for the SNP and for the independence movement.' Ms Cherry also said it was 'irritating' that in her recent autobiography Ms Sturgeon conceded some of the problems with gender self-identification were valid, given, she said, there had been multiple attempts to get her to 'press pause' on the policy at the time. These included, she said, an open letter in the Scotsman newspaper in 2019 by herself and 'quite a few other SNP MPs, MSPs and councillors', and separate calls from herself for a citizens' assembly to examine the issue. She said of Ms Sturgeon's response: 'Not only did she close her ears to them, she demonised those of us who raised concerns. 'She said first of all that our concerns weren't valid. And then she actually compared us to the far-right, said we're misogynist, racist, homophobes.' Joanna Cherry was first elected to the UK Parliament in 2015, and was her party's spokesperson for justice and home affairs until 2021. She lost her seat to Labour in the 2024 general election. The Scottish Government and the SNP have been asked for comment.

Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry
Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry

Speaking at an on-stage conversation with Matt Forde on Wednesday, the lawyer said Ms Sturgeon's top-down approach lay behind the party failing to recognise concerns around gender self-identification, and its failure to achieve Scottish independence post-Brexit. She said that unlike her predecessor Alex Salmond, Ms Sturgeon had shut down debate within the party on strategy and policy discussions, and that 'it was her way or the highway', and dissenters were viewed with 'deep suspicion'. The former Edinburgh South West MP added that she had never been friends with Ms Sturgeon, but that their differences were political rather than personal. 'I've never been close to her. This is not a personality clash. This is a clash based on the way that we do politics,' she said. 'I believe in open debates and discussion. And I don't think she does. I think she was Stalinist in the way in which she ran the party and the country.' She also criticised Ms Sturgeon's strategy for securing a Scottish independence in the post-Brexit period, when she said she 'repeatedly' pursued a mandate for a second referendum from the UK Government without considering a plan B. 'The ideal thing would have been to get a second referendum, but it was unwise to close down other options, and we needed to discuss other options,' Ms Cherry said. 'She never wanted to discuss a plan B, and she never wanted to discuss the possibility of treating an election as a de facto referendum. 'And when she eventually decided to do that, it was only because she'd run out of options, and she did it without any debate or discussion.' She added: 'The reason that I feel that her strategy failed and was so wrong was it was very narrow, and she repeatedly banged her head off the brick wall of the British Government's refusal to grant a section 30 order, rather than having a multi-faceted strategy to put pressure on them to do so, whilst also having a back-up plan if they said no. 'A more skilled politician of the sort of person that Alex Salmond was would have had that kind of a plan, and she didn't have it.' Ms Cherry also described the independence referendum in 2014 as a 'flowering of ideas' that had come about from the 'grassroots up'. She said: 'I think Nicola and her husband, as chief executive of the party, set out to undermine that grassroots power because it scared them, and to make everything imposed in the top-down, and that has had disastrous results for the SNP and for the independence movement.' Ms Cherry also said it was 'irritating' that in her recent autobiography Ms Sturgeon conceded some of the problems with gender self-identification were valid, given, she said, there had been multiple attempts to get her to 'press pause' on the policy at the time. These included, she said, an open letter in the Scotsman newspaper in 2019 by herself and 'quite a few other SNP MPs, MSPs and councillors', and separate calls from herself for a citizens' assembly to examine the issue. She said of Ms Sturgeon's response: 'Not only did she close her ears to them, she demonised those of us who raised concerns. 'She said first of all that our concerns weren't valid. And then she actually compared us to the far-right, said we're misogynist, racist, homophobes.' Joanna Cherry was first elected to the UK Parliament in 2015, and was her party's spokesperson for justice and home affairs until 2021. She lost her seat to Labour in the 2024 general election. The Scottish Government and the SNP have been asked for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store