China to host Pacific foreign ministers for first in-person summit in Xiamen
Foreign Minister Wang Yi will chair the meeting in Xiamen scheduled for 28-29 May.
Photo:
AP / Mark Schiefelbein, file photo
Pacific Islands foreign ministers will be gathering in Fujian province for the third China-Pacific Island Countries Foreign Ministers' Meeting this week.
In a statement, the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry said Foreign Minister Wang Yi will chair the meeting in Xiamen scheduled for 28-29 May.
It said "it will be the first of its kind to be held offline in China."
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters at a daily news briefing on last Wednesday that foreign ministers or representatives from 11 island countries that have diplomatic relations with China, and the Pacific Islands Forum deputy secretary general Esala Nayasi will attend the meeting.
Mao said that the participants will have in-depth exchanges of views on all-round cooperation between China and Pacific Island countries, as well as on international and regional issues of mutual interest.
China is ready to leverage the upcoming meeting to implement the important consensuses reached by leaders of both sides, strengthen solidarity and coordination, pursue common development and prosperity, she said.
she said the objective of the meeting is to jointly build an even closer China-Pacific Island countries community with a shared future.
Mao said China highly value its ties with the Pacific Island countries, and friendly cooperation between the two sides has continued to deepen and expand in recent years.
According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, those attending include:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Leaked files reveal how China is using AI to erase the history of the Tiananmen Square massacre
Photo: Getty Images By Bang Xiao, ABC Hundreds of pages of classified documents leaked to the ABC have offered an unprecedented glimpse into China's infamous censorship regime. It has grown faster, smarter and increasingly invisible, quietly erasing the memory of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre from public view. Thirty-six years on, Beijing still has not disclosed the official death toll of the bloody crackdown on a pro-democracy gathering on June 4, when more than 1 million protesters were in the square. Historians estimate that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) killed anywhere from 200 to several thousand people that day. More than 230 pages of censorship instructions prepared by Chinese social media platforms were shared by industry insiders with the ABC. They were intended to be circulated among multi-channel networks or MCNs - companies that manage the accounts of content creators across multiple social and video platforms like Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok. The files reveal deep anxiety among Chinese authorities about the spread of any reference to the most violently suppressed pro-democracy movement in the country's history. The documents instruct MCNs to remove any content that depicts state violence and include compilations of text, images and video content for reference. The reference material includes graphic scenes of the People's Liberation Army opening fire on civilians, while others say students attacked the soldiers. The ABC understands that the material is being used by frontline content censors to train artificial intelligence tools to moderate vast amounts of content, under the direction of the Cyberspace Administration of China - the country's top internet regulator. China's vast censorship regime relies on hundreds of thousands of human moderators to keep social media platforms compliant. There is also a structured process for censoring posts. Every post is first scanned by AI systems - known as a machine review - which are particularly sensitive to any references to the Tiananmen anniversary. When the ABC asked the Chinese-made AI chatbot DeepSeek to tell us about the massacre, it answered: "That topic is beyond my current scope. Let's talk about something else." One of the documents, a 2022 training manual for censors working for Douyin directly referenced the world-famous Tank Man image, labelling it a "subversive picture". The document also said that any visual metaphor resembling the sequence of one man facing four tanks - even "one banana and four apples in a line" - could be instantly flagged by an algorithm designed to pick up references to the massacre, especially during the first week of June. And when an uploaded video gains traction or matches sensitive patterns, it enters a "traffic pool" and may be escalated through four levels of human checks. Lennon Chang, a cyber risk expert from Deakin University, told the ABC that AI had made the censorship of visual and symbolic references far more feasible in real-time. "Even if you replace the tank man image with bananas and apples, the algorithm has learned the pattern," Dr Chang said. "They use computer vision, natural language processing and real-time filtering. It doesn't change the nature of censorship, but it makes it more powerful." The guidelines also prohibit seemingly innocuous symbols such as candles and flowers that could be interpreted as commemorative. Dr Chang explains that this shift toward algorithmic filtering has deepened the risk of historical amnesia. "If censorship keeps going and is increasingly powered by AI, our future generations might not be able to know what happened," he said. "The data they see will already be filtered and sanitised. It creates a fake world - a fake history." Photo: AFP/Catherine Henriette The leaked documents also shed light on the lives of censors, who work under close oversight from the Cyberspace Administration. All censors are required to pass multiple exams to ensure they are vigilant and can respond swiftly to remove potentially risky content - a crucial safeguard to prevent platforms from being suspended or shut down by authorities. Everything visible online needs to be checked: videos, images, captions, live streams, comments and text. Algorithms are trained to detect visual cues, while human censors are on alert for coded language, disguised symbols and unusual emoji combinations that may signal dissent. Documents also show censors must meet strict productivity targets - some are expected to review hundreds of posts per hour. Their behaviour, accuracy and speed are tracked by internal monitoring software. Mistakes can result in formal warnings or termination. One former and three current workers at ByteDance, the owner of TikTok and Douyin, also spoke to the ABC about their jobs. The employees requested anonymity as they feared repercussions. They said their colleagues suffered from burnout, depression and anxiety due to constant exposure to disturbing, violent or politically sensitive content. One said working as a censor was like "reliving the darkest pages of history every day, while being watched by software that records every keystroke". They are normally paid with a modest salary - often less than $1,500 a month - though the psychological toll is severe. Even though TikTok and Douyin are both owned by Bytedance, they operate as separate platforms. TikTok serves a global audience and is governed by international laws and moderation standards, while Douyin is available only in mainland China and operates under domestic regulations, subject to heavy censorship and direct government oversight. In some cases, platforms in China allow low-risk content to remain online - but under a shadow ban. This means the content is visible to the user who posted it and a limited pool of users. The ABC has reached out to ByteDance for comment. For decades, the first week of June has coincided with routine "system maintenance" - often a euphemism for intensified censorship around the Tiananmen anniversary. Social media platforms like Weibo and WeChat also enforce heavy censorship, especially after a politically sensitive event. A 2022 manual for censors working on the Weibo platform said the Tiananmen massacre was a "sensitive incident" that must "never be shown". It grouped it with a wider ban on content critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or the party chief, President Xi Jinping. Liu Lipeng, a former content moderator for Weibo, says the lead-up to the anniversary is widely known in the industry as a "censorship season", where all staff are on duty and no mistakes are tolerated. "It's the most important event in the whole censorship system. Nothing is as significant," he told the ABC. "Censors must flag any objects arranged in parallel like the tanks, before there was AI. "If a censor can't understand something, they'll send it to a group chat for team discussions." Another document outlines that there is no permanent rule book for censors, as instructions from the government can change daily, with new keywords and forbidden terms added to content filters at any time. Censors are trained to err on the side of caution. One internal memo summarised the approach bluntly: "Delete first. Review later." Dr Chang warns that the implications of AI censorship extend beyond China. "If misleading data continues to flow outward, it could influence the AI models the rest of the world relies on," he said. "We need to think hard about how to maintain databases that are neutral, uncensored and accurate - because if the data is fake, the future will be fake too." Despite China's increasing use of AI to automate censorship, Mr Liu believes Chinese people's intelligence will continue to outsmart the technology. While he worries future generations may struggle to access truthful information, he believes people will find new ways to express dissent - even under an airtight system. "After working as a censor for years, I found human creativity can still crush AI censors many times over," he said. The ABC contacted DeepSeek and Weibo for comment. This story was first published by the ABC .
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
'No upside and very considerable downside' in annoying China: Helen Clark and Don Brash warn
Helen Clark and Don Brash. Photo: RNZ Two former prime ministers and an ex-governor of the Reserve Bank have put their names to a letter questioning the coalition government's foreign policy - in particular "positioning New Zealand alongside the United States as an adversary of China". Helen Clark, Sir Sir Geoffrey Palmer and Dr Don Brash say they are "deeply concerned" about statements made by Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, and actions taken by the government, when it comes to our relationship with the two superpowers. "Our country has for many years enjoyed a cordial relationship with both the United States and China. Both countries were comfortable with that in the past," they said. "But more recently, the United States has described China not only as a competitor, but also as an adversary, and has been putting pressure on other countries to take sides." They said while the US had made a valuable contribution to trade and development in the Pacific, and "good relations… must be maintained", they held concerns about initiatives such as AUKUS Pillar 2, which New Zealand is keeping an open mind about. An update provided to ministers in February said Pillar 2 had the "potential to support New Zealand's national security, defence, and foreign policy settings in the Indo-Pacific" through technology sharing and development. China has [ warned New Zealand against joining it. New Zealand did not consider Pillar 1, as it involved nuclear-powered submarines. The group cited a number of decisions as potentially souring New Zealand's relationship with China, including: They also cited Peters' recent criticism of the 2008 free-trade deal New Zealand made with China (signed during one of his former stints as foreign minister). "It would not be surprising if China were to come to the conclusion that the special relationship which New Zealand has had with it since becoming the first developed country to have a free trade agreement with it in 2008 is no longer so valued by New Zealand. "Yet China is already by far our largest export market, and is almost certain to become an even more important market as the country continues to develop. We see no upside and very considerable downside in the situation which has developed." The group said while New Zealand shared more "political values" with the US, and a longer relationship, a "military relationship with the United States directed against China has many risks for New Zealand". "That is especially true in a situation where the United States itself has recently become more ambivalent about its defence relationships with traditional partners." They urged Luxon to "make it clear at the highest level that New Zealand retains its bipartisan commitment to its strategic partnership with China in the interests of a peaceful and prosperous region and world" when made it to Beijing, expected to be sometime this year. Luxon first met Chinese President Xi Jinping at last year's APEC meeting. He was yet to visit China as prime minister. The other signatories to the statement were former Speaker of the House Sir David Carter, former New Zealand Ambassador to China Carl Worker, and David Mahon, a New Zealand businessman resident in Beijing since 1984. In response, a spokesperson for Peters told RNZ he saw "no value in indulging the tired arguments of various former politicians". "The AUKUS II process was commenced by the Labour government in 2021. New Zealand has yet to be invited to join. "The government stands by its independent foreign policy approach which has been transparent about its focus on advancing New Zealand's security and prosperity after the years of inaction by the previous administration." Clark and Brash, once political foes, last year teamed up to criticise the government's foreign policy, in paticular its refusal to rule out joining AUKUS Pillar 2 . Labour has promised it would not sign New Zealand up to the US-UK-Australia defence agreement . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump is increasingly hostile to China. He's playing with fire
By David Goldman and Phil Mattingly , CNN US President Donald Trump Photo: AFP / Saul Loeb Analysis : Despite widespread concerns that the trade war is dragging down America's economy, President Donald Trump has notched quite a few wins on his economic belt in recent weeks. Inflation keeps falling. Jobs remain plentiful. And there's growing evidence the economy could be booming this quarter. That's why Trump's increasingly hostile rhetoric about China over the past week was particularly concerning ahead of his call on Thursday with Chinese leader Xi Jinping . Trump's economy is cookin' - for now. But the economic Jenga tower the Trump administration has constructed is precariously balanced on a host of economic caveats and unproven theories. Renewed trade tensions with the world's second-largest economy threatens to knock the tower to the ground. May 12 represented a major turning point for the global trade war. Delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Markets were elated. Wall Street banks curtailed their recession forecasts. And moribund consumer confidence rebounded significantly. That's a significant change from April, when tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. The 145 percent tariffs on most Chinese imported goods made the math impossible for American businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner. No one wants to return to that. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in the détente with China, said previous tariff levels were "unsustainable". That's why he said the countries put in place mechanisms to prevent a re-escalation. But Trump and his administration in recent weeks have grown increasingly hostile toward China, accusing the country of breaking the promises it made in mid-May. China has similarly said the United States has failed to live up to its obligations under the agreement. Trump and Xi held a long-awaited phone call on Thursday, a person familiar with the matter said. The White House did not immediately confirm the call, which was also reported by Chinese state media. If the call fails to result in another de-escalation, tensions could boil over, and tariffs could rise again. So could recession forecasts. And the good vibes that have powered a rebound in sentiment and a massive market rally could disappear in a flash. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Photo: MANDEL NGAN/AFP Although virtually no economic reports are entirely good or bad, and with the obvious caveat that monthly economic data are inherently backward looking, US data have been surprisingly resilient lately. So resilient, in fact, that Trump's top economic advisors have made a point of highlighting the widespread predictions of soaring inflation and large-scale job cuts that drove headlines throughout April. "Everything has been alarmist," Bessent said on Sunday on CBS' Face the Nation . "The inflation numbers are the best in four years, so why don't we stop saying this could happen and wait and see what does happen." Annual consumer prices grew just 2.3 percent in April, according to the Consumer Price Index, and inflation that month fell to 2.1 percent, according to the separate Personal Consumption Expenditures price index. The PCE report is particularly noteworthy, because the Federal Reserve favours that report when it considers whether to change interest rates. Over time, the Fed targets 2 percent inflation, so America is, at long last, nearing that long-term target after a years-long bout with historic price hikes. Trump, citing America's low inflation rate, has been bullying Federal Reserve chairperson Jerome Powell to cut interest rates to boost the economy - even summoning Powell to the White House last week to give him a talking to. As Powell has noted, economic data is looking strong. Jobs data, although weakening, has steadied in recent months. The unemployment rate is hovering at just over 4 percent, and employers have added a solid number of jobs each month. The number of available jobs in America unexpectedly increased in April, a potential indicator that the labour market remains robust. Federal Reserve chairperson Jerome Powell Photo: AFP / Oliver Douliery And a positive effect of trade tensions could at least temporarily benefit America's economy. Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the economy, shifted into reverse in the first quarter as businesses stockpiled goods in anticipation of tariffs. This quarter, imports from foreign countries - particularly China - have fallen dramatically. In April, the US trade deficit shrank by its steepest monthly pace on records, which go back to 1992. That should give America a big, albeit momentary, boost. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tool currently predicts the US economy will grow at an adjusted annualised rate of 4.6 percent this quarter, a huge number that would more than make up for the -0.2 percent rate in the first quarter. But Trump's ramping up of restrictions and public scrutiny of China risks putting sugar in the gas tank just as the engine started humming again. Trump on Wednesday said in a Truth Social post that Chinese leader Xi Jinping was "extremely hard to make a deal with". Trade talks have stalled, Bessent said, apparently frustrating Trump. Last week, Trump posted on social media that China "TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US." Trump said that he made a "fast deal" with China to "save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation." He added: "So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has so far refused, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a recent series of measures to be imposed on the country three administration officials told CNN last week. For example, the White House warned US companies against using AI chips made by China's national tech champion Huawei. It stopped US companies from selling to China software that is used to design semiconductors. And the US State Department announced it would "aggressively revoke visas" for some Chinese students in America. China, in turn, has accused the United States of "provoking new economic and trade frictions". "The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations," the Chinese Commerce Ministry said Sunday. Meanwhile, it's not like tariffs have completely evaporated. Trump's levies still make up the highest effective US tariff rate in nearly a century. The United States maintains a 10 percent universal tariff on most goods coming into the country, and Trump just doubled tariffs on steel and aluminium this week. He has threatened higher tariffs on dozens of countries that are unable to reach trade deals with the administration over the course of the next month. And China and the United States, despite their de-escalation last month, maintain significant, double-digit tariffs on one another. Economists, Wall Street analysts, business leaders and consumers continue to sound the alarm bell about the trade war, worrying about a toxic combination of rising prices and slowing economic growth. The reality remains the universal exhale across Wall Street and C-Suites after the US-China de-escalation didn't change the fact that signs of a sharp economic downward turn had been pervasive in what economists call "soft data" for months. In survey after survey capturing business, manufacturing and consumer sentiment, the vibes have remained tangibly anxious even if they've slowed the rapid downward trend. Powell captured that split screen effect best during a May press conference defined by just how many times - and different ways - he could explain Fed officials simply didn't know what would happen next. "People are worried about inflation, about a shock from tariffs," Powell told reporters. "But that shock hasn't hit yet." Surveys data doesn't necessarily serve as leading indicators for the hard economic data to come, and were shown to be particularly divergent over the course of the last five years. Trump's ability to flip a switch and ease the all-consuming pressure on the global economy, at least somewhat, is probably the most blunt and effective tool in modern history to reverse any sentiment doom spiral. But some underlying data is raising concerns. A government report this week showed layoffs in April leapt higher by nearly 200,000 to 1.786 million, reversing a similarly sized drop seen in March. Initial unemployment claims rose to 247,000 last week, far more than estimated. And outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported on Thursday that American employers announced 94,000 layoffs in May - down 12 percent from April but up 47 percent from last year. Layoff announcements have spiked 80 percent this year. Last week, a key economic report showed consumer spending rose just 0.2 percent in April, a weaker-than-anticipated reading and a significant retreat from March. And some consumer and business survey data remain incredibly weak. Consumer sentiment remained near historic lows reached in March despite recent trade deal announcements, according to the University of Michigan. And the Fed's beige book, a collection of business leaders' reactions to the economic environment, showed that companies across industries are remaining deeply uncertain about the economy - particularly because of the trade war. That sentiment, if it remains static and pairs with the pervasive and paralyzing corporate uncertainty, can start to bleed into the underlying data. There have been warning signs of that occurring of late. "I would say surprisingly little direct impact so far in the data that's coming out," Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Austin Goolsbee said this week. "We don't know if that will remain true for the next month or two." So good news could ultimately turn bad, even without escalating tensions with China. But a return to tit-for-tat tariffs and closed borders could make matters significantly worse. -CNN
