logo
Homeland Security has a revealing taste in art

Homeland Security has a revealing taste in art

Boston Globe4 days ago
Advertisement
'American Progress' portrays the expansion of the United States as part of a divine plan. Civilization and American power move steadily into new lands. Those who are displaced flee helplessly toward perdition. Many in Washington still see the world that way: weaker civilizations giving way to irresistible American power.
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Although 'American Progress' was widely reprinted in the late 19th century, it will not be featured in any book about painterly brilliance. The artist, John Gast, was trained in lithography, not painting. He made this picture on order from a publisher who wanted an appealing image for books about the West. The result is arguably the most eloquent work of political art ever produced in the United States. It overflows with symbols and archetypes.
Advertisement
Dominating the picture is a robust blonde-haired angel wearing a flowing robe that evokes the glory of ancient Rome. In her hand she holds a book — a symbol of knowledge. She floats above groups of prospectors, farmers, and settlers as they trek resolutely westward. They seek to implant the American way of life in new lands.
A telegraph wire flows from the angel's hands. Railroads steam below her. Modern technology is depicted as the engine of progress and Americans as the master of that technology.
Most poignant in 'American Progress' are the Native Americans who retreat helplessly before this onslaught. The left-hand side of the picture, into which they are retreating, is dark and threatening, while a brilliant rising sun illuminates the advancing settlers. Native people and buffalo flee together. They represent the fading of races that were considered unable to adapt to American-style civilization.
In 'American Progress,' the transition from pastoral Native American life to farming, ranching, and dynamic modernity is presented as peaceful. Former inhabitants of North America simply make way for the new arrivals. There is no hint of the brutality of 'Indian removal' campaigns, no suggestion that Native peoples resisted, and no reference to US Army units that were, at the moment this picture was painted, violently pushing them off their ancestral lands.
The central idea behind this picture is America's inherent virtue. It is a powerful part of our national self-image. Most Americans, like people in most other large countries, have traditionally believed that extending our influence over others brings benefits to all. Contemplating 'collateral damage' muddies that picture. Nineteenth-century Americans did not want to hear about Indian massacres any more than their descendants have wanted to hear about massacres of Vietnamese, Afghans, or Gazans.
Advertisement
'American Progress' became popular because it portrays us as we like to think we are. The Americans in this picture come not only without malice but with limitless promise. Behind them, in the already-civilized East, are symbols of their achievement, notably the Brooklyn Bridge. Ahead lie new lands that can be likewise transformed as soon as the
The copper and steel work of art on the right is called "American Progress (after John Gast)." It was part of 'The Archaeology of Another Possible Future,' an installation by the artist Liz Glynn at MassMoCa in 2018.
ourtesy of the artist and Paula Cooper Gallery, New York
Many American leaders, now as in the past, view the world as a territory to be conquered, or at least to be brought within the sphere of American influence. Those who resist are like the Native Americans and the buffalo in 'American Progress' — relics of a past era that must yield to a new order.
Intriguingly, the painter who created this rosy vision of American expansion was himself an immigrant. He was born in Berlin, the son of a lithographer. If he was like most European immigrants of that period, he was inspired by stories he had heard about the New World. His painting is a tribute to what Americans had achieved and were achieving.
'American Progress' shows American expansion as benign and conflict-free. It celebrates rugged individualism and offers no sympathy for what Trump would call 'losers.' That may be why the Department of Homeland Security has adopted it.
Stephen Kinzer is a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Smithsonian denies Trump admin pushed to get rid of exhibit's impeachment placard
Smithsonian denies Trump admin pushed to get rid of exhibit's impeachment placard

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Smithsonian denies Trump admin pushed to get rid of exhibit's impeachment placard

The Smithsonian on Saturday denied it was pressured into removing a placard detailing the two impeachments against President Trump at an exhibit in the National Museum of American History. The federal arts and history institution, while confirming it removed the placard from the impeachment section of its 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibit last month, said it did so only because of aesthetic concerns. 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 4 The exhibit spotlights US presidents who were impeached — or in the case of Richard Nixon, nearly. REUTERS It explained that the move was made because 'the placard … did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the Smithsonian said. 'The section in question, Impeachment, will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' it added. 4 The impeachment display is part of a broader exhibit on the American presidency. REUTERS Last week, the Washington Post reported that references to Trump's two impeachments had been scrubbed from the exhibit and claimed that it was the result of a content review the museum chain initiated under pressure from the administration. Some lefty critics quickly jumped on the notion, ripping the administration. But the Smithsonian explained that the placard in question was intended only to be a 'temporary' add-on to the exhibit, which is about 25 years old. 4 Donald Trump is the first US president to have been impeached twice and survived. AP Trump is one of three US presidents to have been impeached, or had charges brought against him, by the House, alongside Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. All three were eventually acquitted by the Senate. Former President Richard Nixon is also mentioned in the Smithsonian display, although he resigned right before he could be impeached over Watergate. The first impeachment against Trump in 2019 was over his alleged pressure campaign to leverage aid for Ukraine to entice the US ally to dig up dirt on the Biden family. His second impeachment took place over the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Trump is also the first former or sitting US president to be criminally indicted — something he also survived. The charges involved falsifying business records. Trump's White House team has been leaning on the Smithsonian to root out wokeness in its policies and exhibits. In March, the president signed an executive order seeking to eliminate any alleged divisive narratives and to champion 'American' values. 4 Smithsonian officials denied that political interference led to the removal of a placard detailing Trump's impeachments. REUTERS 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibit opened to the public in 2000 and features a photo from Johnson's impeachment, copies of a report that sparked Clinton's impeachment and a battered filing cabinet from the Watergate controversy. Trump is briefly mentioned in a web-page companion to the exhibit.

Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary
Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary

New York Post

time39 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary

Business desk: Beyond Trump's Trade Deals 'Dealmaker-In-Chief' Donald Trump has been 'positively monomaniacal' about trade lately, marvels Freddy Gray at The Spectator. His 'real coup' is the 'new framework arrangement with the European Union,' which is 'not simply a major breakthrough in and of itself,' but also 'a useful piece of leverage in the even bigger tariff struggle with China' — because it pulls 'Europe more towards a western trading orbit and less towards the east.' Trump then slammed India for 'buying up Russian oil and gas,' and pivoted sharply by praising a new deal with Pakistan, 'including an arrangement to invest in Pakistani oil.' Advertisement Meanwhile, his enthusiasm for Pakistan — 'an extension of China's empire' — may be part of a plan to 'ring loud alarm bells' in Beijing. From the right: Consolation for the Little Guy 'For all the political criticism they take, the federal courts keep delivering good outcomes more often than not,' cheers The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. In 2016, the Labor Department 'imposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines' on a fourth-generation farm, Sun Valley Orchards — first requesting penalties and then approving them itself, thus 'serving as prosecutor, judge and jury.' Advertisement But an appeals court just ruled the proceedings 'should properly be enforced in federal court' — the proper venues for federal agencies to impose fines. Sun Valley has since gone out of business,' but at least its owners 'have the consolation of a ruling that will vindicate the rights of other farmers and small businesses under the boot heel of the bureaucracy.' Libertarian: Get Honest About Gov't Spending 'What kind of government do Americans want seriously enough to pay for?' asks Veronique de Rugy at Reason. 'I suspect that most people aren't willing to pay the taxes required to fund everything our current government does.' Advertisement Yet 'all the benefits and subsidies that we're unwilling to pay for' but keep going 'will eventually have to be paid for in the future with higher taxes, inflation, or both' by our children and grandchildren. 'Growing the economy' can be 'part of the solution,' but it won't be enough, and 'raising taxes on the rich will fall short too,' since higher tax rates 'do not automatically translate to more tax revenue.' 'It's long past time' we 'ask what level of spending we truly want with the money we truly have.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Hey, Dems — End the #Resistance Advertisement 'Nonstop Democratic fulminations in Trump's second term have been notably unsuccessful in resuscitating the party's toxic brand,' sighs the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Tellingly, 'voters, despite their negative views of Trump's performance on key issues, still prefer Republicans to Democrats.' Also, 'voters neither like nor trust' Dems, and thus don't see them as 'an obvious choice over their opponents.' Yet 'many Democratic politicians persist in reading — loudly — from the #Resistance script.' Why? The '#Resistance trope is what advantages individual Democratic politicians within the party because it generates adulation from activists, media coverage, and gushers of donations.' And taking back the House in 2026 will only 'convince #Resistance aficionados that nothing really needs to change.' Hello, President JD Vance. Health beat: Big Pharma Wins, Patients Lose 'In May, Dr. Vinay Prasad joined the Food & Drug Administration as the top regulator for vaccines,' yet he 'apparently knew the games too well,' gripes Alex Berensen at his Substack: After last week's attacks from Trump's allies, Prasad resigned: 'He was targeted because he posed a direct threat to Big Pharma profits.' Advertisement Just last month, he told Sarepta Therapeutics 'it needed to halt shipments of its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD.' 'Sarepta has never shown its drugs actually benefit patients.' The company won the right to a drug trial in 2016; 'nine years later, Sarepta still hasn't completed those trials.' Yet 'that hasn't stopped it from selling the drug — for up to $1.5 million per year.' Advertisement 'Big Pharma scalped Prasad for his honesty.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump
Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump

UPI

time40 minutes ago

  • UPI

Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs for a weekend in Bedminster, New Jersey, at the White House in Washington DC, on Friday, August 1, 2025. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- Economists are lining up to defend Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer, who was fired by President Donald Trump on Friday over his allegations that the agency manipulated a report showing low job growth for July. "It has been the honor of my life to serve as Commissioner of BLS alongside the many dedicated civil servants tasked with measuring a vast and dynamic economy. It is vital and important work and I thank them for their service to this nation," McEntarfer said on social media Friday. Her firing came after the July report had shown that jobs growth was slower than expected as the unemployment rose, with the United States only adding 73,000 new jobs for the month -- down from 147,000 new jobs added in June. "Today's jobs numbers were rigged in order to make Republicans and me look bad," Trump had said Friday afternoon in a Truth Social post. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called Trump's accusations a "preposterous charge" in an interview with ABC News' "This Week" program Sunday. "These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals. There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number," Summers said. Summers said that the numbers in the job report were "in line" with data and information being reviewed in the private sector and criticized Trump for his "authoritarian" removal of McEntarfer. "Firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms that defend clients that the elected boss finds uncongenial," he said. "This is really scary stuff." Bill Beach, McEntarfer's predecessor, appeared in an interview with CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday where he likewise called the move by Trump "totally groundless" and dangerous. "The commissioner doesn't see the numbers until Wednesday before they're published. By the time the commissioner sees the numbers, they're all prepared. They're locked into the computer system," Beach said. Beach said that the only thing the commissioner can do before the jobs report is published is review the text accompanying the data, as he explained part of the process of how they're compiled. "What I think really upset the president on Friday were the revisions to May and June, big revisions. But that's because, like every time we publish on Friday, there are revisions to the previous two months," he said. "This is a survey. And a survey has sample returns." Beach said the jobs reports are compiled from surveys that are sent out to Americans and hundreds of thousands of businesses each month. But the BLS doesn't receive all the returns in time, keeping the window for responses open an extra two months. "What you saw on Friday was the effect of trying to do a better job, getting more information," Beach said. During his interview, Beach was asked if he would believe future report numbers compiled by the BLS after a successor for McEntarfer is found. "I will, because I know the people who work there. They are some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine. They have worked in every kind of political circumstance. They are completely devoted to producing the very best gold standard data possible," he said. "And that's why BLS is the finest statistical agency in the entire world. Its numbers are trusted all over the world. So, I will trust those numbers." Still, White House officials aimed Sunday to double down on the president's claim that the data was being manipulated, without evidence. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett was interviewed on NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Sunday and said that the BLS needs a "fresh set of eyes." "There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder," he said. "And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it's the president's highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable." The far-right political activist Laura Loomer, who is not an official member of the Trump administration but has positioned herself as an informal chief adviser on personnel matters, called the BLS situation a "vetting crisis." "Great job by President Trump who just announced he is firing Biden holdover Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics," she said on social media. "Every single Biden holdover must be FIRED."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store