DA probes NSFAS student accommodation review
Matlhodi Maseko, the DA Spokesperson for Education and Training questioned the validity of the legal review, concerned that this move might be a 'stalling tactic' by NSFAS.
In a statement on Polity.org.za, Maseko claimed that NSFAS has failed to be transparent on several points surrounding its legal review.
These are: in-depth information on what exactly is under review, timelines of the legal review process, confirming the dissemination of findings to students, higher education institutions and the public at large.
NSFAS announced late last week that its student accommodation management process was undergoing legal review. The Scheme, however did not expand much on the details of the review.
NSFAS reportedly said the outcomes of the review would be implemented to 'enhance transparency, integrity and efficiency in its payment processes.'
The scheme indicated that all student accommodation payments are made following the conclusion of verification and validation processes.
'Non-payment may result from claims that are not funded, claims lacking confirmation from relevant institutions, or cases where registration data was not received before the payment deadline,' said the NSFAS statement.
Maseko said while the DA welcomes such reviews it's far too late, especially since students have to endure evictions, unsafe living conditions and academic disruptions resulting from delayed or non-payment of fees for student accommodation by NSFAS.
'If this process is genuine and not simply a stalling tactic, NSFAS should have no hesitation in committing to full openness and accountability.
'Students cannot continue to bear the cost of NSFAS's mismanagement. Public funds must be used to secure safe, quality student housing and not vanish into dysfunctional systems and incoherent processes, added Maseko.
NFSAS was vague on when its pending legal review will reach conclusion and if it plans on sharing its findings with the public.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
10 minutes ago
- IOL News
ANC defends B-BBEE as DA pushes to dismantle empowerment policies
African National Congress (ANC) stands firm in defending B-BBEE policies, highlighting their role in empowering millions and urging beneficiaries to protect transformation gains against the DA's push to dismantle these initiatives. Image: IOL / Independent Newspapers The African National Congress (ANC) has accused the Democratic Alliance (DA) of seeking to dismantle South Africa's transformation policies, which the ANC says have brought tangible change to the lives of the majority. The party has called on all beneficiaries of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) to defend the gains made under democracy. This comes after the DA announced a set of reform proposals aimed at empowering state-owned entities (SOEs), which it claims offer a better alternative to B-BBEE, employment equity, and the Expropriation Act, policies the party insists must be scrapped. Speaking at a media briefing in Johannesburg, DA leader John Steenhuisen said the three laws are major obstacles to economic growth. 'BBBEE and racial quotas have failed, and together with expropriation without compensation, create an environment that deters investment, growth and job creation for the majority of South Africans,' he said. Steenhuisen added that the DA is not against transformation, but argued that current empowerment policies have failed ordinary South Africans. 'These policies are simply not fair. They don't help the millions of South Africans who just need the government to get out of the way. These policies must go,' he said. He called for the replacement of B-BBEE and employment equity with measures based on need and merit. In response, the ANC said that transformation policies must be continuously evaluated and discussed by all South Africans to ensure they remain aligned with the goals of democracy, social justice, and equality, as outlined in the Constitution. 'The ANC recognises that these conversations and debates must be held among all South Africans, particularly to address concerns that such policies may be unintentionally creating a new form of elitism,' said ANC spokesperson Mhlengi Bhengu-Motsiri. 'To effectively tackle any unintended consequences, the ANC believes that the discussion must be guided by scientific findings.' The ANC said it supports the BEE Commission's call for focused evaluation studies to assess the impact of B-BBEE, stating that such research will help ensure the policy achieves its intended purpose of building a more equitable society. The party highlighted the recent findings of the 2023–2024 Analysis of Major B-BBEE Transactions report, which it says confirms that B-BBEE is delivering measurable benefits to ordinary South Africans. According to the ANC, companies invested R7.2 billion in enterprise development, enabling thousands of black-owned and managed small businesses and cooperatives to grow. Supplier development reached R40.7 billion, while R64 billion was spent on skills development, with a focus on young people, women, and rural learners. Bhengu-Motsiri said B-BBEE is rooted in the democratic framework and is designed to benefit 'black South Africans, that is Africans, Coloureds and Indians, and further extends benefits to white women, who were also historically marginalised in economic participation.' 'These empowerment measures have opened pathways for millions of South Africans into business ownership, corporate leadership, and skilled employment,' she said. 'We call on all South Africans who have benefitted from these measures, including those appointed to various positions in the private sector, to stand in defence of their own gains and reject any political agenda aimed at reversing the progress made.' As the leader of society, the ANC added that it will continue to evaluate all transformation policies to ensure they serve their intended purpose. 'Where these policies are found not to benefit those who were previously oppressed and marginalised, they will be reviewed and strengthened,' the party said. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
IOL News
40 minutes ago
- IOL News
EFF backs government in rejecting US State Department's human rights report
EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo says the US is hypocritical in their report on human rights. Image: File The EFF and the South African government have come together to dismiss the recent United States State Department Human Rights Report, calling out the US for its hypocrisy on human rights issues. The report claimed that South Africa's human rights record has "significantly worsened," and documented several instances of arbitrary or unlawful killings committed by the government or its agents. But both the EFF and government claim this assessment is flawed and biased. It also claimed that the EFF incited violence against Afrikaner farmers, claiming that the party achieved this by reintroducing the contentious song 'Kill the Boer' song at its gatherings and through other acts of incitement. The report said that a provincial police commissioner confirmed in July that police had fatally shot at least 40 criminal suspects in shoot-outs since April. A January report from the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) was also referenced. This report detailed the 2021 unrest in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng, which led to 337 deaths and 3,400 arrests. However, both the EFF and the the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) criticised the US report for applying double standard on human rights. The EFF pointed out that the US has a history of using human rights narratives to justify sanctions, isolation, and even military aggression against other nations. "It is the same tactic used in Iraq under the lies of 'weapons of mass destruction', which left over a million people dead while US corporations looted oil fields,' EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said. "The US has no moral standing to lecture any nation on human rights. This is a country that cages migrant children in detention centers; that has rolled back reproductive rights and stripped millions of women of the freedom to control their bodies," The party also criticised the report for selectively presenting incidents of police brutality while ignoring the broader context of South Africa's struggle against violent crime. "These cases, picked from our broader struggle against violent crime, are inflated to serve Washington's narrative that our nation is unfit to govern itself," the EFF said. 'This report was clearly crafted to smear South Africa for daring to assert its sovereignty, reclaim its land, and stand in solidarity with the oppressed peoples of the world, particularly the people of Palestine,' Thambo said. The Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation's spokesperson Chrispin Phiri also expressed profound disappointment with the report, describing it as "inaccurate and deeply flawed." Phiri said the report's reliance on contextual information and discredited accounts is highly concerning. "The report cites an incident involving the deaths of farm workers and, despite the matter being actively adjudicated by our independent judiciary, misleadingly presents it as an extrajudicial killing," Phiri explained. The government noted that South Africa operates a transparent system where information is freely available from law enforcement agencies and Chapter 9 institutions, which are constitutionally mandated to protect and advance human rights. The government also noted the irony that the US, having exited the UN Human Rights Council, would seek to produce one-sided fact-free reports without any due process or engagement. "This is particularly striking given the significant and documented concerns about human rights within the United States, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its agencies, such as ICE," the government said. "In contrast to the US report, the UN Human Rights Office in Geneva has praised South Africa's Land Expropriation Act, signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa, as a "critical step in addressing the country's racially imbalanced land ownership". This recognition underscores the integrity of South Africa's legislative processes aimed at rectifying historical injustices in a constitutional and human-rights-based manner,' Phiri said.
IOL News
40 minutes ago
- IOL News
Complicity, Silence, Historical Amnesia: Universities and the Genocide in Gaza
British-Cypriot coach Louis Allan, 33, sits atop an olive tree on a main road in Nicosia on May 7, 2025, as he continues a week-long silent sit-in and hunger strike in support of Palestinians in Gaza and calling for an end to the war between Israel and Hamas. University of Pretoria Staff For Palestine (UPS4Palestine) As an academic collective from the University of Pretoria, we offer the following reflections on the unfolding genocide of Palestinians in Gaza as a contribution to a growing number of South African academic voices against the genocide. The increased horrors faced by the Palestinian people in Gaza since October 7, 2023, and especially from March 2025, with the enforcement of a total siege and blockade of all humanitarian aid (barring the trickle that Israel permits), are on an unimaginable scale. It has been confirmed that Israel has directly killed more than 58,000 Palestinians in Gaza since October 2023, more than 17,000 of them children, and has carried out daily 'aid' massacres of Palestinians who are waiting for food and water at distribution points since instituting a total aid blockade in March 2025. With thousands of bodies still buried under the rubble, and many more dying of hunger and preventable diseases, due to the destruction of hospitals and worsening living conditions, some have estimated the real death toll in Gaza to be far higher. According to the United Nations, the illegal and immoral weaponization of food has led to the death of at least 70 Palestinian children from malnutrition. Further, in the West Bank, Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians since October 7, 2023. It has also ramped up the incarceration of Palestinians, with more than 10,000 detained in its torture dungeons by April 2025. Furthermore, the ongoing attacks on Palestinian children have resulted in about 3,000 children having amputations as a result of traumatic force injuries, burns, and infection. This has resulted in thousands of children with a new disability facing uncertain futures. Starving and quarantined within a desolate strip of land, denied basic human rights and continually brutalised by the Israeli Defence Force, the plight of Palestinians in Gaza is a stain on the human conscience, especially the leading Western nations and leaders of the world, who have sacrificed international law and human rights in favour of their imperialist interests in West Asia, as represented by Israel. Effectively, the genocide in Gaza reveals the persistence of the global division of humanity produced and maintained by centuries of European colonialism. It is a genocide transmitted in real time, watched by millions of outraged people around the world and by complicit leaders, journalists, academics, and religious figures, especially in the West and in the Arab world. The Palestinian genocide that has been unfolding for the last 20 months has shown up the fallacy of the international rule of law - permitting Israel the right to carry out this genocide in the full glare of world attention; and also turning a blind eye to Israeli occupation, violent settler colonialism and the denial of Palestinian human rights and sovereignty since Israel's official establishment in 1948. The increasing evidence of the genocide in Gaza, which includes scholasticide, has not sufficiently galvanised many institutions, such as universities, including many in South Africa. While a few South African universities have taken a brave stand, such as the University of Fort Hare and Nelson Mandela University, and thereby risked not only public opprobrium from sectors of South African society but also much-needed funding, other universities blithely carry on 'with business as usual'. Debates in some institutions invariably devolve into spurious and disingenuous comparisons with atrocities in other parts of the world – the by-now common 'whataboutism' – to even more fallacious arguments about a complex situation, two-sidedism, 'not our problem', and the 'hand-wringing, what can we do' argument. The global solidarity we garnered in our struggle against apartheid is a long-distant memory for some. For others who were quite comfortable with apartheid, the international cultural, academic, sports, and economic boycott against apartheid South Africa was an outrage. For such South Africans, a similar outrage should not be perpetrated against Israel, a historical ally of the apartheid government. The inaction and 'apolitical neutrality' of historically white universities, which were bastions and intellectual playgrounds of apartheid, is particularly shameful and is indicative of the superficiality of transformation in these institutions as well as the lack of a genuine commitment to the pursuit of justice. While university leaders spout empty rhetoric about transformation, the pursuit of justice, and responsiveness to local and global issues, their inaction is more telling of their complicity. Erasure through violence and destruction of both tangible and intangible traces of place and belonging, and denial of sovereignty and personhood are core elements of settler colonialism, whether in the Americas, Australia, Africa, or Palestine. These core elements are inextricably linked to race and ethnicity. Thus, as early as 1917, the discourse of erasure and denial of sovereignty and personhood is already clearly evident in the Balfour Declaration, which not only favoured 'the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people', but also posited the Palestinians as the 'other' in contradistinction to the Jewish people. Historian Avi Shlaim argues that the genocide in Gaza is a 'direct result of the Balfour Declaration'. It set in motion the colonisation of historic Palestine and the systemic erasure of native Palestinians. Whereas Jews constituted only 10% of the population and owned a meagre two per cent of the land by 1917, the so-called British Mandate facilitated the mass invasion of mainly European Jews into Palestine and the displacement of Palestinians. This freed up land for Jewish settlements in historic Palestine to create the state of Israel. This process of colonisation continues to this day, and explains why Britain, despite mass support from its citizens for the national liberation of Palestine, has provided unconditional support to Israel in the commission of the genocide in Gaza since October 2023. Defined by racism, oppression, and brutal violence, the Zionist project in Israel has consistently and continually sought to erase the Palestinian presence in its onward march to 'Greater Israel'. This march to 'Greater Israel' has gathered a violent pace in the past 20 months. Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, Palestinian and foreign aid workers, predominantly Palestinian journalists, medical personnel, teachers, and academics, children, and the old are all cannon fodder to the Israeli march to 'Greater Israel'. The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide as 'any of the following acts with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group' by any means of the following actions: Killing members of the group Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and Forcibly transferring children of one group to another. Israeli actions in Gaza constitute a textbook case of genocide, according to Holocaust scholar, Raz Segal. Yet, like in the case of the genocides of the Harara, Herero, and the San, Western political elites, corporate media, and academics refute and deny the evidence. In the case of Gaza, the denial is particularly startling as the evidence is transmitted daily on social media platforms and independent media. The complicity of the so-called 'democratic free' world of the West is monstrously on display.
