Palestinian Group Calls Out Oscar-Winning Doc ‘No Other Land' for 'Normalization' of Israeli Occupation
A prominent Palestinian rights group has sharply criticized the Oscar-winning documentary No Other Land, alleging the film, which was directed by a Palestinian-Israeli collective, violates the guidelines of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. The BDS movement opposes cooperation with Israeli companies operating in the occupied West Bank.
The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), aligned with BDS, has called out No Other Land for allegedly violating so-called 'anti-normalization' guidelines that, the group argues, make the idea of Israeli 'occupation, apartheid, and settler colonialism seem normal and establishing normal relations with the Israeli regime.'
More from The Hollywood Reporter
San Diego Comic-Con Sets First International Edition for Spain in September
'Industry' Star Marisa Abela Needed a Break. So She Took a Role Opposite Cate Blanchett
BBC Takes Thomas Vinterberg's Climate Change Drama Series 'Families Like Ours' for U.K.
No Other Land seems an unlikely target for pro-Palestinian groups. The film chronicles the repeated destruction and demolition of the Masafer Yatta community in the occupied West Bank and the alliance that develops between Palestinian journalist and co-director Basel Adra, and Israeli journalist and co-director Yuval Abraham. Since its debut at last year's Berlinale, where it won the best documentary prize, the film has come under attack from right-wing and pro-Israeli critics. Israel's culture and sports minister Miki Zohar called the film's Oscar win 'a sad moment for the world of cinema,' accusing the documentary of 'defamation of Israel.'
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization in the U.S., has thrown its support behind the film, publicly calling for U.S. distributors and streaming platforms to distribute the movie stateside. (Despite the Oscar win, No Other Land still does not have a U.S. distributor.) 'The American people deserve the right to see this film,' CAIR said.
In its statement on the film first published on March 5, PACBI acknowledges 'Israel, its massive lobby groups, and its anti-Palestinian racist partners in western cultural establishments,' have attacked No Other Land because they see it as 'exposing an important, if partial, dimension of Israel's system of colonial oppression [and] Israel's crimes, such as the ethnic cleansing of Masafer Yatta.'
But the group says the film still violates BDS guidelines, as it was produced with the help of Israeli documentary film NGO Close-Up, which did not provide any funding but assisted the filmmakers during development. PACBI has called for a boycott of Close-Up, which it claims is 'engaging in normalization' by encouraging filmmakers to engage with Israel 'as if it were a normal state.' In 2019, a call to boycott Close-Up was signed by more than 500 filmmakers, most from the Arab world, including Palestinian director Mohamed Bakri (Jenin, Jenin), Egyptian director Ali Badrakhan (Karnak Cafe), and Lebanese documentarian Eliane Raheb (Miguel's War).
PACBI also notes that there has been 'simmering controversy' around No Other Land in the Arab world, particularly since its Oscar win and the acceptance speech by co-director Abraham, in which he called out 'the atrocious destruction of Gaza and its people' as well as condemning the brutality of the October 7th attacks on Israel.
PACBI has also criticized some No Other Land's Israeli members for '[failing] to acknowledge that Israel is perpetrating a genocide, or have even made extremely harmful, immoral statements drawing a false equivalence between the colonizer and the colonized that may be used to rationalize Israel's genocide.'
PACBI, however, has stopped short of calling for a boycott of the film, saying that could prove 'counterproductive,' noting that in 'mainstream circles' the movie could help raise awareness 'about the struggle against Israel's military occupation and ethnic cleansing.'
In an FAQ statement published on the group's website on Monday, PACBI noted that, prior to the Oscars, the 'expected harm for the Palestinian struggle' from publicly criticizing the film was 'significantly higher than the expected benefit.' After the film won an Oscar, however, the group said it saw a danger in what it sees as No Other Land's 'normalization' with regards to Israel, particularly in the Arab region. 'This is also why,' the group writes, 'the position was originally crafted and released in Arabic for an Arab audience.'
Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, a PACBI spokesperson noted that BDS movement's anti-normalization guidelines 'target complicity not identity, and institutions, not individuals,' highlighting that the criticism of No Other Land is not directed at individual filmmakers, but at the movie's links to Close-Up.
THR has requested a comment from both Close-up and the No Other Land filmmakers but did not immediately receive a response.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
The 10 Best Baseball Movies of All Time, Ranked
20 Times the Oscars Got It Wrong
The Best Anti-Fascist Films of All Time
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump wants to score trade deals in Canada. He's unlikely to get them.
President Donald Trump will arrive in the Canadian Rockies on Sunday for a meeting of the world's economic powerhouses facing a potentially calamitous tariff deadline and a burgeoning crisis in the Middle East. But he's unlikely to leave the three-day summit with a breakthrough on either front. Trump is eager to use the G7 meetings to show progress toward an array of trade deals with the U.S.'s most critical allies. The gathering also takes on heightened importance in the wake of an Israeli attack on Iran that sent oil prices skyrocketing and injected fresh uncertainty into the global economy. But Trump officials are struggling to lock down trade pacts that they predicted were imminent in the wake of a first deal with the U.K. nearly a month ago. Even early chatter of a deal with Japan by this week's conference appears unlikely, said two people close to the White House, granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. And now, with the U.S. occupied by turmoil in the Middle East, Trump aides and advisers are tempering expectations for what the G7 may ultimately produce. 'Everybody just wants to survive,' said Ivo Daalder, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and a former U.S. ambassador to NATO. 'There's not a lot of interest in making deals.' In a call with reporters on Friday, a senior U.S. official granted anonymity to preview the summit offered little in the way of specific goals, saying only that Trump sought to 'make progress' in a range of areas including 'making America's trade relationships fair and reciprocal.' The lowered stakes reflect the plodding pace of negotiations with economic partners since April, when Trump blew up their trade ties in pursuit of new deals that he's insisted must be more favorable to the United States. Leaders across Europe are projecting resolve despite the prospect of punishing tariffs come early July. The reduced expectations also underscore how quickly Trump's return to office has fractured the close Western alliance that the U.S. long claimed to lead. Whereas the G7 once prided itself on speaking with one authoritative voice on critical economic and national security matters, most leaders are now just hoping to escape the summit site in Kananaskis, Alberta, without opening a new front in their fight with Trump, diplomatic experts and others involved in the summit preparations said. The G7 countries have already abandoned hopes of signing a traditional joint statement, upending decades of precedent over worries that Trump and his counterparts are too far apart on a number of key issues. The nations instead plan to issue a handful of 'leaders' statements' on more specific issues where all or most of them can reach agreement. The move averts the risk of a repeat of the last Canada-hosted summit, when Trump in 2018 abruptly rejected the statement via an incensed tweet from Air Force One. Back then, negotiators had spent hours haggling over a single word in a line related to trade amid Trump's vows to impose steeper tariffs on allies, said one of the people close to the White House. But shortly after reaching agreement, then-Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau criticized the U.S. tariffs, enraging Trump and prompting him to pull his support. New Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has sought to sidestep conflict with the rest of his agenda as well, with multilateral meetings on topics like energy security and drug trafficking aimed at emphasizing areas of common ground. As for the White House, it's shied away from making grand promises. A potential trade deal with Japan is unlikely to be finalized. And while officials cautioned that Trump could always broker a surprise agreement in meetings with other world leaders, there's little expectation that the summit will yield more than commitments to keep talking. 'Everyone's in really different spots in their trade relationships,' one of the people close to the White House said of the several parallel efforts to strike new trade agreements. 'I would be shocked if they came out with anything like the U.K.-U.S. framework in that environment.' Still, Trump and his aides view the G7 as a high-profile opportunity to reassert American primacy over even their closest allies, said advisers and others involved in the global preparations. Trump is likely to jump at any chance to demonstrate his administration's strength on the world stage, even if just rhetorically — forcing the rest of the group to decide when to go along and when to risk confrontation. 'A success on the U.S. side would be going to the summit and being seen as not being pushed around by other leaders,' said Caitlin Welsh, a former senior National Security Council official during Trump's first term. The president may get plenty of opportunities to cultivate that image. In addition to trade issues, Trump's response to Israel's attack on Iran will be closely watched for clues as to whether the U.S. will join the fray. Trump is also likely to face greater pressure to impose sanctions on Russia over its war in Ukraine — a step that he's publicly floated but remains reluctant to take. The president on Thursday said he was 'very disappointed in Russia' over its resistance to peace talks. But he quickly added that he was 'very disappointed in Ukraine also' in a sign of the wide gap between Trump's attitude toward the war and the rest of the G7's steadfast support for Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was among those invited by Carney, has vowed to seek another sitdown with Trump at the summit. But even the prospect of a brief meeting has raised some concerns within the G7 over whether it's worth the risk that at any moment Trump and Zelenskyy's relationship could go sideways again — and sink U.S. support for Ukraine in the process. 'The value is only in maintaining the status quo,' Daalder said of discussions with Trump on the topic. But for Trump, the trade war that has consumed his first months in office is just as likely to dominate his three days in Canada. The president is expected to hold a series of bilateral meetings on the summit's sidelines, as the administration tries to push ahead trade deals in differing stages of negotiation. Trump has also tried to up the pressure on his G7 allies, vowing to greenlight a market-rattling return to steep tariffs on July 9 should they fail to clinch agreements in the coming weeks. The push still isn't expected to generate any quick victories in an area where negotiations are often measured in years rather than weeks. Yet allies in the U.S. and abroad are hoping that simply being back at the center of it all, surrounded by world leaders eager for a bit of his time, will prove enough progress for Trump to call off an even more severe trade war. 'He's completely comfortable with an outcome that ends in tariffs,' one of the people close to the White House said. 'But a lot of it depends on whether there's progress being made, and if he feels the countries are serious.' Amy Mackinnon contributed to this report.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Israel-Iran attacks loom over Trump at G7: Five things to watch
President Trump heads to Canada on Sunday for the first gathering of the Group of Seven (G-7) alliance since he returned to office in January, a summit that has taken on fresh urgency amid rising tensions in the Middle East. Canada will play host to the gathering of world leaders days after Israel and Iran traded attacks on Friday, risking a further escalation in a simmering situation in the region. The gathering also comes after Trump has for months openly mused about annexing his neighbor to the north as a 51st state. Leaders are also expected to discuss key issues like trade and the war in Ukraine. Here are five things to watch. The G-7 comes at a precarious time in the Middle East after Israel carried out strikes against Iran, which soon retaliated. Residential neighborhoods in both Tel Aviv and Tehran were targets, as were Iranian nuclear sites and military bases. The Trump administration had been attempting to broker an agreement with Tehran to limit its nuclear capabilities, something the president has indicated it may still try to do in the wake of the Israeli attack. Other world leaders have urged de-escalation, wary of another wider conflict in the region. Trump on Friday morning told ABC News that Iran missed its chance for talks. 'I think it's been excellent,' Trump said of the Israeli strikes. 'We gave them a chance and they didn't take it. They got hit hard, very hard. They got hit about as hard as you're going to get hit. And there's more to come. A lot more.' When the first strikes were launched, the Trump administration quickly distanced itself from the Israeli operation. On Friday, a U.S. official confirmed it was helping Israel intercept missiles coming into Israel from Iran. By midday on Friday, Trump told NBC News that Iran may have another opportunity to make a deal over its nuclear program and indicated that the Iranians are calling him and reaching out. Israel then came under a heavy bombardment from Iran. Trump had cautioned Israel the day before the strikes were launched that attacks on Iranian sites could threaten the U.S.'s nuclear talks. 'As long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want them going in because I think that would blow it. Might help it, actually. But also could blow it,' Trump told reporters on Thursday when asked if he had advised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against firing into Iran. Trump's insistence that Canada would be better off being absorbed into the U.S. is sure to linger over his visit to the country, even if it is not on the agenda in a formal way. Trump is set to have a one-on-one meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Monday. The president spent the weeks after his November electoral victory suggesting Canada should become a state and mocking then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as 'governor.' Trump has claimed the U.S. has no need for Canadian imports, while Canada needs the U.S. for business and military protection. Trump hosted Carney at the White House in early May, where Trump doubled down on his suggestion that Canada would benefit from becoming the 51st state even as Carney was adamant it would not happen. 'I say 'never say never.' I've had many, many things that were not doable, and they ended up being doable,' Trump said. 'Canada loves us, and we love Canada. That's I think the number one thing that's important. But we'll see. Over time, we'll see what happens.' Canadian politicians and citizens have signaled they are opposed to the idea of becoming part of the United States, and it's possible Trump will face some protests or demonstrations while in Canada. The summit is being held in Kananaskis, a less populated area in the Canadian Rockies where it may be less likely to see demonstrations or public opposition to Trump and other leaders. Trump's 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs on all trading partners expires on July 8, which would give the administration a few more weeks to negotiate deals on tariffs while only agreements with China and the United Kingdom have been announced. Multiple key trading partners will be at this week's summit, including Japan and members of the European Union. But, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested in testimony to lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Wednesday that the July 8 deadline could have some wiggle room for certain countries. 'It is highly likely that for those countries that are negotiating – or trading blocs, in the case of the EU – who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiation,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not.' The administration had ambitious goals for their negotiations, aiming for 90 deals in 90 days. They have teased that deals with trading partners like India, Japan and Vietnam are close to being finalized, but haven't announced anything concrete. Trump on Thursday said officials from India were in D.C. negotiating a trade deal and that he thought Pakistan officials would be in Washington next week for negotiations. The White House is looking for wins on its trade policy after Trump had to pause his hefty tariffs in April amid pressure from Republicans and Wall Street over concerns that an aggressive policy could lead the U.S. into a recession. The president had also previously suggested that if there is no agreement between the U.S. and other countries, he and his aides will determine an appropriate tariff rate to impose moving forward. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is expected to be at the G-7 but the White House hasn't announced if Trump will meet one-on-one with him. Ukraine and Russia's war is a particularly challenging spot for Trump, after he vowed on the 2024 campaign trail to end the ongoing war within 24 hours of taking office but has made little apparent headway about five months later. Russia has so far refused U.S. proposals for a 30-day ceasefire and Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who he recently said had gone 'absolutely CRAZY.' Trump on Thursday placed blame on both countries. 'I'm very disappointed in Russia, but I'm disappointed in Ukraine also because I think deals could have been made,' he said. Trump has also grown impatient with Zelensky, saying the Ukrainian president needs to do more to stop the war. When Zelensky visited the White House in February, the meeting quickly unraveled into a public spat when Vice President JD Vance suggested Zelensky wasn't thankful enough to Trump for the help he has given his country. The president spoke with Putin earlier this month in the aftermath of a Ukrainian drone attack on Russian bombers. He said the conversation was 'good' but not one that 'will lead to immediate peace.' Additionally, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth raised eyebrows this week when he told senators it 'remains to be seen' if Putin would 'stop at Ukraine' while Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan 'Razin' Caine said he did not believe Putin would stop at Ukraine if he succeeded in taking over the country. The president will travel to The Hague for the NATO Summit later this month, making June a month of meetings with allies. Some notable world leaders from outside the G-7 membership, including Zelensky, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will be at the summit this week in Canada. The White House has said Trump will hold meetings on the sidelines, but didn't confirm with whom. 'I can confirm there will be quite a few bilateral meetings between Trump and other foreign leaders. The White House is still working very hard to finalize that schedule,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Wednesday. This year's NATO summit will take place June 24 and 25. It will mark the first gathering for the alliance since Trump took office. Where former President Biden made support for NATO a cornerstone of his foreign policy, Trump has previously cast doubt on whether the U.S. would protect other members of the alliance if they had not contributed enough to defense spending.
2 hours ago
Hailee Steinfeld reflects on 'unforgettable' wedding to Josh Allen
Hailee Steinfeld says her wedding to Josh Allen was "unforgettable" and "magical." The " Sinners" star opened up about her black-tie wedding last month to the Buffalo Bills quarterback in her Beau Society newsletter on Friday, including photos from the stunning event. "Over the past two weeks, random yet very specific memories have been popping back into our heads, and we've been blurting them out to each other, often through smiles, laughs, and tears," she wrote. "It felt like love was running through the veins of every tree at our gorgeous venue in Santa Barbara," she continued. "Our family and friends coming together amplified it." The Oscar nominee said that the night before the wedding, the couple had a dinner with their immediate families. They also had a welcome party the next day for their guests. On the morning of their wedding, Steinfeld said she and Allen had an early breakfast, writing, "I don't think I could've gone the whole day without seeing him!" When it came to the actual ceremony, Steinfeld said her dad walked her down the aisle. She wore a custom dress designed by Tamara Ralph, for which she had a fitting in Paris after the London premiere of "Sinners." She said that when she saw Allen at the end of the aisle, he "looked like the man of every dream I've ever had." "I just remember the walkup looked like a façade," she wrote. "Josh standing under this huge structure; it was the most surreal thing I'd ever seen." Following their reception, the duo hosted an underground afterparty that ended at 3 a.m. and included a DJ, cigar bar and more, she said. Steinfeld said she and Allen embarked on their honeymoon the next day. "Now we're back and it's been a whole 13 days of being married, and we'll be staying on this high forever!" she wrote. The pair first made their relationship Instagram official in July 2024. They later confirmed their engagement on Nov. 29, 2024, also with an .
